Article

An Overview of Scientific Publication of the Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Mahdiyeh Khazaneha1,2, Farshad Zandrahimi3, Ali Sadatmoosavi1, Soodeh Salarpour4,5, Hossein Karegar-Borzi2,6, Oranus Tajedini7, Hamide Arvan1, Mahboobeh Raeiszadeh8,9★, Amirhosein Raisszadeh10★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Neurology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN.
  2. 2Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, IRAN.
  3. 3Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN.
  4. 4Pharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN.
  5. 5Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN.
  6. 6Department of Traditional Medicine, Faculty of Persian Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, IRAN.
  7. 7Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, IRAN.
  8. 8Herbal and Traditional Medicines Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN.
  9. 9Department of Traditional Pharmacy, Faculty of Persian Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN.
  10. 10Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, IRAN.

CORRESPONDENCE

Mahboobeh Raeiszadeh

Department of Traditional Pharmacy, Faculty of Persian Medicine, Herbal and Traditional Medicines Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN. , m.raeiszadeh@kmu.ac.ir

mah.raeiszadeh@gmail.com

ORCID: 0000-0002-3342-8367,

Received: 21-01-2024; Revised: 26-02-2024; Accepted: 02-04-2024.

Volume 13, Issue 2 · pp. 604–614 · PUBLISHED May-Aug 2024 · DOI: 10.5530/jscires.13.2.47

View on JSR original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Objectives Chamomile (Matricariachamomilla) has been used orally and in topical applications in traditional medicine for centuries for different conditions, including gastrointestinal, liver and respiratory problems, common cold, neuropsychiatric, pain, infections and skin, eye and mouth disorder. The objective of the present bibliometric analysis was to capture the characteristics of research publications on chamomile. Materials and Methods The research population consisted of all English documents published and indexed in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Biosis and Scopus databases until the middle of 2021 about chamomile excluding letters, notes, editorials, short surveys, conference abstracts and books. The data were collected in this study using a multi-stage and combined search strategy. The retrieved records were saved as plain text, tab-delimited and RIS formats. After data storage, the related files were integrated and saved as one file for later use. Bibliometrics R Tools was used for data analysis and drawing scientific maps. Results Total of 1860 publications were published by 6834 authors across 865 sources from 1980 to 2021. Since the beginning of 2006, there has been a sharp in the volume of publications on this topic. The Journal of Ethnopharmacology published the largest number of publications. The most productive country included Iran. Shiraz University had the most organizational affiliation in articles related to chamomile. Conclusion The present study provides the characteristics of the literature on chamomile that allows an understanding of the past, present and future of research in this area. It is a useful evidence-based framework to base future research actions and academic directions.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, medicinal plants are being studied in order to develop new compounds for use in pharmacology, nutraceuticals, food supplements, folk medicine etc., Medicinal plants have been used as safe, cost-effective and easy-to-access therapeutic agents from ancient time. Also, it has been shown that the adverse effects of herbal drugs are relatively less than alternative synthetic ones when they are used properly. Therefore, in recent years, herbal remedies have been noticed and used alongside synthetic drugs for the treatment of several diseases.[1, 2]

One of the most common herbs used for medicinal purposes is chamomile, whose standardized tea, aqueous or hydroalcoholic extracts and essential oils are prepared from dried flowers of the Matricaria species and are used orally or externally.[3] Moreover, the pharmacopoeia of 26 countries included chamomile as a therapeutic agent and its role as a pharmaceutical agent cannot be ignored.[4]

Matricaria chamomilla, which belongs to the Asteraceae family and is known by the English name German chamomile, has been used as an herbal medication since ancient times. It is still popular today and will probably continue to be used in the future, as it contains various bioactive phytochemicals with therapeutic effects. Approximately 120 secondary metabolites have been identified in chamomile essential oil and extract, including 28 terpenoids and 36 flavonoids, which are the most important products of this plant.[5]

In general, the most important terpenoid compounds of chamomile essential oil are bisabolol and its oxides A and B, bisabolone oxide A, chamazulene and farnesene. On the other hand, chamomile extracts were dominated by phenolic compounds, including phenolic acids, flavonoids and coumarins. Among the flavonoids, apigenin is the most promising compound.[4]

Chamomile is an annual herb that grows on all soil types and is native to northern and western Asia, the Mediterranean, Southern Africa and southern and Eastern Europe. It is now widely distributed all around the world.[6]

