Article

A Sunscreen Based on Avobenzone Loaded in Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Enhanced Sun Protection

Jawahar Natarajan1★, Pavalan Krishnan1, Sebatini Sinsi Arokianathan1, Sharuni Sivakumar1, Parish Vendar Saravanan1, Roshan Prasad Rao1★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Ooty, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Jawahar Natarajan

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, Ooty-643003, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

jawahar.n@jssuni.edu.in

Received: 02-09-2024; Revised: 30-10-2024; Accepted: 08-01-2025.

Volume 15, Issue 2 · pp. 490–497 · PUBLISHED Apr-Jun 2025 · DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.20250087

View on IJPI original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Objectives Sunscreen cosmeceuticals play a crucial role in protecting the skin from dangerous ultraviolet radiation, which is linked to various dermatological diseases and skin cancers. Avobenzone is extensively used organic ultraviolet ray gauze; however, due to its inherent instability and limited skin penetration, it has led to research into developing novel delivery systems. This study introduces a pioneering sunscreen formulation employing avobenzone incorporated in solid lipid nanoparticles to enhance sun protection efficacy. Materials and Methods The solid lipid nanoparticles were prepared by the microemulsion method by using glycerol monostearate, soya lecithin, avobenzone and Pluronic F127, which results in the formulation of nano-emulsion and the subsequent formation of solid lipid nanoparticles by lipid precipitation and the sunscreen is loaded in the solid lipid nanoparticles by mixing both the oil phase (cetyl alcohol, cocoa butter) and the aqueous phase (triethanolamine, water) together until a cream-like consistency is obtained. This formulation was then characterized for particle size, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, sun protection factor determination, microbial studies and photostability studies. Results The results indicate a reduction of avobenzone concentrations with a decrease in particle size and show good entrapment efficiency as well as, an ideal sun protection factor range for better ultraviolet absorption, validating the potential of solid lipid nanoparticles-based delivery. Moreover, the microbial studies and photostability assessments demonstrated the safety and biocompatibility of the developed sunscreens. Conclusion This new sunscreen cosmeceutical offers a promising avenue for effective ultra violet protection and encourages further exploration of solid lipid nanoparticles in sunscreen enhancement.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

A material that aids in protecting the skin from the sun's harmful rays. Sunscreens provide dual protection against ultraviolet A and B radiation by reflecting, absorbing and scattering the latter (National Cancer Institute, 2024). The use of sunscreen is complicated and involves a number of public health-related issues. Media reports concerning "dangerous" sunscreens frequently spread prior to the summer holidays (Azurdia et al., 1999; Wright et al., 2001). We offer Solid Lipid Nanoparticles [SLN] as a dynamic drug carrier technology that is water-soluble and effective for correction. Nanoparticles are colloidal particles with sizes ranging from 10 to 1000 nm (Kamble et al., 2010). Aqueous colloidal dispersions with solid biodegradable lipids as the matrix make up solid lipid nanoparticles (Garud et al., 2012).

