jrnls.org logo
Submit

BROWSE ALL JOURNALS

SEE ALL 19 JOURNALS
Journal of Scientometric ResearchNOW IN
Article

Who is Funding Indian Research? A Look at Major Funding Sources Acknowledged in Indian Research Papers

Vivek Kumar Singh1, Prashasti Singh2, Anurag Kanaujia3,4★, Abhirup Nandy5★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Computer Science, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, INDIA.
  2. 2Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, INDIA.
  3. 3Delhi School of Analytics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, INDIA.
  4. 4CSIR-NIScPR, New Delhi, India.
  5. 5Institute of Informatics and Communication, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Anurag Kanaujia

Delhi School of Analytics, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110007, Delhi, INDIA. CSIR-NIScPR, New Delhi, INDIA.

anuragkanaujia01@gmail.com

Received: 15-09-2025; Revised: 29-10-2025; Accepted: 09-12-2025.

Volume 14, Issue 3 · pp. 909–917 · PUBLISHED Sep-Dec 2025 · DOI: 10.5530/jscires.20252176

View on JSR original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Background Science and scientific research activities, in addition to the involvement of the researchers, require resources like research infrastructure, materials and reagents, databases and computational tools, journal subscriptions and publication charges etc. In order to meet these requirements, researchers try to attract research funding from different funding sources, both intramural and extramural. Though some recent reports provide macro level details of the amount of funding provided by different funding agencies in India, it is not known what quantum of research output resulted from such funding. Objective and Methodology This paper, therefore, attempts to identify the research output produced with the funding provided by different funding agencies to Indian researchers. It uses Indian research publication data as a proxy to analyze funded research output of different agencies. Results The major funding agencies that support Indian research publications are identified and are further characterized in terms of being national or international, and public or private. Implications The analytical results not only provide a quantitative estimate of funded research from India and the major funding agencies supporting the research, but also discusses the overall context of research funding in India, particularly in the context of upcoming operationalization of Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF).

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Science is considered to be one of the greatest collective endeavours, that creates new knowledge. However, science and scientific research activities, in addition to the involvement of the researchers, require resources like research infrastructure, materials and reagents, databases and computational tools, journal subscriptions and publication charges etc. In order to meet these requirements, researchers try to attract research funding from different funding sources, both intramural and extramural. India has recently emerged as one of the top knowledge producers in the world, with 3rd rank in the global research output in Science and Engineering domain.[1] However, India’s Gross Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) has reduced from a high of ~0.90% in 2008 to 0.64% of GDP in 2021, which is quite low when compared to several other countries like USA, China, UK, Germany, South Korea etc.[2] Given the limited funding available to support science and technology research in India, it is important to identify what are the major funding agencies that support research activities in India.

The global expenditure on Research and Development (R&D) is about 2.5 Trillion USD as per 2022 data, with countries such as the United States and China spending in excess of 500 billion USD.[3] Competitive research funding is provided by different national agencies, (such as the US’s National Science Foundation-NSF, National Institute of Health-NIH, German Research Foundation-DFG, United Kingdom Research and Innovation-UKRI, French National Research Agency-ANR, National Natural Science Foundation of China etc.,). Similarly, in case of India the research funding support is provided by various agencies such as Department of Science and Technology (DST), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), University Grants Commission (UGC), Science and Engineering Research Board (erstwhile SERB that is now subsumed in ANRF), Department of Biotechnology (DBT) etc. As per the recent report from DST, respective contributions for research and development comprised central government (43.7%), state governments (6.7%), private sector (36.4%), public sector industry (4.4%) and higher education sector (8.8%).[4] Thus, majority funding to research and development activities is coming from public funding. This is in contrast to patterns of many other developed countries, where the private funding for research and development is in excess of the government funding.[5] In case of India, there has been a long-standing call for increasing the contributions for research from the private sector to also boost the overall GERD to level of above 2%. The ANRF specifically proposes to foster investment in R&D from the private sector entities.[6]

In this context, it is important to understand what is the current status of acknowledgement of R&D funding in research publications from Indian institutions. This essentially provides a top-level computational assessment and understanding of use and impact of research funding patterns in India. The article attempts to identify the major funding agencies, and to quantify the research output produced out of such funding. There lies the objective of this paper. Although existing reports provide some macro level financial data about the total amount of funding provided by various agencies, the impact of such funding in terms of published research outputs is not well documented. Therefore, this paper uses Indian research publication data sourced from Web of Science as a proxy to analyze the quantum of research output resulting out of the research funding provided by the different agencies. The analysis also indirectly provides a first-level analysis of accessibility and role of research funding to Indian researchers. More precisely, the study attempts to answer the following research questions:

RQ1: What proportion of Indian research output during 2011-22 received research funding?