Chamomile has been used as a cure for gastrointestinal disorders, the common cold, liver disorders and neuropsychiatric and respiratory problems from ancient times. Moreover, this plant is effective for the treatment of pain, infections and skin, eye and mouth disorders externally.[7]

In a review article Hajizadeh et al. (2020)[8] showed that chamomile is effective for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Their findings extend the novel functions of chamomile in the improvement of glycemic and lipid profiles and oxidative stress indicators in diabetic cases. Moreover, chamomile is used to relieve Post-Menopausal Syndrome (PMS) because of its therapeutic properties, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-spasmodic and anti-anxiety effects.[9] Also, Chamomile can improve cardiovascular conditions, stimulate the immune system and provide some protection against cancer due to its anti-oxidants properties.[10] In a review article, Bayliak et al. (2021)[11] showed that chamomile is enriched in flavonoid contents and it can be utilized to treat obesity and related metabolic disorders. Previous results showed that therapeutic effects of chamomile were associated with modulation of signaling pathways involving the AMP-activated protein kinase, NF-κB, Nrf2 and PPARγ transcription factors.[12]

One of the most widely used methods for analyzing the structure of knowledge in various fields and drawing conceptual maps is co-word analysis. As a graphical modeling method that uses ideas related to relational analysis, co-word analysis can describe the content of documents by examining and analyzing the keywords of articles published in a research field and directly provide a picture of the real content of the subjects in that field.[13] By measuring the relationship between these co-occurrences, the conceptual layout of a domain is illustrated. Conceptually, co-word analysis is an effective way to discover the connections between research domains and shows these important links that may be difficult to discover otherwise.[14] Besides, using this method, emerging subjects and the most widely used methods in each field of research can be identified to draw a clear path for future research.[15]

Figure 1: Flowchart of overview of chamomile.

Because no bibliometric analysis of the chamomile research literature has been conducted to date, the objective of the present study is to capture the characteristics of research publications on this topic and to the best of our knowledge; our study was the first to perform a bibliometric evaluation of chamomile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted using co-word analysis. Co-word analysis is a quantitative approach to detecting the knowledge structure and has been used by various studies in the past decades as a powerful tool for knowledge discovery.

The research population consisted of all English documents published and indexed in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Biosis and Scopus databases from the first until the middle of 2021 about chamomile excluding letters, notes, editorials, short surveys, conference abstracts and books. The data were collected in this study using a multi-stage and combined search strategy. The retrieved records were saved as plain text, tab-delimited and RIS formats. After data collection, the related files were integrated and saved as one file for next use. Bibliometrics R Tool was used for data analysis and drawing scientific maps.

A multi-stage and combined search strategy was used to retrieve related data in each database according to the available capabilities and fields and the possibility of using different operators. To retrieve related records using a comprehensive retrieval process and after specifying synonyms, we searched titles, abstracts and keywords (author keywords and specific keywords) using operators. After the implementation of the search strategy, conference abstracts, books, erratum, reviews and unrelated articles were filtered. The flowchart of chamomile overview was shown in Figure 1.

The bibliometric analysis was conducted using Bibliometrics R Tool.[16] The bibliometric data were analyzed using the Bibliometrics Biblioshiny R-package software (https:// bibliometrix. org/Biblioshiny.html).[17]

This analysis was conducted to visualize, identify and describe the data to achieve the following goals: Determining the annual scientific production in this field based on the year of publication. Determining the core journals in the field. Determining authors and affiliations contributing to this research field. Determining countries active in this research field. Determining keywords, topics and themes in this field.

RESULTS

General Information on the Retrieved Documents

A total of 1860 articles were analyzed. Annexure 1 shows the descriptive statistics of the articles published about chamomile from 1980 to 2021.

This descriptive analysis revealed that 4360 keywords plus and 5076 author keywords were reported in journals. Besides, these articles were written by 6834 authors, with 90 articles being prepared by single authors. The co-authorship rate was reported as 3.82. Author per documents was reported as 3.67, indicating that almost four authors were involved in writing a paper.

Figure 2: Overall publication performance in chamomile research from 1980 to 2020, presented as a total number of publications per year.

The general information in retrieved published documents related to chamomile and the complete information about all the document types retrieved for each database are mentioned in Annexure 1.

