jrnls.org logo
Submit

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

SEE ALL 19 JOURNALS
Journal of Scientometric ResearchNOW IN
Article

Leadership Perspectives on the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: A Broad Systematic Literature Review

Carina Faustina Santos1★, Jorge Laureano Moya Rodriguez1, Cristiano Hora De Oliveira Fontes1, Sandro Breval Santiago2★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Industrial Engineering Program, Polytechnic School, Federal University of Bahia, BRAZIL.
  2. 2Federal University of Amazonas, BRAZIL.

CORRESPONDENCE

Carina Faustina Santos

Jorge Laureano Moya Rodriguez Industrial Engineering Program, Polytechnic School, Federal University of Bahia, BRAZIL.

jorgemoyar@gmail.com

Received: 17-03-2025; Revised: 07-05-2025; Accepted: 24-07-2025.

Volume 14, Issue 2 · pp. 467–478 · PUBLISHED May-Aug 2025 · DOI: 10.5530/jscires.20251691

View on JSR original site ↗

ABSTRACT

The objective of this article is to present a systematic review of the literature on leadership in the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 and to highlight potential for future research. A bibliometric and content analysis of a wide range of scientific production was carried out in order to present the main trends and critical points of this subject. Through the evaluation of a sample group of two hundred and forty-one articles, it was possible to trace paths and understand approaches, identifying features, highlights and challenges of the Industry 5.0 leader. The literature analyzed shows that this leadership is mainly based on the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary for performance and overcoming difficulties inherent to the demands of the industrial segment, which involve technological transformation, sustainability, resilience and human factors. This study fills a gap in the Industry 5.0 leadership literature by systematically exploring human-machine collaboration and sustainability-oriented leadership traits. Additionally, in addition to discussing how to address the demands inherent to Industry 5.0, this paper highlights that the consolidation of the transition from I4.0 to I5.0 is indeed in progress. In this scenario, this paper provides reflections for organizations that are experiencing this transition process.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Humanity has gone through several industrial revolutions at a rapid pace. The industrial sector has been undergoing continuous transformations on a global scale and is currently immersed in the transition from the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0, I4.0) to the fifth industrial revolution (Industry 5.0, I5.0). Companies around the world are still adapting to the practices and advances of I4.0.[1] While I4.0 is centered on technological and digital advancement, which in turn triggered the optimization of industrial processes and procedures, replacing human activities with automated systems, I5.0 stands out for its emphasis on symbiotic collaboration between humans and machines.[2, 3] This evolution is based on premises of sustainability, resilience, and human-centeredness.”[4–6]

Humanity has gone through several industrial revolutions at a rapid pace. The industrial sector has been undergoing continuous transformations on a global scale and is currently immersed in the transition from the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0, I4.0) to the fifth industrial revolution (Industry 5.0, I5.0). Companies around the world are still adapting to the practices and advances of I4.0[1] through technological and digital innovation, optimization of industrial processes, automation and replacement of human activities by intelligent systems. In this continuous transformation, Industry 5.0 emerges as a complementary evolution of Industry 4.0, encouraging the insertion of new premises, by incorporating elements of human centrality, resilience and sustainability for processes in the industrial sector (Kans and Campos 2024). Thus, I5.0 focuses on the consequences of the separation between technological evolution and humanized practices and presents the need for synergy between humans and machines,[2, 3] aiming at the balance in the interactions between technology and society.[4–6]

I5.0 expands on the ideas of I4.0, following the premises of growth and consolidation of digital technology as a way to optimize processes and production. However, beyond this perspective, the fifth industrial revolution proposes a greater balance in the organizational environment through the formation of awareness in relation to the essentiality of the human factor, combining technological advancement and construction of a sustainable, healthy and resilient environment with respect for human rights and the environment.[3] It is, therefore, necessary for the industry to combine increased production with technological evolution, minimizing environmental and social impacts. The industry needs to be well equipped to overcome contemporary challenges.[7]

Leadership is essentially exercised by those who lead, stimulate, guide and accompany employees in the process of evolution.[8, 3] Leaders need contemporary knowledge and specific features to respond assertively to changes. An employee, in the context of the transformations arising from I5.0, is transferred from the company's cost base to become an investment in this new gear.[9, 10] Transformational leaders can have a direct impact in a transition scenario.[11, 3] Being visionary, innovative and committed to professional development, they inspire, stimulate and engage their subordinates.[12, 3] In line with I5.0, distributive leadership develops its leadership in a network, emphasizing the importance of decentralized structures, reciprocal influence and complementary leadership behaviors of formal and informal plural leaders, with shared responsibilities.[13, 14] Therefore, the complexity of this challenge requires expanding the analysis to a perspective capable of identifying the conditions that make leadership truly effective.[15]

This study presents an analysis of the current leadership landscape in the transition from I4.0 to I5.0, identifying challenges and future trends. The scientific production analyzed covers a period of five years and a comparative approach allowed highlighting new discussions through the dynamics of evolution in the context of the transition between the industries 4.0 and 5.0. This article presents the results of a systematic review based on the combination of bibliometric and content analysis techniques.

The motivation for this work is directly associated with the contemporaneity of the subject analyzed. The systematic review allows mapping the studies carried out, identifying gaps in literature and proposing new directions for research. In addition, the connection between keywords which reflect consolidated concepts and theories allows the confirmation of the transition hypothesis from I4.0 to I5.0. Understanding the scenario of this transition is necessary since it explores the typology of leadership at the current time, in addition to identifying the challenges and perspectives, aiming to equip leaders through the acquisition of new skills for the consolidation of I5.0. A changing environment requires new knowledge and new skills from leaders since this process involves the need to overcome challenges such as insecurity and job retention, resistance to change and the development of digital skills.[16–19]

This article is organized into four sections. Section 2 presents the methodology, section 3 presents the results obtained and the content analysis. Section 4 highlights the most important conclusions and contributions to the subject analyzed.

