Review

Comparative Effectiveness of Myo-Inositol and Carnitine in the Management of Hyperinsulinemic Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

1, 1, 1, 1★, 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, 3, 1, 1★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  2. 2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry,, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  3. 3Department of Pharmacology, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  4. 4Innospecs Bioresearch private Limited, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  5. 5Clinical Research Department, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Jayasutha Jayram

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

jayasuthaj@sriramachandra.edu.in

Received: 15-05-2026; Revised: 23-07-2026; Accepted: 18-09-2026.

Volume 17, Issue 1 · pp. 168–176 · 2027 · DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.20270199

View on IJPI original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia playing key roles in its development. Although metformin is widely used to improve insulin sensitivity, its gastrointestinal side effects have increased interest in alternative therapies such as Myo-Inositol (MI) and L-carnitine. This review compares the mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and safety of MI and L-carnitine in the management of hyperinsulinemic PCOS. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, including Randomised Controlled Trials and mechanistic studies published from 2000 to 2024. Relevant evidence assessing the efficacy and safety of Myo-inositol and L-carnitine in PCOS were analyzed. MI functions as a crucial mediator of insulin signaling and helps restore insulin sensitivity, improve ovarian function, and regulate ovulation by maintaining the ovarian myo-inositol to D-chiro-inositol balance. L-carnitine enhances mitochondrial fatty acid transport and β-oxidation, improves energy metabolism, and reduces oxidative stress. Clinical studies have shown that both supplements significantly lower fasting insulin levels, improve insulin resistance, and reduce hyperandrogenic symptoms. MI demonstrates greater benefits in improving ovulation, menstrual regularity, and fertility-related outcomes, while L-carnitine appears more effective in promoting weight loss, reducing body mass index, and improving metabolic parameters. Overall, both MI and L-carnitine are safe and promising therapeutic options for women with hyperinsulinemic PCOS, although further large-scale studies are needed to determine optimal treatment approaches.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a common and heterogeneous endocrine disorder affecting 5-21% of women of reproductive age, characterized by ovulatory dysfunction, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovarian morphology (Azziz et al., 2016; Joham et al., 2022). As a result, single approaches to treatment are not generally adequate for management of all cases. One of the many mechanisms involved in PCOS is insulin resistance (Zhao et al., 2023). Hyperinsulinemia promotes ovarian androgen production and reduces Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) levels, leading to increased circulating bioactive androgens (Dutta et al., 2025). Women with insulin-resistant PCOS are commonly treated with metformin; however, naturally occurring insulin sensitizers have gained attention due to their ability to improve insulin sensitivity with better tolerability and additional metabolic and reproductive benefits (Shaharyar et al., 2026).

Myo-inositol and L-carnitine are naturally occurring compounds that are often reduced in women with PCOS and may help improve insulin sensitivity and metabolic function (Facchinetti et al., 2020; Unfer et al., 2017). This review compares the metabolic, hormonal, and reproductive effects of myo-inositol and L-carnitine in hyperinsulinemic PCOS.

METHODOLOGY

This study is a comprehensive narrative review comparing Myo-inositol and L-carnitine for managing hyper insulinemic Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus for RCTs, mechanistic studies published between 2004 and 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the efficacy safety, or mechanisms of either supplement in PCOS patients, with data extraction focusing study characteristics, intervention details, outcomes (metabolic, hormonal, reproductive, anthropometric), and safety profiles.

INSULIN RESISTANCE AND HYPERINSULINEMIA IN PCOS: MECHANISTIC OVERVIEW

Post-receptor Insulin Signaling Defects

In PCOS, impaired IRS-1/PI3K/AKT signaling causes insulin resistance, while the MAPK/ERK pathway remains active, promoting ovarian cell proliferation and androgen production (Herman et al., 2023; Qi et al., 2025). Insulin increases ovarian androgen production by stimulating StAR protein and CYP17A1 activity in theca cells, resulting in hyperandrogenemia (Hajam et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023).

Inositol Metabolism and the DCI Paradox

In PCOS, altered Myo-Inositol (MI) and D-Chiro-Inositol (DCI) metabolism contributes to insulin resistance, with MI supporting glucose uptake via GLUT4 and DCI promoting glycogen synthesis (Roseff & Montenegro, 2020; Sortino et al., 2017). In PCOS, insulin decreases epimerase activity in peripheral tissues but increases it in the ovary, disrupting the normal MI:DCI balance and reducing the follicular fluid ratio from about 100:1 to as low as 0.2:1 (Kalra et al., 2016; Petrillo et al., 2022). Excess DCI in the ovary impairs aromatase activity and FSH signaling, leading to ovarian dysfunction, a phenomenon known as the DCI paradox that supports the use of myo-inositol supplementation in PCOS (Figure 1) (Eini et al., 2022).

Figure 1: The DCI paradox: Inositol dysmetabolism in PCOS. Shows the DCI paradox side-by-side: Hexamers and its downstream consequences.

Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress

Mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress contribute to insulin resistance in PCOS, characterized by elevated reactive oxygen species and reduced antioxidant defenses (Deer et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025). Mitochondrial dysfunction impairs fatty acid β-oxidation, promoting lipotoxicity and reduced insulin signaling, providing a rationale for the therapeutic use of L-carnitine in PCOS (Römer et al., 2021).