Overall Publication Performance

Figure 2 shows the annual scientific production of chamomile. A total of 1860 articles were published about the chamomile plant in 40 years, of which 1742 were research articles. From 1980 to 2002, the published articles underwent an upward trend followed by a downward trend in 2003. In 2006, there was an increase in the number of published articles, indicating increased attention to this plant. In total, the number of publications before 2006 was low and this number increased significantly since 2011. Data analysis also indicated that the largest number of articles were published in 2020, indicating increased attention to chamomile and the upward trend of studies addressing medicinal plants in recent years.

Top University, Country and Keyword-plus Relations

The relations between universities, countries and keywords were visualized using the Three Fields Plot (TFP). In this instance, the significant features were represented in the diagram by rectangles with different colors. The height of the rectangles in the diagram of the TFP depended on the rate or value of the summation of the relations arising between the component of the rectangle represents (university, keywords and countries) and the diagram of other elements. The more relations the component or element had, the higher the rectangle represented it. Figure 3 shows the TFP analysis of publications on chamomile centered on relations between the universities, keywords and countries. The diagram demonstrated the relations between top universities, keywords and countries in publications on chamomile and its related studies.

The data also indicated that Iran contributed to most of the affiliations and subjects. Besides, Brazil and the United States had the highest contributions in terms of subjects and affiliations and are ranked second and third, respectively. Shiraz University had the greatest number of affiliations in articles related to chamomile. This confirms that this university published the greatest number of articles in this field. One possible reason is that chamomile is native to Fars Province (Shiraz) resulting in more studies on this plant.

Core Journals in the Field of Chamomile

We used source impact and Bradford law to show the original and influential journals publishing articles on chamomile. Table 1 presents the ranking of the top ten journals based on the H, M and G index, the Total number of Citations (TC), the number of publications (NP) and the year of publication (PY_start).

Table 1: Source impact of the top ten journals publishing on chamomile.
JournalH_indexG_indexM_indexTCNPPY_start
Food Chemistry.24321.0434782885321999
Journal of Ethnopharmacology.22380.5945952114381985
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.16180.5714291190181994
Phytomedicine.16250.727273965252000
Phytotherapy Research.16230.666667736231998
Industrial Crops and Products.14221.166667655222010
Journal of Chromatography A.12160.48596161997
Weed Research.12140.387097351141991
Planta Medica.11170.268293713171981
Weed Science.11130.34375353131990

In the time frame analyzed, the Journal of Ethnopharmacology had the highest publication output (n=38), followed by food chemistry (n =32), phytomedicine (n=25) and phytochemistry research (n=23). The most cited journals were Food Chemistry (n=2885), Journal of Ethnopharmacology (n=2114), Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (n=1190) and phytomedicine (n=965). Food Chemistry (H=24) had the highest H index, following by Journal of Ethnopharmacology (H=22).

Figure 3: Relations between keywords (right), countries (middle) and affiliations (left) for research in chamomile literature.

Journals ranking according to Bradford’s law in the field of chamomile

According to Bradford’s law, journals are divided into three zones. Zone 1 shows the core journals as the most important journals in this field. An analysis of journals publishing articles on chamomile showed that 48 journals are classified in Zone 1 and the remaining journals fall under Zones 2 and 3. Table 2 shows the top ten journals classified in Zone 1 according to Bradford’s law and to avoid the length of the table, other journals were not mentioned in the manuscript.

Table 2: The ten top journals rankings according to Bradford law.
JournalsRankFreqcumFreqZone
Journal of Ethnopharmacology.13535Zone 1
Food Chemistry.23267Zone 1
Journal of Essential Oil-Bearing Plants.32592Zone 1
Phytomedicine.424116Zone 1
Phytotherapy Research.524140Zone 1
Industrial Crops and Products.622162Zone 1
Planta Medica.721183Zone 1
Phytochemistry.819202Zone 1
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.918220Zone 1
Weed Science.1016236Zone 1

The most important Zone 1 journals in the field of chamomile publications were the Journal of Ethnopharmacology (35), Food Chemistry (32), Journal of Essential Oil-Bearing Plants (25) and Phytomedicine (24), respectively.

Most prolific authors and authors’ impact

We used the H, G and M index to show the main and influential authors in the published articles on chamomile. Table 3 shows the ranking of the top ten contributing authors.