METHODOLOGY

The SCOPUS database was used for the systematic review, considering its comprehensiveness and quality of bibliometric data.[20, 21] In addition, the SCOPUS database has tools which enable the tracking, analysis and visualization of works, providing a broad view of the world's scientific production as it covers more than 20,000 journals from 5,000 international publishers.[22]

The VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) was used to identify and analyze the papers. This platform allows the creation, visualization and exploration of maps based on bibliometric network data (extracted from the Scopus database),[23, 24] the generation of maps that show co-authorship, citation and co-citation networks, as well as keyword maps.[23, 24] Within the scope of the analyzed topic (I4.0 to I5.0 transition), VOSviewer enabled the recognition of a humanistic, resilient and sustainable approach through the use of appropriate keywords (“sustainability”, “human resource management” and “human”), suggesting that the balance between technology and humanization is in progress. VOSviewer contributed to identifying the advancement of I5.0 goals, connecting concepts, technological elements and human factors.[25]

This work adopts a joint approach of bibliometric and content analysis aimed at understanding the constructs (theoretical model that aims to explain phenomena that are not yet fully understood) inherent to the subject analyzed.[26]

Bibliometric network analysis is a long-established method in academia for quantifying academic literature networks.[27] Furthermore, this approach reflects the relevance attributed by peers to the new knowledge generated, identifies the main keywords, authors, most productive countries and most prominent themes, as well as enabling the perception of the chronological evolution of the theme studied.

This paper aims to answer the following question: How the leadership landscape is being presented in the transition from I4.0 to I5.0? The leadership scenario involves an analysis of multiple factors that affect the leader's performance, including technological advances, climate and health issues, geopolitical dynamics, and socio-environmental pressures of contemporary society. Understanding this context allows for a more in-depth investigation, enabling the identification of challenges, desires, potentialities, and opportunities faced by both leaders and other employees. These variables shape the demand for innovative solutions and strategies that can contribute to the consolidation of I5.0, in which technology, productivity, well-being, and quality of life must be addressed synergistically.[2, 28, 29] What are the trends, features and perspectives related to leadership performance in this transition scenario? What are the new attributes that should be incorporated into leaders in the face of new technologies and aspects related to human factors aiming at the promotion and integration of values such as sustainability and resilience.[3] The steps of this work are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Systematic literature review.

Data collection, screening and delimitation

Searches were performed in the SCOPUS database considering the period from 2018 to 2024. The search considered references of paper titles, abstracts and topic selection. The integrated criteria presented in Table 1 were applied.

Table 1: Delimitation of keywords and applied filters.
ScopusKeywords“industry 5.0 AND leadership”
OR
“industry 4.0 AND leadership”
OR
“Industry 4.0 AND directors, AND supervisors, AND superintendents”
FILTER 1Article title, Abstract, Keywords
FILTER 2Articles
FILTER 3Period (2018-2024)

After defining the keywords, 241 articles were identified. After a content analysis to identify the existence of a direct relationship with the topic of interest, a total of 80 papers were selected.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After including the keywords and selecting the sample, the evaluation and correlation between the articles was carried out with the aim of recognizing patterns. In this exploratory process, similarities in the types of relationships and categories were identified. Then, bibliographic, bibliometric and content analyses were performed.

Bibliometric and content analysis

The configuration of scientific periodical production is characterized in three aspects: annual evolution of the number of published papers, authors and keywords.

In order to preliminarily analyze the direct relationship between I4.0 and I5.0 and aiming to confirm the hypothesis that the new industrial scenario is really a transition scenario, words present in the title, abstract or keywords in publications from 2011 (birth of industry 4.0) to 2024 were tested. Words related to the basic premises of Industry 5.0 were chosen, together with the keyword “Industry 4.0” (Table 2).

Table 2: Delimitation of keywords and applied filters.
Keywords found in industry 4.0 articlesResults
Industry 5.0 assumptionsResilience- industry 4.0 AND AND resilience OR - industry 4.0 AND resilient701
Sustainability- industry 4.0 AND AND sustainable OR - industry 4.0 AND sustainability OR industry 4.0 AND sustainable AND growth328
Centrality of the Human Being- industry 4.0 AND human AND factor OR - industry 4.0 AND man AND machine AND symbiosis OR - industry 4.0 AND people AND centralization OR - industry 4.0 AND human-centeredness OR - Industry 4.0 AND human-centered1122
Total Articles2151

Regarding the perspectives of approach within the scope of the I4.0- I5.0 transition, the works were grouped according to the topics: Sustainability, resilience and people-centeredness (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Evolution of publications - Industry 5.0 Premises.

Figure 2 shows the evolution of publications referring to each of the topics related to Industry 5.0 (sustainability, resilience and human-centeredness), together with the word “Industry 4.0”, suggesting the gradual introduction of the ideas and bases of the fifth revolution which confirms the transition and consolidation of work within the scope of Industry 5.0.

The frequency variation of the 3 keywords (‘sustainability’, ‘resilience’, ‘human-centered’) over the period 2015-2023 also showed increasing dominant behavior. The frequency of ‘sustainability’ has increased from 17 (2015-2016) to 60 (2021-2022) (253%), the frequency of ‘resilience’ has increased from 4 (2015-2016) to 63 (2021-2022) (148%) and the frequency of “human-centered’ has increased from 4 (2015-2016) to 29 (2022-2023) (63%) (‘human-centered’), which clearly reveals a concentration of research related to these topics and the consolidation of the emergence of the theme of industry 5.0 as a new step in the technological level. Although the frequency of publications related to the 3 keywords showed monotonic behavior, the derivative of its increase showed a decrease mainly in the 2020-2022 triennium, which can be attributed to the reduction in the intensity of research activities worldwide caused by the pandemic. Figure 2 shows an increasing occurrence of ‘sustainability’, ‘resilience’ and ‘human-centered leadership’ mainly in publications from 2018 to 2024, indicating a growing academic interest in the principles of Industry 5.0. The increasing emphasis on ‘human-centered leadership’ suggests that researchers are recognizing the need for leadership frameworks that integrate human-machine collaboration.

Another aspect refers to the diversity of papers that address one of the three topics/ pillars (sustainability, resilience and human-centeredness) without an integrated analysis, suggesting that the transition is in its initial phase. Therefore, it is possible to note the absence of studies that consolidate the theme of Industry 5.0 with an integrative approach of its pillars, especially with regard to the topic “leadership in Industry 5.0”.

New keywords were included in a second stage in order to identify references related to the current leadership scenario, in the context of environmental awareness, rational use of resources, adaptability to changes and human factors (Table 3).