RQ2: What are the major funding agencies acknowledged in Indian research publications during 2011-22?

RQ3: How are these identified funding agencies distributed in terms of being national or international and public or private?

Related Work

There have been several previous attempts to analyze the different aspects of research output from India as a whole as well as different institutions and institution systems. For example, many previous studies have tried to analyze India’s research output vis-a-vis various other countries.[7–14] The research output in terms of number of research publications of different states of India has also been analysed recently.[15] Similarly, the research outputs of different institutions and institution systems have been analysed in several respects. This includes major centrally funded institutions,[16] research intensive higher education institutions,[17, 18] Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs),[19–21] Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR),[22, 23] National Institutes of Technology (NITs),[24, 25] Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (IISERs),[26] ICAR,[27] IIMs,[28, 29] Indian Medical Institutions,[30] All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS),[31] and some selected private universities.[32, 33]

The impact of R&D spending on the levels of R&D undertaken has also been a subject of research by some studies. These include (a) India specific studies looking at the spending done by major central government S&T departments on R&D projects,[34–36] health research funding,[37] and (b) international outlook specific studies such as international funding patterns among BRICS nations,[38] G9 countries,[39] an Indian perspective on UKRI’s policy changes in research funding provided by them,[40] linkages of foreign R&D centres in India etc.[41] Some researchers have used R&D data to comment on the policies and mechanisms of research funding. For example, Hoffman, (2013) in a letter[42] responding to a previously published study, suggested the prerequisite of existing knowledge and experts in a country, above the research funding for higher research productivity, while Manu and Gala, 2020 looked at the research funding data and commented on the data management policies and guidelines of various funding agencies.[43] Some other studies have also explored various dimensions of unfunded research.[44, 45]

However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no available studies on identifying the major funding sources acknowledged in the recent Indian research publications, and quantifying the research output produced out of funding provided by different funding agencies to Indian researchers. Therefore, in this work, the major funding agencies that supported Indian research publications are identified and are further characterized in terms of being national or international, and public or private. A large-sized research publication data is analysed for the purpose. The analysis also indirectly provides a first-level analysis of accessibility and role of research funding to Indian researchers. The results obtained present interesting insights about research funding in India. Therefore, this study is novel in terms of its objective, analysis, and results.

Data and Methodology

The study utilised the research publication data collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database as a proxy of research output. The publication records indexed in the WoS core collection (comprising SCIE, SSCI and AHCI) for the period 2011-22 are obtained and analysed. The data period has been limited only till 2022 due to reasons of data stability. The following query was formulated to download the data:

(CU="India") AND (PY=2011-2022) AND DT=(Article OR Review)

Only publication records with document type ‘article or review’ were considered as they represent the primary research output in the database. The analysis methodology is detailed below. The analytical results are computed by writing programs in Python. The complete procedure for analysis is described below and is also shown as a diagram in Figure 1 for clarity of understanding and reproducibility.

Figure 1: Major steps in the analytical methodology.

The search query returned a total of 920,284 publication records for India. In order to identify the funded publications from this dataset, the “Funding Orgs” metadata of publication records was processed. A publication record, whose funding information was not available in this field was considered as non-funded, while a publication record whose funding details were found in this field was considered as a funded publication. In this way, a total of 5,04,268 publications were found to be funded. Thereafter, these 5,04,268 publication records were further analysed to identify the funding agencies attributed with the publication records. This was done by processing the “Funding Orgs”, “Funding Text” and “Funding Name Preferred” metadata fields of the 5,04,268 publication records. First, all the names of funding agencies were extracted. This was followed by a manual disambiguation of agency names, as different variations of names of the same funding agencies were observed. For example, the Department of Science and Technology (DST) was found to be written as DST, DST India, DST Delhi, etc. in the funding metadata of the publication records. The different variations of names of DST were clubbed as DST and the publication records were tagged accordingly. This procedure was followed for the complete list. In this process similar funding agency names from other countries are kept in mind and are appropriately handled.