The last ten years have seen a rise in the use of sunscreen due to ozone layer damage, which allows UV radiation to damage skin. To help with the long-term negative effects brought on by UV radiation A and UV radiation B, topically administered UV blocking medicines are utilized. In light of the aforementioned circumstances, sunscreen efficacy and safety are crucial in order to address the aforementioned issue, which calls for frequent and continuous application. Sunscreen should ideally not permeate the skin, be photostable and work well at low concentrations on the skin. Sunscreen agents fall into two categories: inorganic sunscreens (also known as physical sunscreens) and organic sunscreens (also known as chemical sunscreens). UV filters, often known as organic sunscreen, are active components that absorb UV rays within a specific wavelength range. The UV filters go from low-energy ground to high-energy excited states once they absorb radiation. Physical or inorganic sunscreen works by diffusing and reflecting ultraviolet light. Zinc Oxide (ZnO) and Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) are the components that are most frequently utilized (Kaimal and Abraham, 2011). Because of its photostability and unfavourable side effects, which include acne, rashes, skin swelling or redness and soreness in areas of the skin with hair, organic sunscreen use has been discouraged recently (Xia et al., 2007). Sun damage can have long-term negative effects on skin health and appearance. Wrinkles and lines are caused by Ultraviolet (UV) light damage to the skin and the connective tissue beneath it. Sun damage and UV exposure have compounding consequences you should take all reasonable precautions to protect your skin from UVA and UVB radiation, as they can cause deeply penetrating damage to your skin and cause sunburn (Dhangar et al., 2024). It is still important to wear sunscreen every day, especially in cloudy weather. On a scale of II, the UV index is rated as "moderate," with a score of 3-5. Sunscreen functions by shielding the skin from UV rays, which lowers the chance of sunburn, discolouration and anti-aging symptoms. We focus on making the sunscreen photostable, low concentration and loaded with natural antioxidants and SLN (physical reflector) to address the aforementioned issue. This approach may have a synergistic effect in regulating sun protection (Moloney et al., 2002). Medication employed in SLN are from BCS classes II and IV. SLN are colloidal carrier systems made of high melting point lipids as a solid core coated by an aqueous surfactant (Loxley, 2009). Any method of preparing SLNs results in dispersion form, which causes instability due to the hydrolysis process during long-term storage. By using lyophilization as a spray drying process, they can be transformed into solid, dry powders to improve stability (Sinha et al., 2010). As SLN works as a physical reflector of UV rays and has a high drug-loading capacity, adding the chemical UV absorber avobenzone to it enhances its UV-blocking capacity and avoids chemical deterioration. Synergistic photo protection is achieved when sunscreen is added to SLN. A low concentration of avobenzone is incorporated in SLN, so it helps in reduction of side effect due to avobenzone (Marcato et al., 2011).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Avobenzone was bought from Carbanio. Glyceryl monostearate, Soya lecithin, Pluronic F127, cetyl alcohol, cocoa butter, triethanolamine and sodium benzoate were bought from Sigma-aldrich and only distilled water was used throughout the process.

Methods

Preparation of SLN [microemulsion method]

This process involves diluting a microemulsion in a cold aqueous solution, which forms a nano emulsion and causes lipid precipitation to generate solid lipid nanoparticles (Shah et al., 2014).

In short, Drug is dissolved in melted lipids at a temperature higher than the lipid melting point. To create a transparent, thermodynamically stable microemulsion, an aqueous phase comprising water and surfactant (preheated to the same temperature) is then added with gentle stirring. The microemulsion, which is 25-50 times larger than the hot emulsion, is subsequently added to the cool aqueous phase. Lipids instantly solidify to create solid lipid nanoparticles after dilution, creating a nano emulsion (Shah et al., 2014).

Solid lipid nanoparticles containing medication have been prepared using this technique with success. Its limitations are the large amount of water required to dilute microemulsions its high surfactant usage. Excess water can be removed by lyophilization or ultra-filtration to concentrate solid lipid nanoparticles dispersions (Singh, 2019).

Its high surfactant usage and the substantial volume of water needed to dilute microemulsions are its drawbacks. In order to concentrate solid lipid nanoparticle dispersions, excess water can be eliminated by lyophilization or ultra-filtration (Arianto et al., 2019).

Preparation of SLN-loaded Sunscreen

The needed quantity of cetyl alcohol and cocoa butter were taken in a beaker and heated in a water bath up to 70ºC to gain a molten mass and add SLN to the oil phase).

In another beaker, take triethanolamine, water and sodium benzoate and heat up to 75ºC (Aqueous phase).

Mix both results by adding one phase into another with continuous stirring until a cream-like consistency.

After obtaining cream consistency, add the needed volume of lemongrass oil (Arianto et al., 2019).

EVALUATION STUDIES

Particle size and Polydispersity Index (PDI)

The average particle size and polydispersity index of SLN formulations were measured by Zeta sizer Nano Zs90 (Anton Paar Lite sizer 500). The samples of SLN dispersions were diluted with deionized water (Ahlin et al., 1998). Results of Particle size and Polydispersity index given in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Result of Particle size and PDI results.