Table 3: New keywords - second stage.
ScopusKeywords“industry 5.0 AND leadership”RESULTS: 241 articles found
OR
“industry 4.0 AND leadership”
OR
“Industry 4.0 AND directors, AND supervisors, AND superintendents”
FILTER 1Article title, Abstract, Keywords
FILTER 2Articles
FILTER 3Period (2011-2024)

As a result of the new filters (Table 3), a total of 241 references were obtained, the evolution of which in the period 2018-2023 shows a significant growth in the number of papers published on leadership in the transition from I4.0-I5.0 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Number of publications (vertical column) over five years (row) of research related to leadership in the transition period between I4.0 and I5.0. Note: Publications until Dec 2024.

Figure 3 shows a significant increase in publications between 2021 and 2023, which corresponds to the expansion of political discussions on Industry 5.0 in the European Union and on business models focused on sustainability.[4, 30] According to the publications, European leaders have expressed concerns about the current capitalist model, recognizing the urgency of structural reforms that enable better alignment between economic development and social well-being.[4, 31, 32]

The increase in the number of publications related to the topic of leadership over the period 2018-2024 was statistically confirmed through a regression test.[33] The regression test provided a p-value equal to 0.0002 (less than 0.05 considering a significance level of 95%), which implies rejection of the null hypothesis (there is no significant increase over time, angular coefficient close to zero) and confirms the alternative hypothesis (there is a statistically significant increase in the number of publications, Figure 3).

Figure 4 presents the authors who have published the most papers on the topic of leadership. Three groups of authors stand out: i) Jiju Antony (Khalifa University); ii) Michael Sony (Oxford Brookes Business School); iii) Olivia McDermott (University of Galway). Their respective works address the challenges of I4.0 and point out the importance of leadership in overcoming adversity.

Figure 4: Authors and number of articles published (column) (I4.0 - I5.0 transition).

Only three authors have six publications each related to the same specific theme on leadership. The other authors have few publications addressing the theme of leadership in the transition from I4.0 to I5.0.

Figure 5 shows the distribution of publications by area of knowledge and it can be seen that the theme of leadership is a transversal theme, discussed in works related to the development of products, processes and the provision of services, on a global scale.

Figure 5: Approach to the topic of leadership by area of knowledge in the transition period I4.0-I5.0.

Figure 6 shows the keywords contained in the title or keywords or in the abstract of the 241 papers. The most prominent keyword was “industry 4.0”, followed by “leadership” (both chosen as a parameter for the research). The most prominent words appear with words that characterize the technological context of I4.0, which is verified through words such as “digital transformation”, “digitalization”, “innovation”, “artificial intelligence” and “internet of things”.

Figure 6: Keywords.

The keywords are grouped into five clusters (Table 4). Table 4 highlights that 66% of the occurrences are related to the technology sector, in accordance with the potential of I4.0. On the other hand, it is noteworthy that the technological characteristic has continuity in the context of I5.0, which aims to associate this aspect with the balance between man and machine.

Table 4: Description of keywords extracted from the VOSviewer tool.
KeywordOccurrences
Industry 4.0126
Leadership49
Innovation20
Digital transformation20
Sustainability18
Industrial Revolutions15
Digitization13
Quality 4.012
Fourth Industrial Revolution12
Human Resources G are11
Manufacturing11
Article10
Decision Making10
Artificial intelligence10
Industrial research9
Project management9
Supply chain management9
Sustainable development8
Human8
Supply chain8
Information management7
Internet of Things7
Digitization7
COVID-197
Quality Management7
Technology7

In addition to the technological perspective, a more humanistic, resilient and sustainable approach is also evident, with keywords that reflect this focus (sustainability, sustainable development, human resource management, human, COVID 19). Among the 153 occurrences directly related to the theme Leadership in Industry 5.0, 34% are focused on exclusive aspects of Industry 5.0, which suggests progress in the I4.0-I5.0 transition.

In this scenario of technological consolidation, the skills and capabilities of individuals and organizations are transformed to meet a high-tech scenario,[34] and leadership emerges as a dominant influence in this digital transformation of organizations.[35] In this process of constant change, leaders act as facilitators so that workers can expand their production capacity, become versatile and creative to meet the possible challenges of a technological and behavioral transition.[34]

Content Analysis

Eighty papers associated with the theme of leadership in the I4.0-I5.0 transition were considered with their respective authors 1. The deductive approach and content analysis were applied, organized into three categories: (1) Importance, (2) Features and (3) Challenges of leadership in the industrial transition.

The importance of leadership

Leadership is one of the main factors determining the success of any organization.[15] Effective leadership facilitates and inspires the development and training of employees.[35–37] Leadership studies not only focus on the leader but also on followers, contexts, and cultures.[38] In the era of digital transformation, leaders need to act from a human-centered perspective, recognizing how organizational changes affect the inclusion of employees in an interdisciplinary approach, with a holistic understanding, aiming for a sustainable and resilient environment.[39]

The leader must play a mediating and facilitating role in organizational learning processes, which include: strategic alignment, competence in information technology, institutional trust and willingness to make organizational changes.[40, 41] What features do leaders need to have to meet the transformations that emerge from the I4.0-I5.0 transition process?

Leadership features

Leadership style is the way in which people are directed and motivated by a leader to achieve organizational goals.[15] There are different styles that have gained prominence in recent years, namely, transformational, transactional, autocratic, charismatic, bureaucratic and democratic. The literature highlights that some of these styles are more effective in the I4.0-I5.0 transition scenario, such as transformational leadership which encourages changes in employees, shares the organization's vision and objectives, presents the necessary resources and promotes intellectual stimulation.[42, 43] According to,[38, 3] transformational leadership tends to positively inspire processes and results, and facilitates an environment of support and interaction with followers through continuous training and personal and professional development, encouraging employees to act collectively, beyond their own interests.

The current scenario requires leadership that achieves the implementation of well-defined strategies, effective change management, and a collaborative culture that considers the benefits and effectiveness of knowledge management, sustainability, employee support, and the use of advanced technologies.[35, 44] To this end, the leadership style must involve individual, technical, personal, methodological, and social skills that inspire the development and training of employees in new challenges.[44, 45] Researchers recommend that companies aim for leadership styles capable of improving team skills and abilities.[46, 35, 47–79, 16, 80, 17, 81–87, 10, 88–102, 34, 103–114, 31, 115–118, 32, 19, 119]

The most important skills for leadership are effective communication, innovation, cooperation, creativity, problem solving, lifelong learning, knowledge of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and motivation.[90, 19] These skills stimulate decision-making, emotional intelligence, cognitive flexibility, service orientation, coordination/management skills, critical thinking and creativity, technological skills and complex problem-solving.

