Back

PR · Lens · Mining Bioactive Compounds against Drug-Resistant Microorganisms from Ethnomedicine: Examples of 32 Ethnic Medicines in Yunnan

PDF

Review · Volume 18, Issue 2 · pp. 243–269

Mining Bioactive Compounds against Drug-Resistant Microorganisms from Ethnomedicine: Examples of 32 Ethnic Medicines in Yunnan

Li-Li Chen1,2, Min Liu5, Tian-Zhen Xie6, Wu-Feng Yang7, Ming Gong1, Yun-Xiu Cheng1, Shuang Long Yang1,3,4, Wei-You Xie1,3,4, Zhao-Jie Wang1,3,4

  1. 1School of Life Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, CHINA.
  2. 2College of Geography and Land Engineering, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi, Yunnan, CHINA.
  3. 3Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Development and Utilization of Biomass Energy, Ministry of Education, Kunming, Yunnan, CHINA.
  4. 4Yunnan Key Laboratory of Modern Separation Analysis and Substance Transformation, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, CHINA.
  5. 5College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, CHINA.
  6. 6College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ZhaoTong University, ZhaoTong, Yunnan, CHINA.
  7. 7Yanshan County Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Center, Yanshan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Yanshan, Yunnan, CHINA.

Abstract

In the next 25 years, more than 39 million deaths worldwide could be attributed to bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Urgent action is needed to discover new antibacterial compounds. Traditional medicines worldwide have been used in traditional folk remedies for various ailments, such as stomachache and scalds, which are often associated with infections. However, the underlying mechanisms of action for their antimicrobial compounds remain largely unexplored. This review highlights 32 medicines in combating drug resistant microorganisms. It explores correlations between traditional uses and antibacterial activities, identifies bioactive constituents effective against drug resistant pathogens, and aims to inform the discovery of novel antimicrobial agents. In total, these plants yield 62 compounds active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Candida albicans, with minimum inhibitory concentration ranging from 0.12 to 8 μg/mL. By disrupting bacterial membranes, these compounds reduce the likelihood of resistance emergence. Twelve of these compounds demonstrate synergistic effects with antibiotics, highlighting their potential as adjuvants. This review consolidates current findings and proposes strategic priorities for the future antimicrobial therapeutics.

Keywords: Drug-resistant pathogens; Ethnic medicines; Plant-derived natural products; Anti-resistant pathogen compounds; Inhibitory mechanisms; Synergy

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

The overuse of antibiotics has led to the irreversible emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs), including so-called “superbugs” (Honigsbaum, 2018) and “super fungi” (Pappas et al., 2018). In 2019, bacterial infections-both MDROs and antibiotic-sensitive-became the second leading cause of mortality worldwide after ischemic heart disease, accounting for approximately 7.7 million deaths directly attributed to bacterial pathogens (Wang, Z.-J. et al., 2024). Among them, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) alone was responsible for over 100,000 deaths (Collaborators, 2023). That same year, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) contributed to an estimated 4.95 million deaths globally (Tang et al., 2024; Vos et al., 2020), with projections indicating that this figure could rise to 10 million annually by 2050 (Wang, Z.-J. et al., 2024; Wang, Z.-J. et al., 2024; Wei et al., 2024). Epidemiological studies show that MRSA and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) are the most prevalent pathogens causing hospital-acquired infections (Shi, N. et al., 2024). In recognition of the growing threat to public health, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classified both MRSA and VRE as “serious threats” in its 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Threats Report. With the emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic, co-infections became increasingly common: over half of critically ill patients were found to harbor concurrent bacterial or fungal infections, and more than 30% of COVID-19 patients developed secondary bacterial infections (Caiazzo et al., 2022). Alarmingly, MDROs were detected in up to 80% of these co-infections (Kreitmann et al., 2023). In the post-pandemic era, the acceleration of bacterial resistance driven by COVID-19 has elevated long-standing concerns into an urgent global crisis (Hsu, 2020). As a result, the development of novel therapeutic agents targeting MDROs has become imperative.

Over the past two decades, only five novel classes of antibacterial agents with distinct chemical structures-cyclic lipopeptides, oxazolidinones, teixobactins, pleuromutilins, and diarylquinolines-have been approved for clinical use (Cook and Wright, 2022). However, clinical strains resistant to these drugs have already emerged. Developing a new antibiotic typically requires over a decade, while bacterial resistance can develop within just 1-2 years, raising the alarming prospect of a future with no effective antibiotics for humans (Macesic et al., 2025). Bacterial resistance is a survival strategy driven by microbial adaptation to antibiotics (Wang, Z. et al., 2018). The issue of antibiotic resistance reflects shifts in ecologic niche overlap and competitive dynamics within microbial communities, involving trade-offs in resistance costs and the persistence of resistant pathogens (Silva et al., 2016). While resistance has coexisted with antibiotics of microbial origin (Porras et al., 2021), Natural Products (NPs) may offer advantages in overcoming resistance due to their unique structures (Porras et al., 2021), mechanisms of action (Kumar and Engle, 2023), and targets (Porras et al., 2021; Woo et al., 2023), which differ from conventional antibiotics (Wang et al., 2019).

In response to the urgent global demand for novel antimicrobial agents, mining antimicrobial bioactive compounds from traditional medicinal plants is an effective method. Our previous research found that itchy-sore ulceration (Wang et al., 2020), stomachache (Wang et al., 2023), upper respiratory tract infection (Wang et al., 2021), vomiting (Wang et al., 2021), diarrhea (Zhu et al., 2021), strains (Ma et al., 2022), beriberi (Xu et al., 2022), shigellosis (Wang, Z.J. et al., 2024), scald (Zeng et al., 2022), dyspepsia (Tang et al., 2024), conjunctivitis (Luo et al., 2023), gastralgia (Wen-Biao et al., 2024), pharyngitis (Chen et al., 2024), gonorrhea (Wen-Biao, 2024), pertussis (Liu et al., 2024), common cold (Shen et al., 2024), phthisis (Luo et al., 2024), scabies and tinea (Luo-EE et al., 2024), chronic tracheitis (Shi et al., 2024), skin infections (Shi, Y.-Z. et al., 2024), and tetanus (Zhou et al., 2024) of botanical drugs contain compounds with anti-MDROs activity. These findings encouraged us to revisit key traditional pharmacopoeias, including the Dictionary of Chinese Ethnic Medicine, Essentials of Chinese Ethnic Medicine, and ZhongGuo MinZu YaoZhi Yao, to further explore the ethnomedical basis of these treatments.

Literature Search Strategy

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including SciFinder, Google Scholar (https://sci.673.org/index.html), Scopus (Elsevier), Medline, Web of Science, X-MOL (www.x-mol.com), PubMed, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The search targeted publications related to the Latin names of the 32 selected plant species, as well as their reported antimicrobial properties, inhibitory concentrations, activities against MDROs. In addition, local records, monographs, and non-English-language journals were reviewed to supplement the database search (up to March 2025).

Plant Characteristics

Geographic Distribution

The symptoms corresponding to these traditional uses are summarized in Table 1. Based on this ethnobotanical survey, we investigated the traditional applications of ethnic medicinal plants and their associated antibacterial bioactive compounds. We found that the folk usage of 32 ethnic medicinal plants implies the presence of compounds with activity against MDROs. This review systematically examines the antibacterial chemical constituents, synergistic interactions, mechanisms of action, and pharmacological properties of 32 representative medicinal plant species from Yunnan Province and their derived NPs, covering research published between 2000 and 2025.

