Article

Anticancer Potential of Tephrosia maxima: Inhibition of Cell Viability and Colony Forming Ability in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines

1, 1, 1★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Abilasha Ramasubramanian

Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai-600077, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

abilasha.ramasubramanian@gmail.com

Received: 28-04-2026; Revised: 09-06-2026; Accepted: 11-08-2026.

Volume 19, Issue 1 · pp. 116–123 · 2027 · DOI: 10.5530/pres.20270078

View on PR original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) continues to be a significant global health challenge, especially in developing areas, where lifestyle associated risk factors increase its prevalence. Even with improvements in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemoradiation, toxicities related to treatment and resistance still undermine clinical outcomes, driving the quest for safer, plant-derived supplements. The Tephrosia genus, characterised by a rich content of rotenoids, flavonoids, and isoflavones, has demonstrated promising anticancer capabilities in various models, yet Tephrosia maxima remains largely unexplored.

Materials and Methods: The present study investigated the anticancer potential of T. maxima through molecular docking analysis followed by in vitro evaluation in oral cancer cells. Three primary phytoconstituents, specifically tephrosin, deguelin, and lupeol, were docked to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), which is a crucial oncogenic factor in OSCC. Based on these in silico findings, the biological activity of T. maxima extract was further evaluated using KB oral squamous carcinoma cells through cell viability and clonogenic assays.

Results: Molecular docking revealed that deguelin exhibited the highest affinity (-7.90 kcal/mol), followed by tephrosin (-7.20 kcal/mol) and lupeol (-6.40 kcal/mol), with docking configurations showing stabilizing hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions in the ATP-binding pocket. In vitro tests indicated a dose-related decrease in cell viability, with an IC₅₀ of roughly 96 µg/mL after 24 hr. Clonogenic assays also showed significant reduction in colony forming ability post-treatment, suggesting a decrease in long-term proliferative potential.

Conclusion: These findings collectively emphasize T. maxima as a valuable source of bioactive phytochemicals that can induce cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects on OSCC, likely via interactions targeting EGFR. Although these findings correspond with recognized anticancer properties of similar Tephrosia species, this research provides the preliminary evidence of such effects in T. maxima. Further in vivo and clinical investigations are necessary to confirm these findings and assess its potential for translation into oral cancer treatments.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent malignancy affecting the oral cavity. With the exception of certain regions of France, the disease is relatively rare in the industrialised world, whereas it is widespread in the developing world, particularly in the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia. Although its incidence is increasing among young individuals, oral cancer predominantly affects men over middle age, individuals who smoke, and those lower social economic backgrounds (Scully and Porter, 2001; Dee et al., 2025). According to estimates, infections, poor diet, habit, and tobacco chewing and sedentary lifestyle, sedentary lifestyle combined with alcohol consumption or areca nut usage account for approximately 43% of cancer deaths globally. These risk factors contribute to chronic exposure of oral mucosa to carcinogens leading to genetic and epigenetic alterations. Consequently, the multistep process of oral carcinogenesis, along with genetic alterations, results in progressive dysplasia, uncontrolled cell proliferation, and eventual malignant transformation (Dutta et al., 2012; Gupta et al., 2022; Chang et al., 2017). Despite several therapeutic advancements, complete cure or prevention of cancer still remains elusive (Dee et al., 2025; Mohamad et al., 2023).

The development and progression of OSCC involve complex molecular alternations that disrupt normal cellular regulatory pathways. These include dysregulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and key signaling pathways such as Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways, which play crucial roles in tumor initiation and progression. Consequently, many therapeutic strategies have been developed to target these molecular mechanisms in order to inhibit tumour growth and improve treatment outcomes. Despite these advancements the overall survival rate of OSCC remains relatively low and the disease is often associated with poor prognosis due to later stage diagnosis and high recurrence rates.

