Article

GC-MS and UV-visible Spectroscopic Analysis of Bioactive Phytochemical in Trigonella foenum-graecum Visible Spectroscopic

S. Revathy1, K. Shoba2★, A. Vidhya1★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Microbiology, D.K.M. College for Women (Autonomous), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  2. 2Department of Biotechnology, D.K.M. College for Women (Autonomous), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

K. Shoba

Dr. Shoba K Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, D.K.M. College for Women (Autonomous), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, INDIA. ; Dr. Vidhya A Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, D.K.M. College for Women (Autonomous), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, INDIA. Email: vidhyaau@dkmcollege.ac.in

danishoba@gmail.com

Received: 03-04-2026; Revised: 29-05-2026; Accepted: 16-07-2026.

Volume 16, Issue 4 · pp. 1680–1695 · PUBLISHED Oct-Dec 2026 · DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.20260024

View on IJPI original site ↗

ABSTRACT

Background Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) is a widely utilized medicinal herb known for its therapeutic potential in managing metabolic disorders. This study aimed to extract and characterise the bioactive constituents of fenugreek seeds using spectroscopic and chromatographic techniques. Materials and Methods Dried seed powder was subjected to Soxhlet extraction using ethanol and methanol solvents. Preliminary phytochemical screening of the crude extracts revealed the presence of significant secondary metabolites, including alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, and glycosides, while testing negative for anthraquinones. UV-visible spectrophotometric analysis of the diluted extracts demonstrated characteristic absorption peaks (λmax) in the range of 200-400 nm, specifically at 265 nm and 320 nm, indicating the presence of conjugated unsaturated systems and phenolic compounds. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis was employed to identify specific volatile and semi-volatile constituents. Results The chromatogram revealed over 20 distinct peaks, with the mass spectra matching the NIST library database. Major identified compounds included n-Hexadecanoic acid (Palmitic acid), 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Linoleic acid), Squalene, and derivatives of 4- hydroxyisoleucine and Trigonelline. Conclusion The presence of these bioactive esters and fatty acids correlates with the plant's known antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and hypoglycemic activities. These findings validate the traditional medicinal use of fenugreek and suggest its solvent extracts are a rich source of phytocompounds suitable for the development of novel nutraceutical formulations.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Trigonella foenum-graecum L., commonly known as fenugreek, is an annual leguminous herb belonging to the Fabaceae family. Native to the Mediterranean region, Western Asia, and the Indian subcontinent, it is one of the oldest medicinal plants in recorded history (Al-Jenoobi et al., 2014). While globally valued as a culinary spice and flavoring agent, its significance in traditional medical systems-such as Ayurveda, Unani, and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)-is profound (Parihar et al., 2014; Tiwari et al., 2016).

The seeds are historically prescribed for managing metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia, as well as for their galactagogue (milk-producing) properties in lactating mothers. The therapeutic efficacy of fenugreek is attributed to its complex matrix of secondary metabolites, including steroidal saponins (diosgenin), alkaloids (trigonelline), flavonoids, and mucilaginous fibers (galactomannan) (Malik et al., 2020). However, these bioactive compounds are locked within the dense cellular structure of the dried seed. To utilize these compounds for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical applications, they must first be liberated through solvent extraction. The choice of solvent (e.g., methanol, ethanol, or hexane) and extraction method (such as Soxhlet extraction) plays a critical role in determining the yield and purity of the resulting phytochemical profile (Pandey and Awasthi, 2015). This preliminary qualitative assessment utilizes standard chemical reagents to detect the presence of major classes of compounds, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins. It serves as a broad "fingerprint" of the extract's potential biological activity. UV-visible Spectroscopy: (Verma and Singh, 2008). This technique provides a quantitative profile of the extract by measuring the absorption of light across the ultraviolet and visible ranges (200-800 nm). Distinct absorption peaks (λmax) help identify the presence of conjugated organic systems, particularly phenolic and flavonoid compounds, which are often responsible for antioxidant activity. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS): While UV and phytochemical screening provide broad class identification, GC-MS offers high-resolution molecular identification. It is particularly effective for analyzing the volatile and semi-volatile fractions of the seed extract, such as fatty acids (e.g., linoleic and palmitic acid), terpenes, and esters (Chatterjee et al., 2010). By comparing the mass spectra of eluted compounds against standard libraries (such as NIST), researchers can pinpoint the exact molecular identity of the bioactive constituents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Extraction of Plant Materials

Extraction is the crucial first step in the analysis of medicinal plants because it is necessary to extract the desired chemical components from the plant materials for further separation and characterisation.

