Article

Utilization of NCCMERP Index to Assess and Categorize Medication Discrepancies among Pediatric Patients: A Hospital Based Epileptic Cohort Study

Vivek Nilkanth Patil1, Shashikala Chanmallappa Wali1★, Manjula Gudhoor1, Pratiksha N Kini1, Madiwalayya Shivakantayya Ganachari1, Vishwa Rajakumar Byakod1★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy Practice KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Shashikala Chanmallappa Wali

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi-590010, Karnataka, INDIA.

shashikalawali@klepharm.edu

ORCID: 0000-0001-9736-4086

Received: 14-05-2025; Revised: 26-07-2025; Accepted: 03-09-2025.

Volume 16, Issue 1 · pp. 241–251 · PUBLISHED Jan-Mar 2026 · DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.20260387

View on IJPI original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Background Recurrent seizures characterize epilepsy, affecting 50 million globally, with 12 million in India. Prevalence rates in North India are 6.99 per 1,000 in rural areas and 5.48 in urban areas. Medication errors pose significant risks, necessitating improved pediatric medication reconciliation to enhance treatment outcomes Objectives This study aimed to assess medication discrepancies and their severity using the NCCMERP scale in pediatric patients with epilepsy. Materials and Methods The study aimed to identify and assess the severity of medication discrepancies in a cohort of 110 pediatric epilepsy patients at a tertiary care hospital, and then intervene to address the discrepancies. Results This study screened 247 pediatric epilepsy patients, recruiting 123 eligible participants, with 110 completing a follow-up. Findings revealed a male predominance (70.90%) and diverse socio-economic backgrounds. Common medication discrepancies included drug omissions 38(46.9%) and non-adherence 16(19.73%), emphasizing the need for improved management strategies to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes in pediatric epilepsy care. Conclusion Study identifies key challenges in pediatric epilepsy management, highlighting the need for tailored treatment approaches, improved medication adherence, and enhanced communication among healthcare providers and increased parental involvement for better outcomes.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent seizures are a hallmark of epilepsy, a neurological condition marked by aberrant brain electrical activity (Duncan et al., 2006). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy, with nearly 80% living in low- and middle-income countries. In India, approximately 12 million individuals are affected. A study of children in North India found prevalence rates of 6.99 per 1,000 in rural areas, 5.48 per 1,000 in urban areas, and 4.07 per 1,000 for active epilepsy (Singhi et al., 2021). Childhood epilepsy syndromes include self-limited focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, and developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy. Individuals with epilepsy often face social stigma and challenges managing a chronic condition that disrupts daily life (Moshé et al., 2015). Medication discrepancies in healthcare settings contribute to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), impacting hospital stays and patient outcomes (DeCourcey et al., 2017). Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable to medication errors due to factors like individualized dosing and complex medical conditions, leading to higher rates of adverse events compared to adults (Bédard et al., 2011).

In hospitals, medication discrepancies at admission or discharge affect over 50% of patients, necessitating accurate medication reconciliation to ensure safe and effective treatment Despite these risks, there is limited research on pediatric medication discrepancies, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to improve medication safety for children (Louiselle et al., 2021). A BPMH compiles all medications a patient use, from prescriptions to over-the-counter drugs, herbal supplements, and vitamins. It's crucial in hospitals to prevent errors, ensure safety, and improve treatment results. BPMH includes patient interviews, caregiver input, and external verification for an accurate, current medication record, pivotal for personalized healthcare and seamless continuity of care. So, developing pediatric-specific medication reconciliation models is essential to mitigate Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) and optimize treatment outcomes, similar to protocols used for adults (Mangas et al., 2021).

Studies have shown that medication errors in pediatric patients are often due to inadequate communication among healthcare providers, inadequate patient education, and inadequate medication labeling (Trinkle and Wu, 1996). Additionally, the use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can help reduce medication errors by providing a centralized platform for medication management and reconciliation (Selbst et al., 1999).

The current study aimed to assess medication discrepancies and the category of severity using the NCCMERP among pediatric epileptic patients. This is crucial to identify and address medication-related issues, ultimately improving the quality of care and treatment outcomes for children with epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital over a period of 10 months, focusing on pediatric patients diagnosed with epilepsy. a hospital based epileptic cohort study aimed to assess Medication Discrepancies among a sample size of 110 patients. Epilepsy, a condition characterized by recurrent seizures due to abnormal brain activity, poses significant challenges for pediatric patients, impacting their cognitive development and overall quality of life. By examining medication discrepancies.