Currently, surgical intervention remains the primary treatment modality for OSCC. Chemo radiation or radiation therapy is often employed as an urgent treatment for patients with a high risk of recurrence or as the primary treatment when surgery is not feasible. Although these treatments are integral to cancer management, they are frequently associated with numerous effects that significantly compromise the patient’s quality of life. As a result, there is an increasing need for adjunct therapeutic strategies that can effectively manage the disease while minimising treatment-associated toxicity (Kisling and Stiegmann, 2025; Yin et al., 2013; Kumar et al., 2026).

Given the limitations and side-effects of conventional treatment modalities, increasing attention has been directed towards alternative and complementary therapeutic approaches. Over the past two decades, several herbal remedies from Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine have attracted considerable interest due to their ability to enhance therapeutic efficacy while mitigating the toxic effect associated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy in head and neck cancers (Fateen et al., 2025). Phytomedicine has emerged as a promising anticancer strategy because bioactive phytochemicals can promote apoptosis, inhibit angiogenesis and modulate key signalling pathways involved in cancer development (Aryan, 2018; Lee et al., 2015; Arora et al., 2023).

Indeed, numerous natural compounds have successfully progressed to clinical approval as anti-cancer agents. Examples include compounds derived from Taxis brevifolia, camptothecin and Podophyllum peltatum which have demonstrated significant therapeutic benefits in cancer treatment (Yang et al., 2020; Chazin et al., 2014; Méresse et al., 2004; Kobayashi and Ratain, 2004; Rivera et al., 2004; Postmus et al., 2000). In oral cancer specifically, curcumin has been reported to reduce chemoradiotherapy induced toxicity and promote apoptosis in tumour cells, while other planned derived treatments such as Danshen have demonstrated and inflammatory and anti-proliferative effect through modulation of MAPK signaling pathways (Chaveli-López and Bagán-Sebastián, 2016; Dharman et al., 2021; Hsiao et al., 2018; Hsiao et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2017; Kumar et al., 2020). Therefore, herbal therapies have been recognised for their potential to reduce treatment related side-effects and enhance host immune responses, highlighting their promise as complementary and alternative therapeutic options (Bae et al., 2017; Nik Nabil et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021).

Nevertheless, challenges such as fluctuations in bioactive compound concentrations, lack of standardisation and potential herb-drug interactions remain significant obstacles that warrant further investigation (Shrikant, 2023; Atanasov et al., 2021; Singh et al., 2012).

Within this context, medicinal plants belonging to the genus Tephrosia have attracted scientific attention due to their diverse pharmacological activities. The Tephrosia genus is characterised by its rich content of isoflavones, rotenoids and flavonoids- bioactive compounds that are relatively uncommon in many medicinal plants and are known for their antimicrobial, antioxidant, hepato- protective and anticancer properties (Obbalareddy et al., 2022). Among the various species within this genus, Tephrosia maxima is, at present, a relatively less explored species despite belonging to a group recognised for its anticancer potential in several experimental cancer models.

The limited research available on T. maxima combined with the substantial phytochemical diversity, suggests that it represents a promising candidate for further investigation in cancer therapy. The plant may serve as a source of novel bioactive compounds that could offer therapeutic advantages compared to currently studied herbal agents (Gulecha and Sivakumar, 2011).

However, despite the presence of numerous anticancer phytochemicals within the Tephrosia genus, the specific anticancer potential of T. maxima against oral squamous carcinoma cell lines remains largely unexplored. Additionally, although direct molecular pathway validation in cancer cells was beyond the scope of the study, molecular docking of major phytochemicals against epidermal growth factor receptor, a key oncogenic driver in OSCC, was performed to provide supportive mechanistic insights. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the cytotoxic and anti proliferative effects of T. maxima extract on OSCC cell lines using cell viability and colony formation assays. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the anticancer properties of Tephrosia maxima extract on oral cell carcinoma cell lines supported by molecular docking evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Molecular docking

Tephrosin, deguelin, and lupeol-three of T. maxima's main phytoconstituents-were chosen for docking investigation. The Protein Data Bank provided the crystal structure of EGFR (PDB ID: 1M17), while PubChem provided the 3D structures of the ligands and their energy was minimized. SwissDock was used for docking, and the grid box surrounding the active location was established. Based on binding affinity scores, the optimal binding conformations were found and displayed using PyMOL to examine hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions.