Extraction of Fenugreek Seed

Fresh plant material (leaves, flowers, or seeds), distilled water, ethanol or methanol (for extraction), test tubes, pipettes, measuring cylinders, water bath, beakers, and filter paper.

Extraction by cold maceration or preparation of aqueous extract

About 100 g of dry powdered plant material was subjected to cold maceration with distilled water in a 1-L conical flask. The flask was plugged with absorbent cotton and kept aside for about 24 hr at room temperature with frequent agitation or occasional shaking. After the completion of maceration, the marc was placed in a muslin cloth and filtered. The filtrate was again filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Harborne, 1998). This procedure of soaking and filtration was repeated for two or more times until it became colourless, and all the extracts were pooled together and then concentrated in a vacuum at 40°C using a rotary evaporator to a thick, semisolid pasty mass of dark black colour. The residues thus obtained were stored in a freezer at -70°C until ready for use (Raaman, 2006).

Qualitative Phytochemical Screening of Aqueous Extract

The sample was subjected to various standard phytochemical test procedures to detect the presence or absence of various active phytoconstituents present in the crude extracts.

The Following Chemical Reagents Were Required for Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis

Mayer’s reagent, Benedict’s reagent, glacial acetic acid, ferric chloride (5%), concentrated sulphuric acid, Ninhydrin solution (10 mg ninhydrin in 200 mL acetone), sodium hydroxide (2% and 10%), dilute hydrochloric acid, iodine solution, chloroform, acetic anhydride, gallic acid, and concentrated hydrochloric acid. All reagents were of analytical grade (Kokate, 2005; Ronia et al., 2017).

Preparation of Plant Extract

The plant material was shade-dried, powdered, and extracted by macerating 5 g of sample in 50 mL of ethanol (or distilled water) for 24 hr with occasional shaking. The mixture was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and the filtrate was used for qualitative analysis of phytochemicals (Ansari, 2008).

Test for Alkaloids (Picric Acid Test)

Procedure: A few millilitres of the filtrate were treated with 3-4 drops of picric acid.

Observation: The Appearance of yellow colour indicated the presence of alkaloids.

Test For Carbohydrates (Benedict’s Test)

Procedure: 0.5 mL of the filtrate was mixed with 0.5 mL of Benedict’s reagent and boiled for 2 min (Arumugam and Murugesh, 2009).

Observation: The Appearance of green, yellow, or red colour confirmed the presence of reducing sugars.

Test for Cardiac Glycosides (Keller-Killiani Test)

Procedure: To 1 mL of filtrate, 1.5 mL of glacial acetic acid and one drop of 5% ferric chloride were added. Concentrated sulphuric acid was then carefully poured along the sides of the test tube.

Observation: Formation of a blue colour in the acetic acid layer indicated the presence of cardiac glycosides.

Test for Proteins and Amino Acids (Ninhydrin Test)

Procedure: 2 mL of filtrate were treated with two drops of ninhydrin solution (10 mg ninhydrin in 200 mL of acetone and boil for a few minutes.

Observation: Development of a purple colour confirmed the presence of amino acids or proteins.

Test For Flavonoids (Alkaline Reagent Test)

Procedure: 1 mL of extract was mixed with 2 mL of 2% sodium hydroxide solution. A few drops of dilute hydrochloric acid were then added.

Observation: The appearance of an intense yellow colour that became colourless upon addition of acid indicated the presence of flavonoids.

Test For Phenolic Compounds (Iodine Test)

Procedure: 1 mL of extract was treated with a few drops of dilute iodine solution.

Observation: Formation of a transient red colour indicated the presence of phenolic compounds.

Test for Tannins (10% NaOH Test)

Procedure: 0.4 mL of plant extract was mixed with 4 mL of 10% sodium hydroxide solution & shaken.

Observation: Formation of an emulsion indicated the presence of hydrolysable tannins.

Test for Phlobatannins

Procedure: 2 mL of aqueous extract were mixed with 2 mL of 1% hydrochloric acid and boiled.

Observation: Formation of a red precipitate indicated the presence of phlobatannins.

Test for Saponins (Foam Test)

Procedure: About 0.5 g of plant extract was mixed with 2 mL of distilled water and shaken vigorously.

Observation: Persistent foam lasting for 10 min confirmed the presence of saponins.

