Article

Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research: A Rejoinder to Anderson (2010)

Michael W. Firmin1, Elisha R. Injeti2★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Cedarville University, Cedarville, OH 45314.
  2. 2Associate Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Cedarville University, Cedarville, OH 45314.

CORRESPONDENCE

Elisha R. Injeti

Associate Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Cedarville University, Cedarville, OH 45314.

einjeti@cedarville.edu

Received: 02-06-2012; Accepted: 13-08-2012.

Volume 47, Issue 2 · pp. 221–224 · PUBLISHED 2013 · DOI:

View on IJPER original site ↗

ABSTRACT

This article is a response to Claire Anderson's (2010) special article on presenting and evaluating qualitative research that called for further exploration on how qualitative methodology can and should be integrated into pharmacy research agendas. This rejoinder concurs with her conclusions and advances her call. In addition, particular attention is given to issues of validity, rigor, answering research questions, and mixed-methods approach to research. As a result, the potentially complimentary nature of qualitative and quantitative research is discussed with in the context of research in pharmacy.

KEYWORDS

    Open in new tab

    REFERENCES

    As published

    Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

      Cite this article

      SELECT FORMAT

      Firmin, M. W., & Injeti, E. R. (2013). Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research: A Rejoinder to Anderson (2010). Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 47(2), 221–224.