MYO-INOSITOL: MECHANISMS AND CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Biochemistry and Mechanisms of Action

Myo-inositol is a naturally occurring molecule that acts as a key secondary messenger in insulin and FSH signaling, linking metabolic and reproductive functions in PCOS (Su et al., 2025). Myo-inositol is a naturally occurring compound that serves as a key component of cell signaling pathways, acting as a secondary messenger in insulin and FSH signaling and thereby linking metabolism and reproduction in PCOS (Jiang et al., 2026). Myo-inositol improves insulin sensitivity by activating AMPK and supports ovulation by enhancing FSH signaling, aromatase expression, and estrogen production in ovarian follicles (Dutta et al., 2023). The therapeutic effectiveness of myo-inositol in PCOS depends on maintaining an appropriate MI:DCI ratio, with a 40:1 ratio widely used to restore metabolic and reproductive function without worsening the DCI paradox (Roseff & Montenegro, 2020).

Clinical Evidence: Metabolic Outcomes

The effect of MI on the body in women with PCOS who have insulin levels has been studied in many clinical trials and analyzed in several reviews. One big review that looked at 9 trials with 247 women with PCOS and 249 women without PCOS found that taking MI supplements lowered fasting insulin levels and improved how the body uses insulin. This review showed that MI supplements made a difference in insulin levels and how the body uses insulin. Women who took MI also had testosterone levels and higher levels of a protein that helps reduce the effects of male hormones (Sharon et al., 2024).

A big clinical trial with 196 women with PCOS compared taking metformin to taking metformin and MI together. The trial found that taking metformin and MI together worked better than taking metformin to improve how the body uses insulin. More women who took both metformin and MI showed improvement than women who took metformin. This suggests that MI can be an addition to the medication’s women with PCOS are already taking rather, than something they take by itself (Ravn et al., 2022).

The effect of inositol on PCOS was examined in this review. It was discovered that inositol enhanced ovulation, helped control cycles, and reduced insulin resistance. The research, however, differed from one another. Many were little, making it challenging to make firm judgements (Fitz et al., 2024). At a daily dose of 4 g, inositol is well tolerated. According to research, taking more than 4 g daily does not improve insulin resistance. Doses up to 12 g daily have been used in studies without any negative effects. Nausea and loose stools are among the stomach problems that some people have noticed, but they are typically transient (DiNicolantonio & O’Keefe, 2022).

Clinical Evidence: Reproductive Outcomes

MI has many advantages for PCOS-affected women, particularly in terms of assisting in conception. MI performs several tasks. It improves the body's utilisation of insulin. It immediately affects the ovaries as well. According to certain research, women with PCOS can benefit greatly from taking MI daily for six months. It can lower the level of a hormone called luteinizing hormone. It can also help women get their periods back on track. In fact, sixty eight percent of women who took MI got their periods back to normal (Unfer et al., 2017). MI is also helpful for women who are using treatments to get pregnant like in vitro fertilization. It can help make the eggs healthier and improve the chances of getting pregnant. Some doctors think that women should start taking MI least three months before they try to get pregnant with in vitro fertilization. MI is also good for women with PCOS who are not trying to get pregnant away. It can be used with medicines like birth control pills to help control the symptoms of PCOS. This is because MI and birth control pills work well together to help women with PCOS feel better and be healthier. The International Evidence-based PCOS Guidelines recommend that women with PCOS take MI for least three months before they try to get pregnant. This gives the body time to respond to the MI and get ready, for pregnancy (Mashhadi et al., 2025).

L-CARNITINE: MECHANISMS AND CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Biochemistry and Mechanisms of Action

L-carnitine is a substance that our body makes from other things like lysine and methionine. The kidney, liver and brain are the places where this happens. L-carnitine plays a role in helping our body use fat for energy. It does this by moving acids into the part of our cells where energy is made called the mitochondria (Thakur et al., 2022). L-carnitine supports fatty acid metabolism, prevents lipid accumulation, improves mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity, and reduces oxidative stress and inflammation in PCOS (Virmani & Cirulli, 2022). L-carnitine regulates energy metabolism and inflammation, supporting weight management, reducing androgen levels, improving fertility, and enhancing insulin sensitivity in women with PCOS (Alhasaniah, 2023).

Clinical Evidence: Metabolic Outcomes

Clinical studies suggest that L-carnitine supplementation can improve body weight, BMI, and metabolic parameters in women with PCOS, although its effects may vary depending on the dose and duration of treatment (Talari et al., 2019a, 2019b). Studies indicate that L-carnitine improves glycemic control and insulin resistance, with its effectiveness influenced by dosage, treatment duration, and body mass index (Gheysari et al., 2024). In women with PCOS, L-carnitine has been shown to improve blood glucose levels, reduce insulin resistance, and promote weight loss, with some studies suggesting greater effects on BMI reduction than several other nutritional supplements (Mohd Shukri et al., 2022).