Study Eligibility Criteria

This research focuses on patients who have a history of epilepsy and are between the ages of 2 and 18. The study will not include participants with past kidney transplant history, mental health diagnoses, or cognitive impairment. As a result, a targeted study investigating the effects of epilepsy within the selected age range can be conducted, guaranteeing a distinct and narrow participant group.

Study procedure

After ensuring that the eligibility criteria were met and obtaining consent and assent from epilepsy patients, they were enrolled in a study. Medication discrepancies were identified using a Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) form, capturing types of discrepancies. Outcomes and results from these assessments were gathered and analyzed, and categorized Schematic representation. The methodology implemented in this study encompasses several critical steps designed to assess medication discrepancies among pediatric patients with epilepsy. Initially, patients aged 2 to 18 years, irrespective of gender, were screened based on established inclusion criteria. Comprehensive data collection was facilitated through well-structured and validated forms. To identify medication discrepancies, a Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) form was utilized, effectively capturing various types of discrepancies. The outcomes and results from these assessments were systematically compiled and analyzed. The evaluation process involved categorizing medication discrepancies by severity, following the guidelines set forth by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP). This categorization is vital, as it enables healthcare professionals to comprehend the potential impact and harm associated with medication errors, thereby facilitating appropriate responses and preventive measures (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Schematic representation.

Medication Discrepancies category of severity by using NCCMERP

NCCMERP is an independent organization established in 1995, consisting of 27 national healthcare organizations dedicated to enhancing medication safety and minimizing errors. It has developed a standardized system for classifying medication errors based on their severity, which helps healthcare professionals understand their potential impact and implement appropriate preventive measures. The NCCMERP classification includes nine categories, ranging from errors with no impact to those resulting in patient death, facilitating a clearer understanding of medication discrepancies and supporting efforts to improve patient safety.

We obtained a comprehensive medication history by consulting patients or caregivers familiar with the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) process. After documenting the current prescriptions issued by the attending physician, we categorized the results by severity using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCCMERP) guidelines (Figure 2).

Figure 2: "NCC MERP Index for Categorizing the Severity of Medication Discrepancies".

RESULTS

Demographic data

During our study, we screened 247 pediatric epilepsy patients, recruiting 123 who met the eligibility criteria. Out of these, 110 participants enthusiastically joined, with 13 excluded due to declining (8) or being unreachable (5). All 110 participants successfully completed a 2-month follow-up.

The study revealed a notable male predominance, constituting 70.90% of participants, with females at 29.09%. Age distribution was diverse: 36.36% aged 2-6, 43.63% aged 7-13, and 20% aged 14-18. Parental education varied: 36.36% had primary education, 33.63% secondary, 20.90% were graduates, 1.81% post-graduates, and 7.27% were illiterate. Occupations of parents spanned across various fields: 30% were farmers, 30% businesspeople, 27.27% private sector workers, and 12.72% government employees. Socio-economic status was diverse, with no participants in the upper-income bracket (over 50,000 INR), 46.36% classified as upper-middle class (21,000-50,000 INR), 41.81% as lower-middle class (11,000-20,000 INR), and 11.81% as lower class (under 10,000 INR). Epilepsy onset was varied, with 50% experiencing it from birth to 1 year, 27.27% between 1-3 years, 10.90% between 3-6 years, 9.09% between 6-12 years, and 2.72% between 12-18 years. Seizure types painted a broad picture: a majority (60.90%) had generalized seizures, followed by temporal lobe epilepsy (16.36%), focal seizures (10%), occipital lobe epilepsy (9.09%), frontal lobe epilepsy (2.72%), and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (0.90%) (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of Demographic details among study population.
Sl. No.CharacteristicsCategoryFrequency (n=110)Percentage (%)
1GenderMale7870.90%
Female3229.09%
2Age2-64036.36%
7-134843.63%
14-182220%
3Parents EducationPrimary4036.36%
Secondary3733.63%
Graduation2320.90%
Post Graduate21.81%
Illiterate87.27%
4Parents OccupationFarmer3330%
Business3330%
Private Sector3027.27%
Government Sector1412.72%
5Socio-Economic StatusUpper (More than 50,000)000%
Upper Middle (21,000-50.000)5146.36%
Lower Middle (11,000-20.000)4641.81%
Lower (less than 10,000)1311.81%
6Age of onset of seizuresEarly Infancy (Birth- 1 Year)5550%
Toddlerhood (1-3 Years)3027.27%
Preschool Age (3-6 Years)1210.90%
School Age (6-12 Years)109.09%
Adolescence (12-18 Years)32.72%
7Types of Epilepsy/Seizure)Generalized Seizures6760.90%
Focal Seizures1110%
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy1816.36%
Occipital lobe Epilepsy109.09%
Frontal Lobe Epilepsy32.72%
Lennox Gaustat Syndrome10.90%