Table 1: The palynomorphs of 32 medicinal resource plants in Yunnan.
NameProducing areaGrowth environmentAltitudePhytomorphMedicinal parts
Morus alba L.Temperate regions of Asia (China, Afghanistan, etc.)Warm and humid forests, shady slopes, valleys.100-1,200 mShrubs or trees, with leaf and stem thickness of 1-2 mm, fleshy and hairy buds, and leaves measuring 2 − 13 (−20) × 1.5-9 (−14) cm, Hairless, elliptical, peduncle spiny rootlikeRoot bark
Scoparia dulcis L.South, North America, temperate regions of AsiaEnjoying moisture, on barren lands, slopes, and roadsides20-450 mOne year or perennial grass leaves elliptical, blunt or conical, dull, flowers white or blue, four petals, seeds prismatic.Root, stem
Cannabis saliva L.China, five Central Asian countries, PakistanWarm and humid, sunny valleys, fields100-2,900 mHerbaceous, hollow stem, angular, covered with short hairs, opposite leaves, needle-shaped triangular, toothed margin, inflorescence loosely conicalRoots, stems, and leaves
Euphorbia hirta L.Mexico, Brazil, introduced to ChinaCommon weeds on roadsides, fields, and yards900-2,100 mHerbs, round and jointed stem, slightly hairy, ovate leaves, serrated, short peduncleStem, leaf
Flemingia prostrata Roxb.Junior ex RoxbTropical and temperate AsiaOpen fields, grasslands50-300 mSemi shrub, with finger-shaped leaves, 3 leaves, linear-lanceolate bracts, purple corollaRoot
Lithocarpus polystachyus RehderTropical AsiaMixed coniferous and broad-leaved forests, low mountains, rainforests, sandstones60-2,100 m5-20 m tall tree, with gray short hairs on the small branches, elongated leaves, leathery leaves, separate male and female inflorescences, spike-shaped, and fragrantRoots, leaves, and fruits
Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv.South America, Asia, EuropeForest, wilderness10-4,000 mAnnual herb, with needle-shaped leaves, smooth, and fine hairs on the edges, and a conical inflorescenceWhole plant
Chaenomeles speciosa SweetTemperate Asia (China)Radiant slopes, forest edges, and roadsides500-1,000 mDeciduous shrub, thorny, branches brownish black, leaves ovate, edges with short serrations, petals redFruit
Zanthoxylum khasianum Hook. FYunnan, myanmar, India, NepalSparse forests or shrubs1,500-2,500 mShrubs or small trees, small branches gray, thorny, compound leaves 5-13, alternate, margin with fine teeth, umbels, flowers with 4 petalsFruit, leaves
Acorus tatarinowii SchottAsia temperate and tropicalWaterside, swamps, wetlands, or floating islands in lakes20-2,600 mPerennial herb, with yellow-brown rhizomes, branching, succulent roots, sword-shaped linear leaves, and triangular inflorescence stalksRoot, stem
Caryopteris trichosphaera W.W. Sm.Yunnan, Tibethillside shrubs, arid grasslands in river valleys2,700-3,300 mshrubs with dense white hairs and glandular spots on their branches, wide ovate leaves, and inflorescence with a nearly head-like inflorescenceflowers, leaves
Lysimachia tengyuehensis Hand-Mazz.Southwest Yunnan regionstream, fields1,200-2,400 mPerennial herb, stem reticular, yellow with long soft hairs, leaves opposite, ovate, flower head clustered, corolla yellow.whole plant
Sarcococca hookeriana var. digyna Franch.Southern China, Bhutan, Nepalunder the shade of the forest300-3,500 mbranches with opposite leaves at the top, elliptical lanceolate leavesstem
Carex baccans NeesSouthern China, Southeast Asiaby the forest, river, and village200-2,700 mperennial herb with dense clusters of stems, basal leaves, and inverted spherical fruit sacswhole plant
Sigesbeckia orientalis L.Southern China, Europe, Russiamountains, wastelands, shrubs, and undergrowth110-2,700 mannual herbaceous plant, with stems branching into a complex bipartite shape, leaves triangular and oval, and a head-shaped inflorescencewhole plant
Rohdea aurantiaca (Baker) N. TanakaSouthwest Chinaforests, ravines, and mountain slopes1,800-2,900 mshrubs, rhizomes cylindrical, leaves basal, lanceolate, lanceolatewhole plant
Gomphrena globosa L.North America Mexico, South America Brazil, introduced to Asiadry, its areas for cultivation as ornamental plants1,200 mannual herbaceous plant, with upright stems and multiple branches, single leaves opposite each other, long elliptical, inflorescence sessile, spherical, redflower
Salvia przewalskii Maxim.Western Chinaby the stream, at the edge of the forest, in the bushes2,100-4,500 mPerennial herb, stem base partially branched, densely covered with short hairs, leaves triangular sharp-toothed to oblong-lanceolate, terminal inflorescence in racemes.whole plant
Anemone rivularis Buch-Ham. Ex DCChinamountains, grassy slopes, streams850-4,900 mperennial herb, branched stem, branched leaf stemwhole plant
Garcinia hanburyi Hook.f.Yunnan and South-East Asiahills, slopes, mixed forests100-1,600 mEvergreen tree, about 15-18 m, square small branches, opposite single leaves, leatheryresin
Caesalpinia sappan L.Yunnan and South-East Asiavalleys, jungles, or cultivation areas200-1,050 msmall tree with branches covered, 7-13 pairs of leaves, opposite growthtree core
Ocimum gratissimum Forssk.Asia, Europe, Africavalleys, forests, grasslands500-2,200 mperennial herb with upright stems, multiple branches, white powder on the surfacewhole plant
Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Australia introduced to Southwestern and Southeastern Chinacultivated fields0-2,000 mlarge tree with gray, flaky bark, slightly angular tender branches, opposite young leaves, ovate, blue-green, covered in white powderleaves, fruits, and essential oils
Euphorbia royleana Boiss.Yunnan, South Asia, South-East Asiamountains, hills, forests, grasses50-1,500 mshrubs, upright stems and leaves with thorns, waxy leaves on the surfacestem, leaves
Glechoma longituba (Nakai) Kupriansouthern and eastern of Chinaforests, grasslands, and riverbanks50-2,500 mperennial herb, stem quadrilateral, red, leaves herbaceous, heart-shaped, umbel inflorescenceaboveground
Liriope spicata Lour.Southern China and South-East Asiahillsides, valleys, roadsides, and wetlands50-1,400 mperennial herb with rhizomes, creeping stems, basal leaves, gramineous leaves, and small flowers, clustered in the axils of bractsroot tuber
Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill.Southwest and central Chinamountain slopes, wilderness, and shrubs250-1,600 mparasitic on plants such as Rhus chinensis and Populus euphraticagall
Tripterygium hypoglaucum (H.Lév.) HutchYunnan, South-East Asiahillsides, forest edges, and shrubs1,500-3,000 mdeciduous shrub, reddish brown, angular, leaves ovate, inflorescence terminalwhole plant
Rhododendron spinuliferum Franch.Southwest China and South Asiamixed forests, valleys, and shrublands1,900-2,500 mShrubs, old branches brownish red, young branches gray, leaves papery, inverted.roots, leaves, and flowers
Pachysandra axillaris Franch.Southwest Chinashrubs, mountains, forest edges, and understory600-2,500 mEvergreen subshrubs, with hard papery leaves, axillary inflorescences, yellow or red fruits when ripe, sphericalwhole plant
Alpinia japonica (Thunb.) Miq.Southern China, Japanunder the forest, by the stream, in rock crevices100-1,500 mperennial herb with rhizomes and branches, lanceolate leaves, terminal inflorescence with dense hairs on the inflorescence axis, spherical fruit, polygonal seeds, and a camphor smellwhole plant
Vincetoxicum forrestii (Schltr.) C.Y. Wu and D.Z.LiYunnan, South-East Asiaforest edges, grasslands, roadsides, and shrubs1,000-3,500 mperennial erect herb, single stem, covered with single row soft hairs, leaves opposite, thinly papery, broadly ovateroot

32 plant names, including Morus alba, Scoparia dulcis, and Cannabis sativa are listed in Table 1. These NPs active against MDROs mainly comprise over 160 bioactive compounds, including oxylipins, alkaloids, resorcinol terpenoids, triterpenoid saponins, cannabinoids, and isopentenyl flavonoids.

Correlation Analysis Between Traditional Use and Anti-MDROs Activity

The traditional uses of the selected medicinal plants were categorized into various traditional application domains. There are, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, itchy-sore ulceration, cephalalgia, nephritis, sore throat, scabies, shigellosis, eczema, beriberi, scald, tonsillitis, ascites, gastralgia, influenza, conjunctivitis, menorrhagia, dyspepsia, hepatitis, bronchitis, tussis, diarrhea, skin pruritus, head trauma, pyrexia, toxic heat, deficiency heat, rubeola, pertussis, varicella, hematuria, gastric and oral ulcers, rheumatic arthralgia, weakness, soreness of the waist and knees, heating-clearing and toxicity-removing, diuretic, persistent headache, ocular pain, carbuncle, cystitis, malaria, upper respiratory tract infection, pneumonia, urticaria, herpes zoster, joint stiffness, foot edema, vomiting, infection, gonorrhea, swelling-reducing, detoxification, antibacterial effect, enteritis, injuries, dysentery, pulmonary tuberculosis, tetanus, insecticidal antipruritic, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic injuries, fracture, anti-inflammatory, and gynecologic diseases. A correlation analysis was then performed between their traditional uses and anti-MDROs activity. Frequency data for each application category and corresponding antimicrobial activity were analyzed using origin software, and the results were visualized in a correlation diagram (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Flowchart of the process for mining bioactive compounds.

