Sugar substitutes: Health controversy over perceived benefits
Kirtida R. Tandel1★★ Corresponding author
- 1Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India Educational Forum.
CORRESPONDENCE
Kirtida R. Tandel
Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India Educational Forum.
Volume 2, Issue 4 · pp. 236–243 · PUBLISHED 2011 · DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.85936
ABSTRACT
Sugar is an inseparable part of the food we consume. But too much sugar is not ideal for our teeth and waistline. There have been some controversial suggestions that excessive sugar may play an important role in certain degenerative diseases. So artifi cial sweeteners or artifi cially sweetened products continue to attract consumers. A sugar substitute (artifi cial sweetener) is a food additive that duplicates the effect of sugar in taste, but usually has less food energy. Besides its benefi ts, animal studies have convincingly proven that artifi cial sweeteners cause weight gain, brain tumors, bladder cancer and many other health hazards. Some kind of health related side effects including carcinogenicity are also noted in humans. A large number of studies have been carried out on these substances with conclusions ranging from “safe under all conditions” to “unsafe at any dose”. Scientists are divided in their views on the issue of artifi cial sweetener safety. In scientifi c as well as in lay publications, supporting studies are often widely referenced while the opposing results are de-emphasized or dismissed. So this review aims to explore the health controversy over perceived benefi ts of sugar substitutes.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
As publishedShowing references and in-text citations exactly as published.
Cite this article
SELECT FORMAT
Tandel, K. R. (2011). Sugar substitutes: Health controversy over perceived benefits. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 2(4), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.85936