Class of Drugs Prescribed to Patients

In this study, we analyzed the pharmacological management of pediatric epileptic patients, focusing on the distribution and utilization of various drug classes. A total of 110 patients were assessed, revealing a diverse range of medications across several therapeutic categories, primarily anticonvulsants and CNS stimulants.

Anticonvulsants were the cornerstone of therapy, with Sodium Valproate and its combination with Valproic Acid being the most prescribed agents, used by 29 and 26 patients respectively. Oxcarbazepine, another key anticonvulsant, was administered to 27 patients, reflecting its significant role in managing seizure activity. Clobazam, a benzodiazepine, was prescribed to 34 patients, highlighting its importance as an adjunctive therapy for seizure control. Other notable anticonvulsants included Perampanel (10 patients), Lamotrigine (7 patients), and Lacosamide (8 patients). Less commonly utilized anticonvulsants comprised Topiramate (5 patients), Brivaracetam (5 patients), Levetiracetam (4 patients), and Carbamazepine (3 patients). Single-patient use was recorded for Phenytoin, Ethosuximide, Gabapentin + Methylcobalamine, and Divalproex.

CNS stimulants and antipsychotics were also prevalent, with Risperidone leading this group, prescribed to 28 patients. Olanzapine and Methylphenidate were used by 1 and 3 patients, respectively, indicating their more limited but targeted application. Among antidepressants, Sertraline (an SSRI) and Amitriptyline (a tricyclic antidepressant) were each used by 2 patients, addressing comorbid conditions such as anxiety or mood disorders. Anticholinergics were less frequently prescribed, with Trihexphenedyl being used by 2 patients, while Levocetrizine and Glycopyrrolate each served a single patient. Antidiabetic medication was minimal, with Metformin being the only drug prescribed to 1 patient. Antihypertensive therapy included Clonidine, used by 4 patients, possibly reflecting its role in managing comorbid conditions like ADHD.

For GIT agents, Milk of Magnesia and a combination of Cyproheptadine + Tricholine citrate + Sorbitol were each prescribed to 1 patient, indicating their occasional use for managing gastrointestinal symptoms or appetite enhancement. Nutritional supplements played a supplementary role, with iron supplements being the most common, including Ferrous ascorbate + Folic acid + Mecobalamin used by 4 patients. Other supplements like Mecobalamin + Alpha lipoic acid + Vit. D3 + Folic acid + Pyridoxine HCL and Cholecalciferol catered to specific nutritional needs. Analgesics and antipyretics were used sparingly, with Paracetamol being prescribed to 3 patients for managing pain or fever, while Naproxen + Domperidone was used by 1 patient (Table 2).

