Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Rational use of Medicine Among Interns and Resident Doctors in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
Ganesh Dakhale1★, Sonali Pimpalkhute2, Chaitali Bajait2, Latesh Raghute2★ Corresponding author
- 1Professor in Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Nagpur, INDIA.
- 2Department of Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Nagpur, INDIA.
CORRESPONDENCE
Ganesh Dakhale
Professor in Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Nagpur, INDIA.
Volume 8, Issue 2 · pp. 114–117 · PUBLISHED · DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2016.2.10
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate and compare knowledge, attitude and practice of rational use of medicine among post graduate students and interns in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Material and Method: This was a questionnaire based study which included 100 post graduate students from different specialties and 100 intern students of a tertiary-care teaching hospital. Results:Ninety six percent respondents were aware about the term RUM and 95% practiced it, only 10.5% had NLEMI available at their work place and 48% clinicians were able to correctly name the parts of the prescription slip. 87.5% respondents were aware about EM and 85% prescribed them. Percentage of respondents prescribing EM and practicing RUM was significantly higher in male than in females. (p<0.0001). Though 32% respondents practiced ‘p’ drug concept only 15.5% were aware about STEP criteria. Conclusion: In the present study majority of respondents were aware about most of the issues concerned with RUM addressed in the questionnaire which seems to be a positive finding. But being future prescribers all of them need to have correct knowledge about all the issues addressed.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
As publishedShowing references and in-text citations exactly as published.
Cite this article
SELECT FORMAT
Dakhale, G., Pimpalkhute, S., Bajait, C., & Raghute, L. (). Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Rational use of Medicine Among Interns and Resident Doctors in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 8(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2016.2.10