Clinical Evidence: Reproductive and Fertility Outcomes

The use of L-carnitine in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or PCOS is very helpful in the field of medicine. A study that looked at other studies called a systematic review and meta-analysis was published in 2023 in the journal Clin Endocrinol. This study found that L-carnitine has an effect on fertility outcomes in women with PCOS. It helps women with PCOS to ovulate regularly and gets better results for clinical pregnancies. It also helps with metabolic problems (Salehpour et al., 2019). The way L-carnitine works is easy to understand. To grow follicles in the ovaries a lot of energy is needed. In women with PCOS the cells that help follicles grow do not work well because of many male hormones, oxidative stress and inflammation (Abu-Zaid et al., 2025). L-carnitine helps these cells work better by making them more efficient at using energy. L-carnitine also helps the cells in the ovaries to live and work better. It keeps the mitochondria which're like the powerhouses of the cells working well. This all helps to create an environment for the follicles in the ovaries to grow. Some women with PCOS do not respond to a medicine called clomiphene (Agarwal et al., 2018). In this case, adding L-carnitine to the treatment can really help. It improves the chances of getting pregnant helps with blood sugar control and improves the levels of fats in the blood. All of these things are very helpful for women, with PCOS who are having trouble getting pregnant (Hafezi et al., 2024).

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS: MYO-INOSITOL VERSUS L-CARNITINE

Insulin Resistance and Glycemic Control

In women with hyperinsulinemic PCOS, both MI and L-carnitine result in clinically significant improvements in HOMA-IR and fasting insulin; nevertheless, their efficacy is determined by mechanistically different processes. By re-establishing inositol phosphoglycan signalling, MI directly replicates the molecular effects of insulin on GLUT4 translocation and glycogen formation, thereby addressing insulin resistance at the post-receptor second-messenger level. It is consequently a PCOS-targeted rather than a general insulin sensitiser because its effects are most noticeable in the context of inositol deficiency-mediated insulin resistance, a condition that is unique to PCOS (Vyas, 2022).

On the other hand, L-carnitine indirectly improves insulin signalling by reducing intracellular lipid buildup, oxidative stress, and inflammation-the origins of lipid-induced insulin resistance. Its glycaemic effects are significant in a number of populations, including those with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, although they are not exclusive to PCOS and most likely reflect general mitochondrial support. This distinction has practical implications: in slim women with PCOS whose insulin resistance is predominantly due to inositol pathway dysregulation rather than lipotoxicity, MI may offer more tailored efficacy. When lipid-mediated insulin resistance predominates in obese or overweight women with PCOS, L-carnitine may provide an extra or superior benefit (Bo et al., 2024).

The most insightful direct comparison to date is found in Liao and colleagues' comparative network meta-analysis. In 41 trials involving 2,362 PCOS patients, carnitine exceeded inositol in lowering body weight and BMI (SUCRA values >96%), chromium outperformed both in lowering HOMA-IR, and omega-3 fatty acids demonstrated the largest reduction in FBG. This ranking emphasises that a single-agent approach may be intrinsically less successful for the entire metabolic syndrome burden of PCOS, and that multiple supplements may be most helpful for distinct metabolic goals (Figure 2) (Hu et al., 2023).

Figure 2: Shows the mechanistic divergence of MI vs L-carnitine converging on the same therapeutic outcome.

Androgen Excess and Hormonal Parameters

Because hyperinsulinemia is the primary cause of ovarian androgen overproduction, both MI and L-carnitine have the ability to lessen hyperandrogenism in PCOS. The paths to this common endpoint, however, differ mechanistically. By balancing the intraovarian MI:DCI ratio, reducing excessive DCI-mediated theca cell androgenesis, and increasing FSH-stimulated aromatase activity in granulosa cells to favour oestradiol over androgen synthesis, MI more directly restores the ovarian steroidogenic environment (Baptiste et al., 2010; Barbieri & Hornstein, 1988). Increases in SHBG and decreases in free and total testosterone are the results of these effects, especially when MI treatment lasts longer than 24 weeks. By reducing oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, L-carnitine inhibits the pro-inflammatory and hyperandrogenic environment within the ovary (Simons et al., 2021). Carnitine supplementation dramatically reduces DHEAS and free testosterone, according to clinical studies. The inositol-mediated FSH signalling pathway, which is notably disturbed in PCOS, is not directly modulated by L-carnitine mechanistically, which may account for why MI exhibits more robust and consistent effects on ovarian function and fertility in comparative assessments (Koohpeyma et al., 2022).

Body Weight and Anthropometric Outcomes

One area where L-carnitine definitely surpasses MI clinically is body composition and anthropometric outcomes. Across all trials, carnitine supplementation significantly reduces body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and hip circumference in PCOS patients. This is consistent with carnitine's fundamental role in increasing mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and its ensuing effects on energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate, and lean body mass preservation (Samimi et al., 2016). Although MI has been found in certain studies to result in modest weight reduction, it does not exhibit the same amount of adiposity-targeted effect. In these situations, weight loss enhances ovulatory function, androgen levels, and insulin sensitivity via distinct pathways (Sangouni et al., 2022).

Safety, tolerability, and Practical Considerations

According to clinical research, MI has not resulted in any significant side effects at doses up to 12 g/day, and at the typical therapeutic dose of 4 g/day, there are seldom any significant side effects other from the sporadic mild gastrointestinal complaint (Brown & Wright, 2020). L-carnitine is also well tolerated at doses of 250-3,000 mg/day. A fishy body smell brought on by metabolic conversion to trimethylamine is the most commonly reported adverse effect, which varies based on formulation and dosage (Rocher et al., 2011). Practically speaking, both are readily available as over-the-counter dietary supplements, are well-liked by patients, and don't need to be monitored in a lab like pharmaceutical insulin sensitisers like metformin do (Ortiz-Flores et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2024).