This way we selected a total of 1407 major funding agencies, each of which had at least 50 supported publications during the period. The country of these 1407 funding agencies was identified from the funding metadata of the publication records. In some cases, a web search was also required to correctly identify the funding agency details. The analysis was then performed in two steps. In the first step, the Indian funding agencies were considered and in the next step the foreign funding agencies were considered. This way, a total of 552 funding agencies were identified from India, and the publication records were tagged accordingly. In the second step, the remaining 855 funding agencies belonging to foreign countries were processed in a similar way.

RESULTS

Overall Trends in Funded Publications from India

The analysis of the Indian research output during 2011-2022 revealed that 54.79% of the 9,20,284 total publications had acknowledged data about the receipt of a funding support, (i.e., Funded TP= 5,04,268) while the rest 45.21% (Non-Funded TP= 4,16,016) did not acknowledge any funding support (RQ 1). A comparative overview of the percentage of funded research output of India was also observed vis-a-vis top productive countries like USA, China, Germany, Japan and England during 2011-2022 (Figure 2), for the same document types from WoS database. It was seen that China (~86.48%) accounts for the highest percentage of funded research output followed by Japan (~71.13%) while USA, Germany and England are found to have ~68.01%, 68.59% and ~68.75% of their research output as funded.

Figure 2: Proportion of Funded and Non-funded Publications of Top Productive Countries during 2011-2022.

The year-wise data of funded and non-funded publications during the period is shown in Table 1. A gradual increase is observed in the total share of funded publications over the years with approximately half of the publications acknowledging funding support from the year 2011 itself. The highest percentage of funded publications, about 57% is observed during the years 2015-2018. However, dips in the percentage of funded publications are observed post 2018 which reaches up to 52.68% in the year 2022. In terms of growth rate during 2011-2022, it was observed that the funded research output of India grew with a CAGR (Compounded Annual Growth Rate) of 9.83% while the overall research output of India grew with a CAGR of 9.30%. Thus, the growth of funded research output of India was seen to match pace with the total research output.

Table 1: Year-wise count and % share of Funded Publications for India.
YearTotal Publications (TP)Funded TP% share of Funded TP to TP
201147,11023,52149.93
201249,63425,82652.03
201354,63029,09353.25
201459,40733,40556.23
201562,32035,58157.09
201666,83238,12057.04
201770,84440,80657.6
201876,28444,11457.83
201987,86448,86355.61
20201,01,30554,22153.52
20211,18,81164,74054.49
20221,25,24365,97852.68
Total9,20,2845,04,26854.79

Major Funding Agencies acknowledged in Indian Research Publications

The analysis of funded research publications helps identify the major funding agencies. The top 50 funding agencies identified are listed in Table 2 along with the supported publication counts. Among the Indian funding agencies, the largest share of funded research output was found to be of DST (22.44%). The CSIR followed next with a share of 16.32%. After DST and CSIR; funding agencies like UGC (14.43%), SERB (8.28%) and DBT (6.23%) were found to have a significant count of supported Research publications (RQ 2). Besides the government funding agencies like DST, CSIR, UGC, SERB and DST; 4 IITs (Kharagpur, Bombay, Madras and Kanpur) along with University of Delhi, IISc, Bangalore and VIT Vellore (a private university) are also found in the list, possibly indicating cases of intra-mural research funding. One may observe around 1000 publications acknowledging the support of the Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment (KSCSTE), the only state funding agency that features in the top agencies list.

