Back

JPP · Lens · Pharmacokinetic Study of Ceftriamidine Sodium for Injection in Chinese Healthy Volunteers

PDF

Article · Volume 17, Issue 4 · pp. 571–578

Pharmacokinetic Study of Ceftriamidine Sodium for Injection in Chinese Healthy Volunteers

Zihan Liu1,2, Ganmi Wang3,4, Ning Chen1,2, Jiarong Wu3,4, Yueyuan You3,4, Fei Qin3,4, Huan Zhou1,2

  1. 1Clinical Trial Research Center of First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China.
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Innovative Pharmaceutical Research and Clinical Evaluation Jointly Constructed by Anhui, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China.
  3. 3Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Pharmacology, Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical Holdings Co., Ltd., Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical General Factory, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
  4. 4Guangdong Key Laboratory for Core Technology of Chemical Raw Materials and Pharmaceutical Formulations, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Abstract

Background: MRSA and PRSP resistance has surged over 30 years, threatening clinical outcomes; China-developed cefathiamidine sodium, with enhanced pharmacokinetics, offers potent activity against these Gram-positive pathogens. Objectives: This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic profile of injectable ceftriamidine sodium in healthy volunteers and compares its pharmacokinetics with those of cefathiamidine. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial was a randomized and controlled study. The ceftriamidine sodium group (administered ceftriamidine sodium or placebo) employed a double-blind design with multiple administrations and dose escalation, whereas the cefathiamidine group (administered cefathiamidine) utilized an open-label design with single and multiple continuous administrations. The clinical trial involved ceftriamidine sodium at doses of 3.0 and 4.0 g, corresponding to cefathiamidine doses of 0.5 and 2.0 g. Volunteers received the corresponding drug infusions as per the protocol, and a series of blood samples were collected at specified time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results: In the 3.0 and 4.0 g dose groups of ceftriamidine sodium, the t1/2, Tmax, and Cmax were 1.98–2.11 h, 0.50 h, and 321.14–448.80 μg/mL, respectively. Upon reaching steady state after multiple doses of 3.0–4.0 g, no significant drug accumulation was observed. Following multiple administrations of cefathiamidine at 0.5 and 2.0 g, the peak time at steady state was 0.50 h, t1/2 was 1.26–1.17 h, and Cmax was 48.11–194.40 μg/mL. Conclusion: The half-life of ceftriamidine sodium (1.98–2.11 h) is almost twice as long as that of cefathiamidine (1.17–1.26 h), indicating its pharmacokinetic superiority in reducing the frequency of administration.

Keywords: Ceftriamidine sodium; cefathiamidine; pharmacokinetics

The full text of this article is available as a PDF. Open the PDF.