Table 2: Classification of Drugs Prescribed to the Patients.
Target classClass of drugsDrugsATC CodeFrequency (%) n=110
CNS stimulantAntipsychoticsRisperidoneN05AX0828(25.45%)
OlanzapineN05AH031(0.91%)
MethylphenidateN06BA043(2.73%)
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsSertralineN06AB062(1.82%)
Tricyclic antidepressantAmitriptylineN06AA092(1.82%)
AnticonvulsantsGABA uptake inhibitorsVigabatrinN03AG043(2.73%)
Aliphatic carboxylic acidSodium valproateN03AG0129(31.9%)
SuccinimideEthosuximideN03AD011(0.91%)
IminostillbeneOxcarbazepineN03AF0227(24.55%)
Kainate receptor antagonistsTopiramateN03AX115(4.55%)
IminostillbeneCarbamazepineN03AF013(2.73%)
Aliphatic carboxylic acidSodium valproate + Valproic acidN03AG0126(23.64%)
Selective Non-competitive antagonist of AMPAPerampanelN03AX2210(11%)
PhenyltriazineLamotrigineN03AX097(6.36%)
HCN channel enhancersLacosamideN03AX188(7.27%)
Cyclic GABA analoguesGabapentin + MathylcobalamineN03AX12, A11EA1(0.91%)
SV2A protein ligandBriveracetamN03AX235(4.55%)
LevetiracetamN03AX144(4.4%)
HydantoinPhenytoinN03AB021(0.91%)
GABA modulatorsOx carbamazepineN03AF021(0.91%)
Aliphatic carboxylic acidDivalproexN03AG011(0.91%)
BenzodiazepinesClobazamN05BA0934(30.91%)
DiazepamN05BA011(0.91%)
AnticholinergicsAntihistaminesLevocetrizineR06AE091(0.91%)
AntimuscarinicsGlycopyrrolateA03AB021(0.91%)
TrihexphenydilN04AA012(1.82%)
AntidiabeticBiguanideMetforminA10BA021(0.91%)
AntihypertensiveAlpha Agonist’sClonidineC02AC014(4.4%)
Drugs acting on GITLaxativeMilk of magnesiaA02AA011(0.91%)
Appetite EnhancerCyproheptadine + Tricholine citrate + SorbitolR06AX02, A11HA1(0.91%)
Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitorAtomoxetineN06BA091(0.91%)
NMDA receptor antagonistsMementineN06DX011(0.91%)
Nutritional supplementsCalciumCholecalciferolA11CC011(0.91%)
Iron supplementsFerrous fumarate + Folic acidB03AD031(0.91%)
Ferrous ascorbate + Folic acid + mecobalaminB03AE104(4.4%)
Iron + Zinc + Vit. B12B03AE1(0.91%)
Ferrous fumarate + Folic acid + Zinc sulphateB03AE041(0.91%)
Vitamin supplementsMecobalamin + alpha lipoic acid + Vit. D3 + Folic acid + pyridoxine HCLB03BA03, A11HA02, A11CC05, B03BB01, A11HA025(4.55%)
Pyridoxine HCLA11HA021(0.91%)
Analgesics and AntipyreticsNSAIDs and AntipyreticNaproxen + DomperidoneM01AE02, A03FA031(0.91%)
ParacetamolN02BE013(2.73%)

Medication Discrepancy and category of severity by using NCCMERP

Discrepancies in pediatric epileptic patients, focusing on their causes, frequency, and severity as classified by the NCCMERP Index. A total of 81 discrepancies were identified, with incomplete medication histories being the most common, occurring 38 times. This issue was attributed to standardization problems, patient factors, and communication gaps, leading to 8 instances classified as category A (potential for harm) and 21 instances in categories B-D (actual harm). Additionally, drug duplication was noted 3 times, primarily due to medication reconciliation errors, with 2 instances in category A and 1 in category B-D. Incorrect dosing information appeared 5 times, linked to changes in clinical status and treatment variability, resulting in 3 instances classified as category A. Furthermore, drug omissions accounted for 19 occurrences, with significant contributions from inadequate reconciliation and critical omissions leading to 7 instances in category A and 21 in categories B-D. Lastly, non-adherence was documented 16 times, often stemming from miscommunication among healthcare providers and complex treatment regimens, resulting in 4 instances classified as category A and 9 in categories B-D. Overall, this analysis underscores the urgent need for improved medication management processes and communication strategies to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes for pediatric patients with epilepsy (Table 3).

Table 3: Discrepancy and category of severity by using NCCMERP.
DiscrepancyCauses of DiscrepanciesFrequency (n=81)Category of severity By using NCCMERP IndexFrequencyPercentage (%)
Changed FrequencyIncomplete medication history19A89.87%
Standardization, patient factors, and communication issues contributeB-D911.10%
Inadequate reconciliation and communication gapsE-H22.46%
- NIL-I00%
Drug DuplicationIncorrect dosing information3A22.46%
Medication reconciliation errors and overlapping prescriptions.B-D11.23%
Overlapping prescriptions and adverse reactionsE-H00%
- NIL-I00%
Drug OmissionIncomplete medication histories38A78.64%
Communication gaps, patient non-adherence, and treatment misunderstandings.B-D2125.92%
Omitted medications and critical omissionsE-H1012.34%
- NIL-I00%
Wrong DurationIncorrect dosing information5A33.70%
Changes in clinical status, treatment variability, and lack of follow-up.B-D11.23%
Incorrect duration and prolonged treatmentE-H11.23%
- NIL-I00%
Non-AdherenceMiscommunication between healthcare providers16A44.93%
Complex regimens, side effects, and lack of adherence education.B-D911.10%
Monitoring needs and adherence complicationsE-H33.70%
- NIL-I00%
Total Discrepancies81100%

Category of discrepancy with respect to drug

The data reveals various medication-related issues that occurred over a certain period. The most prevalent issue was Drug Omission, which affected 38 instances. This primarily involved sodium valproate (7 instances), risperidone (4), sodium valproate + Valproic acid (3), Levetiracetam (3), oxcarbazepine (3) and carbamazepine (2). This suggests that patients may have been taking these medications for longer or shorter durations than recommended.

