Review

Mouth Dissolving Tablets: Bridging Laboratory Innovations and Consumer Convenience

Kirtimaya Mishra1, Asra Jabeen2, Swetha Vegesna3, Gowri Sankar Chintapalli4, Debasis Patra1, Diptimayee Jena1★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, INDIA.
  2. 2Department of Pharmacognosy, Bharat Institute of Technology, Mangalpally, Ibrahimpatnam, Telangana, INDIA.
  3. 3School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University- Kakinada (JNTUK), Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
  4. 4School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Diptimayee Jena

Miss. Diptimayee Jena Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Centurion University of Technology & Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, INDIA.

diptimayee.pharma@gmail.com

Received: 14-08-2025; Revised: 24-10-2025; Accepted: 09-12-2025.

Volume 16, Issue 2 · pp. 425–430 · PUBLISHED Apr-Jun 2026 · DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.20260373

View on IJPI original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Mouth Dissolving Tablets (MDTs) are considered as a novel approach to improvize patient compliance and fast drug delivery. They constitute a significant improvement in pharmaceutical technology. The dissertation explores the numerous excipients used, their modes of action, and formulation strategies that are used to obtain the best bioavailability and dissolving rates. Key benefits are covered in detail, including speedier onset of action, better patient adherence, and simplicity of administration without the need for water. The overview also discusses the difficulties encountered in the development and manufacturing processes as well as the regulatory issues that are relevant to MDTs. MDTs are of the good hardness and dose uniformity variety that dissolve and dissolve quickly in our saliva in a couple of seconds. The fact that MDTs are administered without the need for chewing or water consumption is their most effective feature. Due to these unique qualities, this innovative dosage form is highly preferred by paediatric, geriatric, and most importantly travelling patients. Superdisintegrants, alike croscarmellose, crospovidone, sodium starch glycolate, and magnesium aluminium silicate (veegum HV) are required for the manufacture of this kind of tablet. In addition, methylcellulose is utilised as a bulking agent, mustard and soy lecithin as an emulsifying agent, fatty alcohol as a lubricant, and sweeteners and flavourings are added as additional ingredients in the MDT formulation.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

The oral cavity has been a preferred site for quick medication absorption. As these formulations are affordable and simple to administer for people who struggle or are unable to swallow oral conventional dose forms, the development of this medication delivery into newer, unique dosage forms for certain classes of drugs has been popular. These systems were designed to be readily framed according to their design (Carmen et al., 2023). Among these formulations, Mouth Dissolving Tablets (MDTs) are the one. MDTs are also referred as oro-dispersible tablets, melt-in-mouth tablets, fast melting, fast disintegrating, fast dissolving, and so on (Tundlayat et al., 2024). Due to their special qualities, these dosage forms, which are both conventional as well as patented, are in high demand from manufacturers and patients alike (Giulia et al., 2022; Khatri et al., 2018; Narkevich et al., 2018). Currently, a third of people experience dysphagia, sometimes known as trouble swallowing. Little ones also have trouble in ingesting solid dosage forms. Children's immature neurological and muscular systems might also make it difficult for them to swallow (Van den et al., 2015). Travelling individuals who may not have easy access to water plainly suffer with taking their medications.

Aforementioned difficulties can be easily treated with these dosages (Logemann, 1995; Ryan et al., 2001; Vaqar et al., 2012; Willig et al., 1994). Regarding the same as orally disintegrating, the development of the MDT was informed by the development of orodispensing technology in previous decades. To create an effective oral dissolving tablet, formulations using a variety of processes, such as direct compression, moisture-activated wet granulation, and lyophilization, must be used (Ghourichay et al., 2021). A good dosage of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) (0.5 to 600 mg) with enough mechanical strength and temporal dispersion is made possible by these tablets.