Table 3: Top ten contributing authors in field of chamomile research.
AuthorsAffiliationCountryH_indexG_indexM_indexTCNPPY_start
Kovacik JozefŠafárik University.Slovak Republic27421.6881887512006
Klejdus BořivojMendel University of Agriculture and Forestry.Czech Republic20311.3331302312007
Hedbavny JosefMendel University of Agriculture and Forestry.Czech Republic18261.385848262009
Backor MartinUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik.Slovakia15170.938984172006
Ferreira Isabel C.F.R.Instituto Politécnico de Bragança.Portugal13141.083645142010
Repcak MiroslavŠafárik University.Slovak Republic13240.31614291980
Barros LillianInstituto Politécnico de Bragança.Portugal11120.917580122010
Gruz JiříPalacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany ASCR.Czech Republic990.64332592008
Kelber OlafPhytomedicines Supply and Development Center.Germany990.528292004
Szoke Éva B.9120.391176121999

In the entire dataset of 6834 contributing authors, Kovacik J (Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zem?d?lská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic) was ranked first in the number of published articles (n=51), followed by Klejdus B (Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zem?d?lská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic) with 31 published articles. Moreover, Kovacik J had the highest H-, M- and G-index among contributing authors in chamomile publications.

Analysis of the most relevant affiliation In publications on chamomile

Table 4 shows the most relevant universities based on at least one author in each published document on chamomile studies. The results obtained from the analysis shows that the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences had the highest affiliation, followed by the Islamic Azad University, Safarik University and Mendel University in Brno.

Table 4: Most relevant authors affiliation in publications on chamomile.
AffiliationNumbers of articles
SHIRAZ University of Medical Sciences.62
ISLAMIC AZAD University.58
SAFARIK University.56
MENDEL University of BRNO.39
University of SAO PAULO.35
University of TEHRAN Medical Sciences.35
SHAHID BEHESHTI University of Medical Sciences.34
University of BELGRADE.34
TABRIZ University of Medical Sciences.29
University of NOVI SAD.24
NATL Research Center.22
University of FED CEARA.22
University of PENN.22
TARBIAT MODARES University.21
University of MISSISSIPPI.20
University of TEHRAN.19
KING SAUD University.18
University of Life Science LUBLIN.18
CAIRO University.17
ERCIYES University.16

Most cited chamomile papers

Of 1742 articles related to chamomile, the average number of citations per document was 21.48 and the average number of citations per year per document was 2.03. Table 5 demonstrates the top ten papers according to the total number of citations. The research article entitled “Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts” published by Miliauskas G in the Journal of Food Chemistry in 2004 received the highest number of citations (n=1095). Results of this paper showed that ethyl acetate, acetone and methanol extracts of Matricaria recutita had antioxidant activity via DPPH assay. Also, most of the total phenolic contents of chamomile were flavonoids.[18] The research article entitled “Impedance measurements to study the antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Lamiaceae and Compositae” published by Marino M in the International Journal of Food Microbiology in 2001 ranks second with 438 total citations. They results showed that essential oil of chamomile had generally a bacteriostatic activity, but it had not showed bactericidal effects at tested concentration on gram positive and gram negative bacteria.[19] The research article entitled “Effect of oil extracted from some medicinal plants on different mycotoxigenic fungi” published by Soliman KM et al. in the food and chemical toxicology journal in 2002 ranks third with 342 total citations. Results of this research showed that chamomile oil at all tested concentrations were partially effective against the test toxigenic fungi such as Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. ochraceus and Fusarium moniliforme.[20] The publication entitled “Antibacterial Effects of the Essential Oils of Commonly Consumed Medicinal Herbs Using anin vitro Model” wrote by Sokovic M et al. In the Molecules journal ranked fourth with 321 total citations.[21] Also, the research published by Abdel-Gaber AM et al. in corrosion science journal entitled “Inhibitive action of some plant extracts on the corrosion of steel in acidic media” the same as previous publication had 321 total citations.[22]

Table 5: Most globally cited documents on chamomile.
PaperTotal citationsTotal citation per YearNormalized total citation
Miliauskas G, 2004, FOOD CHEM109560.833316.385
MARINO M, 2001, INT J FOOD MICROBIOL43820.85719.708
Soliman KM, 2002, FOOD CHEM TOXICOL34217.19.6338
Sokovic M, 2010, MOLECULES32126.7510.3779
Abdel-Gaber AM, 2006, CORROS SCI32120.06258.1969
Hurrell RF, 1999, BRIT J NUTR27712.04356.8294
Kultur S, 2007, J ETHNOPHARMACOL26217.46676.6419
Srivastava JK, 2010, MOL MED REP25321.08338.1795
Viola H, 1995, PLANTA MED2358.70376.3514
Budzinski JW, 2000, PHYTOMEDICINE23310.59094.0043

Analysis of keywords

Frequently used words in the field of chamomile

The keywords are the high-level summarization and refinement of the article core and can represent its main content and the frequency of occurrence and co-occurrence can reflect themes focuses in a special field to some extent.