Non-adherence was the second most common issue, affecting 16 instances, with risperidone (2), oxcarbazepine, and sodium valproate being the most affected medications. This indicates that patients may have missed doses or stopped taking their medications without consulting their healthcare providers. Drug duplication occurred in 3 instances, involving sodium valproate + Valproic acid, Clobazam, and oxcarbazepine. This could lead to potential adverse effects or interactions if not properly managed. Changed frequency affected 19 instances, with sodium valproate + Valproic acid being the most affected (5), followed by Clobazam (3) and carbamazepine (2).

Finally, Wrong Duration occurred in 5 instances, primarily involving sodium valproate, sodium valproate + Valproic acid, Carbamazepine, Topiramate, Phenytoin. This could lead to suboptimal treatment outcomes if not addressed promptly (Table 4).

Table 4: Category of discrepancy with respect to drug.
Changed Frequency(n)Drug Duplication(n)Drug Omission(n)Wrong Duration(n)Non-Adherence(n)
Naproxen + Domperidone1Sodium Valproate + Valproic Acid1Sodium Valproate7Sodium Valproate1Risperidone2
Methylphenidate1Clobazam1Brivaracetam1Phenytoin1Oxcarbazepine1
Vigabatrin1Oxcarbazepine1Risperidone4Carbamazepine1Amitriptyline1
Lobazam1Sodium Valproate + Valproic Acid3Sodium Valproate + Valproic Acid1Naproxen + Domperidone1
Carbamazepine2
Oxcarbazepine1Cholecalciferol1Topiramate1Sodium Valproate1
Sodium Valproate1Trihexphenedyl1Lamotrigine1
Sodium Valproate + Valproic Acid5Perampanel1Clobazam1
Metformin1Paracetamol1
Diazepam1Levetiracetam3Pyridoxine1
Levetiracetam1Oxcarbazepine3Clonidine1
Clobazam3Pyridoxine1Oxcarbazepine1
Cyproheptadine + Tricholine Citrate + Sorbitol1Lamotrigine1Lacosamide1
Levocetrizine1Phenytoin1
Diazepam1
Carbamazepine2Sodium Valproate + Valproic Acid1
Milk of Magnesia1
Olanzapine1Mecobalamin +Alfa Lipoic Acid +Vit D3 + Folic Acid + Pyridoxine HCL1
Sertraline1
Naproxen + Domperidone4
Total19Total3Total38Total5Total16

Rate of Polypharmacy

The investigation into polypharmacy among pediatric patients with epilepsy, involving a sample of 110 patients, reveals important trends in the prescription of antiepileptic medications. The analysis shows that 36.36% of these patients were treated with a single antiepileptic medication, while a significant 49.09% were prescribed two to three medications. A smaller group, comprising 14.55%, received four to five medications. Overall, 43.14% of patients were on monotherapy, indicating they received only one antiepileptic drug, whereas 56.86% were on polytherapy, which involves multiple medications. This trend towards polytherapy likely reflects the complexities associated with managing pediatric epilepsy, especially for children who do not respond sufficiently to monotherapy, as indicated by various studies highlighting the prevalence of polypharmacy in pediatric populations with chronic conditions like epilepsy.

The data further breaks down the specific combinations of antiepileptic drugs prescribed to individual patients. Among those studied, 43.14% were on one drug, 30.39% received two drugs, and 17.65% were treated with three drugs; even fewer were prescribed four (5.88%) or five (2.94%) medications. This suggests that while many pediatric patients can be effectively managed with one or two medications, a significant number require more extensive treatment regimens to achieve optimal seizure control.

When categorized by type of epilepsy, the study revealed varying rates of monotherapy and polytherapy. For generalized epilepsy, 26.47% of patients were on monotherapy compared to 33.33% receiving polytherapy. In contrast, focal epilepsy showed lower rates for both treatment types, with only 1.96% on monotherapy and 5.88% on polytherapy. Temporal lobe epilepsy exhibited equal distributions for both treatment approaches at 9.80% (Table 5).