Table 2: Top Agencies acknowledged in the publications with the count of funded publications during the period (2011-22).
Sl. No.Funding AgencyIndian/ ForeignFunded Publications% share to Funded TP
1DSTI11317422.44
2CSIRI8228616.32
3UGCI7276714.43
4SERBI417458.28
5DBTI314046.23
6DAEI199313.95
7NIHF184573.66
8UKRIF179213.55
9NSFF140432.78
10ICMRI140142.78
11National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFCF92921.84
12Spanish GovernmentF87411.73
13JSPSF85801.7
14MOEI85161.69
15ICARI64471.28
16National Research Foundation of KoreaF61681.22
17European Union EUF61511.22
18United States Department of Energy DOEF60911.21
19German Research Foundation DFGF58531.16
20Ministry of Education Culture Sports Science and Technology Japan MEXTF53681.06
21DRDOI50991.01
22King Saud UniversityF49890.99
23Department of Science Technology DOST PhilippinesF47960.95
24European Research Council ERCF38270.76
25Conselho Nacional De Desenvolvimento Cientifico E Tecnologico CNPQF36200.72
26MOESI31880.63
27Federal Ministry of Education Research BMBFF31010.61
28Chinese Academy of SciencesF28930.57
29Fundacao Para A Ciencia E a Tecnologia FCTF27270.54
30Alexander Von Humboldt FoundationF26940.53
31Ministry of Science and Technology TaiwanF26840.53
32Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research - CGIARF26800.53
33Russian Foundation for Basic Research RFBRF26320.52
34Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERCF26300.52
35WELLCOME TRUSTF26110.52
36Fundacao De Amparo A Pesquisa Do Estado De Sao Paulo FAPESPF25230.5
37MEITYI24000.48
38AICTEI21550.43
39IIT KharagpurI17120.34
40IIT BombayI16240.32
41University of DelhiI15720.31
42IIT MadrasI14440.29
43IIScI14250.28
44INSAI13270.26
45ISROI10610.21
46IIT KanpurI10250.2
47DOSI10040.2
48MNREI10030.2
49KSCSTEI9590.19
50VIT VelloreI9530.19

Indian research publications during the period have also received support from various foreign funding agencies as well. In terms of analysing the support provided by foreign funding agencies to Indian research publications during 2011-2022, it was observed that NIH (National Institute of Health, US) supported 18,457 publications, followed by UKRI (UK Research and Innovation department, 17,921 publications), and the NSF (US National Science Foundation, 14,043 publications). Agencies from China, Spain, Japan, Korea, and Germany were also found to have featured among the top 20 funding agencies acknowledged in Indian research output (RQ2). The foreign funding support to these Indian research publications may have been possible through collaborative research schemes and projects. An analysis of the full data of funded publications shows that there are 4,41,988 publications funded by Indian agencies (which is 87.63% of total funded publications) and 3,71,163 publications funded by foreign agencies (which is 73.60% of total funded publications). This suggests that there are a significant number of funded publications that attracted funding support from Indian and foreign agencies. Many of such publication records may be instances of bilateral or multilateral cooperation programs of funding (RQ3).

Now we try to analyse the type of funding agencies in terms of being public or private. It can be observed that a major portion of research publications is supported by government agencies, both national and international. There are also instances of some private agencies, research foundations and trusts which were acknowledged. However, the supported publication counts for these agencies is quite low and as a result they do not figure in the top 50 funding agencies acknowledged in Indian research publications. Among these type of agencies from India, the major ones include Hyderabad eye research foundation (510 publications), Tata trusts (325 publications), Infosys foundation (301 publications), Sanofi Aventis (230 publications), GVK Biosciences (50 publications) etc. Among such agencies from foreign countries, the major ones with funded publication counts are Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research - CGIAR (2680), Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - BMGF (2262), Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1403), Harrison Goddard Foote Germany (952), The Welch Foundation (892), GlaxoSmithKline (558), Novartis (450), Johnson and Johnson (438), AstraZeneca (438), Pfizer (435), Merk (363), Bristol Myers Squibb Biotech (342), NVIDIA Corporation (323), Eli Lilly pharmaceutical (313), Kavli Foundation (308), Simons foundation (308), Carlsberg Foundation (282), Roche (191), Abbott (143), Bayer (171) etc. (RQ3). It may be noted that some of the foundations and agencies such as CGIAR act as platforms for consolidating funds from national governments, private foundations, and multilateral funding and development agencies. These observations show that among the private agencies, research foundations and trusts, more foreign entities are acknowledged. However, the amount of government funding far exceeds and indicates the dominant role played by this type of funding in the national research activities.