The goal of the Mouth Dissolving Drug Delivery System idea was to increase patient compliance (Bala et al., 2013). These dosage forms minimise the need for water during administration by rapidly disintegrating and/or dissolving, releasing the medication as soon as they come into exposure to saliva. This feature alone makes them extremely appealing to patients who are younger and older (Mahajan et al., 2011; Nagar et al., 2011; Parmar et al., 2012; Peh and Wong, 1999). All age groups frequently experience difficulty swallowing traditional tablets and capsules, but elderly and dysphagic patients are particularly likely to experience this. This dysphagia issue is associated with a variety of medical conditions, including stroke, Parkinson's disease, AIDS, thyroidectomy, head and neck radiation therapy, and other neurological disorders like cerebral palsy (Bhidayasiri et al., 2022; Jena et al., 2024; Schindler et al., 2021; Stocchi et al., 2019; Umemoto and Furuya, 2020; Warnecke et al., 2016; Yap and Camm, 2003). According to one study, the biggest obstacle to taking tablets for 26% of the 1576 patients was their size, with surface, shape, and taste coming in second and third.

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Advantages and limitations are interpreted in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Advantages and Disadvantages.

NECESSITY OF DEVELOPING MDTS

Non-invasive delivery technologies are still needed due to patient dissatisfaction with traditional methods. The key target demographics are children and the elderly, who struggle to take regular tablets (Reddy et al., 2011).

PHENOMENON OF MOUTH DISSOLVING

When designing mouth-dissolving tablet formulations, super-disintegrants are significantly more carefully considered. They provide rapid disintegration of the tablet by causing swelling and water absorption (Figure 2). The swelling process of the super-disintegrants wets the surface of the carrier, facilitating tablet dissolving and increasing dissolution rates (Baby et al., 2024). Super-disintegrants' performance is dependent on both the density of the generated matrix and the swelling capacity of the dissolving media (Figure 3). The larger swelling capacity and density of the matrix lead to a greater degree of disintegration (Masih et al., 2017).

Figure 2: Patient related factors influencing the development of MDTs.
Figure 3: Effectiveness factors influencing the development of MDTs.

In this procedure, porous tablets with good mechanical strength and fast dissolution have been created. Other tablet excipients were combined with inert solid substances, and the mixture was compacted into tablets. Sublimation produced a structure with pores. The tablets sublimate in 10-20 sec (Arya and Chandra, 2010; Kumar and Devi, 2022; Kushagra et al., 2016; Mishra et al., 2024). The majority of APIs utilised in MDT formulations cause systemic impacts instead of local impacts. Drug and excipient properties should not have a significant impact on tablet properties. However, certain drug properties, alike; particle size, crystal structure, solubility, compressibility, along with hygroscopicity, can alter final MDT features. The most prevalent chemicals synthesised as MDTs are antihypertensives, anti-inflammatories, antifungals, analgesics, antibiotics, and antilipidemic (Nannjkar and Shinde, 2020). There are various standards for pharmaceuticals used in MDT formulation that qualify MDTs as an acceptable and optimal dosage form. For example, the medicine should be ionised, disseminated, and permeated through the mucosa, leaving no residue in the oral cavity. Moreover, the API's molecular weight should be less than 500 Da. For daily use, active ingredients should be less than 50 mg, having agreeable taste, a short half-life, and odour. Resilience to extreme climatic conditions, low production costs, along with compatibility with prevailing processing and packaging techniques rendering them increasingly attractive to both patients and industry (Babu and Akhtar, 2020; Nand et al., 2010; Nilesh and Prakash, 2024; Roy et al., 2022).

FORMULATION AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

Mechanism of Superdisintegration

Tablet disintegration occurs through four major methods, as listed below.

Swelling

Tablet disintegration is often attributed to swelling. Tablets that have extensive porosity show poor disintegrating effect attributed to insufficient swelling force. In contrast, tablets with poor porosity exhibit considerable swelling force.

Porosity and Capillary action

Capillary action is the initial stage in disintegration. Placing the tablet in aqueous media weakens the intermolecular connection, causing it to break down into fine particles. Tablet water uptake is determined by the hydrophilic properties of the drug/excipient along with the tableting process. Disintegrants exhibiting a porous structure and low interfacial tension form a hydrophilic network surrounding drug particles, which aids in disintegration (Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4: Mechanism of action of MDTs.
Figure 5: Onset of action of MDTs.