According to,[3] leaders of the fifth industrial revolution must have features based on knowledge of enabling technologies, team management, data-driven decision-making and an attitude capable of bringing revolutionary concepts about this new scenario into work practice.

Leadership challenges in the transition scenario

The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0, I4.0) is connected with innovative approaches and technological advances that began in Germany in 2011. I4.0 is based on simulation technology, industrial Internet of Things (IoT), systems integration, cybersecurity, cloud computing, additive manufacturing, reality augmentation systems, big data analysis, and robotic process automation, among others.[17, 57]

Over the years, several changes have impacted people's lives and various institutions. Phenomena such as COVID-19 and environmental disasters have emerged, which have prompted new reflections and the need for continuous adaptations to ensure the survival and improvement of processes and routines, not only in society but also in the organizational environment. In response to these transformations, leaders need to follow the premises of institutions, in the face of the new demands imposed by the contemporary scenario. In addition, the virtual environment has become “ubiquitous”.

The fifth industrial revolution (Industry 5.0, I5.0) is associated with principles such as human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience, in a context of continuous technological advances.[1, 3] Resilience enables versatility and adaptability to external factors such as climate change. Sustainability is associated with concern for the resources used, the impact generated on the environment, and responsible action. Human-centricity in the face of changes in the nature of work and organizations has direct impacts on the worker's routine and the organizational environment.[65]

In the context of industry transformation through the adoption of techniques and processes based on information technologies, the management and optimization of work processes deserves to be highlighted, aiming at increasing productivity and reducing costs, considering, on the other hand, the lack of resources and financial investments, the lack of qualification and training of employees and the technical and procedural challenges.[17, 18, 112]

The changing nature of work and organizations, the increase in productivity made possible by automation of work and the replacement of human labor have a direct impact on employee retention and work relationships. Such transformations result in insecurity and the need for constant training to use new technological resources.[17, 112, 19] In this environment, people experience a mix of positive and negative emotions while working together with intelligent machines, which influences satisfaction, well-being and health.[16, 112] The effects of the introduction of new technologies on the human workforce have been the subject of studies and debates, which are still incipient.[119] In times of uncertainty, leadership is essential to harmonize this volatile reality, through welcoming, identifying learning gaps and managing training.[41, 16, 17]

It is important that leaders are aware of their role, the organizational context, and are well equipped with skills and knowledge about their organization and their subordinates.[36] On the other hand, humanity is experiencing pressure for more sustainable solutions, with adaptability to abrupt social and environmental changes.[77, 120] According to,[121] the COVID-19 pandemic has unbalanced organizations, bringing unforeseen, adverse situations and highlighted the need for organizational leaders to develop resilience, recovery, agility and reaction capabilities.

Understanding the role of the leader, as well as their demands and adaptation priorities, is essential for the transition from an exclusively technological focus to a more balanced approach which meets the technological needs of the industrial environment but, at the same time, promotes the well-being of the people involved. This process involves the incorporation of principles related to sustainability, human-centered and resilient approach, as advocated by Industry 5.0.[122, 123] A leader aligned with the three fundamental premises of Industry 5.0 contributes significantly to the transformation of the various industrial sectors, promoting innovations that balance productive efficiency and organizational well-being, in addition to fostering a more adaptable environment capable of responding to global changes. Multinational automakers have management that is more committed to human relations and sustainability.[124] Programs or practices focused on ESG (Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance) provide the automotive sector with technological resources to achieve productive efficiency and product innovation.[125, 126] In the context of abnormal situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important that organizational leaders develop resilience, adaptation, agility and recovery capabilities.[121]

CONCLUSION

Observing the last few years of research, there is a trend towards consolidation of the transition from I4.0-I5.0, with the gradual increase in ideas and premises of the fifth industrial revolution (sustainability, resilience and human-centricity) in works related to I4.0.

Leadership in the context of I5.0 faces the challenge of mapping features that promote the acquisition of skills appropriate to the context of constant change. These changes impose, among other things, the need for a different perspective on human factors which, unlike technological challenges, remain little explored.

Contemporary leadership requires attributes that go beyond the position held and is anchored in knowledge, technical and behavioral skills that add value and facilitate the facing of emerging challenges. These skills allow the leader to play a mediating role, which is essential in the context of technological and humanistic transitions.

Bibliometric research contributes to the recognition of the transitional context in which leadership and industry are inserted. The trends and competencies identified suggest reflections and alternatives focused on achieving a sustainable, resilient and human approach in the technology industry. To this end, industry needs to equip itself. The results suggest future research that details the skills needed by leaders so that the industry can promote appropriate training through continuous learning plans, in addition to providing the sectors with tools to attract new leadership positions.