Zeta Potential

Zeta potential measurement can be carried out using a zeta potential analyzer or zeta meter. Before measurement, SLN dispersions are diluted 50-fold with the original dispersion preparation medium (water) for size determination and zeta potential measurement (Netto et al., 2017). Results of Zeta Potential given in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Result of Zeta potential.

Entrapment Efficiency (EE)

The centrifugation method was utilized to ascertain the entrapment effectiveness of SLN dispersion. To gather the liquid supernatant, SLN dispersion, which is equivalent to 5 mg of medication, was centrifuged for an hour at 20,000 rpm in a refrigerated centrifuge. Once the recovered liquid had been suitably diluted with fresh phosphate buffer saline in 7.4, it was screened to determine the concentration of free medication. Using the formula, the absorbance at 207 nm in a UV spectrophotometer was measured to determine the entrapment efficiency (Netto et al., 2017).

SPF Determination

All samples weighed 1 g each, which was then transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask, diluted to volume with ethanol, ultrasonicated for 5 min and filtered through cotton, discarding the 1st mL. A 50 mL volumetric flask was filled to capacity with ethanol after a 5.0 mL aliquot was transferred there. After that, a 25 mL volumetric flask was filled with ethanol to make up the remaining volume from a 50 mL aliquot. A 1 cm quartz cell was used to get the sample's absorption spectra in solution, with ethanol serving as a blank. The Mansur equation was then used to the absorption measurements, which were obtained in the 290-320 nano meter (nm) region (Griffin et al., 1997).

Where:

EE (λ)-erythemal effect spectrum (Table 1);

I (λ)-solar intensity spectrum;

Abs (λ)-absorbance of sunscreen product;

CF-correction factor (=10) (Griffin et al., 1997).

Table 1: Normalized product function calculation as per Mansur’s equation.
Wavelength (nm)EE*1 (normalized)
2900.015
2950.0817
3000.2874
3050.3278
3100.1864
3150.0837
3200.018
Total1

Microbial Studies

In vitro studies

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus detection

In order to investigate the presence of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, 10 mL of the prepared dilution were mixed with 10 mL of fluid soybean casein digest medium that had been enhanced at a concentration that was twice as high as that advised for the standard medium preparation. For 48 hr, the tubes were incubated at 35±2ºC. Tubes showing no growth after incubation were declared negative for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The subsequent procedures involved transferring a loop of medium tubes exhibiting growth to Cetrimide Agar, a selective medium for P. aeruginosa identification. Additionally, a circle is moved to Baird Parker Agar, especially in the case of S. aureus. Upon incubation for 72 hr at 35±2ºC, the plates were examined. The sample tested positive for the presence of related bacteria in the case of growth on these selective mediums (Brown and Diffey, 1986).

Yeast and Mold detection

Sample contamination with Mold and yeast was investigated using Sabouraud Dextrose Agar and Broth. A tube containing Sabouraud Dextrose broth that had been enriched at a concentration two times greater than that advised for ordinary medium production was filled with 10 mL of the resulting dilution. For 3-5 days, the tubes were incubated at 25ºC. After the incubation period, tubes that showed no turbidity were labelled as negative. A culture loop was moved to a Sabouraud Dextrose Agar plate in the event of turbidity and the plate was incubated at 25ºC for 3-5 days. The development of any colony on the plate's surface indicated that yeast or Mold had contaminated the sample; yeast and Mold contamination was detected in the sample.19 Results of Microbial studies given in Tables 2 and 3, Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 3: Result of Microbial studies using cetrimide agar.
Figure 4: Result of microbial studies using soya bean casein digest.
Table 2: Preparation of Medium using Cetrimide Agar.
FormulationProcedureObservationInference
1Prepare a Cetrimide Agar plate and spread the inoculation broth to Agar medium. (By spread plate method).No colonies are formed.No growth was reported
Table 3: Preparation of Broth using soya bean casein digest.
FormulationProcedureObservationInference
110 mL of soya bean casein digest+10 mL of prepared cream were autoclaved for 20 min at 121ºC at 15 psi of pressure.No microbial turbidity formed.No Turbidity

Determination of photostability studies

Preparation of SLN loaded sunscreen

Take 10 mg of SLN Loaded Avobenzone Cream and dilute with 6-8 mL of acetonitrile. Place the prepared solution in UV chamber for 45 min to 1 hr. Sonicate the prepared solution for 5 min and make up the volume to 10 mL with acetonitrile. Take 1 mL of the filtrate from the above solution and make the volume into a 10 mL volumetric flask with ACN. From the above solution, prepare the serial dilution of different concentrations, respectively. Check the UV absorbance of the solution (Dutra et al., 2004). Results of Photostability studies given in Table 4 and Figure 5.