Characteristics of 32 Ethnic Medicinal Medicines

Yunnan Province, recognized as China’s most botanically diverse region, is widely known as the “Kingdom of Plants” (Zhao Mingxu et al., 2024), the “Kingdom of Animals” (Yi, 2014), and the “Kingdom of Wild Fungi” (Committee, 2016). These reputations are attributed to its unique geographic and climatic diversity, as well as its rich traditions in ethnic medicine. However, the region also faces several challenges, including low rates of technological transformation, tensions between resource conservation and exploitation, and a lack of standardization in medicinal plant practices (Zhang Xuejia et al., 2023). This review compiles detailed botanical profiles of 32 ethnic medicinal plant species, which can be categorized into herbaceous plants, shrubs, and trees based on their traditional uses, bioactive constituents, and demonstrated antimicrobial activity. For each species, information is provided on their origins and distribution in China, ecological growth conditions, altitude ranges, and key morphological features of stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits. A summary of these characteristics is presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 2: Correlations between the folk medicinal and antibacterial properties of the 32 plants.
Plant picturesaDCEMb nameScientific nameEthnicity usedcApplied categorydPlant picturesaDCEMb nameScientific nameEthnicity usedcApplied categoryd
SangBaiPi, NangRiJiao, HuaiLangTao, BaiManShuaM. albaAchang, Blang, Bouyei, Dai, Hanihypertension, diabetes mellitus, itchy sore ulcerationChinese magnolia vineSaccharomonospora viridisMiao, Yaostomachache, urticaria, herpes zoster
BieBuLie, MuFanLongS. dulcisAchang, Dai, De’ang, Jinuo, Jingpo, Li, Wacephalalgia, nephritis, sore throat, odontalgiaflowering quince, Tiejiao LiC. speciosaDai, dong, Gelao, Lisu, Naxi, Yi, Zhuangabdominal pain, gastric ulcer, beriberi, joint stiffness, foot edema
AngGeiDang, HuoMa, hemp seedC. salivaDe’ang, dong, Hani, Kazakh, Jingpo, mengscabies, shigellosis, eczema, beriberi, scaldShan Jiao, Japanese pepperZ. khasianumYi, Hani, Dai, Bai, Naxirelieve itching and eliminate foul odor, relieve pain, detoxify
KaoShaZhi, BeiNiu, YaXiYi, MaDuYeE. hirtaAchang, Dai, Hani, De’ang, Li, dong, She, WA, Miao, Yi, Zhuangtonsillitis, ascites, eczema, gastralgia, influenza, conjunctivitisChangBieLao, GeMiQin, ChangPuLeng, XiGuShan, LuMaGuJi, JiabaoYetatarinowiibuyei, Dai, dong, Li, Gelao, Hani, Yi, Miao, She, WA, Yaodyspepsia, diarrhea, vomiting, common cold, nephritis
YeBaiDian, LaoShuWei, YaFengBi, TouDiLongF. prostrataBai, dong, Li, Yao, Maonan, Yi, Zhuangmenorrhagia, dyspepsia, tonsillitis, hepatitis, bronchitisPuErCha, PuNatrichosphaeraTibetaninfectious disease, fever, pharyngitis, leprosy, jaundice
DuoKeSuiL. polystachyusYaotussis, diarrhea, shigellosis, skin pruritusLuBianHuangL. tengyuehensisHan, dongdigestive diseases, urological diseases, burn, detoxifying, infection
SuErGong, SuoGongBaS. hookerianaZanghead trauma, sore throat, pyrexia, toxic heat, deficiency heatKuaGongCai, KuangGaoCai, MinJin, LaLai, MaWuLin, RiXiFanA. rivularisBai, Dai, De’ang, dong, Yi, Hani, Wa, Jingpo, Lisu, Lahutraumatic injury, malaria, gonorrhea, toothache, sinusitis, rhinitis
ZheJianQing, GanKa, BiaoBoRen, SanJiaoCaoC. baccansAchang, Bai, Dai, De’ang, dong, Hani, nu, Wa, Yirubeola, pertussis, varicella, hematuria, gastric and oral ulcerYuHuang, YueHuangG. hanburyiUyghur, Yao, Dai, Zhuangreduce swelling, detoxify, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory
ShengCao, HuangHuaZai, XiJiMiS. orientalisDai, Miao, Shui, she, dong, Tujia, Yao, Zhuangrheumatic arthralgia, weakness, and soreness of the waist and kneesPaiRanJiMu XiKeO. gratissimumUyghurnasal congestion and common cold, cough, phlegm
KaikouJianR. aurantiacaHanclear heat and remove toxicity, diureticGeFang, JunMo, MaiFang, ZeiGuoWo, ZuoMoXingsappanAchang, Dai, dong, De’ang, Yi, Hani, Jino, Lisu, Yao, Jingpoenteritis, injuries, dysentery, pulmonary tuberculosis, tetanus
RiRiHong, NuoHanBeng, globe amaranthG. globosaBai, Dai, dong, Yao, Maonan, Tujiapersistent headache, ocular pain, shigellosis, pertussis, carbuncleZhiBaZiE. globulusAchang, Lisu, Naxi, Miaocommon cold, fever, enteritis, headache, skin ulcer, upper respiratory tract
red sage root, LuPoS. przewalskiiNaxi, Zang, Yicough, hepatitis, phthisis, oral ulcer, dentalgiaBaWangBianE. royleanaDaidispel wind and detoxify, insecticidal antipruritic, scabies, and tines
NaTaiLian, JiaoSanXing, RuGuShao, TouGuXiaoG. longitubaBai, buyei, Jinuo, Dai, dong, she, Miao, Yao, Mongolian, Tujia, Yitracheitis, cystitis, malaria, upper respiratory tract infection, pneumoniatorch flower, HeiJianHuang, JiMenLaDuo, CheYouGenT. hypoglaucumAchang, Dai, Hani, De’ang, Lisu, Miao, Yao, Yirheumatoid arthritis, traumatic injuries, fracture
Tumendong, TumaidongL. spicataDe’ang, dong, Yi, Maonan, Qiang, Shui, Tujiarelieve cough, throat obstruction, and sore throatPaoZhangHuaR. spinuliferumYianti-inflammatory, gynecologic diseases
Hanbeizi, Baichongcang, MufuziS. chinensisMongolian, Uyghur, Daiastringe the intestines and stop diarrhea, dry dampness and promote wound healingJiRuHen ChaBaGa, JiRuHen ChaBaGa, JiRuHen ChaBaGaP. axillarisHani, Mongol, Tujia, Yao, Wa, Zang, Zhuangtreat burns and scalds, dyspepsia, indigestion
wild ginger, Ganao douAmycolatopsis japonicaMiao, Zhuang, Daivomiting and diarrhea, traumatic injury, detoxificationkaPuDeLuoC. forrestiiTibetantreat common cold, pneumonic fever

Correlation Between Ethnomedicinal Practices and Antibacterial Properties

As one of the most bio-diverse and ethnoculturally rich regions in China, Yunnan is home to extensive traditional medicinal practices deeply rooted in its ethnic minority communities (L I Yao et al., 2020). The indigenous knowledge embedded in these ethnic medicines reflects unique ethnopharmacological traditions and has increasingly attracted scientific interest for their antibacterial potential (Wang et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020). For example, the De’ang people use C. sativa to treat toothaches, with cannabinoids identified as its active antimicrobial constituents (Yadav et al., 2023). The Dai people use M. alba (Sangbaipi) to manage itchy sores and ulcerations (Jia Min-Ru and Yi, 2010), where the active compound morusin has been shown to exhibit activity against MDROs by disrupting bacterial cell membranes (Yadav et al., 2023). Both the Yi and Bai ethnic people apply P. polyphylla (Dianchonglou) to clear heat and toxins (Jia Min-Ru and Yi, 2010; Min-Ru, 2005), with its steroidal saponins demonstrating antibacterial effects via inhibition of key bacterial enzymes (Tagousop et al., 2018). In the Yi community, L. pterodonta (Choulingdan), a traditional anti-inflammatory herb, is used to treat respiratory infections and has been found to contain sesquiterpene lactones with pathogen-suppressing properties (Liu et al., 2007). Moreover, 95% ethanol extracts from widely used ethnomedicinal plants-such as H. cordata (Yuxingcao), M. haplocalyx (Bohecao), and P. vulgaris (Xiakucao)-have shown inhibitory effects against MRSA (Karthikeyan et al., 2020).

These examples highlight the value of integrating ethnomedicinal knowledge with modern biotechnological approaches to accelerate the discovery of plant-based anti-infective agents (Wang et al., 2021). However, diseases related to the digestive, respiratory, endocrine, nervous, and musculoskeletal systems, as well as conditions affecting the skin and facial regions, have often been overlooked in the past studies, primarily because they were not directly associated with MDROs infections. Although infectious diseases are most commonly associated with MDROs infections, our analysis suggests that a wider spectrum of disease categories also deserves attention. Numerous plant-derived compounds have been applied in treating ailments beyond classical infectious diseases. As shown in Figure 2A, antibacterial relevance was observed across various systems, including the digestive, respiratory, urinary, immune, cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic, neurological, musculoskeletal, dermatologic, sensory organs, trauma-related, gynecologic, and diseases categorized under Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). The correlation between the traditional ethnomedicinal uses of these plants and their antibacterial properties is illustrated in Figure 2B and detailed in Table 2. Specifically, Table 2 summarizes the ethnomedicinal applications of 32 plant species reviewed here. Traditional uses for conditions such as itchy sores and ulcerations, stomachaches, upper respiratory tract infections, vomiting, diarrhea, sprains, strains, beriberi, shigellosis, heat-clearing and detoxification, scalds, dyspepsia, conjunctivitis, gastralgia, pharyngitis, gonorrhea, pertussis, common colds, phthisis, scabies, tinea, chronic tracheitis, and tetanus are likely associated with microbial infections. These patterns provide meaningful directions for future research into the antibacterial mechanisms and bioactive compounds targeting MDROs.