There is a noticeable gap in the literature regarding the analysis of leadership competencies in the transition process from Industry 4.0 to 5.0, considering the innovative nature of this topic. Future studies can expand this literature review and conduct field research, involving both industrial and academic experts, in order to generate more robust data on the skills required of leaders in this new scenario.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Pereira, R; Santos, N.. ‘Industry 5.0: reflections on a new paradigmatic approach for industry.’. ANPAD. EnANPAD. 2022;2177–576.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Akkaya, B; Ahmed, J.. VUCA-RR toward industry 5.0. Agile management and VUCA-RR: opportunities and threats in Industry 4.0 towards Society 5.0. Emerald Publishing Limited. 2022;1–11.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Thomas, A; Chawla, Y; Varma, A; Szleter, P. The Role of Business Leaders in Industry 5.0. In: The International Research & Innovation Forum 2023;pp. 629-640. Cham: Springer Nature. 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Breque, M; De Nul, L; Petridis, A.. ‘Industry 5.0: towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry.’. Luxembourg, LU.: European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2021;46.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Xu, X; Lu, Y; Vogel-Heuser, B; Wang, L.. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0-inception, conception and perception. J Manuf Syst. 2021;61:530–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Huang, S; Wang, B; Li, X; Zheng, P; Mourtzis, D; Wang, L.. Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0-comparison, complementation and co-evolution. J Manuf Syst. 2022;64:424–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Akturk, C; Talan, T; Cerasi, CC. Education 4.0 and University 4.0 from Society 5.0 Perspective, IEEE. 2022.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Antonazzo, L; Stroud, D; Weinel, M.. Smart manufacturing and tasks automation in the steel industry: reflecting on routine work and skills in Industry 4.0. Econ Ind Democr: 0143831X231201002. 2023;44(1):25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X211059227DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Črešnar, R; Nedelko, Z.. Understanding future leaders: how are personal values of generations Y and Z tailored to leadership in industry 4.0?. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114417DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Bakir, A; Dahlan, M.. Higher education leadership and curriculum design in industry 5.0 environment: a cursory glance. Dev Learn Organ. 2023;37(3):15–7.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Xie, L.. The impact of servant leadership and transformational leadership on learning organization: a comparative analysis. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2020;41(2):220–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0148DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Amankwaa, A; Gyensare, MA; Susomrith, P.. Transformational leadership with innovative behaviour: examining multiple mediating paths with PLS-SEM. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2019;40(4):402–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2018-0358DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Chou, CH; Shrestha, S; Yang, CD; Chang, NW; Lin, YL; Liao, KW et al. miRTarBase update 2018: a resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D296–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1067DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Klar, S; Leeper, TJ.. ‘Identities and intersectionality: a case for Purposive sampling in Survey‐Experimental research.’ Experimental methods in survey research: techniques that combine random sampling with random assignment;. 2019;419–33.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Al Khajeh, EH.. Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. Hum Resour Manag Res. 2018;2018:1–10.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Mukhuty, S; Upadhyay, A; Rothwell, H.. Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: the role of human resource practices. Bus Strategy Environ. 2022;31(5):2068–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3008DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Nor, MM; Ilias, K; Hamid, MA; Siraj, S; Abdullah, MH; Yaakob, MN et al. The use of fuzzy Delphi method in developing soft skills of Industrial Revolution 4.0 in Pdpc at Malaysian institute of teacher education. Res Militaris. 2022;12(2):7345–58.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Şimşek Demirbağ, K; Yıldırım, N.. Getting the measure of the fourth Industrial Revolution: advantages and challenges of Industry 4.0 in the Turkish white goods industry. Cent Eur Manag J. 2023;31(1):82–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-03-2021-0026DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Sahara, S; Oktaviani, V; Sandi, E; Zulfa, V; Yasinta, RB; Sa’diyah, R et al. Graduate competencies based on the aspect of organizational activity in industry 4.0. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2024;13(2):652–62. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25803DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Donthu, N; Kumar, S; Pattnaik, D; Lim, WM.. A bibliometric retrospective of marketing from the lens of psychology: insights from Psychology & Marketing. Psychol Mark. 2021;38(5):834–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21472DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Paul, J; Lim, WM; O’Cass, A; Hao, AW; Bresciani, S.. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR ‐ 4 ‐ SLR). Int J Con Stud. 2021;45(4):O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Henchen, AV; Moura-Leite, R; Lopes, JC.. Sustainability and management of Higher Education Institutions: analysis of scientific production. J Environ Manag Sustain. 2019;8(1):38–60.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Van Eck, NJ; Waltman, L.. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Hernández-Perlines, F; Ariza-Montes, A; Blanco-González-Tejero, C.. Intrapreneurship research: A comprehensive literature review. J Bus Res. 2022;153:428–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.015DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Al Husaeni, DF; Nandiyanto, AB; Maryanti, R.. Bibliometric analysis of educational research in 2017 to 2021 using VOSviewer: Google Scholar indexed research. Indonesian J Teach Sci. 2023;3(1):1–8.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Homrich, AS; Galvão, G; Abadia, LG; Carvalho, MM.. The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;175:525–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Scheffler, M; Brunzel, J.. Destructive leadership in organizational research: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics. 2020;125(1):755–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03621-3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Di Battista, A; Grayling, S; Hasselaar, E; Leopold, T; Li, R; Rayner, M et al. Future of jobs report 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Ivanov, D.. The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. Int J Prod Res. 2023;61(5):1683–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Soares, AL; Simões, AC; Zimmermann, R.. 0+ 1-uma visão integradora da Indústria 5.0. Indústria. 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Botti, A; Baldi, G.. Business model innovation and Industry 5.0: a possible integration in GLAM institutions. Eur J Innov Manag. 2025;28(1):27–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2023-0825DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Olsson, AK; Eriksson, KM; Carlsson, L.. Management toward Industry 5.0: a co-workship approach on digital transformation for future innovative manufacturing. Eur J Innov Manag. 2024.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Hansen, JE; Sato, M; Simons, L; Nazarenko, LS; Sangha, I; Kharecha, P et al. Global warming in the pipeline. Oxf Open Clim Change. 2023;3(1):kgad008.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgad008DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Mustapha, I; Ali, M; Khan, N; Sikandar, H.. The impact of Industry 4.0 on innovative organizations, A thematic review using the PRISMA statement 2020. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2023;17(9):88–105.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Hargitai, DM; Bencsik, A.. The role of leadership in digital learning organizations. Emerg Sci J. 2023;7(Special Issue 2):111–24. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-SIED2-09DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Shaharruddin, S; Musa, MM.. A future Malaysian banking landscape in embracing IR4.0: A new leadership model. ARASET. 2022;28(3):264–71. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.28.3.264271DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.Behie, SW; Pasman, HJ; Khan, FI; Shell, K; Alarfaj, A; El-Kady, AH et al. Leadership 4.0: the changing landscape of industry management in the smart digital era. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2023;172:317–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.014DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Tal, D; Gordon, A.. Leadership of the present, current theories of multiple involvements: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2016;107(1):259–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1880-yDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. 39.Gledson, B; Zulu, SL; Saad, AM; Ponton, H.. Digital leadership framework to support firm-level digital transformations for Construction 4.0. Constr Innov. 2024;24(1):341–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2022-0328DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. 40.Ruel, H; Rowlands, H; Njoku, E.. Digital business strategizing: the role of leadership and organizational learning. Compet Rev. 2021;31(1):145–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2019-0109DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. 41.Saabye, H; Kristensen, TB; Wæhrens, BV.. Developing a learning-to-learn capability: insights on conditions for Industry 4.0 adoption. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2022;42(13):25–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2021-0428DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  42. 42.Kim, JK; Yang, JJ; Lee, YK.. The impact of transformational leadership on service employees in the hotel industry. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(9):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090731DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  43. 43.Van Dun, DH; Kumar, M.. Social enablers of Industry 4.0 technology adoption: transformational leadership and emotional intelligence. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2023;43(13):152–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2022-0370DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  44. 44.Khatri, P; Dutta, S.. Next generation leadership skill set for Industry 4.0. Int J Public Sect Perform Manag. 2023;11(2):191–200.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  45. 45.Townsend, TA; Pedron, CD; De Souza, RM; Ruas, RL.. Industry 4.0 projects: A set of new individual competencies. Int J Comput Aid Eng Technol. 2023;18(4):225–52.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  46. 46.Podgórska, M.. Challenges and perspectives in innovative projects focused on sustainable Industry 4.0-A case study on polish project teams. Sustainability. 2022;14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095334DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  47. 47.Do, NB.. A novel method for the evaluation of the influence of transformational leadership style on employees’ turnover intention (IT) in the retail industry as facing the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2019;12(8):1362–70.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  48. 48.Nguyen, XH; Doan, XT; Tran, HL.. CEO ethical leadership, corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: evidence from garment and textile industry. Manag Sci Lett. 2019;9(Special Issue 13):2433–42. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.012DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  49. 49.Sousa, MJ; Santos, V; Sacavém, A; dos Reis, IP; Sampaio, MC.. 4.0 leadership skills in hospitality sector. J Rev Glob Econ. 2019;8:105–17. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.11DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  50. 50.Suryaningtyas, D; Sudiro, A; Eka, AT.; Dodi, W.I.; Acad Strateg Manag, J.. "Organizational resilience and organizational performance: Examining the mediating roles of resilient leadership and organizational culture.";18(2). 2019.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  51. 51.Uys, J; Webber-Youngman, R.. A 4.0D leadership model postulation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution relating to the South African mining industry. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2019;119(10):793–800. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/17/450/2019DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  52. 52.Veselovsky, MY; Izmailova, MA; Yunusov, LA; Yunusov, IA.. Quality of digital transformation management on the way of formation of innovative economy of Russia. Qual Access Success. 2019;20(169):66–71.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  53. 53.Zakaria, N; Nasir, A; Akhtar, A.. Are the leaders ready to embrace industry 4.0?. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst. 2019;11(5):543–9.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  54. 54.Bencsik, A.. Challenges of management in the digital economy. Int J Technol. 2020;11(6):1275–85. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i6.4461DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  55. 55.Hahm, SW.. A study of the roles of leadership styles and attitudes with social responsibility for the 4th Industrial Revolution. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst. 2020;14(2):789–806.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  56. 56.Prameswari, M; Asbari, M; Purwanto, A; Ong, F; Kusumaningsih, SW; Mustikasiwi, A et al. The impacts of leadership and organizational culture on performance in Indonesian public health: the mediating effects of innovative work behavior. Int J Control Autom. 2020;13(2):216–27.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  57. 57.Satpathy, S; Dash, KK; Mohapatra, M.. A study on the new design thinking for Industrial Revolution 4.0, requirements and graduate readiness. Rupkatha J Interdiscip Stud Humanit. 2020;12(4). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n4.09DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  58. 58.Vaidya, RW; Prasad, K; Mangipudi, MR.. Mental and emotional competencies of leader’s dealing with disruptive business environment-A conceptual review. Int J Manag. 2020;11(5):366–75.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  59. 59.Bag, S; Yadav, G; Dhamija, P; Kataria, KK.. Key resources for industry 4.0 adoption and its effect on sustainable production and circular economy: an empirical study. J Cleaner Prod. 2021;281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125233DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  60. 60.Buntain, M.. Process manufacturers leverage cloud computing for advanced analytics. InTech. 2021;68(2):1–9.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  61. 61.Fan, YJ; Liu, SF; Luh, DB; Teng, PS.. Corporate sustainability: impact factors on organizational innovation in the industrial area. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041979DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  62. 62.Fok-Yew, O; Hamid, NA.. The influence of lean practices and leadership on business excellence: Malaysian E&E manufacturing companies. Estud Econ Apl. 2021;39(4).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  63. 63.Kipper, LM; Iepsen, S; Dal Forno, AJ; Frozza, R; Furstenau, L; Agnes, J et al. Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. Technol Soc. 2021;64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101454DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  64. 64.Kwiotkowska, A; Gajdzik, B; Wolniak, R; Vveinhardt, J; Gębczyńska, M.. Leadership competencies in making industry 4.0 effective: the case of polish heat and power industry. Energies. 2021;14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144338DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  65. 65.Molino, M; Cortese, CG; Ghislieri, C.. Technology acceptance and leadership 4.0: A quali-quantitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010845DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  66. 66.Ruel, H; Rowlands, H; Njoku, E.. Digital business strategizing: the role of leadership and organizational learning. Compet Rev. 2021;31(1):145–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2019-0109DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  67. 67.Saabye, H; Kristensen, TB; Wæhrens, BV.. Developing a learning-to-learn capability: insights on conditions for Industry 4.0 adoption. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2022;42(13):25–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2021-0428DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  68. 68.Soomro, MA; Hizam-Hanafiah, M; Abdullah, NL; Ali, MH; Jusoh, MS.. Embracing industry 4.0: empirical insights from Malaysia. Informatics. 2021;8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020030DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  69. 