Figure 5: Calibration curve for Photostability studies.
Table 4: Calibration curve for Photostability studies.
Sl. No.Concentration (µg/mL)Absorbance (nm)
100
2204
3406.53
46010.912
58014.103
610017.521

Preparation of Blank

Take 10 mg of blank sunscreen without avobenzone and add 6 to 8 mL of ACN. Sonicate the prepared solution for 5 min and make up the volume up to 10 mL with ACN. Place the prepared solution in UV chamber for 45 min to 1 hr. Take 1 mL of the filtrate from the above solution and make up the volume to 10 mL volumetric flask with ACN. Check the UV absorbance of the solution (Dutra et al., 2004).

RESULTS

Photostability studies

SLN Loaded Avobenzone Cream and dilute with 6-8 mL of acetonitrile. Place the prepared solution in UV chamber for 45 min to 1 hr. Sonicate the prepared solution for 5 min and make up the volume to 10 mL with acetonitrile. Take 1 mL of the filtrate from the above solution and make the volume into a 10 mL volumetric flask with ACN.

After performing the photostability test with the help of a UV spectrophotometer, the absorbance increases with an increase in concentration of sunscreen.

Particle Size, PDI and Zeta Potential

Particle size and Poly dispersity index

Zeta potential

Drug entrapment efficiency

From the results, it has been observed that the formulation containing high lipid concentration has a high entrapment as compared to other formulations. The prepared formulation of SLN-loaded sunscreen has 70.76% entrapment.

Preparation of medium

SPF determination

As The Mansur equation specifies the sun protection factor range with the help of absorbance value. The absorbance obtained for the formulation of sunscreen was found to be 18.1. The calculation is as follows

DISCUSSION

The particle size, polydispersity index and zeta potential of solid lipid nanoparticles show that the particle size decreases as the concentration of avobenzone decreases. The polydispersity index was found to be 22.7%. The zeta potential was found to be -3.2 mV.

Microbial Studies

Preparation of Broth using soya bean casein digest

From the results, it has been observed that the high lipid concentration in formulation have high entrapment as compared to other formulation. The prepared formulation of SLN-loaded sunscreen has 70.76% entrapment.

The calibration curve was plotted and a linear line was obtained with an r=0.9972. After performing the photostability test with the help of a UV spectrophotometer, the absorbance increases with an increase in concentration of sunscreen. This indicates that the prepared sunscreen formulation has good photostability.

As the ideal value of the SPF range is found to be 15, the formulation has an excellent sun protection range with the SPF of 18.1.

Microbial studies shows that this formulation is free from the microbial contamination and does not promote the growth of microbes like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, as confirmed with cetrimide agar for fungal growth like Yeast and Mold.