Cell culture

KB cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and maintained at 37ºC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO₂. The extract of T. maxima was initially dissolved in DMSO to create stock solutions, which were subsequently diluted with the culture medium to achieve the necessary concentrations, ensuring that the final DMSO concentration stayed below 0.1% (v/v).

MTT assay

The MTT assay was utilized to evaluate the cytotoxic ability of the T. maxima extract. KB cells were plated into 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 10⁴ cells/well and incubated for 24 hr to promote adherence. Cells were subsequently treated with different concentrations of extract (25-200 µg/mL) for 24 hr, using 0.1% DMSO as the control. After treatment, MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was introduced to each well and incubated for 4 hr at 37ºC to allow for formazan crystal formation. The supernatant was gently taken out, and the crystals were dissolved in DMSO. Absorbance was determined at 570 nm using a microplate reader. Cytotoxicity (%) was determined using the equation:

Formula

Cell viability (%) was calculated by deducting the cytotoxicity value from 100%. The half-maximal inhibition concentration (IC₅₀) was established

Colony formation assay

Using a clonogenic assay, the cells' capacity to establish colonies following treatment was assessed. After being placed on 35-mm culture plates, KB cells per plate were allowed to adhere overnight. Following that, cells were treated with 50 µg/mL of T. maxima extract for 24 hr, while controls were administered 0.1% DMSO. After treatment, a new growth medium was added, and the cells were incubated for ten days. Colonies were fixed with methanol, then stained for 10 min with 0.5% crystal violet, rinsed with PBS, and left to air dry. Colonies with over 50 cells were manually counted. Treatment effects were determined using the surviving percent and plating efficiency.

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicates and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc test was used. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. IC₅₀ values were calculated using nonlinear regression.

Ethical statement

This study did not involve human or animal subjects. Experiments were conducted using established cell lines following institutional biosafety guidelines.

RESULTS

Molecular docking analysis

Molecular docking analysis was performed to evaluate the binding affinity and interaction profile of major photo constituents of T. maxima with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Among the tested compounds, deguelin showed the highest binding affinity (-7.9 kcal/mol), with tephrosin following (-7.29 kcal/mol) and then lupeol (-7.55 kcal/mol) Table 1.

Table 1: Binding energy of bioactive compounds of Tephrosia maxima with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR).
CompoundBinding Energy (Kcal/mol)Key Interactions
Tephrosin-7.29H-bond, hydrophobic
Deguelin-7.9H-bond
Lupeol-7.55Hydrophobic

Detailed analysis showed that deguelin formed stable hydrogen bonds with key amino acid residues within the ATP-binding site of EGFR, along with significant hydrophobic interactions that contribute to complex stabilisation. Tephrosin also demonstrated favourable interactions, including both hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, while lupeol primarily exhibited hydrophobic interactions.

The presence of these interactions within the active site suggests a strong potential for these compounds to competitively inhibit EGFR kinase activity. Notably, deguelin showed the most stable binding conformation, indicating its potential as a leading compound among the tested phytoconstituents. These findings highlight the ability of T. maxima-derived compounds to target EGFR mediated signaling pathways which play a critical role in the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma Figure 1.

Figure 1: Molecular docking analysis of bioactive compounds from Tephrosia maxima with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): (A) Tephrosin, (B) Deguelin, (C) Lupeol, and (D) protein-ligand interaction within the ATP-binding pocket showing hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions.

Cytotoxicity (MTT assay)

The MTT assay assessed the cytotoxic impact of T. maxima extract on KB oral squamous carcinoma cells. Cell viability diminished in a dose-dependent manner across all examined doses (25-200 µg/mL). A marked decrease in growth inhibition was indicated by the IC₅₀ value at 24 hr, estimated to be approximately 96 µg/mL Figure 2.