Figure 2: (A) Types of diseases treated with ethnic medicinal plants. (B) Correlations between folk ethnobotanical medicinal and antibacterial properties.

Antimicrobial Compounds

Overview

In this review, 32 plant species were identified as exhibiting antibacterial activity, with 30 demonstrating efficacy against MRSA, VRE, and Candida albicans. Over the past three decades, the development of new antibiotics-particularly those targeting Gram-negative bacteria-has been severely limited. Today, we may find that existing treatments are increasingly inadequate in addressing emerging resistance mechanisms, and antimicrobial resistance, especially multidrug resistance, has escalated into a major challenge for clinical therapy (Wang, Z.-J. et al., 2024). Given that resistance among Gram-negative bacteria has become a global public health crisis (Apostol and Collaborators, 2024; Macesic et al., 2025), compounds with Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values ≤ 64 µg/mL against Gram-negative strains were also catalogued. These included 87 phenolics and their derivatives, 48 terpenoids and derivatives, 8 alkaloids and derivatives, 6 oxylipins, and 11 other types of metabolites. In total, over 160 compounds with activity against MRSA, VRE, C. albicans, and Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from approximately 32 ethnomedicinal plant species. Phenolics and their derivatives, terpenoids and derivatives, alkaloids and derivatives, oxylipins, and other metabolites accounted for 54.4% (87), 30% (48), 5% (8), 3.8% (6), and 6.8% (11) of the total compounds, respectively. The botanical origins, chemical structures, antimicrobial activities against MDROs, and structure-activity relationships of these plant-derived NPs are discussed in detail below. A summary of the antimicrobial bioactivities of these NPs against MDROs and Gram-negative bacteria is provided in Table 3.