69.Winasis, S; Djumarno, D; Riyanto, S; Ariyanto, E.. The effect of transformational leadership climate on employee engagement during digital transformation in Indonesian banking industry. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2021;5(2):91–6. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.3.001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  70. 70.Wu, Q; Cherian, J; Samad, S; Comite, U; Hu, H; Gunnlaugsson, SB et al. The role of CSR and ethical leadership to shape employees’ pro-environmental behavior in the era of industry 4.0. a case of the banking sector. Sustainability. 2021;13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179773DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  71. 71.Ávila Bohórquez, JH; Gil Herrera, RJ.. Proposal and validation of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for SMEs. J Ind Eng Manag. 2022;15(3):433–54. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3673DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  72. 72.Bai, Y; Wang, Z; Alam, M; Gul, F; Wang, Y.. The impact of authentic leadership on innovative work behavior: mediating roles of proactive personality and employee engagement. Front Psychol. 2022;13:879176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879176DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  73. 73.Banmairuroy, W; Kritjaroen, T; Homsombat, W.. The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation’s component factors: evidence from Thailand ’s new S- curve industries. Asia Pac Manag Rev. 2022;27(3):200–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.09.001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  74. 74.Chumnumporn, K; Jeenanunta, C; Simpan, S; Srivat, K; Sanprasert, V.. The role of a leader and the effect of a customer’s smart factory investment on a Firm’s Industry 4.0 technology adoption in Thailand. Int J Technol. 2022;13(1):26–37. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4814DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  75. 75.Coopasamy, S; Botha, AP.. Leadership 4.0: leadership changes required in the South African petroleum industry to support the fourth Industrial Revolution. S Afr J Ind Eng. 2022;33(2):96–110.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  76. 76.Glogovac, M; Ruso, J; Maricic, M. "ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0.". Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2022;33(5-6):529–47.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  77. 77.Jayashree, S; Reza, MN; Malarvizhi, CA; Gunasekaran, A; Rauf, MA.. Testing an adoption model for Industry 4.0 and sustainability: A Malaysian scenario. Sustain Prod Consumption. 2022;31:313–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.015DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  78. 78.Kwiotkowska, A; Wolniak, R; Gajdzik, B; Gębczyńska, M.. Configurational paths of leadership competency shortages and 4.0 leadership effectiveness: an fs/QCA study. Sustainability. 2022;14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052795DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  79. 79.Long, ND; Ooi, PT; Le, TV; Thiet, LT; Ai, TV; An, LQ et al. Leading in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution – a Perspective from Vietnam. Int J Technol. 2022;13(5):949–57. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5839DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  80. 80.Nasir, A; Zakaria, N; Zien Yusoff, RZ.. The influence of transformational leadership on organizational sustainability in the context of industry 4.0: mediating role of innovative performance. Cogent Bus Manag. 2022;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2105575DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  81. 81.Peña, J; Caruajulca, P.. Industry 4.0 evolutionary framework: the increasing need to include the human factor. J Technol Manag Innov. 2022;17(3):70–83. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242022000300070DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  82. 82.Podgórska, M.. Challenges and perspectives in innovative projects focused on sustainable Industry 4.0-A case study on polish project teams. Sustainability. 2022;14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095334DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  83. 83.Shaharruddin, S; Musa, MM.. A future Malaysian banking landscape in embracing IR4.0: A new leadership model. ARASET. 2022;28(3):264–71. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.28.3.264271DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  84. 84.Yang, K; Sunindijo, RY; Wang, CC.. Identifying leadership competencies for Construction 4.0. Buildings. 2022;12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091434DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  85. 85.Zhu, J; Zhang, B; Xie, M; Cao, Q.. Digital leadership and employee creativity: the role of employee job crafting and person-organization fit. Front Psychol. 2022;13:827057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827057DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  86. 86.Adekanmbi, FP; Ukpere, W.. The impact of innovative work behavior, perceived Leadership 4.0, and corporate social responsibility on sustaining banking industry performance in Nigeria within the 4IR Era. Banks Bank Syst. 2023;18(4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(4DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  87. 87.Adhiatma, A; Fachrunnisa, O; Nurhidayati, N; Rahayu, T.. Creating digital ecosystem for small and medium enterprises: the role of dynamic capability, agile leadership and change readiness. J Sci Technol Policy Manag. 2023;14(5):941–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-12-2020-0171DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  88. 88.Behie, SW; Pasman, HJ; Khan, FI; Shell, K; Alarfaj, A; El-Kady, AH et al. Leadership 4.0: the changing landscape of industry management in the smart digital era. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2023;172:317–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.014DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  89. 89.Bianco, D; Godinho Filho, M; Osiro, L; Ganga, GM.. Unlocking the relationship between lean leadership competencies and Industry 4.0 leadership competencies: an ISM/fuzzy Micmac approach. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2023;70(6):2268–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3069127DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  90. 90.Čermáková, J; Houda, M; Rolínek, L; Pech, M.. Perception of the leadership competency in the 4th revolution era in the Czech Republic. Manag Prod Eng Rev. 2023;14(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2023.145361DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  91. 91.Dabić, M; Maley, JF; Črešnar, R; Nedelko, Z.. Unappreciated channel of manufacturing productivity under industry 4.0: leadership values and capabilities. J Bus Res. 2023;162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113900DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  92. 92.Das, P; Perera, S; Senaratne, S; Osei-Kyei, R.. A smart modern construction enterprise maturity model for business scenarios leading to Industry 4.0. Smart Sustain Built Environ. 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  93. 93.Jufrizen, S; Farisi, S; Muslih, Sari M.. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of affective commitment and work engagement of hotel employees in Indonesia. Probl Perspect Manag. 2023;21(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  94. 94.Gadekar, R; Sarkar, B; Gadekar, A.. Analysis and evaluation of roadblocks hindering Lean-Green and Industry 4.0 practices in Indian manufacturing industries. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol. 2023;15(1):1–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDSST.325350DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  95. 95.Govindan, K; Arampatzis, G.. A framework to measure readiness and barriers for the implementation of Industry 4.0: A case approach. Electron Com Res Appl. 2023;59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101249DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  96. 96.Hargitai, DM; Bencsik, A.. The role of leadership in digital learning organizations. Emerg Sci J. 2023;7(Special Issue 2):111–24. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-SIED2-09DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  97. 97.Khatri, P; Duggal, HK; Dutta, S; Kumari, P; Thomas, A; Brod, T et al. Unveiling heterogenous knowledge-oriented leadership and knowledge acquisition based hybrid work agility of knowledge workers. J Knowl Manag. 2023;27(11):253–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0793DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  98. 98.Khatri, P; Dutta, S.. Next generation leadership skill set for Industry 4.0. Int J Public Sect Perform Manag. 