The in vitro investigations carried out for this study confirm that sunscreen has a synergistic impact and that SLN blocks UV rays. Strong UV blocking, avobenzone can absorb UV light between 320 and 400 nm in wavelength. Therefore, it may be possible to manufacture new sunscreen products by lowering their concentration. Reduction of skin side effects can be achieved by firmly integrating organic UV-blockers into the solid SLN matrix. An enhanced carrier system for potentially hazardous sunscreens may be built around SLN.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that there is a large market for sunscreen, whether it is synthetic, natural, or a combination of the two, because people are aware of the need for UVA and UVB protection as well as photostable sunscreen for consistent UVA/UVB protection. These chemical absorbers that have been loaded with SLN may offer a unique sunscreen that is safe, affordable and photostable while also having many more skin-protecting benefits. This study concludes that the SLN-loaded avobenzone sunscreen presents a promising approach for enhanced UV protection. It highlights the potential for further exploration of SLN technology in developing effective sunscreen formulations with reduced side effects, paving the way for safer and more efficient sun protection products.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Ahlin P. Kristl J. Šmid-Korbar J. 1998 Optimization of procedure parameters and physical stability of solid lipid nanoparticles in dispersions Acta Pharmaceutica (Zagreb) 48 4 259 267GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Arianto A. Cella G. Bangun H. 2019 August 30 Preparation and evaluation of sunscreen nanoemulsions with synergistic efficacy on SPF by combination of soybean oil, avobenzone and Octyl Methoxycinnamate Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 7 17 2751 2756 https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.745DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Azurdia R. M. Pagliaro J. A. Diffey B. L. Rhodes L. E. 1999 Sunscreen application by photosensitive patients is inadequate for protection The British Journal of Dermatology 140 2 255 258 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02658.xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Brown S. Diffey B. L. 1986 October The effect of applied thickness on sunscreen protection: In vivo and in vitro studies Photochemistry and Photobiology 44 4 509 513 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1986.tb04700.xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Dutra C. A. Oliveira D. A. G. C. Kedor-Hackmann E. R. M. Santoro M. I. R. M. 2004 Determination of sun protection factor (SPF) of sunscreen by ultraviolet spectroscopy Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 40 31).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Garud A. Singh D. Garud N. 2012 Solid lipid nanoparticles: Method, characterization and application International Current Pharmaceutical Journal 1 11 364 393GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Griffin M. E. Bourget T. D. Lowe N. J. 1997 Sun protection factor determination in the United States Cosmet Sci Technol. Ser. 499 512).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Kamble V Jagdale D. Kadam V. 2010 Solid lipid nanoparticles as drug delivery system International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 1 3 1 9GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Kaimal S. Abraham A. 2011 Sunscreens Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 77 2 238 243 https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.77480DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Loxley A. 2009 Solid lipid nanoparticles for the delivery of pharmaceutical actives Drug Delivery Technology 9 Suppl. 8 32GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Marcato P. D. Caverzan J. Rossi-Bergmann B. Pinto E. F. Machado D. Silva R. A. Justo G. Z. Ferreira C. V. Durán N. 2011 Nanostructured polymer and lipid carriers for sunscreen: Biological effects and skin permeation Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 11 3 1880 1886 https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.3135DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Moloney F. J. Collins S. Murphy G. M. 2002 Sunscreens: Safety, efficacy and appropriate use American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 3 3 185 191 https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200203030-00005DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.National Cancer Institute Sunscreen. National Cancer Institute (US) May 8 2024 http://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-term/def/sunscreenGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Netto M. Pharm G Jose J. 2017 December 10 Development, characterization and evaluation of sunscreen cream containing solid lipid nanoparticles of silymarin Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 17 6 1073 1083GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Shah R. M. Malherbe F. Eldridge D. Palombo E. A. Harding I. H. 2014 August Physicochemical characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) prepared by a novel microemulsion technique Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 428 286 294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.057DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Singh R. 2019 Preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles through various methods using different precursors Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 9 2 415 419 https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v9i2.2461DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Sinha V. R. Srivastava S. Goel H. Jindal V. 2010 Solid lipid nanoparticles: Trends and implications in drug targeting International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutical Sciences 1 212 234GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Radiation: The known health effects of ultraviolet radiation World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-the-known-health-effects-of-ultraviolet-radiationGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Wright M. W. Wright S. T. Wagner R. F. 2001 Mechanisms of sunscreen failure Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 44 5 781 784 https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.113685DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Xia Q. Saupe A. Müller R. H. Souto E. B. 2007 November 16 Nanostructured lipid carriers as novel carrier for sunscreen formulations International Journal of Cosmetic Science 29 6 473 482 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2007.00410.xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Natarajan, J., Krishnan, P., Arokianathan, S. S., Sivakumar, S., Saravanan, P. V., & Rao, R. P. (2025). A Sunscreen Based on Avobenzone Loaded in Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Enhanced Sun Protection. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 15(2), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20250087