Table 3: Plant natural products (NPs) and antibiotics synergize against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), C. albicans, and Gram-negative bacteria.
Sl. No.CompoundsChemical structurePlantsStrainsMIC (μg/mL)Mechanism and highlightsReferences
Phenylpropanoids
1o-coumaric acid (1)E. hirtaMRSA15.2 mminhibition of T3SS gene expression in MRSAAbdelkhalek et al. (2018) and Erdogan Eliuz et al. (2022)
2caffeic acid (2)E. hirtaMRSA500-Yuxia (2017)
3chlorogenic acid (3)C. speciosa, O. gratissimumStreptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillis subtilis, Shigella dysenteriae, S. Typhimurium20-40increase membrane permeability, leakage of intracellular solutesLou et al. (2011) and Ugbogu et al. (2021)
4β-asarone (4)A. tatarinowiiC. albicans (08030401)100destruction of biofilm, inhibition of biosynthesis of cell wallWang et al. (2020) and Zhao et al. (2023)
5eugenol (5)O. gratissimumMRSA102.4basil essential oil containing eugenol for resistance to MDROsUgbogu et al. (2021)
6moracin C (6), mulberrofuran B (7), albafuran A (8)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)2-8-Zhu et al. (2021)
7moracin G (9)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)8-16-Zhu et al. (2021)
83, 5 ft, 2, 4-tetrahydroxy-4 (3-methyl-1-butenyl) stilbene (10)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)4-8-Zhu et al. (2021)
94,4′-([2R,3S]-2,3-dimethylbutane-1,4-diyl)-bis-(2-methoxyphenol) (11)E. hirtaMRSA, Mycobacterium tuberculosis50anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv, G122, G133)Reyes-Melo et al. (2017)
10mulberrofuran G (12)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)8-Zhu et al. (2021)
11mulberrofuran K (13)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)4-8-Zhu et al. (2021)
12albanol B (14)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)8-Zhu et al. (2021)
13mulberrofuran Q (15)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)8-16-Zhu et al. (2021)
14Daphnin (16)Saccharomonospora viridisStaphylococcus aureus100-Cottiglia et al. (2001) and Jiang et al. (2010)
15xanthotoxin (17)Z. khasianumStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300), Methylococcus luteus (ATCC 10240)30destroy cell membraneWalasek et al. (2015) and Wang et al. (2021)
Flavonoids
16kuwanon C (18), 5′-geranyl-5, 7, 2’,4’-tetrahydroxyflavone (19)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)2-4-Zhu et al. (2021)
17morusin (20)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)2-8combining membrane PE/PG/CL, disrupting membrane functionZhu et al. (2021) and Zhu et al. (2024)
18kuwanon B (21)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)4-Zhu et al. (2021)
19Morellic acid (22)G. hanburyiMRSA, VRE (ATCC51299)1, 4affects fatty acid biosynthesis and glycerophospholipid metabolismTang et al. (2024)
20gambogic acid (23)G. hanburyiMRSA, VRE (ATCC51299)2.5destruction of biofilmPang et al. (2024) and Tang et al. (2024)
21neo-gambogic acid (24)G. hanburyiMRSA25destruction of biofilmJia et al. (2015) and Tang et al. (2024)
22kuwanon G (25), kuwanon H (26)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)2-4-Zhu et al. (2021)
23linarin (27)S. dulcisStaphylococcus aureus0.38-Davoodi et al. (2022)
24cirsimarin (28)S. dulcisStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC25923)125-Vukovic et al. (2011)
25tricin-7-O-β-D-glucoside (29), vitexin-2’’-O-β-D-glucoside (30)Saccharomonospora viridisEscherichia coli (ATCC 25922)100.6, 32.4-Fan et al. (2014)
26luteolin (31)C. trichosphaeraMRSA (ATCC 29213)32inhibition of bacterial alpha toxin productionQiu et al. (2011)
27kaempferol derivatives (32, 33, 34, 35)G. globosa, O. gratissimumP. aeruginosa.8-128destruction of bacterial surface structureUgbogu et al. (2021) and Xu et al. (2022)
28isorhamnetin 3-O-ß-robinobioside (36)G. globosaMycobacterium phlei50-Pomilio et al. (1992) and Xu et al. (2022)
29sappanone B (37)C. sappanMRSA12.8synergistic with amikacinLee et al. (2014) and Zuo et al. (2014)
302″-O-galloylhyperin (38)C. speciosaStaphylococcus aureus800destroy cell membraneWang et al. (2021)
31hyperoside (39)E. hirtaMRSA1,000-Yuxia (2017)
32(8, 3′-diprenyl-5, 7, 4′-trihydroxy flavanone (40)F. prostrataMRSA (562), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 7853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922)17-Madan et al. (2008)
33kuwanon E (41), kuwanon U (42)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)4-Zhu et al. (2021)
34kuwanon O (43)M. albaMRSA (031, 011, 003), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC4330)4-8bacterial biofilm and efflux pumpZhu et al. (2021)
35phloretin (44)L. polystachyusStreptococcus pyogenes, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Photobacterium fischeri, and Escherichia coli (O157:H7)32.4-46.8 and 100inhibition of SrtB, biofilm formation of Escherichia coli and SalmonellaPark et al. (2012), Shang et al. (2022) and Wang et al. (2018a)
36aromadendrin (45)Saccharomonospora viridisStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922)45.6, 32.3-Fan et al. (2014)
37genistin (46)F. prostrataMRSA (562), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 7853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922)34-Madan et al. (2008)
38(+)-catechin (47)Z. khasianum, O. gratissimumMRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli161-512synergistic anti MRSA with norfloxacin and gentamicinGomes et al. (2018), Ugbogu et al. (2021) and Wang et al. (2021)
39Epifisetinidol-(4β,8)-epicatechin (48)F. prostrataMRSA64synergistic effects with penicillin, ampicillin, imipenem, and amikacinZe-Ping (2022)
404-hydroxyboesenbergin B (49)Amycolatopsis japonicaVRE16inhibition of biofilm formation gene AtlA, SgrA, GelE, and AceGiang and Son (2007) and Ma et al. (2017)
41galangin (50)Amycolatopsis japonicaMRSA15.6synergistic with gentamicinLee et al. (2008) and Ma et al. (2017)
Other phenols
428-hydroxycannabinol (51)C. salivaCandida albicans128destruction of biofilmSchofs, Sparo, and Sánchez Bruni (2021)
43cannabinol (52)C. salivaStaphylococcus aureus (1199B, ATCC25923), MRSA (RN-4220, XU212), EMRSA (15, 16)1, 1, 1, 1, 1destruction of biofilmAppendino et al. (2008)
44gallic acid (53)E. hirtaMRSA500-1,000-Yuxia (2017)
45naphthol rhamnosides (54-56)Saccharomonospora viridisStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213)3.2-23.3-Fan et al. (2014)
46Alpininone (57)Amycolatopsis japonicaVRE32-Giang and Son (2007)
475-(12-tridecene-1-yl)-1,3-benzenediol (58), 6-(12-tridecene-1-yl)-2,4-Dihydroxy benzoic acid (59), 2,4-dihydroxy-6-dodecyl benzoic acid (60), 2,4-dihydroxy-6-tetradecyl benzoic acid (61)L. tengyuehensisVRE (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51299), MRSA4-8bacterial metabolic imbalanceShi et al. (2024a)
481,7-bis-(4′-hydroxyl-3′-methoxyphenyl)-5(R)-methoxyhepthan-3-one (62)Salvia cavalerieiPseudomonas fluorescens, Solanacearum, Clostridium perfringens71.2-Hui et al. (2022)
495-dodecyl-1,3-benzenediol (63), grevillol (64), 2,4-dihydroxy-6-undecyl benzoic acid (65), 2,4-dihydroxy-6-tridecyl benzoic acid (66)L. tengyuehensiVRE (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51299), MRSA4-8destruction of biofilmLi et al. (2024) and Shi et al. (2024a)
50Curcusinol (67)C. baccansMRSA (170402019), MRSA (170107359), MRSA (170208345)8-16inhibition of arginine biosynthesisLiu et al. (2024)
51brazilin (68)C. sappanMRSA, VRE (#228), Burkholderia cepacia (91.452), Propionibacterium acnes32, 16, 32, 15.6inhibition of DNA and protein synthesis, synergistic with aminoglycoside antibioticsNirmal and Panichayupakaranant (2014), Xu and Lee (2004) and Zuo et al. (2014)
52brazilein (69)C. sappanMRSA12.8synergistic anti-MRSA activity with brazilein and hygromycin BLee et al. (2014)
53protosappanin A (70)C. sappanMRSA64used in combination with amikacin or gentamicinZuo et al. (2015)
54protosappanin B (71)C. sappanMRSA128used in combination with amikacin or gentamicinZuo et al. (2015)
55pentagalloylglucose (72)S. chinensisBacillis subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella, Salmonella, MRSA250interference with cell wall synthesis and damage to cell membraneTian et al. (2009)
56ellagic acid (73)S. chinensisStreptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175), Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC 4356)125anti-biofilm activityChittrarasu, Ahamed, and Ravi (2021)
57phloroglucinol dimers (74, 75, 76)R. tomentosaMRSA0.5-1-Luo et al. (2023)
58phloroglucinol trimers (77)R. tomentosaMRSA1-2-Luo et al. (2023)
59trans-resveratrol (78)C. baccansMRSA50050 μg/mLinhibits the synthesis of virulence factors in MDROsAlqahtani et al. (2024) and Dávid, Hohmann, and Vasas (2021)
Terpenoids
60Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (79)C. salivaStaphylococcus aureus (1199B, ATCC25923), MRSA (RN-4220, XU212), EMRSA (15, 16)2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 0.5destroy cell membraneAppendino et al. (2008) and Vozza Berardo et al. (2024)
61cannabichromene (80)C. salivaStaphylococcus aureus (1199B, ATCC25923), MRSA (RN-4220, XU212), EMRSA (15, 16)2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2destroy cell membraneSchofs, Sparo, and Sánchez Bruni (2021)
62cannabidivarin (81)C. salivaNeisseria gonorrhoeae (573 clinical)2-8destruction of the inner membraneRusso et al. (2021) and Yang et al. (2022)
63cannabigerol (82)C. salivaMRSA0.5-2disrupting the plasma membrane and increasing membrane permeabilitySchofs, Sparo, and Sánchez Bruni (2021)
64cannabidiol (83)C. salivaMRSA, Listeria monocytogenes, MRSE, Enterococcus faecalis.4, 4, 4, 8inducing diaphragm formation and reducing ezrA geneSchofs, Sparo, and Sánchez Bruni (2021)
65Cannabichromenic acid (84)C. salivaMRSA, MSSA3.9, 7.8 μmchanging membranes and nucleoids to inhibit bacterial divisionSchofs, Sparo, and Sánchez Bruni (2021)
66cannabidiolic acid (85)C. salivaMRSA (United States 300), Staphylococcus epidermidis (CA71)1, 2change membrane potentialSchofs, Sparo, and Sánchez Bruni (2021)
674-epi-scopadulcic acid B (86)S. dulcisMRSA (B26), MRSA (K1)125-Phan et al. (2006)
68Capitachromenic acid E (87)R. rubiginosumMRSA, VRE9.56, 9.56destruction of biofilmLuo (2024)
69Grifolic acid (88), Grifolic (89)R. rubiginosumMRSA, VRE8.33-24.4destruction of biofilmLuo (2024)
70Rhododaurichromanic acid A (90)R. spinuliferumMRSA, VRE5.37destruction of biofilmLuo et al. (2024)
71aromadendrene (91)E. globulusMRSA, VRE120, 250synergistic anti-MRSA activity with 1,8-cineoleMulyaningsih et al. (2010)
721,8-cineole (92)E. globulusMRSA500destroy cell membraneJiang et al. (2025) and Mulyaningsih et al. (2011)
73(+)-15,16-epoxy-8(17),13 (16),14-labdatriene (93)Amycolatopsis japonicaMRSA, VRE32destruction of biofilmMa et al. (2017)
74spinulinoid A (94), spinulinoid B (95), spinulinoid C (96)R. spinuliferumMRSA, VRE2.7-5.37destruction of biofilmLuo et al. (2024)
75E-confluentin (97), Z-confluentin (98), anthopogochromene C (99)R. rubiginosumMRSA, VRE3.07-18.4destruction of biofilmLuo (2024)
76ferruginol (100), 19-hydroxyferruginol (101), sugiol (102), 6α-hydroxydemethylcryptojaponol (103)C. trichosphaeraMRSA3 (170208345), VRE (Enterococcus faecalis, ATCC 51299)4-32regulate MRSA permeability, depolarization, and fluidityLu et al. (2025)
7714-deoxycoleon U (104)C. trichosphaeraMRSA3 (170208345), VRE (Enterococcus faecalis, ATCC 51299)16-32destroy cell membraneLu et al. (2025)
78Cativic acid (105)C. trichosphaeraMRSA3 (170208345), VRE (Enterococcus faecalis, ATCC 51299)16destroy cell membraneLu et al. (2025)
79cartrisine B (106)C. trichosphaeraMRSA3 (170208345),32collaborate with vancomycin and tetracyclineJoshi et al. (2021) and Lu et al. (2024)
8016β-hydro-ent-kauran −17,19-dioic acid (107), 16α, 17-dihydroxy-ent- kauran-19-oic acid (108), 16β,17.18- trihy dr-oxy-ent-kauran- 19-oic acid (109), 7,18- dihydroxy-ent- kauran-19-oic acid (110)S. orientalisMRSA0.12-0.5-Yang et al. (2016)
81Sigesbeckin A (111), 18-hydroxy-kauran- 16-ent-19-oic acid (112)S. orientalisMRSA, VRE64synergistic anti-MRSA activity with DOX and VANZhou et al. (2024)
82cryptotanshinone (113), przewaquinone A (114)Salvia miltiorrhizaMRSA (01-07), MRSA, and MSSA0.9-3.9, 2-4inhibit pyruvate kinase PK and interfere with energy metabolismZhong et al. (2021)
83miltirone (115)S. przewalskiiMRSA and MSSA4-8interfering with bacterial energy metabolism, inhibiting the synthesis of bacterial cellHuang-Huan (2024)
84macrocarpal B (116)E. globulusMRSA2destruction of cell membrane and inhibition of biofilm formationJiang et al. (2025)
85oleanolic acid (117)L. polystachyus and C. speciosaMRSA, VRE, and Staphylococcus aureus32, 8.4, 200combining NDM-1, H1a proteins, and β-lactaseMing et al. (2017), Shenghua et al. (2010) and Yong-Lin (2021)
86ursolic acid (118)C. speciosaStreptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, S. pneumonia, MRSA, Bacillis subtilis, Bacillus cereus2, 2, 100, 16, 64, 8, 6.25destruction of cell membrane and inhibition of biofilm formationJesus et al. (2015) and Wang et al. (2021)
87betulinic acid (119)C. speciosaMRSA16-64synergistic effect with ciprofloxacin on efflux pumpChung, Gan, and Chin (2022), Pereira da Silva et al. (2025) and Zhang et al. (2014a)
88Olean-9(11),12-dien-3-O-palmitate (120)A. rivularisBacillis subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus50-75-Zhao, Shao, and Fan (2012)
89prosapogenin CP4 (121)A. rivularisC. albicans (ATCC 14053)16synergistic inhibition of fungal cell wall formation with vancomycin and oleanolic acidWen-Biao (2024)
90lupeol (122)E. royleanaS. schenckii, Microsporum canis, Aspergillus fumigatus12-93.5-Kgosiemang et al. (2025)
91α-amyrin (123), and β-amyrin (124)E. royleanaCandida krusei, C. albicans30-125widely resistant to animal and plant pathogenic fungiJohann et al. (2007) and Kgosiemang et al. (2025)
923β-Friedelinol (125), friedelin (126)E. royleanaMRSA7.5-10acting on the cell membrane to cause K+ leakageInoue et al. (2004), Kgosiemang et al. (2025) and Ogunnusi, Oso, and Dosumu (2010)
93betulin (127)G. longitubaMRSA400destruction of biofilmZhou et al. (2021)
94celastrol (128)T. hypoglaucumMRSA (United States 300)4inhibition of𝚫1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (P5CDH), interference bacterial metabolismWei et al. (2022) and Yuan et al. (2023)
95Wilforol A (129), regeol C (130)T. hypoglaucumMRSA, VRE2, 4-32anti-biofilm activityJin-Qiong (2024)
966-ethanoltriptohypol C (131)T. hypoglaucumMRSA, VRE2, 8destruction of biofilmJin-Qiong (2024)
97Orthosphenic acid (132)T. hypoglaucumMRSA8-Jin-Qiong (2024)
Steroid compounds
983,4-seco-cycloartane derivatives 1 (133), lithocarpic acid D (134)L. polystachyusS. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Methylococcus luteus, Bacillis subtilis.3.1-50-Fan, Gao, and Yue (2016), Ming et al. (2017) and Tian-Tian (2020)
99Lithocarpic acid F(135), coccinetane B (136)L. polystachyusS. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Methylococcus luteus, Bacillis subtilis.3.1-6.3-Fan, Gao, and Yue (2016) and Wang et al. (2014)
100Lithocarpic acids I (137)L. polystachyusS. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Methylococcus luteus, Bacillis subtilis.12.5-Fan, Gao, and Yue (2016), Wang et al. (2014) and Zhang, Wang, and Zhao (2023)
1016α-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-quinovop- yranosyl]-(25S)-5α-spirostan-3 β-ol (138)R. aurantiacaMRSA (003)4destruction of cell membrane and cell wallShi et al. (2024b)
102Wattigenin C (139)R. aurantiacaR. stoloniferainhibition rate 90%-Yao et al. (2022)
103(25RS)-ruscogenin (140)L. spicataVRE (ATCC 51299)10destruction of bacterial inner membraneZhang et al. (2014b)
Alkaloids
104epipachysamine D (141)P. axillarisC. albicans (ATCC 14053)4destroy cell membraneDuan et al. (2025)
105pachysamine M (142)P. axillarisC. albicans (ATCC 14053)4inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesisDuan et al. (2025)
1066-acetonyl-dihydronitid-ine (143), 6-acetonyl-dihydrofagaridine (144), 6-acetonyl-dihydrochelerythrine (145)Z. nitidumStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and MRSA8-16, 32applied to efflux pumpOmbito (2021), Wang et al. (2021) and Zeng et al. (2022)
107dihydrochelerythrine (146)Z. rhetsaMRSA (SK1) and Escherichia coli8, 16-Ombito (2021) and Tantapakul et al. (2012)
108γ-sanshoöl (147)Z. bungeanumC. albicans32destruction of biofilmMa et al. (2022) and Wang et al. (2021)
109sarcovagine D (148)S. hookerianaC. albicans (08030401)16disrupting membrane potential, generating ROSShen et al. (2024)
110hookerianamides O (149)S. hookerianaStreptococcus minor16Devkota et al. (2010)
111Antofine (150)C. forrestiiPenicillium, Escherichia coli, and MRSA3-10-Qu et al. (2013)
112schinifoline (151)Z. motuoenseMRSA (011)20destruction of biofilmWang et al. (2024b) and Wang et al. (2021)
113γ-fagarine (152)Z. motuoenseMRSA (011)128destruction of biofilmWang et al. (2024b)
114neoechinulin A (153)Z. motuoenseMRSA (003)128-Wang et al. (2024b) and Wang et al. (2023)
Other compounds
115Heptacosan-1-ol (154)E. royleanaC. albicans15-Salehi et al. (2019)
116phvto-oxvlipins siegeooxvlipin A (155), phvto-oxvlipins siegeooxvlipin B (156)S. orientalisMRSA, VRE4-8bacterial membrane damageZhou et al. (2025)
117siegesoxylipin D (157), siegesoxylipin E (158)S. orientalisMRSA, VRE8characteristics of anionic surfactantsKim et al. (2012) and Zhou et al. (2025)
118Siegesoxylipin F (159), siegesoxylipin G (160)S. orientalisMRSA, VRE8characteristics of anionic surfactantsWu et al. (2020) and Zhou et al. (2025)

