Article

What is the Required Level of Data Cleaning? A Research Evaluation Case

Peter van den Besselaar1★, Ulf Sandström2★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Organization Sciences and Network Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS.
  2. 2Department of INDEK, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

CORRESPONDENCE

Peter van den Besselaar

Department of Organization Sciences and Network Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS.

p.a.a.vanden.besselaar@vu.nl

Volume 5, Issue 1 · pp. 7–12 · PUBLISHED · DOI: 10.5530/jscires.5.1.3

View on JSR original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Bibliometric methods depend heavily on the quality of data, and cleaning and disambiguating data are very timeconsuming. Therefore, quite some effort is devoted to the development of better and faster tools for disambiguating of the data (e.g., Gurney et al. 2012). Parallel to this, one may ask to what extent data cleaning is needed, given the intended use of the data. To what extent is there a trade-off between the type of questions asked and the level of cleaning and disambiguating required? When evaluating individuals, a very high level of data cleaning is required, but for other types of research questions, one may accept certain levels of error, as long as these errors do not correlate with the variables under study. In this paper, we present an earlier case study with a rather crude way of data handling as it was expected that the unavoidable error would even out. In this paper, we do a sophisticated data cleaning and disambiguation of the same dataset, and then do the same analysis as before. We compare the results and discuss conclusions about required data cleaning.

KEYWORDS

Open in new tab

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

    Cite this article

    SELECT FORMAT

    Besselaar, P. V. D., & Sandström, U. (). What is the Required Level of Data Cleaning? A Research Evaluation Case. Journal of Scientometric Research, 5(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.5.1.3