Particle Repulsive Force

Another disintegrant mechanism explains why nonswellable tablets swell. Guyot-Hermann conveyed a particle repulsion theory built around the discovery that tablets dissolve whenever no swelling particles are detected. Disintegration is induced by electric repelling interactions among particles, which actually require water. Researchers discovered that wicking comes first, then repulsion.

Deformation

During tablet compression, fragmented particles distort and return to their natural structure when exposed to watery medium or water. Deforming starch granules during compression can improve their swelling capacity. The increased size of distorted particles causes the tablet to break.

TECHNIQUES USED FOR FORMULATION OF MDTS ARE

Freeze Drying,

Molding,

Phase Transition Process,

Cotton Candy Process,

Spray Drying,

Mass Extrusion,

Nanonization,

Direct Compression,

Fast Dissolving Films,

Sublimation,

Melt Granulation.

PATIENT ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLIANCE

The pharmaceutical formulation is an important factor in treatment compliance. The MDT formulations are very appropriate. This medication may aid patients who have difficulty swallowing, including the elderly and young, as well as those with underlying illnesses. The MDT formulation is preferable for people who loathe capsules/pills, as well as those who are bedridden. However, energetic people who are engaged or travelling may get benefit from this briefing, which does not require water (Albert et al., 2006). For many patients, a fast-dissolving effective formulation that does not require water outperforms pills and capsules. Medications swallowed without water by bedridden patients may stick to the oesophageal membrane and disintegrate prematurely, potentially causing an oesophageal lesion (Channer and Virjee, 1985; D’arcy, 1984; Ergun and Miskovitz, 1992). MDT formulations have been favoured over conventional presentations, indicating a requirement for a modified to typical dose forms. This basic formulation can boost patient acceptability of prescribed medications, resulting in better compliance. MDTs have the advantage of dissolving quickly in the oral cavity (15-120 sec), resulting in rapid absorption as well as therapeutic action. Some MDTs are especially engineered for being absorbed through the oesophagial mucosa along with buccal areas, accelerating bioavailability over standard dosage forms. These tablets have received emphasis not only for their efficacy, but also for their ability to overcome obstacles caused by other oral medicines such as chewing tablets, effervescent pills, gums, suspensions (Vishal et al., 2022).

MTDs have witnessed increased demand over the last decade, and the field has grown considerably in the pharmaceutical industry. Many medications are best administered orally. Recent technological advances have encouraged scientists to create MDTs that improve patient compliance and convenience. These pills dissolve or disintegrate in the mouth, removing the need for extra water and making it easier to consume active pharmacological components. The formulation's success and practicality prompted the development of additional MDT technologies. MDTs are solid unit dosage forms that quickly dissolve in the mouth lacking drinking or chewing (Parkash et al., 2011). MDTs, or orally disintegrating tablets, are particularly useful for youngsters and the elderly who have difficulties in swallowing traditional pills and capsules. MDTs can be manufactured in a variety of ways, with product success dependent on drug compatibility and excipient selection in the delivery system. Universal research has been performed to develop super disintegrating chemicals and test new formulation procedures. Despite the multitude of current MDTs, there is still room for refining and invention in order to standardise novel technologies. This comprises taste masking, instant disintegration/dissolution, and quick release. MDTs have substantial advantages as solid dosage forms and may be created for most present drugs in the near future.