Table 5: Rate of Polypharmacy(Antiepileptics) According to Types of Epilepsy.
Rate of Polypharmacy (Antisezure Medications)
Sl. No.Category of PolypharmacyFrequency (n=102)Percentage(%)
1Monotherapy Antisezure Med’s4443.14%
2Ploytherapy Antisezure Med’s5856.86%
According to no of Antiepileptic Drug Combinations Prescribed to Individual Patients
Sl. No.No of Aniepileptic Drug CombinationsFrequency (Patients) (n=102)Percentage(%)
1One Drug4443.14%
2Two Drug3130.39%
3Three Drug1817.65%
4Four Drug65.88%
5Five Drug32.94%
According to Type of Epilepsy
Sl.NoEpilepsy TypeMonotherapy Frequency%Polytherapy Frequency%
1Generalized2726.47%3433.33%
2Focal21.96%65.88%
3Temporal Lobe Epilepsy109.80%109.80%
4Occipital Lobe Epilepsy54.90%43.92%
5Frontal Lobe Epilepsy00%32.94%
6Lennox Gaustaut Syndrome00%10.98%

The analysis also highlighted specific drug regimens tailored to various forms of epilepsy. In Frontal Lobe Epilepsy, notable combinations included Risperidone (0.5 mg) with Vigabatrin (500 mg) and Sodium Valproate with Perampanel, each prescribed to individual patients (0.98%). For Occipital Lobe Epilepsy, regimens such as Levetiracetam (500 mg) combined with Topiramate (50 mg) and Oxcarbazepine (300 mg) with Clobazam (10 mg) were similarly noted for one patient each (0.98%). Temporal Lobe Epilepsy demonstrated a wider variety of treatment options, including Sodium Valproate (300 mg) combined with Risperidone (2 mg). In Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, a regimen consisting of Topiramate (100 mg) and Clobazam (100 mg) was administered to one patient (0.98%). Generalized Epilepsy was represented by combinations such as Carbamazepine (100 mg) and Oxcarbazepine (300 mg) with Clobazam (10 mg).

DISCUSSION

This prospective observational study aimed to identify and quantify the various types of medication discrepancies among pediatric epileptic patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka. Study mainly focused on various types of epilepsy, identification of Medication Errors using BPMH and categorization of Medication Errors Using NCCMERP Scale.

In a total of 110 patients, 78 (70.90%) were male and 32 (29.09%) were female. Similar to a study led by Niriayo et al., which reported 152 (60.8%) males and 98 (39.2%) females11. Regarding age categories, the highest number of patients with epilepsy were in the 7-13 age group, with 48 patients (43.6%), whereas Shamil Ahmed Dima et al., had 68 (35.4%) patients in the 10-14 age group (Mehta et al., 2023). In the present study, a significant proportion of patients were in the Upper Middle (46.36%) and Lower Middle (41.81%) categories. In contrast, Mehta et al., found that the majority of patients (97%) were in the Lower socioeconomic category, with only 1% in the Lower Middle category and none in the Upper Middle categories. Understanding these socioeconomic factors is crucial for developing targeted interventions to reduce medication errors and improve care for pediatric epileptic patients across different socioeconomic groups (Mohammed et al., 2022).

In the present study, generalized seizures were the most prevalent, accounting for 60.90% (67 cases) of the total seizures. This finding aligns closely with the study by Hawi Mohammed et al., where generalized seizures also predominated, making up 61.2% (104 cases). In the present study, focal seizures represented 10% (11 cases) of all seizures recorded, whereas in Hawi Mohammed et al.'s study, they constituted a higher proportion at 17.6% (30 cases). Focal seizures, on the other hand, showed some variation between the two studies (Joshi et al., 2023).

In this study, the primary treatment focus was on anticonvulsants, with Clobazam prescribed to 34 patients and sodium valproate to 29 patients, making them the most commonly used medications. Oxcarbazepine (27 patients) and a combination of sodium valproate with Valproic acid (26 patients) were also frequently administered. Additionally, Perampanel (10 patients), Lacosamide (8 patients), and lamotrigine (7 patients) were prescribed. Contrastingly, Joshi et al., study reported significantly higher use of anticonvulsants, with valproate prescribed to 174 patients, followed by carbamazepine (61 patients), Levetiracetam (30 patients), and Clobazam (8 patients). These differences likely stem from varying clinical approaches and regional treatment guidelines in managing epilepsy and related conditions (Onatade et al., 2017). Besides anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, primarily risperidone (28 patients), were prominently prescribed, followed by vitamin and iron supplements, as well as antihypertensive medications.