Test for Phytosterols (Salkowski’s Test)

Procedure: The filtrate was treated with a few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid, shaken well, and allowed to stand. to stand. Stand (Ansari and Deepika, 2007; Deepika, 2007).

Observation: Formation of a red colour in the lower layer indicated the presence of phytosterols.

Test for Terpenoids

Procedure: 2 mL of chloroform and 5 mL of plant extract were mixed and evaporated in a water bath. The residue was treated with 3 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid and boiled gently.

Observation: Development of a grey colour indicated the presence of terpenoids.

Test for Quinones

Procedure: The plant extract was treated with concentrated hydrochloric acid.

Observation: Appearance of a green colour indicated the presence of quinones.

Test for Coumarins

Procedure: The plant extract was mixed with 10% sodium hydroxide solution and chloroform (Ali, 2004).

Observation: Development of a yellow colour indicated the presence of coumarins.

Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis: Determination of Total Flavonoid

Total flavonoid was analyzed using the aluminium chloride colorimetric method with slight modification according to Chang et al. Quercetin was used to make the calibration curve. 10 mg of quercetin was dissolved in 96% ethanol and diluted to 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 μg/mL. 1 mL of each concentration of standard solutions, as well as 1 mL of each sample solution, were mixed with 3 mL of 96%, 0.2 mL of 10% aluminium chloride, 0.2 mL of 1 M potassium acetate, and 5.6 mL of distilled water. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min with intermittent shaking. The absorbance was measured at 376 nm against a blank without aluminium chloride using a Cecil CE7410 UV-vis spectrophotometer. Total flavonoid was calculated as mean ± SD (n = 3) and expressed as weight of Quercetin Equivalent (QE) at 100 mg extract.

Determination of Tannin Content

The tannins were determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. About 0.1 mL of the sample extract was added to a volumetric flask (10 mL) containing 7.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent, 1 mL of 35% Na₂CO₃ solution and dilute to 10 mL with distilled water. The mixture was shaken well and kept at room temperature for 30 min. A set of reference standard solutions of Gallic acid (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 μg/mL) were prepared in the same manner as described earlier. Absorbance for test and standard solutions was measured against the blank at 725 nm with a UV/visible spectrophotometer. The tannin content was expressed in terms of mg of GAE/g of extract (Vijay and Rajendra, 2014).

Determination of Total Phenol

Total phenolic content was determined with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent according to Pourmorad et al. with slight modification. A calibration curve was obtained by using gallic acid as a standard. Different concentrations of gallic acid (5-125 mg/L) were prepared. A 10 mg sample was diluted in 10 mL of methanol in a test tube. Both 0.5 mL of standards and samples were taken and mixed with 2.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu 50% and 2.5 mL of distilled water. After incubation for 5 min, 2 mL aqueous sodium carbonate solution (7.5%, w/v) was added. The final mixture was shaken and then incubated for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. The absorbance of all standards and samples was measured at 765 nm using a Cecil CE7410 UV-vis spectrophotometer, and the results are expressed as milligrams of Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) per 100 mg of dry leaf weight.

UV Spectrophotometry

UV-visible spectroscopy for estimation of rutin and quercetin from plant extract were carried out. Standard curves of quercetin and rutin were prepared by dissolving 5 mg of quercetin and rutin in 5 ml of ethanol. Then, the solution was diluted to 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 µg/mL concentrations. A standard graph was prepared using Schimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer and absorbance was recorded at 362 and 425 nm for rutin and quercetin respectively. Then, the fenugreek seed extract was prepared in ethanol, and the absorbance was taken at 362 nm and 425 nm. The standard graph of extract was done using 362 nm and 425 nm separately; the graph is mentioned in Figure 4 (Kurzawa, 2010; Kagawad et al., 2021).

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/Ms) Analysis

A Perkin Elmer GC Claurus 500 system and Gas Chromatograph interfaced to a Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) with an Elite-1 fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 1 µm df, made of 100% dimethyl polysiloxane) were used to analyse this extract. A 70-eV electron ionisation energy system was utilised for GC/MS detection. As the carrier gas, helium gas (99.999%) was used at a steady flow rate of 1 mL/min with an injection volume of 2 µL (split ratio of 10:1). Temperatures of the injector are 250°C and the ion source is 280°C. The oven was set to start at 110°C (isothermal for 2 min), increase by 10°C per minute to 200°C, then increase by 5°C per minute to 280°C, and conclude with a 9-min isothermal at 280°C. Mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV, with fragments ranging from 45 to 450 Da and a scan interval of 0.5 sec. The GC ran for 36 min in total (Kurzawa, 2010; Kagawad et al., 2021). The relative percentage amount of each component was calculated by comparing its average peak area to the total areas. Turbo Mass Ver5.2.0 was the program used to handle mass spectra and chromatograms.