As shown in Table 6, the most common words are in four groups, including keyword plus, title, abstract and author’s keyword, along with their co-occurrence. The most common co-occurrences in the following tables include L. (n=106), plants (n=104), extracts (n=89) and growth (n=89) in keyword plus; chamomile (n=225), Matricaria chamomilla (n=116), essential oil (n=98) and medicinal plants (n=82) in author’s keywords. However, chamomile (n=475), Matricaria (n=384), chamomilla (n=275) and essential (n=214) were the most title keywords, chamomile (n=2309), plants (n=1263), study (n=1240) and oil (n=1085) were the most frequent abstract keywords. Chamomile was the most frequent keyword in author’s, title and abstract keywords. We identified keywords with a high frequency, which can be used to predict research areas attracting an extraordinary degree of attention.

Table 6: Most frequent words in keyword plus, author’s keyword, title keyword and abstract keyword.
Keyword plusOcAuthor’s keywordsOcTitle keywordsOcAbstract keywordOc
L.106Chamomile225Chamomile475Chamomile2309
Plants104Matricaria chamomilla116Matricaria384Plants1263
Extracts89Essential oil98Chamomilla275Oil1085
Antioxidant86Medicinal plants82Essential214Plant1064
Chamomile80Asteraceae59Plants191Matricaria940
Essential oil75Matricaria recutita58Oil167Activity919
Flavonoids64Oxidative stress58Recutita140Essential885
Phenolic-compounds58Flavonoids45Herbal138Extracts825
Oxidative stress55Apigenin41Medicinal133Chamomilla720
Matricaria-chamomilla50Antioxidant activity39Extracts126Extract710
Constituents49Heavy metals34Oils108Herbal675
Chemical-composition47Alpha-bisabolol29Evaluation92Treatment651
Antioxidant activity44Antimicrobial activity28Antioxidant84Content594
Apigenin44Antioxidants28Analysis80Medicinal591

Conceptual structure map

Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) is a regularly used sociological method. In this approach, extensive data with multiple variables are compressed into a low-dimensional space to create an intuitive two-dimensional (or three-dimensional) graph. This graph illustrates the similarity between the keywords by utilizing plane distance. The keywords that have attracted attention in recent years are near the center point. By contrast, the closer the keywords are to the edge, the narrower the study theme, or transferred to other themes.[23]

The conceptual structure map of chamomile (Figure 4) was plotted based on the authors’ keywords and showed two clusters in blue and red. The blue cluster shows the relation between alpha-bisabolol and pharmacological investigations.

Figure 4: The conceptual structural map in published documents on chamomile studies.

Oxidative stress is mentioned at the center of the red cluster because most of the studies that have been done on the chamomile plant are related to the inhibition of oxidative stress. Furthermore, lipid peroxidation, L., mechanisms, inhibition, acid, tea and plants were close to the center point in the red cluster. However, antioxidant activity, chemical composition, components, chamomile, accumulation and cadmium were closer to the edge.

Thematic evolution map of chamomile publications

The thematic evolution map of chamomile literature in Figure 5 shows the historical development of this plant. Thematic evolution was carried out in two times intervals using Biblioshiny. Periods were selected based on the number of articles. As shown in Figure 2, in 2013, the number of articles reached the middle. In each period the keywords are not the same, in a lexicographic sense or number. Then the Fuzzy Sets Theory (FST) terminology evolves through the time intervals using different keywords to identify the content of the documents. New topics with their related keywords appear and others disappear. Hence, there is a subset of keywords that remained unchanged during consecutive time intervals and a subset of keywords only used in some.[24] For example, the keywords chamomile, Matricaria chamomilla and medicinal plant appeared in both studied time intervals. In contrast, the keywords Asteraceae, Matricaria and Matricaria recutita only appeared in the first studied time intervals (1980-2013). The second period (2014 to 2021) reveals the articles published on chamomile, essential oil, antioxidant activity, apigenin, Chamaemelum Nobile, oxidative stresses, medicinal plants, natural products and Matricaria chamomilla. Moreover, the links show the relationship between the keywords in two-time frames and the thicker the lines, the greater the relationship between the two keywords.

