Applying the ecological Shannon’s diversity index to measure research collaboration based on coauthorship: A pilot study

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to test the usefulness of a slightly modified Shannon’s diversity index (H) as a numerical measure of intragroup research collaboration diversity based on coauthorship. Altogether, 527 peer‑reviewed scientific papers by two university departments were used as the study material. Nonrandom rationalized sampling was executed to enable the confirmation of the authors’ affiliations. The smallest unit of collaboration, i.e., a pair of authors, was created by matching every author with each of the coauthors from the same department he or she collaborated with. H was calculated at the department level and compared with the previously published, coauthorship based measures of research collaboration: The collaborative index (CI), degree of collaboration (DC) and collaboration diversity index (CDI). Obviously, H expressed a different aspect of research collaboration than the existing indexes. Compared to CI, DC, and CDI, H revealed novel aspects of collaboration when the abundance of collaboration increased and the distribution of collaborative relations between coauthors moved closer to the uniform distribution at the same time. H can provide additional information about collaborative relationships between researchers based on coauthorship, and it should be considered as a partial indicator of research collaboration.

KEYWORDS

• Coauthorship
• diversity
• research collaboration

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

• DOI10.4103/2320-0057.174866Copy

RELATED ARTICLES

Matched on section and article type within this issue of JSR.

• Article · VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3The research publications of members of European national noncommunicable disease health advisory committeesElena Pallari, Grant Lewison · pp. 124–134Research ArticleSame type: Article
• Article · VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3Impact of collaboration on Indian forensic science research: A scientometric mapping from 1975 to 2012J. John Jeyasekar, P. Saravanan · pp. 135–142Research ArticleSame type: Article
• Article · VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3Publics, issues, and nanotechnology in Indian news mediaKoen Beumer · pp. 143–152Research ArticleSame type: Article
• Article · VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3A citation analysis of the research reports of the Central Mining Institute. Mining and Environment using the Web of Science, Scopus, BazTech, and Google Scholar: A case studyMagdalena Bemke‑Świtilnik, Aneta Drabek · pp. 153–160Research ArticleSame type: Article