Figure 2: Dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of Tephrosia maxima extract on KB oral squamous cell carcinoma cells assessed using MTT assay after 24 hr of treatment. Data are expressed as percentage cell viability.

Colony formation assay

Using the clonogenic assay, the T. maxima extract's capacity to inhibit long-term proliferation was assessed. Colonies were significantly smaller and fewer in number after treatment with 50 µg/mL extract than after DMSO control. The survival fractions dropped dramatically, suggesting a reduced ability to proliferate and self-renew Figure 3. After treatment, the inhibition of colony formation is evident in representative photos. A clonogenic assay with 50 µg/mL Tephrosia maxima for 10 days showed decreased colony formation compared to the control.

Figure 3: Effect of Tephrosia maxima extract on colony formation in KB cells. Treatment with extract significantly reduced the number and size of colonies compared to control, indicating inhibition of long-term proliferative capacity.

DISCUSSION

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) represents a significant proportion of head and neck malignancies and remains a substantial global health challenge (Nagi et al., 2023). This burden is primarily driven by the aggressive clinical course of the disease, frequent recurrence and inherent or acquired resistance to standard treatment modalities (Fateen et al., 2025; Kumar et al., 2025; Muthukrishnan and Warnakulasuriya, 2018). While surgical intervention, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have seen technical refinements, overall clinical outcomes are frequently hindered by systemic toxicity and therapeutic failure (Kumar et al., 2024). Consequently, there is an increasing shift towards investigating plant derived compounds as adjunct or alternative therapeutic interventions (Srivastava et al., 2025). Natural compounds remain a cornerstone of oncological drug discovery offering a diverse array of bioactive phytochemicals that can concurrently modulate multiple signaling pathways involved in tumorigenesis and cancer progression (Jeyachandran, 2024).

In this study, the Tephrosia maxima extract exhibited potent cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects against KB Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) cells. Quantitative analysis using MTT assay demonstrated a dose dependent reduction in cell viability, yielding a Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) of approximately 96 µg/mL at 24 hr post treatment. These data underscore the significant cytotoxic potential of the extract against the KB cell line.

Furthermore, clonogenic assays revealed a marked concentration dependent inhibition of colony formation following exposure to T. maxima. This suppression of Colony Forming Units (CFU’s) indicates a disruption of long term proliferative capacity. Collectively these results suggest that the mechanism of action of the extract involves both the induction of acute cytotoxicity and impairment of malignant cell survival and proliferation.

While literature specifically detailing the pharmacological profile of T. maxima remains sparse, the anticancer potential of the Tephrosia genus is well documented across several related species. Extracts from T.pulcherrima and T.pumila have demonstrated significant inhibitory effects against HT-29 and RAW cell lines underscoring their cytotoxic efficacy (Ganapaty et al., 2008).

Phytochemical characterisation of T.calophylla has further identified bioactive benzil and coumestan derivatives with established anti neoplastic properties (Ganapaty et al., 2009). Similarly, investigations into T.tinctoria revealed robust biological activity which has been attributed to high concentration of flavonoids and diverse secondary metabolites (Lakshmi et al., 2010). These data support the hypothesis that the Tephrosia genus is a rich source of phytochemicals capable of exerting potent cytotoxicity effects on malignant cell populations.

A key phytochemical frequently identified across the Tephrosia genus is beta sitosterol, a phytosterol extensively characterised for its antioxidant, chemopreventive and anti neoplastic properties. Prior investigations have established that beta sitasterol effectively induces apoptosis, retards tumour progression across diverse malignancies including breast, prostate and colorectal carcinomas (Kishore and Roy, 2011).

Beyond direct cytotoxicity, Tephrosia derived extracts have demonstrated hepatoprotective and preventive efficacy in hepatocarcinoma models, underscoring the broader therapeutic utility in oncology (Rizvi et al., 2018). Tephrosia purpurea extracts have shown significant cytotoxic activity against HeLa cervical cancer cells, with the ethyl acetate fraction emerging as the most potent anti neoplastic phase (Shanmugapriya et al., 2011).

