Review

Evolving Health Frontiers in MRKH Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Shaik Khadeer Ahamad1★, Sreeteja Panjala1, Shravani Vanga1, Chandraprakash Gollapelli1, Rama Rao Rao1★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy Practice, CMR College of Pharmacy, Kandlakoya, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Shaik Khadeer Ahamad

Department of Pharmacy Practice, CMR College of Pharmacy, Kandlakoya, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.

chukumunna95@gmail.com

Received: 24-03-2025; Revised: 16-05-2025; Accepted: 02-07-2025.

Volume 19, Issue 1 · pp. 32–37 · PUBLISHED · DOI: 10.5530/ijopp.20260001

View on IJPP original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, or Mullerian agenesis, affects approximately 1 in 4,500 women, characterized by congenital absence of the uterus and upper two-thirds of the vagina. While patients possess normal secondary sexual characteristics and functional ovaries, they face unique challenges related to sexual function and reproductive potential. This review explores two rapidly evolving aspects mullerian agenesis care: non-surgical vaginal creation methods and fertility preservation strategies. Progressive vaginal dilation remains the gold standard for neovagina creation, with emerging devices and digital health tools enhancing home-based therapy outcomes. On the fertility front, options such as oocyte cryopreservation, gestational surrogacy, and the experimental yet promising uterine transplantation are reshaping possibilities for biological motherhood. This review emphasizes the importance of patient-centred approaches, technological integration, and ethical considerations in advancing care for individuals with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

KEYWORDS

Open in new tab

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

    Cite this article

    SELECT FORMAT

    Ahamad, S. K., Panjala, S., Vanga, S., Gollapelli, C., & Rao, R. R. (). Evolving Health Frontiers in MRKH Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 19(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijopp.20260001