2023;11(2):191–200.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  99. 99.Khourshed, NF; Elbarky, SS; Elgamal, S.. Investigating the readiness factors for Industry 4.0 implementation for manufacturing industry in Egypt. Sustainability. 2023;15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129641DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  100. 100.Kim, JK; Yang, JJ; Lee, YK.. The impact of transformational leadership on service employees in the hotel industry. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(9):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090731DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  101. 101.Mollah, MA; Choi, JH; Hwang, SJ; Shin, JK.. Exploring a pathway to sustainable organizational performance of South Korea in the digital age: the effect of digital leadership on IT capabilities and organizational learning. Sustainability. 2023;15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107875DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  102. 102.Suryadi, S; Muslim, AQ; Praja, BA.. Analysis of digital leadership in higher education in creating a world-class university at state universities. Corp Gov Organ Behav Rev. 2023;7(4):119–26. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv7i4p10DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  103. 103.Nirmal, DD; Nageswara Reddy, K; Sohal, AS; Kumari, M.. Development of a framework for adopting Industry 4.0 integrated sustainable supply chain practices: ISM–MICMAC approach. Ann Oper Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05427-xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  104. 104.Rodriguez-Lora, V; Valencia Arias, A; Brand-Ortiz, J.. Research trends in the field of organisational management: A bibliometric analysis. Intangible Cap. 2023;19(3):459–73. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2180DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  105. 105.Serrano, DR; Fraguas-Sánchez, AI; González-Burgos, E; Martín, P; Llorente, C; Lalatsa, A.. Women as Industry 4.0. entrepreneurs: unlocking the potential of entrepreneurship in Higher Education in STEM-related fields. J Innov Entrep. 2023;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00346-4DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  106. 106.Shang, G; Low, SP; Lim, XY.. Prospects, drivers of and barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in project management. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag. 2023;13(5):629–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-12-2022-0195DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  107. 107.Sharma, Y; Suri, A; Sijariya, R; Jindal, L.. Role of education 4.0 in innovative curriculum practices and digital literacy– A bibliometric approach. E Learn Digit Media. 2025;22(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231221073DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  108. 108.Takmasheva, I; Zelinskaya, A.. Modeling of sustainable development processes of entrepreneurial ecosystem in the context of biological threats based on the example of YUGRA. Rel Int Mundo Atual. 2023;2(40).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  109. 109.Tortorella, GL; Cauchick-Miguel, PA; Frazzon, EM; Fogliatto, FS; Godinho Filho, M; Thürer, M.. Readiness of Brazilian Industrial Engineering postgraduate programs for Industry 4.0: A knowledge dimensions assessment. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2023;31(3):501–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22595DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  110. 110.Townsend, TA; Pedron, CD; De Souza, RM; Ruas, RL.. Industry 4.0 projects: A set of new individual competencies. Int J Comput Aid Eng Technol. 2023;18(4):225–52.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  111. 111.Van Dun, DH; Kumar, M.. Social enablers of Industry 4.0 technology adoption: transformational leadership and emotional intelligence. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2023;43(13):152–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2022-0370DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  112. 112.Annamalai, S; Vasunandan, A.. Embracing intelligent machines: A qualitative study to explore the transformational trends in the workplace [journal]. CEMJ. 2024;32(3):350–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-03-2023-0137DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  113. 113.Avwokeni, AJ.. Strategic leadership and transactional leadership: the mediating effect of digital leadership in the world of Industry 4.0. J Econ Admin Sci. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-05-2023-0138DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  114. 114.Pereira, T; Oliveira, M; Ferreira, F; Busu, M.; Ciravegna-martins-da-fonseca, L.M.. Manuf Companies Ind 4.0 Maturity Perception Level: A Multivariate Analysis.". Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2024;17(1):196–216.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  115. 115.Cisneros, YL; Frías, SC; Infante, JR; Tribeño, PA; Yong-Chung, FE.. The estate of the art on digital transformation strategies for businesses. RISTI Rev Iber Sistem Tecnol Inf. 2024;2024(E65):44–56.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  116. 116.Gledson, B; Zulu, SL; Saad, AM; Ponton, H.. Digital leadership framework to support firm-level digital transformations for Construction 4.0. Constr Innov. 2024;24(1):341–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2022-0328DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  117. 117.Muslim, AQ; Setyono, L.. Exploring the nexus of digital leadership and digital literacy on higher education performance: the role of digital innovation. Eur J Educ Res. 2024;13(1):207–18.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  118. 118.Sony, M; Antony, J; Tortorella, G; McDermott, O; Gutierrez, L.. Determining the critical failure factors for Industry 4.0: an exploratory sequential mixed method study. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2024;71:1862–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3159860DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  119. 119.Ghazy, K; Fedorova, AE.. Hotel employees’ attitude and acceptance toward human-robot co-working based on the Industry 5.0 concept. Changing Soc Pers. 2022;6(4):906–26. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2022.6.4.209DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  120. 120.Petrescu, MG; Neacșa, A; Laudacescu, E; Tănase, M.. Energy in the era of Industry 5.0-opportunities and risks. Industry 5.0: creative and innovative organizations. Springer. 2023;71–90.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  121. 121.Albuquerque Pai, A; Anand, A; Pazhoothundathil, N; Ashok, L.. Leadership perspectives on resilience capabilities for navigating disruption. J Asia Bus Stud. 2024;18(1):103–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-03-2023-0081DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  122. 122.Knap-Stefaniuk, A.. The skills members of multicultural teams need to succeed in Industry 5.0-the opinion of managers from Portugal, France, and Greece. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;225:1478–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.136DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  123. 123.Poláková, M; Suleimanová, JH; Madzík, P; Copuš, L; Molnárová, I; Polednová, J.. Soft skills and their importance in the labour market under the conditions of Industry 5.0. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e18670.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18670DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  124. 124.Ribeiro, VB. Competências dos gestores na Indústria 5.0: estudo da indústria automotiva brasileira. 2024.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  125. 125.Ghadge, A; Mogale, DG; Bourlakis, M; Maiyar, LM; Moradlou, H.. Link between Industry 4.0 and green supply chain management: evidence from the automotive industry. Comput Ind Eng. 2022;169:108303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108303DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  126. 126.Nayal, K; Raut, RD; Yadav, VS; Priyadarshinee, P; Narkhede, BE.. RETRACTED: The impact of sustainable development strategy on sustainable supply chain firm performance in the digital transformation era. Bus Strategy Environ. 2022;31(3):845–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2921DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Santos, C. F., Rodriguez, J. L. M., Fontes, C. H. D. O., & Santiago, S. B. (2025). Leadership Perspectives on the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: A Broad Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Scientometric Research, 14(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20251691