These cumulative observations align with the current findings and suggest that the cytotoxic profile of T. maxima may be attributed to a similar profile of bioactive secondary metabolites such as beta sitosterol or related steroidal compounds.

Additional members of the Tephrosia genus further illustrate its robust pharmacological profile. For example, T. villosa has demonstrated significant toxicity in brine shrimp lethality assays (Artemia salina), a classical indicator of potent bioactive metabolites with potent anti neoplastic utility (Nondo et al., 2011). Furthermore, specific flavonoids isolated from T. toxicaria have been characterised for their cancer chemopreventive properties, highlighting the genus’s role in interfering with early-stage oncogenesis (Jang et al., 2003; Muralidharan et al., 2023).

Investigations into T. vogelii have similarly revealed high biological potency characterised by low LC50 values in preliminary screening models (Marango et al., 2017). These findings reinforce the classification of the Tephrosia genus as a critical natural reservoir of diverse biologically active secondary metabolites with promising anticancer potential.

Molecular docking analysis conducted in this study provides critical mechanistic insights into the observed cytotoxic activity of Tephrosia maxima. In silico evaluation of primary phytoconstituents-deguelin, tephrosin and lupeol, revealed favourable binding orientations with the catalytic domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). As a well characterised oncogenic driver., EGFR is frequently over expressed in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) where its dysregulation orchestrates uncontrolled proliferation, enhanced survival, neoangiogenesis and metastatic progression. Among the ligands screened, deguelin exhibited the most robust binding affinity followed by tephrosin and lupeol. Analysis of the docking indicated that these interactions are stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic bonds within the highly conserved ATP- binding pocket of EGFR kinase domain.

These binding characteristics suggest a competitive inhibition mechanism that potentially eliminates receptor activation. These data imply that the antineoplastic efficacy of T. maxima may be mediated through the targeted disruption of EGFR dependent signaling cascades, thereby arresting tumour growth and survival.

The integration of cytotoxicity assays, colony formation analysis and molecular docking simulations provides preliminary evidence supporting the antineoplastic potential of T. maxima. The significant reduction in cell viability observed via MTT assay highlights potent acute cytotoxic effects, while the concomitant suppression of colony formation underscores the extracts' capacity to inhibit long term tumorigenic potential.

These experimental observations are further corroborated by in silico data which elucidate a plausible molecular mechanism centred on the targeted inhibition of EGFR.

Collectively, these findings are consistent with the established pharmacological profiles of related Tephrosia species and underscore the therapeutic promise of T. maxima as a candidate for further drug development and targeted therapy in oral oncology.

Despite the promising results, several limitations of the current study warrant acknowledgement. The experimental evaluations were conducted exclusively in vitro utilising a single OSCC cell line (KB cells). These findings may not fully encapsulate the complex, multi-dimensional biological interactions and systemic pharmacokinetics inherent to in vivo environments. While the molecular docking analysis offers robust predictive data regarding ligand receptor affinity, these in silico interactions require empirical validation through molecular and biochemical studies.

Future investigations should prioritise the bioassay guided fractionation and structural characterisation of the primary bioactive constituents within T. maxima. Additionally, comprehensive studies are required to elucidate the specific molecular pathways beyond EGFR that may be modulated by these compounds followed by evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles in preclinical animal models.

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights Tephrosia maxima as a potent pharmacological candidate against Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). Molecular docking simulations which revealed that key phyto constituents specifically deguelin, tephrosin and lupeol exhibit high binding affinities for the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). This interaction points towards a probable mechanism of action involving the disruption of EGFR mediated signaling cascades, which are frequently overexpressed in oral malignancies. Supporting these in silico findings, in vitro evaluation demonstrated a significant dose-dependent reduction in neoplastic cell viability, characterized by an IC50 value of approximately 96 µg/mL. Beyond immediate cytotoxicity the extract markedly suppressed the colony forming potential of OSCC cells suggesting a robust inhibition of long term proliferative pathways essential for tumour progression.