Figure 5: Thematic evolution map of chamomile publications based on authors keywords.

DISCUSSION

The method of bibliometric analysis can be used to analyze a large amount of scientific data. With this method it is possible to get the evolutionary nuances of a particular subject while the emerging areas in that particular field are revealed to us.[25] If bibliometric studies are done well in a special field, it can create firm foundations for advancing that field in meaningful and new ways. Conducting bibliometric studies in a specific field allows the researcher to get an overview of the subject, find out the knowledge gaps and get ideas for future research.[26]

The objective of the present bibliometric analysis was to capture the characteristics of research publications on the topic of chamomile. The search conducted on Medline, Web of Science, Bioscience and Scopus yielded nearly 1900 research publications from 1980 to 2021, representing the first bibliometric analysis of chamomile literature to date to the author’s knowledge.

Several scientometric studies have investigated the field of plants. For example, in the study of Aurang Zeb et al.,[27] the interaction between nanoparticles and plants has been investigated. The results of this study, which examined more than 900 scientific documents, will be advantageous for fully understanding the relevant research themes and the research trends of interaction of nano-plant.

In a previous paper the scientometric analysis was done to obtain knowledge mapping of Coptis. Overall, their results showed that the anti-oxidative stress, pharmacokinetics and Alzheimer’s disease treatment of Coptis are new hotspots in this field and this data are beneficial for future research.[28]

The results of a bibliometric analysis on Moringa oleifera publications during 1935-2019 showed that there are more than 3000 publications in this field and the global annual average publications production on M. oleifera study registered 16.18% growth and averaged to 17.69 citations per document.[29] Also, similar research on Celastrus paniculatus during 2001 to 2018 showed that among 120 publications, annual output on research registered 16.55% and 85.71% growth during the last 18 years. The bibliometric analysis showed that more pharmacological study and other researches on the safety, bioavailability and pharmacokinetics are necessary in future.[30]

Moreover, similar studies have examined plants in terms of bibliometric studies, among which plants such as Aloe vera,[31] Panax species[32] and rographis paniculate,[33] Withania somnifera,[34] Curcuma longa,[35] Nigella sativa[36] and etc., can be mentioned.

In current study a total of 1860 articles were analyzed about chamomile that had been written by 6834 authors. Our results showed that 90 articles were prepared by a single author and almost about four authors were involved in writing a paper.

Chamomile is popular as a traditional medicinal plant in the prevention and healing of disease in the world for centuries.[37] Articles related to the chamomile have been of interest in most countries, but Shiraz University (Iran) has the greatest number of affiliations in articles and chamomile is native to this region. Besides, Brazil and the United States have the highest contributions in terms of subjects and affiliations and are ranked second and third, respectively.

The impact factor of a journal and the total number of journal or document citation are between the important criteria used to express the scientific impact of a publication. Also, the number of citations actually indicates the dissemination of its results and is used as a marker to measure the importance of that article in the special subject.[24, 38] Therefore, the total number of citation of documents is mentioned in the current study to assess the paper’s quality. From the analysis, we observed that most of the leading papers on chamomile and chamomile-related studies were published in high impact factor journals such as the ethnopharmacology (n=38), food chemistry (n=32) and phytomedicine (n=25). In the same manner, the topmost cited papers on chamomile studies were also published in high impact factor journals and the average citations per documents was 21.48 and average citations per year per doc was 2.03. The most cited paper on chamomile retrieved from the current analysis was the research article entitled “Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts” published in Journal of Food Chemistry in 2004 with 1095 citations.[18]

“Chamomile” is the word that is most frequently used in author keywords, title and abstract and “L” in keywords plus which refers to Linn, the person naming the chamomile plant for first time.