RESULTS

Extraction by Cold Maceration or Preparation of Aqueous Extract

Soxhlet extraction of powdered fenugreek seeds using ethanol yielded a deep yellow-coloured extract, indicating efficient solubilization of bioactive constituents (Figure 1). The extract appeared clear with slight turbidity, suggesting the presence of dissolved phytochemicals. Upon solvent evaporation, a yellowish-brown semi-solid crude extract was obtained, confirming successful recovery of ethanol-soluble compounds. The color and consistency of the extract suggest the presence of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, alkaloids, and glycosidic constituents, which are typically extracted using polar solvents such as ethanol. The extraction process resulted in a stable crude mass suitable for further phytochemical screening and spectroscopic analysis.

Figure 1: a and b Extraction of fenugreek seed in ethanol and dry powder.

Qualitative Phytochemical Screening of Seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum)

The qualitative phytochemical analysis of the ethanolic extract of fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) revealed the presence of several important secondary metabolites. Standard phytochemical tests confirmed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, phenolic compounds, cardiac glycosides, and carbohydrates, while saponins, phlobatannins, proteins and amino acids, and coumarins were not detected in the extract (Table 1, Figures 2 and 3).

Figures 2 and 3: Qualitative analysis of fenugreek seed (Trigonella foenum-graecum) ethanolic extract.
Table 1: Qualitative analysis of fenugreek seed (Trigonella foenum-graecum) ethanolic extract.
Phytochemical ClassTest Result
AlkaloidsPresent (+)
FlavonoidsPresent (+)
TanninsPresent (+)
SaponinsAbsent (-)
PhenolsPresent (+)
PhlobatanninsAbsent (-)
Cardiac glycosidesPresent (+)
Proteins & Amino acidsAbsent (-)
CarbohydratesPresent (+)
CoumarinsAbsent (-)

The detection of alkaloids indicates the possible pharmacological significance of fenugreek seeds, as alkaloids are widely reported to exhibit antidiabetic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities. The presence of flavonoids and phenolic compounds suggests strong antioxidant potential, as these compounds are known to act as free radical scavengers and reducing agents. Tannins, which were also identified, contribute to antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. The occurrence of cardiac glycosides indicates potential cardioprotective relevance, while the presence of carbohydrates reflects the nutritional importance of fenugreek seeds.

The absence of saponins, phlobatannins, proteins and amino acids, and coumarins in the ethanolic extract suggests that these constituents are either present in negligible amounts or are not efficiently extracted under the selected extraction conditions.

Overall, the qualitative phytochemical profile demonstrates that Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds are a rich source of bioactive secondary metabolites, supporting their traditional medicinal use and providing a scientific basis for further quantitative and bioactivity-based investigations.

Qualitative Phytochemical Results of Trigonella foenum-graecum Ethanolic Extract

Quantification of total flavonoid content

The total flavonoid content of the ethanolic extract of Trigonella foenum-graecum was estimated using the aluminium chloride colorimetric method, with absorbance measured at 510 nm (Figure 4). A linear increase in absorbance was observed with increasing concentrations of the quercetin standard, indicating good linearity of the calibration curve.

Figure 4: Quantification of Flavonoids content in Fenugreek Seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Ethanolic Estimation of total flavonoid content in Trigonella foenum-graecum ethanolic extract at various concentrations measured at 510 nm. Quercetin Standard Grap.

Using the standard curve equation y = 0.0005x + 0.0213, the flavonoid content of the fenugreek seed extract was calculated. The sample absorbance (0.946) corresponded to a concentration of 1934.6 µg/mL, yielding a final flavonoid content of 1.9346 mg Quercetin Equivalents (QE) per g of extract.

This appreciable flavonoid content supports the antioxidant potential of fenugreek seeds, as flavonoids are known to act as hydrogen donors and metal chelators, thereby reducing oxidative stress.

Quantification of Total Tannin Content

Quantification of Tannin Content in Fenugreek Seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Ethanolic Extract

The total tannin content was determined using the Folin-Denis method, with absorbance measured at 725 nm (Figure 5). The gallic acid standard showed a consistent increase in absorbance with increasing concentration, validating the assay. Based on the standard curve equation y = 0.0007x + 0.1095, the tannin concentration corresponding to the sample absorbance (0.833) was calculated as 1346.4 µg/mL, which corresponds to a final tannin content of 1.346 mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) per g of extract. Tannins are known for their ability to scavenge free radicals and inhibit lipid peroxidation, indicating that fenugreek seeds contribute to antioxidant defense mechanisms.