While these findings underscore the potential of T. maxima as a rich source of bioactive photochemicals with anti-proliferative properties, the scope of the present study remains limited to in vitro assays and computational modeling. Consequently, the transition from laboratory procedures to clinical application necessitates further rigorous investigation including in vivo studies to assess systemic efficacy and safety as well as detailed mechanistic evaluations to fully elucidate the apoptosis mechanisms or cell cycle arrest pathways involved. Such validation is essential to confirm the therapeutic viability of T. maxima and to establish its role as a herbal adjunct in the comprehensive management of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors thank the institution for providing facilities and support.

ACKREVIATIONS

MAPK
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
PI3K/Akt
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B
DMEM
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
FBS
Fetal Bovine Serum
DMSO
Dimethyl Sulfoxide
MTT
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide
ATP
Adenosine Triphosphate
PBS
Phosphate-Buffered Saline.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

SUMMARY

This study evaluates the anticancer potential of Tephrosia maxima against Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines using an integrated in silico and in vitro approach. Initially, molecular docking analysis demonstrated that key phytoconstituents like tephrosin, deguelin and lupeol exhibited favorable binding affinity towards epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), suggesting possible inhibition of oncogenic signalling pathways.

Based on these findings, the biological activity of T. maxima extract was further assessed in KB oral cancer cells. The MTT assay revealed a dose dependent reduction in cell viability with an IC50 of approximately 96 µg/mL. Additionally, clonogenic assays showed a significant decrease in colony forming ability, indicating impaired long-term proliferative capacity.