Combination Therapy: Evidence and Rationale

A strong theoretical foundation for combination therapy is created by the molecular complementarity of MI and L-carnitine, one of which functions at the insulin second-messenger level within the phosphoinositide cascade and the other at the level of mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism and oxidative stress. This theory is directly addressed by an ongoing RCT (NCT07266259) that compares levocarnitine + MI versus MI alone in subfertile women with insulin -resistant PCOS. The primary and secondary endpoints being measured are HOMA-IR, LH: FSH ratio, and testosterone, and AMH (Zhang et al., 2026). A parallel trial examining acetyl-L-carnitine with MI and D-chiro-inositol (NCT05767515) further supports the growing clinical interest in these combinations. Such combinations may address complementary aspects of PCOS pathophysiology, accordingly to early mechanistic data: carnitine reduces the lipotoxic and pro-oxidant environment that independently sustains insulin resistance and ovarian dysfunction, while MI restores inositol-mediated insulin signalling (Clinical TrIALS, 2026). Clinicians may rationally consider sequential or combination supplementation strategies guided by phenotypic characteristics-particularly BMI, the degree of insulin resistance, the predominant symptom burden, and fertility goals-until solid head-to-head comparative data from adequately powered trials are available (Gómez-Peralta et al., 2024) (Table 1).

Table 1: Rationale for Combination Therapy.
FeatureMyo-inositol (MI)L-CarnitineCombined effectReferences
Target PathwayInsulin signalingFatty acid metabolismMulti-level action(Zhang et al., 2026)
MechanismSecond messenger (IPG)Mitochondrial β-oxidationComplementary(Zhang et al., 2026)
Insulin resistanceDirect effectIndirect effectSynergistic improvement(Clinical TrIALS, 2026)
Reproductive roleImproves ovarian signalingSupports Mitochondrial functionBetter follicular environment(Clinical TrIALS, 2026)
Metabolic effectMildStrong (weight/BMI)Balanced benefit(Gómez-Peralta et al., 2024)
EvidenceStrong (reproductive)Strong (metabolic)Emerging (RCTs ongoing)(Gómez-Peralta et al., 2024)

PHENOTYPE-DIRECTED THERAPEUTIC CONSIDERATIONS

From the comparative evidence reviewed, several phenotype-stratified recommendations can be proposed, with the caveat that high-quality head-to-head trial data are currently insufficient to support absolute recommendations over empirical clinical judgment (Elsayed et al., 2023; Sachdeva et al., 2019). The data most clearly supports MI as the first-line nutraceutical strategy for slim women with PCOS (BMI < 25 kg/m²) who typically present with ovulatory dysfunction, subfertility, and high HOMA-IR without considerable adiposity (Gudović et al., 2024). The standard dose of MI 4 g/day (alone or in a 40:1 ratio with DCI) for a minimum of 3-6 months is recommended, with MI-DCI supplementation initiated at least 3 months before assisted reproduction procedures (Yang et al., 2024).

Given its improved benefits on body weight, BMI, and broader glycaemic indicators, L-carnitine (2,000-3,000 mg/day) may be especially helpful in overweight or obese women with PCOS (BMI≥25 kg/m²) who have considerable insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and weight-related comorbidities (Pakravanfar et al., 2020). Co-administration with MI in this phenotype is a logical approach to concurrently address the lipotoxic component of insulin resistance and the inositol pathway malfunction, and it ought to be investigated further in clinical trials with sufficient power. The addition of L-carnitine to ovulation induction procedures has shown benefits in clinical pregnancy rates for women with PCOS and clomiphene-resistant infertility, and it should be included in institutional algorithms (Hidalgo-Lozada et al., 2024). Combination treatments with metformin are still therapeutically important for women with severe insulin resistance or PCOS-associated metabolic syndrome, where nutraceutical monotherapy may not be adequate (Saadati et al., 2025; Zeng et al., 2025) (Table 2).

Table 2: Phenotype-Stratified Treatment Selection in PCOS.
ParameterLean PCOS (BMI<25)Overweight/Obese PCOS (BMI≥25)References
Dominant mechanismInositol pathway defectLipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction(Elsayed et al., 2023; Sachdeva et al., 2019)
Preferred agentMyo-inositol (MI)L-carnitine(Gudović et al., 2024)
Key actionImproves insulin signaling (PI3K/AKT, GLUT4)Enhances β-oxidation; reduces fat accumulation(Yang et al., 2024)
Main benefitOvulation and cycle regulationWeight loss and metabolic improvement(Pakravanfar et al., 2020)
Best useInfertility, ovulatory dysfunctionObesity-associated metabolic PCOS(Hidalgo-Lozada et al., 2024)
StrategyMI±metforminL-carnitine±MI(Saadati et al., 2025; Zeng et al., 2025)

LIMITATIONS OF THE EVIDENCE BASE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Even while the clinical evidence for MI and L-carnitine in PCOS is increasing, there are still a number of significant methodological issues that restrict the quality of the conclusions that can be made. Small sample sizes (usually 30-100 participants per arm), brief treatment periods (8-24 weeks), considerable variation in diagnostic criteria (Rotterdam versus Androgen Excess Society criteria), baseline BMI, co-interventions (dietary modification and lifestyle counselling), and outcome measurement techniques are characteristics of most individual trials. It is impossible to rule out publication bias favouring favourable findings (Alesi et al., 2022). Direct head-to-head comparative trials between MI and L-carnitine are virtually non-existent, and the existing network meta-analyses, while providing indirect comparative estimates, are subject to the assumptions inherent in network analysis methodology (“American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,”, 2026). Neither medication's long-term metabolic effects, such as preventing the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, have been sufficiently assessed in PCOS-specific populations (Harrison et al., 2024).