DISCUSSION

This study has analysed research publications from India during 2011-22 to identify the major funding sources acknowledged. It computed the year wise patterns and growth of Indian research publications and the funded Indian research publications. The proportionate share of funded publications of India is compared with patterns of some other countries namely, USA, China, Germany, Japan, and England. It is observed that the proportion of funded research publications from India ranged between 49-58% with a cumulative of 504,268 funded publications (54.79%) (RQ1). This level is however much lower than the other countries considered, such as China (86.48%), US (68.01%) etc. This indirectly indicates the availability/ accessibility of more research funding opportunities in these countries. When seen in the light of the Gross Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) by these countries, it becomes evident that India needs to invest much more in R&D. Further, many of these countries have a good part of research funding from non-government sources, indicating the need for exploring opportunities for research from various non-government sources in India.

The analysis identifies the major funding sources, based on the acknowledgement written by authors in the research publications. The most acknowledged agencies in Indian research publications are DST, CSIR, UGC, SERB, and DBT. Among the foreign funding agencies, the major ones include NIH, UKRI, NSF, NSFC etc. (RQ2). A small set of the research publications have acknowledged private agencies, research foundations and trusts. Some major agencies providing such support include Hyderabad eye research foundation, Tata trusts, Infosys foundation, Sanofi Aventis, GVK Biosciences, BMGF, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, The Welch Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, NVIDIA etc. Among these, more foreign entities are acknowledged than Indian entities, underlining the lack of enough private funding sources in India (RQ3).

In this context, it may be relevant to correlate the findings of the present study with data on quantum of funding by various agencies as provided by the R&D statistics in the DST report.[4] DST (funding up to INR 1,402.8 Crore and named in 22% publications), DBT (funding up to INR 330.8 Crore and named in 6.23% publications), Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY, funding up to INR 310.6 Crore and named in 0.48% publications), Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE, funding up to INR 221.5 crores and named in 0.2% publications), and the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO, funding up to INR 70.9 crores and named in 1.01% publications), are the top five bodies providing extramural funding support R&D activities during the year 2020-21. It may be noted that DST’s R&D expenditure was in excess of INR 3,000 crore out of which, INR 1,402.8 crore is spent on Extramural research (EMR) grants by the agency. The EMR funding by DST is highest among the Indian funding agencies which also corresponds to the highest number of funded publications. On the other hand, the funding support from the private sector is limited and well below global trends for private investment in R&D at 65%.[4] This may be the reason for a significantly lower number of research publications acknowledging these agencies.

In continuation to the discussion above, one may also like to look at the operationalisation of the ANRF, which along with other roles, aims to: (a) assist in setting up conducive research infrastructure and environment, and (b) support research into capital intensive technology developments, by (c) encouraging public sector enterprises and private sector entities to invest in its activities.[6] The focus of ANRF leans upon the private sector investment heavily, proposing about two-thirds (~70%) of the overall funding from the private entities while the rest one-third (~30%) comes from the government.[46] Bringing together the public and private agencies for supporting research into capital intensive technologies is going to be a challenging task to be taken up by ANRF. It is more relevant to see this in the context of the findings of this study which tell us that the major portion of funded research publications from India are supported by government funding, both among Indian as well as foreign funding agencies. Only a few foreign funding agencies were private entities and even less among the Indian entities are private. These observations thus show a completely different pattern than what is envisaged by the ANRF, and therefore it will need a complete paradigm shift for ANRF to be able to change the funding patterns for the Indian research ecosystem.

LIMITATIONS

The data for this study was retrieved from the Web of Science database which indexes selected research publications[47] as a result there may be other research publications resulting out of different funding sources but captured in the data of the present study. Another point to remember here is that the funding agency information is retrieved from the publications from the relevant metadata. In case of publications where the authors of the publication fail to acknowledge funding support or the funding metadata is missing for whatever reason, the publication is not counted as an instance of funded publication even if it may have received funding support. Furthermore, the study only considers research publications resulting out of research funding, whereas such funding may result in more types of outcomes such as patents, technological developments, R&D infrastructure, and capacity building etc. These outcomes, subject to availability of data, may thus also be considered in future exercises to get a more detailed account of outcomes arising out of research funding.