Collectively, the results suggest that T. maxima possesses notable cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects, potentially mediated through EGFR inhibition. These findings highlight its promise as a source of bioactive compounds for future development of adjunctive therapies in oral cancer, although further in vivo and other advanced studies are required.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Aryan, H.. The role of herbal medicine as anti-cancer medicine: From the claim to truth. Galen Medical Journal. 2018;7:Article e1179. https://doi.org/10.22086/gmj.v0i0.1179CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Atanasov, A. G.; Zotchev, S. B.; Dirsch, V. M.; Supuran, C. T.; International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 2021;20(3):200–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00114-zCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Bae, K.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, J.; Cho, C.-K.; Oh, B.; Costa, D. et al. Traditional oriental herbal medicine and natural killer cells for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytotherapy Research. 2017;31(4):519–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5781CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Chang, J. S.; Hsiao, J.-R.; Chen, C.-H.. ALDH2 polymorphism and alcohol-related cancers in Asians: A public health perspective. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2017;24(1):Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-017-0327-yCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Chaveli-López, B.; Bagán-Sebastián, J. V.. Treatment of oral mucositis due to chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2016;8(2):e201–e209. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52917CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Chen, C.-F.; Lu, C.-C.; Chiang, J.-H.; Chiu, H.-Y.; Yang, J.-S.; Lee, C.-Y. et al. Synergistic inhibitory effects of cetuximab and curcumin on human cisplatin-resistant oral cancer CAR cells through intrinsic apoptotic process. Oncology Letters. 2018;16(5):6323–6330. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9418CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Chen, R. J.; Arora, R. D.; Menezes, R. G.. Vinca alkaloid toxicity. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. 2024.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Dee, E. C.; Laversanne, M.; Bhoo-Pathy, N.; Ho, F. D. V.; Feliciano, E. J. G.; Eala, M. A. B. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality estimates in 2022 in Southeast Asia: A comparative analysis. The Lancet. Oncology. 2025;26(4):516–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(25CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.del Chazin, E.; Reis, R. daR.; Junior, W.T.V.; Moor, L.F.E.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A.. An overview on the development of new potentially active camptothecin analogs against cancer. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2014;14(12):953–962. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557514666141029233037CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Dharman, S.; G, M.; Shanmugasundaram, K.; Sampath, R. K.. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of curcumin/turmeric for the prevention and amelioration of radiotherapy/radiochemotherapy induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2021;22(6):1671–1684. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1671CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Dutta, K. R.; Banerjee, S.; Mitra, A.. Medicinal plants and oral cancer. International Journal of Pharmacy. 2012;3:198–208.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Fateen, N. K.; Yasothkumar, D.; Ramasubramanian, A.; Ramani, P.. Overexpression of FRMD5 associated with worse prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2025;26(1):176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-025-00805-5CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Ganapaty, S.; Srilakshmi, G. V. K.; Pannakal, S. T.; Laatsch, H.. A pyranochalcone and prenylflavanones from Tephrosia pulcherrima (Baker) Drumm. Natural Product Communications. 2008;3(1):49–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0800300111CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Ganapaty, S.; Srilakshmi, G. V. K.; Pannakal, S. T.; Rahman, H.; Laatsch, H.; Brun, R.. Cytotoxic benzil and coumestan derivatives from Tephrosia calophylla. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(1):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.10.009CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Gupta, R.; Mariano, L. C.; Nethan, S. T.; Kedar, A.; Sinha, D. N.; Warnakulasuriya, S. et al. Risk reversal of oral, pharyngeal and oesophageal cancers after cessation of betel quid users: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Global Health. 2022;88(1):Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3643CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Hsiao, Y.-T.; Kuo, C.-L.; Chueh, F.-S.; Liu, K.-C.; Bau, D.-T.; Chung, J.-G.. Curcuminoids induce reactive oxygen species and autophagy to enhance apoptosis in human oral cancer cells. The American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2018;46(5):1145–1168. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X1850060XCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Jang, D. S.; Park, E. J.; Kang, Y.-H.; Hawthorne, M. E.; Vigo, J. S.; Graham, J. G. et al. Potential cancer chemopreventive flavonoids from the stems of Tephrosia toxicaria. Journal of Natural Products. 2003;66(9):1166–1170. https://doi.org/10.1021/np0302100CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Jeyachandran, S.. Comment on, “Single nucleotide polymorphisms as markers of genetic susceptibility for oral potentially malignant disorders risk: review of evidence to date”. Oral Oncology. 2024;156:Article 106955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106955CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Kishore, K.; Roy, D.. Tephrosia purpurea Pers.(Fabaceae)-A common winter weed of Chhattisgargh, India-As a source of anticancer drug. Indian J Appl Pure Biol. 2011;26:53–55.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Kobayashi, K.; Ratain, M. J.. Pharmacodynamics and long-term toxicity of etoposide. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 1994;34:S64–S68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00684866CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Kumar, A.; Ramasubramanian, A.; Muthumanickam, P.; Purushothaman, B.. Isolation of Bioactive Metabolites from Tephrosia maxima and Tephrosia callophylla: A Phytochemical and Functional Study. Pharmacognosy Research. 