The analysis of discrepancies in pediatric epilepsy management reveals a total of 81 issues categorized by severity according to the NCCMERP index. These discrepancies include incomplete medication histories, drug duplication, drug omissions, incorrect dosing duration, and non-adherence, each shedding light on the challenges in managing this condition.

A total of 81 discrepancies were identified in medication management, with Drug Omission being the most frequent at 38 occurrences. According to Raliat Onatade et al., a study of pharmacist-written discharge medication orders revealed only 10 errors among 509 prescriptions, resulting in a significantly lower error rate of 2%. This stark contrast indicates that while both settings encounter medication management challenges, the frequency and nature of errors differ notably depending on who is responsible for writing the orders (Reddy et al., 2019).

The findings of our study indicate that 38 cases (46.9%) involved discrepancies related to drug omissions, while 5 cases (6.16%) were associated with incorrect durations. In comparison, research conducted by Peddolla Sushma Reddy et al., reported similar findings, with drug omissions accounting for 14 cases (45.16%) and wrong duration discrepancies for 3 cases (9.67%). These results suggest that the majority of discrepancies stem from drug omissions (Gattari et al., 2015).

Our study identified several factors contributing to medication discrepancies, with 3 cases (3.70%) linked to incorrect dosing information and 7 cases (8.64%) associated with incomplete medication history errors. In contrast, research by Theresa B. Gattari et al., reported 3 cases (9%) of dosing errors and 18 cases (26%) related to documentation errors. These findings highlight the significance of dosing and documentation issues in medication discrepancies (Satish et al., 2024).

Our data indicates a varied distribution of medication errors, showing a notable prevalence of non-harmful errors (Categories A and B-D), while instances of harm (Categories E-H) are less frequent. This highlights the necessity for ongoing monitoring and enhancement of medication administration practices to reduce potential risks to patient safety. In contrast, the study by Satish s et al., found that a significant proportion of medication errors falls under Categories C and D, where errors reached patients but did not result in harm or only required monitoring (52.54% and 36.07%, respectively) (Wang et al., 2021).

The findings indicate significant medication-related challenges in the patient population, particularly concerning drug omission and non-adherence. Sodium Valproate was the most frequently omitted medication, with 7 instances, highlighting critical gaps in medication management due to communication deficiencies and inadequate patient education. Additionally, Levetiracetam was omitted 3 times, further emphasizing the need for improved provider communication. Drug duplication occurred in 3 cases, including overlaps like Sodium Valproate + Valproic Acid (5 instances), raising concerns about potential adverse effects and increased healthcare costs. Furthermore, non-adherence was reported in 16 cases, driven by side effects from medications such as Diazepam and Olanzapine, along with financial constraints affecting access to essential drugs like Metformin and Carbamazepine. These findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced communication strategies and improved patient education initiatives to effectively address these issues.