CONCLUSION

The Study analysed the research publications from India during the period 2011-22 with the purpose of quantifying the proportion of research output that attracted funding from some funding agency. Further, the major funding agencies that supported Indian research publications are identified and are further characterized in terms of being national or international, and public or private. The proportionate share of funded research publications in India is found to be significantly lower as compared to other major knowledge producing countries. This indicates the need for proactive steps for increased research fund availability and accessibility to our researchers. Further, the majority of the funded research output is supported by public funding agencies with very low funded research output supported by private agencies and non-government organizations. The results thus not only highlight the need for increased research funding in India but also indicate the need to widen the research funding support ecosystem by including various non-government agencies. The ongoing process of operationalization of Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) may be a major enabler in this direction and the Indian research community is eagerly awaiting these positive changes.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.National Science Board; National Science Foundation. Publications output: U.S. and international comparisons. Alexandria, VA: Science and Engineering Indicators. 2021;NSB-2021-4.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Ritchie, H; Mathieu, E; Roser, M. Research and Development. 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.UNESCO. How much does your country invest in R&D? Institute of Statistics.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.DST. Research and Development statistics at a glance 2022-23. New Delhi: Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Eurostat Statistics explained, R&D expenditure. 2024.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Ministry of Law and Justice, GoI. The Anusandhan National Research Foundation act; 2023. New Delhi: Gazette of India. CG-DL-E-14082023-248091.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Gupta, BM; Dhawan, SM. Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996-2006. Scientometrics. 2009;80(2):473–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2083-yDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Panat, R. On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China. Scientometrics. 2014;100(2):471–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1236-4DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.CII. Glimpses of research productivity of Indian universities and research institutions. Confederation of Indian Industry. New Delhi: Indian Citation Index. 2016.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Prathap, G. A three-dimensional bibliometric evaluation of recent research in India. Scientometrics. 2017;110(3):1085–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2181-1DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Rajan, KS; Swaminathan, S; Vaidhyasubramaniam, S. Research output of Indian institutions during 2011-2016: quality and quantity perspective. Curr Sci. 2018;114(4):740–6. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i04/740-746DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Prathap, G. Comparative evaluation of research in IISc, IITs, NUS and NTU using CWTS Leiden Ranking 2017 data. Curr Sci. 2018;114(3):442–3. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/442-443DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Singh, P; Singh, VK; Arora, P; Bhattacharya, S. India’s rank and global share in scientific research: how data drawn from different databases can produce varying outcomes?. J Sci Ind Res. 2020;80(4):336–46.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Singh, VK; Nandy, A; Singh, P; Karmakar, M; Singh, A; Lathabai, HH et al. Indian Science Reports: a web-based scientometric portal for mapping Indian research competencies at overall and institutional levels. Scientometrics. 2022;127(7):4227–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04395-6DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Kanaujia, A; Nandy, A; Singh, P; Singh, VK. Mapping the research output from Indian states. Curr Sci. 2023;124(11):1245–55. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v124/i11/1245-1255DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Kanaujia, A; Singh, P; Nandy, A; Singh, VK. Research contribution of major centrally funded institution systems of India. Curr Sci. 2022;123(9):1082–8. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v123/i9/1082-1088DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Nishy, P; Panwar, Y; Prasad, S; Mandal, GK; Prathap, G. An impact-citations-exergy (iCX) trajectory analysis of leading research institutions in India. Scientometrics. 2012;91(1):245–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0594-4DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Prathap, G. The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr Sci. 2014;107(3):389–96.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Prathap, G; Gupta, M. Ranking of Indian universities for their research output and quality using a new performance index. Curr Sci. 2009;97(6):751–2.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Prathap, G. ‘Benchmarking research performance of the IITs using’ Web of Science and” Scopus” bibliometric databases.” Curr. Sci. 2013;105(8):1134–8.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Banshal, SK; Singh, VK; Basu, A; Muhuri, PK. Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology. Curr Sci. 2017;112(5):923–32. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i05/923-932DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Abrol, D. Publicly funded research and policy reforms in India: lessons from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). Contemp Perspect. 2007;1(2):58–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/223080750700100203DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Mukherjee, B. Research in Indian CSIR laboratories: A bibliometric study. SRELS J Inf Manag. 2017;54(4):165–74. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2017/v54i4/118103DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Bala, A; Kumari, S. Research performance of National Institutes of Technology (NITs) of India during 2001-2010: a bibliometric analysis. SRELS J Inf Manag. 2013;50(5):555–72. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2013/v50i5/43774DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Banshal, SK; Solanki, T; Singh, VK. Research performance of the National Institutes of Technology in India. Curr Sci. 2018;115(11):2025–36. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v115/i11/2025-2036DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Solanki, T; Uddin, A; Singh, VK. Research competitiveness of Indian institutes of science education and research. Curr Sci. 2016;110(3):307–10. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i3/307-310DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Suresh, N; Thanuskodi, S. Research output of ICAR-Indian institute of horticultural research: A scientometric study. Libr Philos Pract. 2019;2166.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Tyagi, S. Unveiling research productivity of premier IIMs of India (2010-2021). Libr Hi Tech. 2024;42(1):350–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2022-0262DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Singh, P; Nandy, A; Singh, VK. A bibliometric analysis of research output from Indian institutes of management. DESIDOC Jl Lib Info Technol. 2023;42(6):364–76. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.42.6.18316DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Ray, S; Shah, I; Nundy, S. The research output from Indian medical institutions between 2005 and 2014. Curr Med Res Pract. 2016;6(2):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmrp.2016.04.002DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Nishavathi, E; Jeyshankar, R. Research productivity of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS): a scientometric analysis. Libr Philos Pract. 2018;1084:1–20.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Prathap, G; Sriram, P. Mega private universities in India: prospects and promise for world-class performance. Curr Sci. 2017;2165–7.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Banshal, SK; Singh, VK; Mayr, P. Comparing research performance of private universities in India with IITs, central universities and NITs. Curr Sci. 2019;116(8):1304–13. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i8/1304-1313DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Mouly, VS; Sankaran, JK. R&D funding in India: an empirical study. Prometheus. 1999;17(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029908629394DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Majumdar, SK. Retentions, relations and innovation: the financing of R&D in India. Econ Innov New Technol. 2011;20(3):233–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590903516335DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Srinivasaiah, R; Renuka, SD; Prasad, UK. Impact of DST-FIST funding on research publications in India (2000-2020): A bibliometric investigation. JSCIRES. 2021;10(2):135–47. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.10.2.28DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.Dandona, L; Dandona, R; Kumar, GA; Cowling, K; Titus, P; Katoch, VM et al. Mapping of health research funding in India. Natl Med J India. 2017;30(6):309–16. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-258X.239069DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Shueb, S; Gul, S. Measuring the research funding landscape: A case study of BRICS nations. Glob Knowl Mem Commun. 2023;74(1/2):346–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-08-2022-0192DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. 39.Huang, MH; Huang, MJ. An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics. 2018;115(2):833–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2677-yDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. 40.Sami, N. Rethinking the research funding process: an Indian perspective. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2023;47(2):312–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13148DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. 41.Patra, SK; Krishna, VV. Globalization of R&D and open innovation: linkages of foreign R&D centers in India. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2015;1(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0008-6DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  42. 42.Hoffman, RJ. Knowledge, not funding is the most important research resource. Asia Pac J Med Toxicol. 2013;2(2):77. https://doi.org/10.22038/apjmt.2013.1002DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  43. 43.Manu, TR; Gala, B. Research data management: an evaluation of Indian research funding agencies’ policies and guidelines. Libr Herald. 2020;58(4):42–65. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2469.2020.00030.9DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  44. 44.Edwards, R. Why do academics do unfunded research? Resistance, compliance and identity in the UK neo-liberal university. Stud Higher Educ. 2020;47(4):904–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1817891DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  45. 45.Stein, MD; Rubenstein, L; Wachtel, TJ. Who pays for published research?. JAMA. 1993;269(6):781–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500060081035DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  46. 46.PIB. The Minister says, Anusandhan National Research Foundation is aimed at equitable funding of scientific research and for bringing in greater private participation. New Delhi: Ministry of Science and Technology. 2023.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  47. 47.Singh, VK; Singh, P; Karmakar, M; Leta, J; Mayr, P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Web of Science. Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5113–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Kanaujia, A., & Nandy, A. (2025). Who is Funding Indian Research? A Look at Major Funding Sources Acknowledged in Indian Research Papers. Journal of Scientometric Research, 14(3), 909–917. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20252176