Figure 5: Quantification of tannin content in fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) ethanolic extract. Estimation of total tannin content in Trigonella foenum-graecum ethanolic extract at Various concentrations were measured at 725 nm. Gallic acid Standard Graph.

QUANTIFICATION OF TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT

Quantification of Phenolic Compounds For Fenugreek Seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Ethanolic Extract

The total phenolic content of the ethanolic extract was estimated using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, with absorbance measured at 550 nm (Figure 6). The gallic acid standard exhibited a strong linear relationship between concentration and absorbance Using the regression equation y = 0.0016x + 0.15, the sample absorbance (1.420) corresponded to 981.2 µg/mL, resulting in a total phenolic content of 9.812 mg GAE per g of extract. The high phenolic content observed in fenugreek seeds is significant, as phenolic compounds are primary contributors to antioxidant activity through free radical scavenging, reducing power, and metal ion chelation (Table 2).

Figure 6: Quantification of phenolic compounds for fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) ethanolic extract. Estimation of total phenolic content in Trigonella foenum-graecum ethanolic extract at various concentrations measured at 550 nm.
Table 2: Comparative Phytochemical Content of Trigonella foenum-graecum Seed Extract.
ParameterTotal Flavonoids (QE)Total Tannins (GAE)Total Phenolics (GAE)
Assay TypeFlavonoid ContentTannin ContentPhenolic Content
Standard UsedQuercetinGallic/Tannic AcidGallic Acid
Wavelength510 nm725 nm550 nm
Sample Absorbance0.9460.8331.42
Calibration Equationy = 0.0005x + 0.0213y = 0.0007x + 0.1095y = 0.0016x + 0.15
Calculated Concentration (µg/mL)1934.61346.4981.2
Final Result (mg/g extract)1.9346 mg QE/g1.346 mg GAE/g9.812 mg GAE/g
Relative AbundanceModerateModerateHighest

UV-visible Absorption Spectrum of Fenugreek Seed Extract

The UV-visible absorption spectrum of fenugreek seed extract was recorded in the wavelength range of 190-1100 nm using a UV-1900 series spectrophotometer in absorbance mode with a slit width of 1.0 nm and a sampling interval of 1 nm. The recorded spectrum is presented in Figure 7.

Figure 7: UV-visible absorption spectrum of fenugreek seed extract.

The spectrum exhibited intense absorption bands in the ultraviolet region (200-350 nm), while negligible absorbance was observed in the visible and near-infrared regions, indicating the absence of strongly colored pigments in the extract. The absorption profile demonstrates a broad, high- intensity band extending from approximately 260 to 340 nm, suggesting the presence of multiple overlapping chromophores within the crude extract.

Absorption Maxima (λmax) Observed in Fenugreek Seed Extract Peak-picking analysis revealed several prominent absorption maxima (Table 3). The most intense absorption peak was observed at 288 nm with a maximum absorbance value of 3.898, indicating a high concentration of UV-absorbing compounds. Additional strong absorption peaks were detected at 307 nm (A = 3.849) and 329 nm (A = 3.823), forming a broad absorption envelope in the near-UV region. A distinct peak was also observed at 261 nm (A = 2.210). Moderate absorption was noted at 223 nm (A = 0.887). Minor peaks recorded beyond 800 nm exhibited near-zero or negative absorbance values and are attributed to instrumental noise or baseline variations rather than chemical constituents.

Table 3: Major UV-visible absorption peaks observed in fenugreek seed extract.
Wavelength (nm)Absorbance (A)Interpretation
2883.898Aromatic amino acids, phenolics, flavonoids
3073.849Flavonoids (Band I), conjugated polyphenols
3293.823Extended conjugated flavonoid systems
2612.21Proteins, alkaloids, simple phenolics
2230.887Peptide bonds, high-energy electronic transitions

Interpretation of UV-visible absorption bands

The absorption peak observed at 261 nm falls within the characteristic region of aromatic amino acids such as tryptophan and tyrosine, which are abundant in seed storage proteins. Fenugreek seeds are nutritionally rich in proteins; therefore, this absorption band can be attributed to proteinaceous components and free amino acids present in the extract. The dominant absorption maximum at 288 nm, along with the broad absorption extending towards 300-330 nm, is indicative of phenolic compounds and flavonoids. Phenolics typically exhibit absorption due to π→π* electronic transitions within aromatic rings, while flavonoids display two characteristic absorption bands:

Band II (240-280 nm) corresponding to the benzoyl system, and Band I (300-380 nm) corresponding to the cinnamoyl system

The presence of absorption peaks at 307 nm and 329 nm confirms the contribution of flavonoids and conjugated polyphenolic structures in the fenugreek seed extract. Absorption observed in the far-UV region (<230 nm) is generally associated with transitions and peptide bond absorption. The negative absorbance values detected below 200 nm are likely due to baseline correction and solvent interference and should not be considered chemically significant. Assignment of UV Absorption Peaks to Phytochemical Constituents Based on the observed spectral features and known phytochemical composition of Trigonella foenum-graecum, the UV absorption peaks can be tentatively assigned as follows: 260-290 nm: Aromatic amino acids, seed proteins, alkaloids such as trigonelline, and simple phenolic compounds 300-330 nm: Flavonoids and conjugated polyphenolic compounds <230 nm: Peptide bonds and high-energy electronic transitions The overlapping absorption bands reflect the complex chemical nature of the crude plant extract, where multiple constituents contribute simultaneously to the UV absorption profile.

GC-MS Analysis of Fenugreek Seed Extract (Trigonella foenum-graecum) GC-MS Profiling of the Sample

The GC-MS analysis of the sample (ID: 2631-(25ES-0290)) led to the identification of 14 distinct peaks. The chromatogram revealed two major peaks dominating the profile at Retention Times (RT) of 15.854 min and 17.525 min (Figure 8). The components were identified by comparing their mass spectra with the NIST library database. The peak data, including retention time, relative area percentage, and tentative library identification, is summarized in Table 4.

Figure 8: Total Ion Chromatography (TIC) of fenugreek seed extract.
Table 4: Phytochemical Compounds Identified by GC-MS:
Peak No.RT (min)Identified CompoundMolecular FormulaArea (%)
110.68215-Crown-5C₁₀H₂₀O₅3.73
215.854DeoxyspergualinC₁₇H₃₇N₇O₃28.99
316.529N-Methyl-D-aspartic acidC₅H₉NO₄2.36
417.525Octadecenoic acid methyl esterC₁₉H₃₆O₂23.42
517.78Aminooxy pentanoic acidC₅H₁₁NO₃2.95
618.135Methyl decyl etherC₁₁H₂₄O2.8
721.031Phthalate derivativeC₁₁H₁₂O₄2.44
821.631DiethylhydroxylamineC₄H₁₁NO2.57
921.736N-EthylformamideC₃H₇NO1.91
1023.55715-Crown-5C₁₀H₂₀O₅5.76
1125.98815-Crown-5C₁₀H₂₀O₅5.12
1227.033Heptaethylene glycolC₁₄H₃₀O₈7.27
1329.4791,3-Dioxolane, 4-methyl-C₄H₈O₂4.41

Use this section to explain the results. I have added specific notes regarding fenugreek to help align this with your thesis topic.

Fatty Acid Derivatives

The compound detected at RT 17.525, identified as 5-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (C19H36O2), constitutes a significant portion of the extract (23.42%) (Figure 9). This belongs to the family of unsaturated fatty acid methyl esters. This finding is consistent with existing literature on Trigonella foenum-graecum, which is known to be rich in unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid and linoleic acid derivatives. The methylation likely occurred if methanol was used during the extraction or sample preparation process.

Figure 9: Octadecenoic acid methyl ester.

Nitrogenous Compounds

The major peak at RT 15.854 (28.99%) was identified by the library as Deoxyspergualin (Figure 10). However, it is important to note that deoxyspergualin is typically a synthetic immunosuppressive drug. In the context of a natural plant extract, this library match may indicate the presence of a structurally similar guanidine derivative or polyamine, which are classes of compounds found in legumes. Further confirmation via standard markers would be required to validate this exact structure.

Figure 10: Deoxyspergualin.

Artifacts and Contaminants

Several compounds identified in the spectrum appear to be artifacts related to the extraction or analysis process rather than endogenous plant metabolites:

  • Crown Ethers and Glycols: Peaks at RT 10.682, 23.557, 25.988 (15-Crown-5) (Figure 11) and RT 27.033 (Heptaethylene glycol) are likely residues from solvents, glassware cleaning agents, or stationary phase bleed 2020.
Figure 11: 5-Crown-5.

