Review

Investigations on Piper betle grown in Sri Lanka

Arambewela L. S. R.1, Arawwawala L. D. A. M.1★, Kumaratunga K. G2, Dissanayake D. S1, Ratnasooriya W. D.3, Kumarasingha S. P.4★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Industrial Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7.
  2. 2Food Control Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Anuradhapura.
  3. 3Department of Zoology, University of Colombo.
  4. 4Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka (currently at Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia).

CORRESPONDENCE

Arawwawala L. D. A. M.

Industrial Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7.

menukaarawwawala@yahoo.com

Received: 07-07-2010; Revised: 18-09-2011; Accepted: 11-10-2011.

Volume 5, Issue 10 · pp. 159–163 · PUBLISHED 23 December 2011 · DOI: 10.4103/0973-7847.91111

View on PR original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Piper betle is an economically important plant cultivated in Sri Lanka. Although more than 12 cultivars of betel are reported in Sri Lanka, very few scientific investigations have been carried out on them. Studies on the chemical constituents indicated that safrole is the major constituent, followed by chavibitol acetate, in the essential oil of common betel leaves of Sri Lanka. Investigations on the bioactivities of P. betle revealed the presence of antimicrobial, insecticidal, antioxidant, antinociceptive, antidiabetic and gastroprotective activities. In addition, P. betle was found to be safe in terms of hepatotoxicity, renotoxicity, hematotoxicity, gross morphology, weights of organs, stress or aversive behaviors in rats. The above fi ndings indicate the vast potential of P. betle yet to be harnessed for the benefit of mankind and the betel industry of Sri Lanka.

KEYWORDS

Open in new tab

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

    Cite this article

    SELECT FORMAT

    R., A. L. S., M., A. L. D. A., G, K. K., S, D. D., D., R. W., & P., K. S. (2011). Investigations on Piper betle grown in Sri Lanka. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 5(10), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.91111