Our study revealed that 44 patients (43.14%) were treated with monotherapy antiseizure medications, while 58 patients (56.86%) received polytherapy. In a comparable study by Yuxuan Wang et al., 135 patients (71.79%) were on monotherapy, and 53 patients (28.19%) were prescribed polytherapy. the breakdown of drug combinations indicates that 43.14% of patients are prescribed a single AED, 30.39% are on two drugs, and 17.65% require three drugs, with smaller percentages on four (5.88%) or five (2.94%) drugs. This suggests that while many patients can be managed with fewer medications, a notable number require more complex regimens due to refractory seizures or comorbidities. When analysed by epilepsy type, generalized epilepsy is most prevalent, with 26.47% on monotherapy and 33.33% on polytherapy. Focal epilepsy shows lower rates of both treatment types (1.96% monotherapy, 5.88% polytherapy), while temporal lobe epilepsy exhibits an equal distribution between the two approaches. Notably, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is exclusively treated with polytherapy, reflecting its complexity.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores critical challenges in managing pediatric epilepsy, particularly regarding demographic factors, medication adherence, and treatment discrepancies. The significant male predominance and varied socio-economic backgrounds highlight the need for tailored treatment approaches that address individual patient needs. Additionally, resolving identified medication discrepancies is vital for enhancing patient safety and optimizing therapeutic outcomes. Future efforts should prioritize effective communication among healthcare providers and increased parental involvement in treatment plans to improve adherence and enhance the quality of life for pediatric epilepsy patients.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Bédard, P.; Tardif, L.; Ferland, A.; Bussières, J.-F.; Lebel, D.; Bailey, B. et al. A medication reconciliation form and its impact on the medical record in a paediatric hospital. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2011;17(2):222–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01424.xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.DeCourcey, D. D.; Silverman, M.; Chang, E.; Ozonoff, A.; Stickney, C.; Pichoff, D. et al. Medication reconciliation failures in children and young adults with chronic disease during intensive and intermediate care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2017;18(4):370–377. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001090DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Dima, S. A.; Shibeshi, M. S.. Antiepileptic drug adherence in children in southern Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. PLOS One. 2022;17(2):Article e0263821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263821DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Duncan, J. S.; Sander, J. W.; Sisodiya, S. M.; Walker, M. C.. Adult epilepsy. The Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Gattari, T. B.; Krieger, L. N.; Hu, H. M.; Mychaliska, K. P.. Medication discrepancies at pediatric hospital discharge. Hospital Pediatrics. 2015;5(8):439–445. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2014-0085DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Joshi, K. P.; Bhave, A. L.; Vyas, P. P.. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of medication adherence in children suffering from epilepsy attending pediatric out-patient department at a tertiary care teaching hospital. International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. 2023;12(4):563–569. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20231892DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Louiselle, K.; Harte, L.; Thompson, C.; Pabst, D.; Calvert, A.; Patterson, M. E.. Medication discrepancy risk factors for paediatric patients with epilepsy at hospital admission. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2021;26(4):384–394. https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-26.4.384DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Mangas, C. M.; Iturgoyen-Fuentes, D. P.; Cuervas-Mons, V. M.. Implatantion of a medication reconciliation model upon admission to a pediatric hospital. Annales Paediatrici. 2021;4(1):1050.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Mehta, K.; Kumar, R.; Kaur, N.. Quality of life in pediatric patients with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs: A cross-sectional study using QOLCE-55 tool in north India. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research [Internet]. (2023;16(11):75–79. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48251DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Mohammed, H.; Lemnuro, K.; Mekonnen, T.; Melaku, T.. Adherence to anti-seizure medications and associated factors among children with epilepsy at tertiary Hospital in Southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Neurology. 2022;22(1):310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02842-8DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Moshé, S. L.; Perucca, E.; Ryvlin, P.; Tomson, T.. Epilepsy: New advances. The Lancet. 2015;385(9971):884–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Niriayo, Y. L.; Gebregziabher, T.; Demoz, G. T.; Tesfay, N.; Gidey, K.. Drug therapy problems and contributing factors among patients with epilepsy. PLOS One. 2024;19(3):Article e0299968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299968DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Onatade, R.; Sawieres, S.; Veck, A.; Smith, L.; Gore, S.; Al-Azeib, S.. The incidence and severity of errors in pharmacist-written discharge medication orders. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2017;39(4):722–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0468-9DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Reddy, P. S.; Biju, V.; Bhavana, I.. Identifying medication errors in a tertiary care teaching hospital: A prospective observational study. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2019;9(6-s):103–106. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v9i6-s.3766DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Satish, S.; Thattiott, S.; Shabaraya, A. R.. Research study on medication error severity classification using NCC-MERP guidelines. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024;2(9):332–337. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13712642DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Selbst, S. M.; Fein, J. A.; Osterhoudt, K.; Ho, W.. Medication errors in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care. 1999;15(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006565-199902000-00001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Singhi, P.; Gupta, A.. Epilepsy in children-Important facets. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2021;88(10):991–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03682-zDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Trinkle, R.; Wu, J. K.. Errors involving pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy: A literature review. Medical and Pediatric Oncology. 1996;26(5):344–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICIDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Wang, Y.; Xia, L.; Li, R.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Zhou, Q. et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of monotherapy and polytherapy in seizure-free patients with epilepsy following antiseizure medication withdrawal. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021;12:Article 669703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.669703DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Patil, V. N., Wali, S. C., Gudhoor, M., Kini, P. N., Ganachari, M. S., & Byakod, V. R. (2026). Utilization of NCCMERP Index to Assess and Categorize Medication Discrepancies among Pediatric Patients: A Hospital Based Epileptic Cohort Study. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 16(1), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20260387