Future research priorities should include: (1) large-scale, sufficiently powered, multi-center RCTs comparing MI versus L-carnitine versus their combination versus placebo, stratified by phenotypic characteristics and BMI; (2) mechanistic biomarker studies examining inositol phosphoglycan levels, acylcarnitine profiles, and mitochondrial function markers as predictors of differential treatment response; (3) long-term (12-24 month) follow-up studies assessing sustained metabolic and reproductive effects; (4) determining the ideal MI:DCI ratio in women with varying degrees of insulin resistance; and (5) investigating metformin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and lifestyle interventions in the context of precision medicine approaches to PCOS (Kong et al., 2025).

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in PCOS, MI and L-carnitine are both scientifically sound, mechanistically different, and clinically validated treatment alternatives (Houston & Templeman, 2025; Zhang et al., 2025). Because of its essential function in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation as well as its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory qualities, L-carnitine has wider metabolic effects, most notably on body weight and adiposity, which are especially helpful in the overweight or obese PCOS phenotype (Placidi et al., 2022; Xiang et al., 2025). Their molecular synergy provides a solid basis for combination approaches deserving of more clinical investigation, and the two drugs are complementary rather than competitive. Until high-quality head-to-head comparison trial data are available, treatment decisions should be based on phenotypic features, metabolic severity, and reproductive priorities (Bakr et al., 2025; Lehár et al., 2009; Roy et al., 2026).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors sincerely thank the management of Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, for their continuous encouragement and support throughout this work.

ABBREVATIONS

AMH
Anti-Müllerian Hormone
BMI
Body Mass Index
DCI
D-Chiro-Inositol
DCI-IPG
D-Chiro-Inositol Phosphoglycan
DHEAS
Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate
ERK
Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase
FSH
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
GLP-1
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1
GLUT4
Glucose Transporter Type 4
HbA1C
Glycated Hemoglobin
HOMA-IR
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance
IVF
In vitro Fertilization
ICSI
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
IRS-1
Insulin Receptor Substrate-1
IPG
Inositol Phosphoglycan
LH
Luteinizing Hormone
MAPK
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
MI
Myo-Inositol
MI-IPG
Myo-Inositol Phosphoglycan
PCOS
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
PI3K
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase
RCT
Randomized Controlled Trial
ROS
Reactive Oxygen Species
SHBG
Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin
StAR
Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein
SUCRA
Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION

Harini Vinayagam: Collection and/or assembly of data; Data analysis and interpretation; Writing the article. Ritikasri Venkatraju: Collection and/or assembly of data; Data analysis and interpretation; Writing the article. Sneha Raja: Data analysis and interpretation; Writing the article. Jayasutha Jayram: Research concept and design; Critical revision of the article; Final approval of the article. Sujatha Kuppusamy: Critical revision of the article; Final approval of the article. Divya Varshini Natarajan: Writing the article. Rajeswari Jagadeesan: Writing the article, Janeviennygrace: Writing the article, Roshini Nivetha: Writing the article, Sudharshan Antony Raj: Writing the article, Nandhakumar Kannan: Writing the article, Sruthika Natarajan: Writing the article.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Abu-Zaid, A.; Alghamdi, G. A.; Alharbi, A. S.; Baradwan, S.; Saleh, S. A. K. et al. Effect of L-carnitine supplementation on fertility outcomes among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 2025;68(4):260–272. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.24272CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Agarwal, A.; Sengupta, P.; Durairajanayagam, D.. Role of L-carnitine in female infertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2018;16(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0323-4CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Alesi, S.; Ee, C.; Moran, L. J.; Rao, V.; Mousa, A.. Nutritional Supplements and Complementary Therapies in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Advances in Nutrition. 2022;13(4):1243–1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab141CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Alhasaniah, A. H.. l-carnitine: Nutrition, pathology, and health benefits. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2023;30(2):103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103555CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2026;119(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70201CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Azziz, R.; Carmina, E.; Chen, Z.; Dunaif, A.; Laven, J. S. E. et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2016;2(1):16057. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.57CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Bakr, A.; Basem, Y.; Sherif, A.; Ata, A.; Saad, N. N. et al. Tailored Therapeutic Strategies for Fetuses, Neonates, Pediatrics, Geriatrics, Athletes, and Critical Cases in the Era of Personalized Medicine. Diseases. 2025;14(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14010012CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Baptiste, C. G.; Battista, M.-C.; Trottier, A.; Baillargeon, J.-P.. Insulin and hyperandrogenism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2010;122(1-3):42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.12.010CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Barbieri, R. L.; Hornstein, M. D.. Hyperinsulinemia and ovarian hyperandrogenism. Cause and effect. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America. 1988;17(4):685–703.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Bo, T.; Gao, L.; Yao, Z.; Shao, S.; Wang, X. et al. Hepatic selective insulin resistance at the intersection of insulin signaling and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Cell Metabolism. 2024;36(5):947–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2024.04.006CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Brown, B.; Wright, C.. Safety and efficacy of supplements in pregnancy. Nutrition Reviews. 2020;78(10):813–826. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz101CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Clinical TrIALS.. The Effects of Acetyl-L-Carnitine and Myo/​Chiro-Inositol in Patients With PCOS (PCOS). 2026.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Deer, E.; LaMarca, B.; Reckelhoff, J. F.; Shawky, N. M.; Edwards, K.. The Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Women’s Reproductive Disorders: Implications for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Preeclampsia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025;26(13):6439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136439CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.DiNicolantonio, J. J.; H O’Keefe, J.. Myo-inositol for insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome and gestational diabetes. Open Heart. 2022;9(1):e001989. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-001989CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P.; Rao, S.; Elgarawany, G. E.; Samrot, A. V. et al. Targeting Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Pathophysiology with Flavonoids: From Adipokine-Cytokine Crosstalk to Insulin Resistance and Reproductive Dysfunctions. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(10):1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18101575CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Dutta, S.; Shah, R. B.; Singhal, S.; Dutta, S. B.; Bansal, S.; Sinha, S. et al. Metformin: A Review of Potential Mechanism and Therapeutic Utility Beyond Diabetes. Drug design, development and therapy. 2023;17:1907–1932. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S409373CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Eini, F.; kutenaei, M. A.; Foroutan, T.; Salehi, E.. High levels of follicular fluid testosterone could impair oocyte developmental competency via affecting aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway in PCOS patients. BMC Molecular and Cell Biology. 2022;23(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-022-00449-yCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Elsayed, A. M.; Al-Kaabi, L. S.; Al-Abdulla, N. M.; Al-Kuwari, M. S.; Al-Mulla, A. A. et al. Clinical Phenotypes of PCOS: a Cross-Sectional Study. Reproductive Sciences. 2023;30(11):3261–3272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01262-4CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Facchinetti, F.; Unfer, V.; Dewailly, D.; Kamenov, Z. A.; Diamanti-Kandarakis, E. et al. Inositols in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Overview on the Advances. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2020;31(6):435–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2020.02.002CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Fitz, V.; Graca, S.; Mahalingaiah, S.; Liu, J.; Lai, L. et al. Inositol for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Inform the 2023 Update of the International Evidence-based PCOS Guidelines. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2024;109(6):1630–1655. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad762CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Gheysari, R.; Nikbaf-Shandiz, M.; Hosseini, A. M.; Rasaei, N. et al. The effects of L-carnitine supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors in participants with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2024;16(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01415-8CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Gómez-Peralta, F.; Pinés-Corrales, P. J.; Santos, E.; Cuesta, M.; González-Albarrán, O.; Azriel, S.. Diabetes Management Based on the Phenotype and Stage of the Disease: An Expert Proposal from the AGORA Diabetes Collaborative Group. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(16):4839. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164839CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Gudović, A.; Bukumirić, Z.; Milincic, M.; Pupovac, M.; Andjić, M. et al. The Comparative Effects of Myo-Inositol and Metformin Therapy on the Clinical and Biochemical Parameters of Women of Normal Weight Suffering from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Biomedicines. 2024;12(2):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020349CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Hafezi, M.; Arabipoor, A.; Ghaffari, F.; Vesali, S.; Zareei, M.; Hessari, Z. H.. Adding L-carnitine to antagonist ovarian stimulation doesn’t improve the outcomes of IVF/ ICSI cycle in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Journal of Ovarian Research. 