2025;17(4):1341–1347. https://doi.org/10.5530/pres.20250024CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Kumar, S L.; Naik, Z.; Panwar, A.; M, S.; Keluskar, V.; Kumar, R. S.. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of Nigella sativa (75% v/v) cream and clobetasol propionate (0.05% w/w) gel in oral lichen planus-a double-blinded randomized control trial. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2024;28(1):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01130-6CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Kumar, V. B.; Lin, S.-H.; Mahalakshmi, B.; Lo, Y.-S.; Lin, C.-C.; Chuang, Y.-C. et al. Sodium danshensu inhibits oral cancer cell migration and invasion by modulating p38 signaling pathway. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020;11:Article 568436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.568436CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Lakshmi, P.; Bobbarala, V.; Ganapaty, S.. Evaluation of Tephrosia tinctoria. International Journal of Chemical and Analytical Science. 2010;1:14–17.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Lee, C.-T.; Huang, Y.-W.; Yang, C.-H.; Huang, K.-S.. Drug delivery systems and combination therapy by using vinca alkaloids. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2015;15(15):1491–1500. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026615666150414120547CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Lim, R. J.; Nik Nabil, W. N.; Chan, S. Y.; Wong, Y. F.; Han, L. X.; Gong, J. Y. et al. Effects of herbal medicine for xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: An observational study in a tertiary cancer hospital. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2019;27(9):3491–3498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4646-2CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Mali, S. B.. Cancer treatment: Role of natural products. Time to have a serious rethink. Oral Oncology Reports. 2023;6:Article 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2023.100040CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Marango, S. N.; Khayeka-Wandabwa, C.; Makwali, J. A.; Jumba, B. N.; Choge, J. K.; Adino, E. O. et al. Experimental therapeutic assays of Tephrosia vogelii against Leishmania major infection in murine model: In vitro and in vivo. BMC Research Notes. 2017;10(1):Article 698. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3022-xCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Muralidharan, M.; Muthupandian, S.; Dejene, T. A.. Bloom syndrome: An oral potentially malignant disorders aiding in malignancy vigour. International Journal of Surgery. 2023;109(3):529–530. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000009CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Muthukrishnan, A.; Warnakulasuriya, S.. Oral health consequences of smokeless tobacco use. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2018;148(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1793_17CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Nagi, R.; Muthukrishnan, A.; Rakesh, N.. Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of symptomatic oral lichen planus -A systematic review. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2023;13(2):353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.03.003CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Nondo, R. S. O.; Mbwambo, Z. H.; Kidukuli, A. W.; Innocent, E. M.; Mihale, M. J.; Erasto, P. et al. Larvicidal, antimicrobial and brine shrimp activities of extracts from Cissampelos mucronata and Tephrosia villosa from coast region, Tanzania. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011;11(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-33CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Obbalareddy, S.; Kolli, P. K.; Yejella, R. P.; Athili, L. D.; Ponnada, S.. Review on Tephrosia genus. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry. 2022;12(3):35. https://doi.org/10.33289/IJRPC.12.3.2022.12(35CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Postmus, P. E.; Haaxma-Reiche, H.; Smit, E. F.; Groen, H. J.; Karnicka, H.; Lewinski, T. et al. Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: Comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy—A phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2000;18(19):3400–3408. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.19.3400CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Rizvi, T. S.; Khan, A. L.; Ali, L.; Al-Mawali, N.; Mabood, F.; Hussain, J. et al. In vitro oxidative stress regulatory potential of Citrullus colocynthis and Tephrosia apollinea. Acta Pharmaceutica. 2018;68(2):235–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2018-0012CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Sandhya, S.; Venkata, K. R.; Vinod, K. R.; Rsnakk, C.. Assessment of in vitro antacid activity of different root extracts of Tephrosia purpurea (L.) Pers. by modified artificial stomach model. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2012;2(3):S1487–S1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.Scully, C.; Porter, S.. Oral cancer. The Western Journal of Medicine. 2001;174(5):348–351. https://doi.org/10.1136/ewjm.174.5.348CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Singh, A.; Sharma, R.; Anand, K. et al. Food-drug interaction. International Journal of Pharmacy and Chemical Sciences. 2012;1:264–279.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. 39.Srivastava, K. C.; Saini, R. S.; Lin, G. S. S.; Heboyan, A.; Shrivastava, D.. A decadal bibliometric analysis on the therapeutic strategies in oral Lichen Planus. Health Science Reports. 2025;8(2):Article e70403. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70403CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. 40.Yang, Y.-H.; Mao, J.-W.; Tan, X.-L.. Research progress on the source, production, and anti-cancer mechanisms of paclitaxel. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines. 2020;18(12):890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5364(20CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. 41.Zhang, X.; Qiu, H.; Li, C.; Cai, P.; Qi, F.. The positive role of traditional Chinese medicine as an adjunctive therapy for cancer. BioScience Trends. 2021;15(5):283–298. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2021.01318CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Mohan, A., Kumar, A., & Ramasubramanian, A. (2027). Anticancer Potential of Tephrosia maxima: Inhibition of Cell Viability and Colony Forming Ability in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. Pharmacognosy Research, 19(1), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.5530/pres.20270078