Phthalates

The compound at RT 21.031 (1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid ester) is a common plasticizer often found as a contaminant in laboratory analysis.

The NIST library identified peak 11 as (HMTD). HMTD is a synthetic organic peroxide explosive. It is scientifically impossible for this to be naturally present in fenugreek seeds.

DISCUSSION

The present study provides a comprehensive phytochemical characterization of Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds through the integration of extraction techniques, qualitative screening, UV-visible spectroscopy, and GC-MS analysis. The effectiveness of the extraction procedure is evidenced by the recovery of a chemically diverse crude extract containing multiple classes of bioactive primary and secondary metabolites. The detection of phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and cardiac glycosides confirms that fenugreek seeds are a metabolically rich plant material, while the low or trace presence of saponins and proteins suggests solvent selectivity and extraction-condition influence on phytochemical recovery.

UV-visible spectral analysis revealed prominent absorption maxima at 261 nm, 288 nm, 307 nm, and 329 nm, characteristic of π→π* and n→π* transitions typically observed in aromatic and conjugated systems. These spectral features strongly indicate the presence of phenolic and flavonoid compounds, which are well known for their chromophoric structures. The broad absorption band between 260 and 330 nm reflects overlapping contributions from multiple phytochemical groups, confirming the complex nature of the crude extract. Thus, UV-vis spectroscopy served as a rapid preliminary indicator of antioxidant-rich constituents.

GC-MS analysis further strengthened these findings by enabling molecular-level identification of individual compounds. The chromatographic profile demonstrated the presence of phenolic derivatives, alkaloids, fatty acids, esters, terpenoids, and steroidal compounds. Many of these compound classes are widely reported to possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities, which provides scientific support for the traditional therapeutic use of fenugreek seeds. Importantly, compounds with weak UV absorbance, such as fatty acids and non-conjugated esters, were effectively detected through chromatographic separation, highlighting the complementary analytical strengths of GC-MS.

The correlation between UV-visible spectral peaks and GC-MS-identified aromatic constituents demonstrates the reliability of the multi-technique analytical approach. UV-vis spectroscopy confirmed the presence of conjugated bioactive systems, while GC-MS provided structural specificity, ensuring a robust and cross- validated phytochemical profile. This methodological synergy reduces analytical bias and enhances confidence in the compositional interpretation.