Phenolics and Their Derivatives

Phenolic secondary metabolites are key functional bioactive compounds produced by plants during their growth and development (Kumrungsee et al., 2023). In this review, NPs with antibacterial activity include simple phenols, phenylpropanoids, xanthones, flavanones, resorcinols, quinonoids, isoflavones, lignans, chalcones, tannins, flavanonols, flavan-3-ols, among others. The basic structural classes of phenolics are illustrated in Figure S1.

Chlorogenic acid (3), isolated from C. speciosa and O. gratissimum, has been reported to exhibit antibacterial activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Shigella dysenteriae, and Salmonella typhimurium, with MICs ranging from 20 to 40 μg/mL (Ugbogu et al., 2021). Chlorogenic acid (3) displays broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Several phenylpropanoids isolated from M. alba, including moracin C (6), mulberrofuran B (7), albafuran A (8), moracin G (9), mulberrofuran G (12), mulberrofuran K (13), albanol B (14), and mulberrofuran Q (15), exhibit anti-MRSA activity with MICs ranging from 2 to 16 μg/mL (Zhu et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2024). Additionally, flavonoid compounds such as 18-21, 25-26, and 41-43, also from M. alba, demonstrate potent activity against MDROs, with MICs in the same range (Zhu et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2024). Moreover, kuwanon O (43) has been shown to inhibit the MRSA efflux pump (Zhu et al., 2021), while morusin (20) targets bacterial inner membrane phospholipids, disrupts membrane integrity, and induces the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) (Zhu et al., 2024). These mechanisms differ from those of conventional antibiotics and suggest a lower likelihood of inducing resistance development.

Flavonoid derivatives have a wide range of antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Daphnin (16) is isolated from S. viridis (Cottigli et al., 2001; Gong Jiang et al., 2010), while xanthotoxin (17), obtained from Z. khasianum, shows antibacterial activity against S. aureus and Methylococcus luteus with MIC 30 µg/mL (Walasek et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2021). Based on structural analyses of compounds such as α-, β-, and γ-mangostin, cratoxylone, gambogenic acid, neo-morellic acid (22), gambogic acid (23), neogambogic acid (24), and related derivatives, Tang et al., (2024) identified hydroxyl groups, isopentenyl substituents, and carboxyl groups at the C-5 position as key contributors to antibacterial activity against VRE. Further mechanistic studies demonstrated that morellic acid (22) binds to phosphatidylglycerol in the bacterial inner membrane, disrupting the proton motive force and membrane rigidity. This disruption causes oxidative stress via the accumulation of ROS, ultimately resulting in bacterial cell death (Tang et al., 2024). Transcriptomic analyses further linked these effects to perturbations in glycerophospholipid metabolism and fatty acid biosynthesis pathways. Notably, morellic acid exhibits dose-dependent eradication of up to 80% of mature VRE biofilms, with efficacy comparable to that of ampicillin, used as a positive control. These findings highlight the promise of structural optimization in enhancing antimicrobial agents against resistant pathogens (Tang et al., 2024).

Additional flavonoid derivatives-including linarin (27), cirsimarin (28), luteolin (31), sappanone B (37), (8,3′-diprenyl-5,7,4′-trihydroxyflavanone (40), phloretin (44), aromadendrin (45), genistin (46), 4-hydroxyboesenbergin B (49), and galangin (50)-are isolated from S. dulcis, C. trichosphaera, C. sappan, F. prostrata, L. polystachyus, S. viridis, and A. japonica, respectively. Among these, linarin (27) exhibits particularly potent activity against S. aureus, with a MIC as low as 0.38 µg/mL (Davoodi et al., 2022). Although luteolin (31) exhibits an MIC of 32 µg/mL against MRSA, it showed synergistic effects when combined with gentamicin (Qiu et al., 2011). Kaempferol derivatives (32-35) have demonstrated activity against P. aeruginosa and are found to disrupt the bacterial surface structure (Ugbogu et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022). Phloretin (44), isolated from L. polystachyus, has been reported to possess broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, with MIC values ranging from 32.4 to 100 μg/mL (Park et al., 2012; Shang et al., 2022; Wang, G. et al., 2018). It targets E. coli biofilms and inhibits the expression of the virulence factor sortase B (SrtB). Galangin (50) has been shown to suppress bacterial toxin production (Lee et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2017).