In the entire dataset of 6834 contributing authors, Kovacik J, Klejdus B and Hedbavany J had a greater number of published articles on chamomile, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a comprehensive search was conducted for learning about the present status of chamomile research and predicting the further tendency of the scientific research of this plant. In recent years, many studies have addressed chamomile. Since the popularity of traditional medicine and the use of medicinal plants for treating diseases has increased, the use of optimal and efficient analytical approaches, such as scientometrics seems necessary. Besides, specifying countries, universities and authors with the most scientific contributions in studies on chamomile is of great importance. The present study showed the keywords most frequently used over the years and the connections between chamomile compounds and their therapeutic effects. A scientometric analysis of the articles published in this field reveals the shortcomings in the field and directions for future research.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Kakoei, S; Karbasi, N; Raeiszadeh, M; Tajadini, H; Nekouei, AH. The efficacy of henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) mouthwash versus chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% mouthwash as adjuvant therapy of oral lichen planus: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2022;290:115037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2022.115037DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Mohamadi, N; Soltanian, S; Raeiszadeh, M; Moeinzadeh, M; Ohadi, M; Sharifi, F et al. Characteristics and in vitro anti skin aging activity and UV radiation protection of morin loaded in niosomes. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2022;21(11):6326–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15273DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Srivastava, JK; Shankar, E; Gupta, S. Chamomile: A herbal medicine of the past with a bright future. Molecular medicine reports. 2010;3(6):895–901. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2010.377DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Singh, O; Khanam, Z; Misra, N; Srivastava, MK. Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.): an overview. Pharmacognosy reviews. 2011;5(9):82. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.79103DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Qiu-Xiang, X; Hong-Tong, B; Ling-Chen, S; Tian-Gang, G; Chuang-Dao, J; Lei, S. Research Progress on Active Composition and Practical Application of Medicinal Plants of Matricaria recutita. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 2012;39(9):1859.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Wu, H; Yang, K; Dong, L; Ye, J; Xu, F. Classification, Distribution, Biosynthesis, and Regulation of Secondary Metabolites in Matricaria chamomilla. Horticulturae. 2022;8(12):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121135DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.El Mihyaoui, A; Esteves da Silva, JC; Charfi, S; Candela Castillo, ME; Lamarti, A; Arnao, MB. Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.): a review of ethnomedicinal use, phytochemistry and pharmacological uses. Life. 2022;12(4):479. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12040479DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Hajizadeh-Sharafabad, F; Varshosaz, P; Jafari-Vayghan, H; Alizadeh, M; Maleki, V. Chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) and diabetes mellitus, current knowledge and the way forward: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2020;48:102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.c.tim.2019.102284DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Khalesi, ZB; Beiranvand, SP; Bokaie, M. Efficacy of chamomile in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of Pharmacopuncture. 2019;22(4):204. https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2019.22.028DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.El Joumaa, MM; Borjac, JM. Matricaria chamomilla: A valuable insight into recent advances in medicinal uses and pharmacological activities. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2022;21(6):1913–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-022-09817-0DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Bayliak, MM; Dmytriv, TR; Melnychuk, AV; Strilets, NV; Storey, KB; Lushchak, VI. Chamomile as a potential remedy for obesity and metabolic syndrome. EXCLI journal. 2021;20:1261.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Sah, A; Naseef, PP; Kuruniyan, MS; Jain, GK; Zakir, F; Aggarwal, G. A Comprehensive Study of Therapeutic Applications of Chamomile. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15(10):1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15101284DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Tajedini, O; Ghazizade, A; Sadatmoosavi, A. Identifying the Effects of Co-authorship Strategies on the Citation-based Performance of Scholars: A Social Networks Analysis. J Sci Res. 2018;7(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.7.1.3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Khazaneha, M; Osareh, F; Shafiee, K. Trend linking of multiple system atrophy: a scientometric study. Endocrine, Metabolic and Immune Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-Immune, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders). 2021;21(4):700–10. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530320666200607194810DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Sadatmoosavi, A; Tajedini, O; Esmaeili, O; Abolhasani Zadeh, F; Khazaneha, M. Emerging trends and thematic evolution of breast cancer: Knowledge mapping and co-word analysis. JMIR cancer. 2021;7(4):e26691. https://doi.org/10.2196/26691DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Rodríguez-Soler, R; Uribe-Toril, J; Valenciano, JDP. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Land use policy. 2020;97:104787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land.usepol.2020.104787DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Aria, M; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics. 2017;11(4):959–75.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Miliauskas, G; Venskutonis, P; Van Beek, T. Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food chemistry. 2004;85(2):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.05.007DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Marino, M; Bersani, C; Comi, G. Impedance measurements to study the antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Lamiaceae and Compositae. International journal of food microbiology. 2001;67(3):187–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605.(01DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Soliman, KM; Badeaa, R. Effect of oil extracted from some medicinal plants on different mycotoxigenic fungi. Food and chemical toxicology. 2002;40(11):1669–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(02DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Soković, M; Glamočlija, J; Marin, PD; Brkić, D; Van Griensven, LJ. Antibacterial effects of the essential oils of commonly consumed medicinal herbs using an in vitro model. Molecules. 2010;15(11):7532–46. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15117532DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Abdel-Gaber, A; Abd-El-Nabey, B; Sidahmed, I; El-Zayady, A; Saadawy, M. Inhibitive action of some plant extracts on the corrosion of steel in acidic media. Corrosion science. 2006;48(9):2765–79.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Hu, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, S; Xing, M; Zhang, S; Fu, Y et al. DCCRN: Deep complex convolution recurrent network for phase-aware speech enhancement. arXiv preprint arXiv:200800264. 2020.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Igwaran, A; Edoamodu, CE. Bibliometric analysis on tuberculosis and tuberculosis-related research trends in Africa: a decade-long study. Antibiotics. 2021;10(4):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040423DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Donthu, N; Kumar, S; Pandey, N; Lim, WM. Research constituents, intellectual structure, and collaboration patterns in Journal of International Marketing: An analytical retrospective. Journal of International Marketing. 2021;29(2):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X2110.04234DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Donthu, N; Kumar, S; Mukherjee, D; Pandey, N; Lim, WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research. 2021;133:285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Zeb, A; Liu, W; Wu, J; Lian, J; Lian, Y. Knowledge domain and emerging trends in nanoparticles and plants interaction research: A scientometric analysis. NanoImpact. 2021;21:100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2020.100278DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Huang, Z; Hou, Z; Liu, F; Zhang, M; Hu, W; Xu, S. Scientometric analysis of medicinal and edible plant coptis. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:725162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.725162DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Gupta, B; Ahmed, K. Moringa oleifera: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Publications during 1935-2019. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2020;14(28). https://doi.org/10.5530/phrev.2020.14.12DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Ahmed, K; Gupta, B; Singh, N; Thakur, V; Kumar, A. Celastrus paniculatus: A Bibliometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2001-18. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2020;14(27). https://doi.org/10.5530/phrev.2020.14.3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Badgujar, AB; Poojary, DV; Pednekar, S. A scientometric assessment of proximateprinciples, catalase activity and phytochemistry of Aloe barbadensis Miller. IOSR Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2020;6(3):10–4.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Zeng, T-x; Pei, J; Miao, Y-j; Zheng, Y; Gu, S-j; Zhao, L et al. Current Status and Research Trends of Panax Between 1900–2019: A Bibliometric Analysis. Chinese journal of integrative medicine. 2022;28(6):547–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-021-3315-8DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Gupta, B; Ahmed, K; Bansal, J; Bansal, M. Andrographis paniculata Global Publications Output: A Bibliometric Assessment during 2003-18. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2019;9(3). https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.2019.3.20DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Gupta, B; Ahmed, K. Research on Withania somnifera (Ashwaganda): A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 1995-2018. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2019;9(2). https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.2019.2.12DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Sivasekaran, K. Curcuma Longa (Medicinal Plant) Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output with Reference to Web of Science. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). 2021;12(5):1477–96. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.2115DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Gupta, B; Mueen Ahmed, K. Research on Nigella sativa: A scientometric assessment of global publications’ output during 1989–2018. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2018;8(4). https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_10_1DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.Srivastava, JK; Gupta, S. Chamomile: A herbal agent for treatment of diseases of the elderly. Foods and dietary supplements in the prevention and treatment of disease in older adults: Elsevier. 2015;171–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-418680-4.00018-XDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Munzer, BW; Love, J; Shipman, BL; Byrne, B; Cico, SJ; Furlong, R et al. An analysis of the top-cited articles in emergency medicine education literature. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;18(1):60. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31492DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Khazaneha, M., Zandrahimi, F., Sadatmoosavi, A., Salarpour, S., Karegar-Borzi, H., Tajedini, O., Arvan, H., Raeiszadeh, M., & Raisszadeh, A. (2024). An Overview of Scientific Publication of the Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 13(2), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.13.2.47