Article

A retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of intravenous bumetanide and comparison of potency with furosemide

Jean M. Nappi1

  1. 1Professor of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcome Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina Campus, Charleston, SC, United States.

Received: 06-09-2012; Accepted: 09-02-2013.

Volume 11, Issue 1 · pp. 44–50 · PUBLISHED Jan-Mar 2013 · DOI:

View on PP original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Background: The potency of intravenous bumetanide to furosemide using a ratio of 1:40 has been suggested; however, there are little data supporting this ratio. Recent drug shortages required the use of bumetanide in a large patient population, enabling further characterization of the efficacy of IV bumetanide. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to estimate a dose-response effect of IV bumetanide on urine output (UOP) in all patients that received 48 hours of therapy as well as in a subgroup of patients with heart failure (HF). This subgroup was used to compare the potency of bumetanide with furosemide. A secondary safety objective described electrolyte replacement required during therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study examining the dose-response effect of IV bumetanide in patients receiving at least 48 hours of intermittent (iIV) or continuous (cIV) dosing, measured by UOP per mg of drug received (mL/mg). The potency of IV bumetanide was compared with furosemide in a subset of patients with HF using pre-existing data. The safety of IV bumetanide was analyzed by quantifying electrolyte replacement received during the study period. Results: The primary outcome was higher in the iIV group (n=93) at 1273 ± 844 mL/mg compared with the cIV group (n=16) at 749 ± 370 mL/mg (P=0.002). Among patients with HF who received furosemide (iIV n=30, cIV n=26) or bumetanide (iIV n=30, cIV n=3), a potency ratio of 41:1 was found for the iIV group and 34:1 for all patients with HF. There was no significant difference in electrolyte replacement between groups. Conclusion: A greater response was seen with intermittent bumetanide compared with continuous infusion bumetanide. This study supports the 40:1 dose equivalence ratio (furosemide:bumetanide) in patients with HF receiving at least 48 hours of intravenous intermittent bumetanide.

KEYWORDS

Open in new tab

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

    Cite this article

    SELECT FORMAT

    Nappi, J. M. (2013). A retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of intravenous bumetanide and comparison of potency with furosemide. Pharmacy Practice, 11(1), 44–50.