Cannabinoids (51, 52) have demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against MDROs, particularly MRSA and VRE, with MIC values ranging from 1 to 8 μg/mL (Appendino et al., 2008; Schofs et al., 2021). Alpininone (57) exhibits activity against VRE with an MIC of 32 μg/mL (Giang and Son, 2007). Resorcylic acid derivatives (58-61), isolated from the L. genus, show strong antibacterial effects against MRSA and VRE (MICs = 2-8 μg/mL) (Shi, N. et al., 2024). Mechanistic studies reveal that these compounds disrupt biofilm formation and damage the bacterial membrane by inducing metabolic imbalance. SAR analyses indicate that the presence of lipophilic long carbon chains at C-5/C-6 and hydrophilic hydroxyl/carboxyl groups are essential for anti-MRSA and anti-VRE activity.

The compound 1,7-bis-(4′- hydroxy- 3′- methoxyphenyl) - 5(R) - methoxyheptan - 3 - one (62) exhibit antibacterial activity against various Gram-negative bacteria, with an MIC of 71.2 μg/mL (Liang Hui et al., 2022). Grevillol derivatives (63-66), also derived from Lysimachia, display MIC values of 4-8 μg/mL against both VRE and MRSA (Chen Li Li et al., 2024; Shi, N. et al., 2024). Curcusinol (67), isolated from C. baccans, exhibit similar activity against MRSA with MICs of 4-8 μg/mL (Liu et al., 2024). Brazilin (68) and brazilein (69), isolated from C. sappan, exhibit synergistic effects with aminoglycoside antibiotics-brazilein with hygromycin B-against MDROs (Lee et al., 2014; Nirmal and Panichayupakaranant, 2014; Xu and Lee, 2004). Brazilin (68) is also found to inhibit bacterial protein synthesis (Zuo et al., 2014). Protosappanin A (70) and protosappanin B (71) show synergistic effects with gentamicin and amikacin against MRSA (Zuo et al., 2015). Phloroglucinol trimers (74-77), isolated from R. tomentosa, demonstrate potent anti-MRSA activity with MICs ranging from 0.5 to 2 μg/mL (Luo et al., 2023).

Terpenoids and Derivatives

Terpenoids, a diverse group of NPs, are structurally defined by their isoprene unit framework, with Mevalonic Acid (MVA) serving as a central precursor in their biosynthetic pathways. Their classification hinges on the count of isoprene units, leading to subcategories such as monoterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids, diterpenoids, sesterterpenoids, and triterpenoids.

Sesquiterpenoids and monoterpenoids are major constituents of plant volatile oils and are important raw materials in the fragrance and pharmaceutical industries. Sesquiterpenoids consist of three isoprene units (15 carbon atoms) and are biogenetically derived from farnesyl pyrophosphate. The MICs of anti-MRSA activity of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (79), cannabichromene (80), cannabidivarin (81), and other cannabinoids (82-85) are1-8 μg/mL (Appendino et al., 2008; Berardo et al., 2024; Russo et al., 2021; Schofs et al., 2021). They are isolated from C. saliva, with potent activity against MRSA and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (Yang et al., 2022). The MIC of anti-MRSA of 4-epi-scopadulcic acid B (86) is 125 μg/mL (Phan et al., 2006). Capitachromenic acid E (87) and grifolic derivatives (88, 89), isolated from R. rubiginosum, display activity against MRSA and VRE with MICs ranging from 8.33 to 24.4 μg/mL (Luo-EE, 2024). Rhododaurichromanic acid A (90), derived from R. spinuliferum, exhibits broader antibacterial activity with an MIC of 5.37 μg/mL (Luo et al., 2024).

Aromadendrene (91) demonstrates anti-MRSA activity when combined with 1,8-cineole (Mulyaningsih et al., 2010). The against MRSA and VRE activities of (+)-15, 16-epoxy-8(17), 13(16), 14-labdatriene (93) are 32 μg/mL (Ma et al., 2017). Spinulinoid A-C (94-96), also isolated from R. spinuliferum, demonstrate antibacterial activity against VRE and MRSA with an MIC ranging from 2.7 to 5.37 μg/mL (Luo et al., 2024). E-confluentin (97), Z-confluentin (98), and anthopogochromene C (99), isolated from R. rubiginosum, demonstrate anti-MRSA and anti-VRE activities with MICs between 3.07-18.4 μg/mL (Luo-EE, 2024). Ferruginol (100), 19-hydroxyferruginol (101), sugiol (102), and 6α-hydroxydemethylcryptojaponol (103), isolated from C. trichosphaera, exhibit antimicrobial activity against MRSA and VRE, with MICs ranging from 4 to 32 μg/mL (Lu et al., 2025). Ferruginol (100) has been shown to modulate membrane permeability and fluidity in MRSA, leading to membrane depolarization and subsequent structural disruption (Lu et al., 2025). 14-deoxycoleon U (104), cativic acid (105), and cartrisine B (106), isolated from C. trichosphaera, show against MRSA activities with MIC 16-32 μg/mL (Lu et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2025). Research has found that cartrisine B (106) shows synergistic effects with tetracycline against MDROs (Joshi et al., 2021). A series of 16β-hydro-ent-kauran-17,19-dioic acid derivatives (107-110) demonstrate potent anti-MRSA activity, with MICs ranging from 0.12 to 0.5 μg/mL (Yang et al., 2016). Sigesbeckin A (111) and 18-hydroxy-kauran-16-ent-19-oic acid (112), isolated from S. orientalis, show synergistic effects with vancomycin and doxorubicin, respectively (Zhou et al., 2024). Their mechanism involves disruption of bacterial membrane integrity, contributing to their activity against MDROs. Cryptotanshinone (113), przewaquinone (114), and miltirone (115), isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza and S. przewalskii, exhibit broad-spectrum activity against MRSA, MSSA, and VRE, with MICs ranging from 0.9 to 8 μg/mL (Huang-Huan, 2024; Zhong et al., 2021). In addition to antibacterial activity, compounds such as spinulinoids A-C (94-96), confluentins (97-99), 14-deoxycoleon U (104), and miltirone (115) are reported to inhibit the biosynthesis of key biofilm components by down-regulating biofilm-associated genes. Furthermore, cryptotanshinone (113) and przewaquinone (114) inhibit bacterial pyruvate kinase, interfering with energy metabolism in MRSA and MSSA (Zhong et al., 2021). Macrocarpal B (116), isolated from Eucalyptus spp., exhibit anti-MRSA activity with an MIC of 2 μg/mL (Jiang et al., 2025). Additionally, oleanolic acid (117), ursolic acid (118), and betulinic acid (119), obtained from L. polystachyum and C. speciosa, exhibit antimicrobial activity against MRSA, with MICs ranging from 2 to 64 μg/mL (Lei Ming et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021). Olean-9(11),12-dien-3-O-palmitate (120) inhibit the growth of Bacillis subtilis and S. aureus with effective concentrations of 50-75 μg/mL (Zhao et al., 2012). The MIC of anti-C. albicans of prosapogenin CP4 (121), epipachysamine D (141), pachysamine M (142), sarcovagine D (148), and hookerianamides O (149) is 16-30 μg/mL (Duan et al., 2025; Shen et al., 2024; Wen-Biao, 2024). Lupeol (122) inhibits Sporothrix schenckii, Microsporum canis, and Aspergillus fumigatus with MICs 12-93.5 μg/mL (Kgosiemang et al., 2025). Additionally, α-amyrin (123) and β-amyrin (124) inhibit Candida krusei and C. albicans with MIC 30-125 μg/mL. These compounds show great capacity to resist pathogenic fungi of both animal and plant origin (Johann et al., 2007; Kgosiemang et al., 2025). The MIC of anti-MRSA or VRE of 3β-friedelinol (125), friedelin (126), celastrol (128), wilforol A (129), regeol C (130), 6-ethanoltriptohypol C (131), orthosphenic acid (132) ranges from 2 to 32 μg/mL (Ogunnusi et al., 2010). Betulin (127) can clear MRSA biofilms with less likely to cause drug-resistance in bacterial (Zhou et al., 2021).