2024;17(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01319-7CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Hajam, Y.A.; Rather, H.A.; Neelam; Kumar, R.; Basheer, M.; Reshi, M.S.. A Review on Critical Appraisal and Pathogenesis of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Endocrine and Metabolic Science. 2024;14:Article ID: 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endmts.2024.100162CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Harrison, C.; Tay, C. T.; Busby, M. A.; Mousa, A.; Teede, H.; Boivin, J.. Challenges experienced by those with polycystic ovary syndrome in healthcare interactions: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2024;49(4):104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104293CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Herman, R.; Sikonja, J.; Jensterle, M.; Janez, A.; Dolzan, V.. Insulin Metabolism in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Secretion, Signaling, and Clearance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(4):3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043140CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Hidalgo-Lozada, G. M.; Villarruel-López, A.; Nuño, K.; García-García, A.; Sánchez-Nuño, Y. A. et al. Clinically Effective Molecules of Natural Origin for Obesity Prevention or Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(5):2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052671CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Houston, E. J.; Templeman, N. M.. Reappraising the relationship between hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance in PCOS. The Journal of endocrinology. 2025;265(2):e240269. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-24-0269CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Hu, X.; Wang, W.; Su, X.; Peng, H.; Tan, Z.; Li, Y. et al. Comparison of nutritional supplements in improving glycolipid metabolism and endocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2023;11:e16410. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16410CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Jiang, S.; Zhai, L.; Shao, Y.; Sun, F.; Liu, X.. Targeting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway: an important molecular mechanism of herbal medicine in the treatment of MASLD/MASH. Frontiers in nutrition. 2026;12:1743899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1743899CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Joham, A. E.; Norman, R. J.; Stener-Victorin, E.; Legro, R. S.; Franks, S. et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2022;10(9):668–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Kalra, B.; Kalra, S.; Sharma, J.. The inositols and polycystic ovary syndrome. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2016;20(5):720. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.189231CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Kong, Y.; Yang, H.; Nie, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Nian, X.. Berberine as a multi-target therapeutic agent for obesity: from pharmacological mechanisms to clinical evidence. European Journal of Medical Research. 2025;30(1):477. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02738-6CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Koohpeyma, F.; Gholizadeh, F.; Hafezi, H.; Hajiaghayi, M.; Siri, M. et al. The protective effect of L-carnitine on testosterone synthesis pathway, and spermatogenesis in monosodium glutamate-induced rats. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2022;22(1):269. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03749-0CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Lehár, J.; Krueger, A. S.; Avery, W.; Heilbut, A. M.; Johansen, L. M. et al. Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity. Nature Biotechnology. 2009;27(7):659–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1549CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.Liu, H.; Jin, L.; Wang, X.; Shi, J.; He, Y.; Sun, N. et al. Reactive oxygen species in polycystic ovary syndrome: Mechanistic insights into pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities. Redox biology. 2025;85:103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2025.103776CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Mashhadi, F.; Sedghi, Z.; Hemmat, A.; Rivaz, R.; Roudi, F.. Nutritional Interventions for Enhancing Female Fertility: A Comprehensive Review of Micronutrients and Their Impact. Nursing Research and Practice. 2025;2025(1):2137328. https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/2137328CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. 39.Mohd Shukri, M. F.; Norhayati, M. N.; Badrin, S.; Abdul Kadir, A.. Effects of L-carnitine supplementation for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13992. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13992CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. 40.Ortiz-Flores, A. E.; Luque-Ramírez, M.; Escobar-Morreale, H. F.. Pharmacotherapeutic management of comorbid polycystic ovary syndrome and diabetes. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2018;19(17):1915–1926. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2018.1528231CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. 41.Pakravanfar, F.; Ghadiri-Anari, A.; Nadjarzadeh, A.; Fallahzadeh, H.; Hosseinzadeh, M.. The effect of L-carnitine supplementation on weight and body composition in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security. 2020;5(3):282–289. https://doi.org/10.18502/jnfs.v5i3.3801CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  42. 42.Petrillo, T.; Semprini, E.; Tomatis, V.; Arnesano, M.; Ambrosetti, F. et al. Putative Complementary Compounds to Counteract Insulin-Resistance in PCOS Patients. Biomedicines. 2022;10(8):1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081924CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  43. 43.Placidi, M.; Di Emidio, G.; Virmani, A.; D’Alfonso, A.; Artini, P. G. et al. Carnitines as Mitochondrial Modulators of Oocyte and Embryo Bioenergetics. Antioxidants. 2022;11(4):745. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11040745CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  44. 44.Qi, Y.-B.; Yi, P.; Fu, X.-H.. Research progress on insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reproductive and Developmental Medicine. 2025;9(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000131CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  45. 45.Ravn, P.; Gram, F.; Andersen, M. S.; Glintborg, D.. Myoinositol vs. Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Metabolites. 2022;12(12):1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12121183CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  46. 46.Rocher, F.; Caruba, C.; Broly, F.; Lebrun, C.. Traitement par L-Carnitine et mauvaise odeur corporelle : un effet secondaire à connaître. Revue Neurologique. 2011;167(6-7):541–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2010.08.015CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  47. 47.Römer, A.; Linn, T.; Petry, S. F.. Lipotoxic Impairment of Mitochondrial Function in β-Cells: A Review. Antioxidants. 2021;10(2):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020293CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  48. 48.Roseff, S.; Montenegro, M.. Inositol Treatment for PCOS Should Be Science-Based and Not Arbitrary. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2020;2020(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6461254CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  49. 49.Roy, A.; Singh, A. K.; Hazra, S.; Setyawan, H. Y.; Pandit, S.; Muhammad, D. R. A. et al. Contribution of endophytes for combating multi-drug-resistant pathogens–A recent review on novel approaches. Phytomedicine Plus. 2026;6(3):Article 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phyplu.2026.100980CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  50. 50.Saadati, S.; Mason, T.; Godini, R.; Vanky, E.; Teede, H.; Mousa, A.. Metformin use in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): Opportunities, benefits, and clinical challenges. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2025;27(S3):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16422CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  51. 51.Sachdeva, G.; Gainder, S.; Suri, V.; Sachdeva, N.; Chopra, S.. Comparison of the Different PCOS Phenotypes Based on Clinical Metabolic, and Hormonal Profile, and their Response to Clomiphene. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2019;23(3):326–331. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_30_19CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  52. 52.Salehpour, S.; Nazari, L.; Hoseini, S.; Moghaddam, P. B.; Gachkar, L.. Effects of L-carnitine on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2019;23(4):392. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190033CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  53. 53.Samimi, M.; Jamilian, M.; Ebrahimi, F. A.; Rahimi, M.; Tajbakhsh, B.; Asemi, Z.. Expression of Concern : Oral carnitine supplementation reduces body weight and insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Clinical Endocrinology. 2016;84(6):851–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13003CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  54. 54.Sangouni, A. A.; Baghban, F.; Khosravi, M.; Mozaffari-Khosravi, H.; Dehghan, A.; Hosseinzadeh, M.. Effect of L-carnitine supplementation on lipid accumulation product and cardiovascular indices in women with overweight/obesity who have knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Rheumatology. 2022;6(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00286-8CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  55. 55.Shaharyar, A.; Chaudhry, S.; Jha, V.; Bhadada, S. K.; Walia, R.. Beyond Monotherapy: Targeting the triad of insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism and obesity in PCOS. AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes. 2026;13(3):473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aed.2026.02.008CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  56. 56.Sharon P, M.; P, M.; Manivannan, A.; Thangaraj, P.; B M, L.. The Effectiveness of Myo-Inositol in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Study. Cureus. 2024;16(2):e53951. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53951CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  57. 57.Simons, P. I. H. G.; Valkenburg, O.; Bons, J. A. P.; Stehouwer, C. D. A.; Brouwers, M. C. G. J.. The relationships of sex hormone‐binding globulin, total testosterone, androstenedione and free testosterone with metabolic and reproductive features of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. 2021;4(3):e00267. https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.267CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  58. 58.Sortino, M. A.; Salomone, S.; Carruba, M. O.; Drago, F.. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Insights into the Therapeutic Approach with Inositols. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2017;8:341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00341CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  59. 59.Su, X. B.; Fedeli, V.; Liu, G.; Amma, M. M.; Boulasiki, P. et al. Basic features of cellular inositol metabolism as revealed by a newly developed LC-MS method. Biochemical Journal. 2025;482(11):675–690. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20253028CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  60. 60.Talari, H. R.; Azad, Z. J.; Hamidian, Y.; Samimi, M.; Gilasi, H. R. et al. Effects of Carnitine Administration on Carotid Intima-media Thickness and Inflammatory Factors in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019a;10(1):89. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_2_18CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  61. 61.Talari, H. R.; Azad, Z. J.; Hamidian, Y.; Samimi, M.; Gilasi, H. R. et al. Effects of Carnitine Administration on Carotid Intima-media Thickness and Inflammatory Factors in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019b;10(1):89. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_2_18CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  62. 62.Thakur, Y.; Bharti, R.; Sharma, R.. Myths and reality of L-carnitine (3-hydroxy-4-N-trimethylammonium butyrate) supplementation and its chemistry: A systematic review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;48(5):1277–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.287CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  63. 63.Unfer, V.; Facchinetti, F.; Orrù, B.; Giordani, B.; Nestler, J.. Myo-inositol effects in women with PCOS: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine Connections. 2017;6(8):647–658. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0243CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  64. 64.Virmani, M. A.; Cirulli, M.. The Role of l-Carnitine in Mitochondria, Prevention of Metabolic Inflexibility and Disease Initiation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(5):2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052717CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  65. 65.Vyas, L.. Management of polycystic ovary syndrome among Indian women using myo‐inositol and D-chiro-inositol. Bioinformation. 2022;18(2):103–110. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630018103CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  66. 66.Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.. Androgen excess: a hallmark of polycystic ovary syndrome. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1273542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1273542CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  67. 67.Xiang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, J.; Xiong, S.; Yang, C. et al. Comprehensive review of the expanding roles of the carnitine pool in metabolic physiology: beyond fatty acid oxidation. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2025;23(1):324. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06341-5CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  68. 68.Yang, J.; Liang, J.; Xu, J.; Lin, T.; Ye, Q.; Lin, Q. et al. The impact of dietary interventions on polycystic ovary syndrome patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Reproductive medicine and biology. 2024;23(1):e12607. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12607CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  69. 69.Zeng, G.; Lu, X.; Li, P.; Zeng, T.; Lin, Z. et al. Is it feasible to treat polycystic ovarian syndrome with or without insulin resistance using glucokinase activators as novel hypoglycaemic medications? A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024;14(12):e088484. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088484CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  70. 70.Zeng, W.; Luo, Y.; Ou, J.; Gan, D.; Huang, M.; Tomlinson, B. et al. Metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome: unraveling multi-stage therapeutic mechanisms from puberty to long-term health outcomes. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2025;16:1654372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1654372CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  71. 71.Zhang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liao, Y.; Jiang, S. et al. Microbial metabolites in tumor epigenetic regulation. IMeta. 2026;5(1):e70115. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.70115CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  72. 72.Zhang, Y.; Ma, H.; Sun, P.; Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Zhao, W.. Therapeutic targets of L-carnitine against polycystic ovary syndrome and the underlying signaling mechanisms. Medicine. 2025;104(51):e46532. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000046532CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  73. 73.Zhao, H.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, X.; Nie, X.; He, B.. Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome across various tissues: an updated review of pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment. Journal of Ovarian Research. 2023;16(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01091-0CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Vinayagam, H., Venkatraju, R., Raja, S., Jayram, J., Kuppusamy, S., Natarajan, D. V., Jagadeesan, R., Janeviennygrace, Nivetha, R., Raj, S. A., Kannan, N., & Natarajan, S. (2027). Comparative Effectiveness of Myo-Inositol and Carnitine in the Management of Hyperinsulinemic Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 17(1), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20270199