CONCLUSION

Over the last decade, MDTs have developed popularity. MDT formulations require quick disintegration, dissolving, or melting in the tongue. This can be accomplished by creating a porous tablet matrix or by using superdisintegrants and/or effervescent excipients. Clinical trials have demonstrated that MDTs improve patient compliance, have a faster onset of action, and boost bioavailability. However, many people are not aware of this distribution strategy. As a result, chemists are charged with sharing information about this system. Because of its low mechanical strength, this dose form should be used with caution. The packaging of MDTs is crucial. MDTs require a particular amount of saliva for disintegration and dissolution, hence patients with dry mouth should not be provided them.This dosage type is most suited for young patients who do not have primary teeth and elderly patients who have lost their teeth for good. Many MDTs have been tested and found to have strong discriminating power. In the near future, this delivery mechanism is likely to become equally significant as current distribution systems.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Arya, A.; Chandra, A.. Fast drug delivery system: A review, 02(2). Scholars Research Library.. 2010;350–356.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Babu, A.; Akhtar, S.; Babu, A.; Akhtar, S. Overview of formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablet: A promising tablet dosage form. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2020;8(3):1–9.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Baby, L.; Fathima, T.; Mallikarjuna, G.. Fast-melt tablets: A New Era on brand-new drug delivery system and its technology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024;2(10):1108–1118.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Bala, R.; Pawar, P.; Khanna, S.; Arora, S.. Orally dissolving strips: A new approach to oral drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2013;3(2):67–76. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973X.114897DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Bhatia, V.; Dhingra, A.; Chopra, B.; Guarve, K.. Co-processed excipients: Recent advances and future perspective. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2022;71:Article 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103316DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Bhidayasiri, R.; Phuenpathom, W.; Tan, A. H.; Leta, V.; Phumphid, S.; Chaudhuri, K. R. et al. Management of dysphagia and gastroparesis in Parkinson’s disease in real-world clinical practice-Balancing pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022;14:Article 979826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.979826DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Channer, K. S.; Virjee, J. P.. The effect of formulation on oesophageal transit. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1985;37(2):126–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb05021.xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.D’Arcy, P. F.. Oesophageal problems with tablets and capsules. Pharmacology International. 1984;5:109.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Ergun, G. A.; Miskovitz, P. F.. Aging and the esophagus: Common pathologic conditions and their effect upon swallowing in the geriatric population. Dysphagia. 1992;7(2):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493434DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Ghourichay, M. P.; Kiaie, S. H.; Nokhodchi, A.; Javadzadeh, Y.. Formulation and quality control of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs): Recent advances and perspectives. BioMed Research International. 2021;2021:Article 6618934. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6618934DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Jena, D.; Jabeen, A.; Mahato, A. D.; Choudhary, K.; Mahato, R.; Chakraborty, P. et al. Optimizing encorafenib validation: A quality by design approach empowered by green chemistry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2025;15(2):524–530. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20250120DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Khatri, P.; Shah, M. K.; Vora, N.. Formulation strategies for solid oral dosage form using 3D printing technology: A mini-review. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2018;46:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2018.05.009DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Kumar, R. S.; Devi, M. G.. Review article on fast dissolving tablets. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022;6(Suppl. 2):13684–13698. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.8960DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Kushagra, K.; Gauravi, X.; Suresh, K. J.. Fast-Melt Tablets (FMTs): Revolutionizing rapid relief an in-depth review of swift dissolve technology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences. 2016;5(2):311–322.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Logemann, J. A.. Dysphagia: Evaluation and treatment. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 1995;47(3):140–164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000266348DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Mahajan, A.; Chabra, N.; Aggarwal, G.. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving buccal films: A review. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2011;3:152–165.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Masih, A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, S.; Tiwari, A. K.. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research. 2017;9(2):8–18. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i2.17382DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Milián-Guimerá, C.; McCabe, R.; Thamdrup, L. H. E.; Ghavami, M.; Boisen, A.. Smart pills and drug delivery devices enabling next generation oral dosage forms. Journal of Controlled Release. 2023;364:227–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.10.041DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Mishra, K.; Jena, D.; Goswami, S.. Deciphering the pharmacological realm of ranibizumab in ophthalmology: Present insights and future prospects. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2024;16(4):681–686. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2024.16.87DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Nagar, P.; Chauhan, I.; Yasir, M.. Insight into polymers: Film formers in mouth dissolving films. Drug Invention Today. 2011;3:280–289.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Nand, P.; Vashist, N.; Anand, A.; Drabu, S.. Mouth dissolving tablets- A novel drug delivery system. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 2010;3(1):1–7.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Nannjkar, D.; Shinde, J.. Recent trends of mouth dissolving tablet: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2020;62(2):157–165.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Narkevich, I. A.; Flisyuk, E. V.; Terent’eva, O. A.; Semin, A. A.. Additive manufacturing technologies for pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 2018;51(11):1025–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-018-1733-5DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Nilesh, S. M.; Prakash, W. P.. Fast dissolving tablets: A review of formulation and evaluation strategies. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2024;12(5):440–453.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Parkash, V.; Maan, S.; Deepika; Yadav, S.; Hemlata; Jogpal, V.. Fast disintegrating tablets: Opportunity in drug delivery system. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research. 2011;2(4):223–235. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.90877DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Parmar, D.; Patel, U.; Bhimni, B.; Tripathi, A.; Daslaniya, D.; Patel, G.. Orally fast dissolving films as dominant dosage form for quick release. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Biological Science. 2012;1:27–41.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Peh, K. K.; Wong, C. F.. Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery: Swelling, mechanical, and bioadhesive properties. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1999;2(2):53–61.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Pitzanti, G.; Mathew, E.; Andrews, G. P.; Jones, D. S.; Lamprou, D. A.. 3D Printing: An appealing technology for the manufacturing of solid oral dosage forms. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2022;74(10):1427–1449. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpp/rgab136DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Reddy, B. D. R.; Reddy, V. Y.; Lalitha, C. T.. Rapimelts: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences. 2011;6:1–8.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Roger Reig, A.; Plazas Fernández, M. J.; Galván Cervera, J.; Heras Navarro, J.; Artés Ferragud, M.; Gabarrón Hortal, E.. Acceptance survey of a fast dissolving tablet pharmaceutical formulation in allergic patients: Satisfaction and expectancies. Allergologia et Immunopathologia. 2006;34(3):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1157/13088176DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Roy, D.; De Anjan, B.. An Overview on Mouth Dissolving Tablets. S. and Das., A. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. 2022;50(4):1–30.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Ryan, M. M.; Schnell, C.; Strickland, C. D.; Shield, L. K.; Morgan, G.; Iannaccone, S. T. et al. Nemaline myopathy: A clinical study of 143 cases. Annals of Neurology. 2001;50(3):312–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.1080DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Schindler, A.; Pizzorni, N.; Cereda, E.; Cosentino, G.; Avenali, M.; Montomoli, C. et al. Consensus on the treatment of dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2021;430:Article 120008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.120008DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Stocchi, F.; Coletti, C.; Bonassi, S.; Radicati, F. G.; Vacca, L.. Early morning OFF and levodopa dose failures in patients with Parkinson’s disease attending a routine clinical appointment using time-to-ON questionnaire. European Journal of Neurology. 2019;26(5):821–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13895DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Tundlayat, J. R.; Sakhare, A. D.; Biyani, K. R.. A review: Mouth dissolving tablet. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2024;15(5):1331–1339.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Umemoto, G.; Furuya, H.. Management of dysphagia in patients with Parkinson’s disease and related disorders. Internal Medicine. 2020;59(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.2373-18DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.van den Engel-Hoek, L.; De Groot, I. J. M.; De Swart, B. J. M.; Erasmus, C. E.. Feeding and swallowing disorders in pediatric neuromuscular diseases: An overview. Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases. 2015;2(4):357–369. https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-150122DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Vaqar, T. L. Z.; Edelman, F. S.; Stafstrom, C. E.. Juvenile Myasthenia gravis: Frequent presentation with Bulbar Symptoms. Journal of Pediatric Sciences. 2012;4(3):e142.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. 39.Warnecke, T.; Suttrup, I.; Schröder, J. B.; Osada, N.; Oelenberg, S.; Hamacher, C. et al. Levodopa responsiveness of dysphagia in advanced Parkinson’s disease and reliability testing of the FEES-levodopa-test. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2016;28:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.04.034DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. 40.Willig, T. N.; Paulus, J.; Lacau Saint Guily, J.; Béon, C.; Navarro, J.. Swallowing problems in neuromuscular disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994;75(11):1175–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. 41.Yap, Y. G.; Camm, A. J.. Drug induced QT prolongation and torsades de pointes. Heart. 2003;89(11):1363–1372. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.11.1363DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Mishra, K., Jabeen, A., Vegesna, S., Chintapalli, G. S., Patra, D., & Jena, D. (2026). Mouth Dissolving Tablets: Bridging Laboratory Innovations and Consumer Convenience. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 16(2), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20260373