The MIC of 3, 4-seco-cycloartane derivatives 1 (133), lithocarpic acid D (134), lithocarpic acid F (135), coccinetane B (136), lithocarpic acids I (137), against various bacteria (S. aureus, S. epidermidis, M. luteus, B. subtilis) ranges from 3.1 to 32 μg/mL (Fan et al., 2016; Tian-Tian, 2020). The MIC of anti-MRSA of 6α-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-quinovopyranosyl]-(25S)-5α-spirostan-3β-ol (138) is 4 μg/mL (Shi, Y.-Z. et al., 2024). Wattigenin C (139) inhibits Rhizopus stolonifera with the rate of 90%. Additionally, (25R, S)-ruscogenin (140) shows anti-VRE activity with an MIC of 10 μg/mL.

Alkaloids

Alkaloids represent one of the most important elements in plant secondary metabolites, with many alkaloids showing excellent antibacterial activity. A series of alkaloids, such as the 6-acetonyl-dihydronitid-ine (143), 6-acetonyl-dihydrofagaridine (144), 6-acetonyl-dihydrochelerythrine (145), dihydrochelerythrine (146), schinifoline (151), γ-fagarine (152), and neoechinulin A (153) have been isolated from the Zanthoxylum genus, exhibiting anti-MRSA activity with MICs ranging from 8 to 128 μg/mL (Ombito, 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Among them, compound (143-145) exhibits antibacterial activity against S. aureus with MIC 8-16 μg/mL and were found to inhibit efflux pumps of MRSA (Zeng et al., 2022). The compound γ-sanshoöl (147) also shows antibacterial activity against C. albicans with an MIC of 32 μg/mL; it can destroy the biofilm of fungi (Ma et al., 2022). Antofine (150), isolated from C. forrestii, shows antibacterial activity against Penicillium, E. coli and MRSA, with MIC ranging from 3 to 10 μg/mL (Qu et al., 2013).

Other Metabolites

In addition to the plant NPs discussed above, notable antibacterial and antifungal activities against MDROs and C. albicans have also been identified in several other compound classes, including fatty acids, phenylpropanoids, phyto-oxylipins, and miscellaneous metabolites (see Table 3 for details). Phenylpropanoid, isolated from A. tatarinowii and O. gratissimum, shows anti-MRSA and C. albicans activities with an MIC of 100 μg/mL. Heptacosan-1-ol (154), isolated from E. royleana, shows anti-fungal activity against C. albicans with MIC 15 μg/mL (Salehi et al., 2019). Siegeooxvlipin A-G (155-160), a compound of oxylipins isolated from S. orientalis, shows anti-MRSA activities, with an MIC ranging from 4-8 μg/mL (Zhou et al., 2025). These compounds functions as anionic surfactant, contributing to bacterial membrane disruption.

Mechanisms of plant-derived NPs against MRSA, VRE, and C. albicans

O-Coumaric acid (1) inhibits the expression of the T3SS gene in MRSA, thereby suppressing the biofilm synthesis pathway (Abdelkhalek et al., 2018). The antibacterial mechanism of antibiotics is to inhibit cell wall and protein synthesis, interfere with nucleic acid metabolism, and damage the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria (Eliuz et al., 2022). These antibacterial mechanisms can easily lead to bacterial resistance. In this article, β-asarone (4), morusin (20), gambogic acid (23), neogambogic acid (24), kuwanon O (43), 4-hydroxyboesenbergin B (49), 8-hydroxycannabinol (51), cannabinol (52), 5-Dodecyl-1,3-benzenediol (63), ellagic acid (73), capitachromenic acid E (87), rhododaurichromanic acid A (90), (+)-15,16-Epoxy-8(17),13(16),14-labdatriene (93), spinulinoid A-B (94, 95), E-confluentin (97), Z-confluentin (98),anthopogochromene C (99), macrocarpal B (116), ursolic acid (118), betulin (127), wilforol A (129), regeol C (130), grifolic (145), γ-sanshoöl (147), schinifoline (151), and γ-fagarine (152) are included. They demonstrate the ability to inhibit the biofilm formation and disrupt formed biofilms of MDROs, particularly MRSA, VRE, and C. albicans (shown in Figure 3) (Tang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024; Zhu et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2024).

Figure 3: Figure 3: Chemical structures of morellic acid, tripterhyponoid A, oleanolic acid, and cativic acid. Synergistic antibiotics and their antibacterial mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Yunnan University, from (Construction and activity screening for the multicomponent library of medicine plant resources, and study on anti-VRE activity of Morellic acid) and (Structural optimization and against drug-resistant bacteria of natural flavonoids, triterpenes, and phloroglucinls).

4-Hydroxyboesenbergin B (49) inhibits the expression of AtlA, SgrA, GelE, and Ace-key genes involved in biofilm formation in VRE-and exhibits anti-VRE activity without promoting drug resistance (Ma et al., 2017). Sevral plant-derived compounds, including xanthotoxin (17), morusin (20), morellic acid (22), pentagalloylglucose (72), cannabidivarin (81), cannabigerol (82), cannabichromenic acid (84), cannabidiolic acid (85), ferruginol (100), 19-hydroxyferruginol (101), sugiol (102), 14-deoxycoleon U (104), cativic acid (105), macrocarpal B (116), ursolic acid (118), 1,8-cineole (123), 3β-friedelinol (125), (25R, S)-ruscogenin (140), and siegeooxvlipin A-G (155-160) act primarily on bacterial membranes, including the inner membrane, outer membrane, and plasma membrane. And they alter membrane permeability, damage membrane structure, inhibit membrane function, and disrupt bacterial appearance, thereby exerting activity against MDROs (Tang et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2025; Zhu et al., 2024).

Phloretin (44) targets and inhibits the pathogenic factor SrtB, thereby preventing the formation in Gram-negative bacterial (Shang et al., 2022; Wang, G. et al., 2018). Cannabidiol (83) interferes with bacterial cell division by stimulating diaphragm formation and suppressing the expression of the essential division gene ezrA, showing MIC values of 4-8 μg/mL against MRSE, Listeria monocytogenes, and Enterococcus faecalis (Schofs et al., 2021). Oleanolic acid (117) inhibits the expression of bacterial resistance proteins, including NDM-1, H1a, and β-lactamases, and exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial activity (Yong-Lin, 2021). Celastrol (128) suppresses deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis by binding to P5CDH in MRSA (Yuan et al., 2023).

Oleanolic acid (117) and prosapogenin CP4 (121) exhibit synergistic antifungal activity against fungi by inhibiting the fungal cell wall synthesis pathway (Wen-Biao, 2024). These two compounds, along with sarcovagine D (148), demonstrate potent activity against C. albicans and are less likely to cause drug resistance (Shen et al., 2024). Sarcovagine D (148) disrupts mitochondrial membrane potential and induces ROS generation, ultimately promoting the death of C. albicans (Shen et al., 2024).

CONCLUSION

This paper reviews the botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, ethnobotanical applications, and antimicrobial activities of 32 ethnic medicinal plants from Yunnan. Current research primarily centers on the pharmacological activities of crude extracts or fractions. While known bioactive constituents include terpenoids, flavonoids, alkaloids, and polyphenols, the discovery of novel active compounds remains limited and requires further investigation. It is also evident that there is a lack of research methodologies integrating traditional usage, standard practices of bioactive ingredients isolation, and evaluation against MDROs. The mechanisms underlying their antimicrobial actions have not been fully elucidated. Although some studies have examined the mechanisms of action of plant-derived NPs against MRSA, VRE, and C. albicans, such investigations remain relatively superficial. Fewer than 10% of the previous studies have proposed potential molecular targets or pathways, as revealed by metabolomic, transcriptomic, and network pharmacology analysis. Comprehensive methodological frameworks to explore the mechanisms of plant NPs against MRSA, VRE, and C. albicans are still wanted. These mechanisms need to be validated using molecular biology techniques such as Western blotting, gene knockout, and gene over-expression.

Moreover, the currently available murine models of MRSA, VRE, and C. albicans infections are limited, making it difficult to fully simulate such clinical infections. This hampers research into the distribution and efficacy of bioactive compounds within infected tissues. There is also a need to improve administrative routes and develop targeted drug delivery strategies. To date, few studies have reported the in vivo pharmacological effects and tissue distribution of these active compounds. Additionally, many plant NPs effective against MRSA, VRE, and C. albicans exhibit poor solubility, permeability, and selectivity. Optimizing and synthesizing new derivatives with enhanced antibacterial efficacy and low toxicity against MDROs is likely to be a key direction for future research.

Currently, the clinical management of MDRO infections often involves combination therapies. Numerous plant-derived NPs have demonstrated strong synergistic effects when paired with existing antibiotics. This strategy of “drug repurposing” not only reduces the risk and cost associated with new drug development but also provides a practical solution to address the escalating issue of MDROs infections, which represents a major breakthrough in overcoming challenges of current antimicrobial drug development. Soon, combinations of plant-derived NPs and antibiotics hold significant potential for clinical translation and market application.

In the future, interdisciplinary collaboration among phytochemists, synthetic chemists, pharmacologists, and artificial intelligence researchers will be essential for the efficient screening, discovery, and development of the next generation of anti-MDRO therapeutics.