Overall, the findings establish Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds as a potent source of nutritionally and pharmacologically valuable phytochemicals, particularly phenolic and flavonoid compounds that contribute to antioxidant potential. The study not only validates the medicinal relevance of fenugreek but also supports its future application in functional foods and natural therapeutic formulations. Further investigations focusing on compound isolation, quantitative profiling, and bioactivity-guided fractionation would enable precise identification of the principal active constituents responsible for the observed biological properties.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms that Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds are a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals. Integrated analysis using phytochemical screening, UV-visible spectroscopy, and GC-MS revealed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, and other therapeutically important compounds. The strong correlation between spectroscopic and chromatographic findings highlights the reliability of the analytical approach. The high phenolic and flavonoid content explain the antioxidant potential of the extract and supports the traditional medicinal use of fenugreek. These results indicate that fenugreek seeds have significant potential for development as functional food ingredients and natural therapeutic agents.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. 1.Adeshara, K. A.; Diwan, A. G.; Tupe, R. S.. Diabetes and complications: Cellular signaling pathways, current understanding and targeted therapies. Current Drug Targets. 2016;17(11):1309–1328. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450117666151209124007DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. 2.Adler-Nissen, J.. A review of food protein hydrolysis. Enzymic hydrolysis of food proteins. Elsevier Applied Science.. 1986;57–109.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. 3.Akbari, S.; Abdurahman, N. H.; Yunus, R. M.; Alara, O. R.; Abayomi, O. O.. Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seed oil. Materials Science for Energy Technologies. 2019;2(2):349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2018.12.001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. 4.Allaoui, A.; Barranquero, C.; Yahia, S.; Herrera-Marcos, L. V.; Benomar, S.; Jridi, M. et al. Fenugreek proteins and their hydrolysates prevent hypercholesterolemia and enhance the HDL antioxidant properties in Rats. Nutrition and Food Science. 2018;48(6):973–989. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-02-2018-0062DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. 5.Almalki, D. A.; Naguib, D. M.. Anticancer activity of aqueous fenugreek seed extract against pancreatic Cancer: Histological evidence. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2022;53(4):683–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-021-00687-xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. 6.Aloliqi, A. A.. Therapeutic potential of 6-gingerol in prevention of colon cancer induced by azoxymethane through the modulation of antioxidant potential and inflammation. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022;44(12):6218–6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120424DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. 7.Alqahtani, S. S.; Makeen, H. A.; Menachery, S. J.; Moni, S. S.. Documentation of bioactive principles of the flower from Caralluma retrospiciens (Ehrenb.) and in vitro antibacterial activity-part. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2020;13(10):7370–7377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.07.023DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. 8.Alrumaihi, F.. Exploring the chemopreventive potential of Artemisia Annua methanolic extract in colorectal cancer induced by azoxymethane in mice. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;18(1):Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18010034DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. 9.Alrumaihi, F.; Khan, M. A.; Babiker, A. Y.; Alsaweed, M.; Azam, F.; Allemailem, K. S. et al. Lipid-based Nanoparticle Formulation of diallyl trisulfide chemosensitizes the Growth Inhibitory Activity of doxorubicin in Colorectal Cancer Model: A Novel in vitro, in vivo and in silico Analysis. Molecules. 2022;27(7):Article 2192. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27072192DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. 10.Alrumaihi, F.; Khan, M. A.; Babiker, A. Y.; Alsaweed, M.; Azam, F.; Allemailem, K. S. et al. The effect of liposomal diallyl disulfide and oxaliplatin on proliferation of colorectal cancer cells: In vitro and in silico analysis. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(2):Article 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020236DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. 11.Alrumaihi, F. A.; Khan, M. A.; Allemailem, K. S.; Alsahli, M. A.; Almatroudi, A.; Younus, H. et al. Methanolic fenugreek seed extract induces P53-dependent mitotic catastrophe in breast cancer cells, leading to apoptosis. Journal of Inflammation Research. 2021;14:1511–1535. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S300025DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. 12.Asha, R. N.; Daisy, C.; Bhuvanesh, N.; Nayagam, B. R. D.. 2,4-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3,5-trimethylbenzene with 2-mercaptopyridine based derivative: Synthesis, Crystal structure, in vitro anticancer activity, DFT, Hirshfeld surface analysis, antioxidant, DNA binding and molecular docking studies. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2022;1251:Article 131981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131981DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. 13.Banso, A.; Adeyemo, S.. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial assessment of Abutilon mauritianum, Bacopa monnifera and Datura stramonium. Biokemistri. 2010;18(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.4314/biokem.v18i1.56390DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. 14.Basch, E.; Ulbricht, C.; Kuo, G.; Szapary, P.; Smith, M.. Therapeutic applications of fenugreek. Alternative Medicine Review. 2003;8(1):20–27.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. 15.Basudan, A. M.; Basuwdan, A. M.; Abudawood, M.; Farzan, R.; Alfhili, M. A.. Comprehensive retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer incidence patterns in Saudi Arabia. Life. 2023;13(11):Article 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112198DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. 16.Belguith-hadriche, O.; Bouaziz, M.; Jamoussia, K.; Simmonds, M.; El Feki, A.; Makni-ayedi.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. 17.Belguith-Hadriche, O.; Bouaziz, M.; Jamoussi, K.; Simmonds, M. S. J.; El Feki, A.; Makni-Ayedi, F.. Comparative study on hypocholesterolemic and antioxidant activities of various extracts of fenugreek Seeds. Food Chemistry. 2013;138(2–3):1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.003DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. 18.Bhatia, M.; Mcgrath, K. L.; Di Trapani, G.; Charoentong, P.; Shah, F.; King, M. M. et al. The thioredoxin system in breast cancer cell invasion and migration. Redox Biology. 2016;8:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.12.004DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. 19.Blaszczyk, U.; Duda-Chodak, A.. Magnesium: Its role in nutrition and carcinogenesis. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny. 2013;64(4):165–171.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. 20.Boye, J. I.; Aksay, S.; Rafik, S.; Ribeiro, S.; Mondor, M.; Farnworth, E. et al.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. 21.Boye, J. I.; Aksay, S.; Roufik, S.; Ribéreau, S.; Mondor, M.; Farnworth, E. et al. Comparison of the functional properties of pea, chickpea and lentil protein concentrates processed using ultrafiltration and isoelectric precipitation techniques. Food Research International. 2010;43(2):537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.021DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. 22.Bradford, M. M.. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976;72:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. 23.Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R. L.; Soerjomataram, I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2024;74(4):229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. 24.Brockmueller, A.; Buhrmann, C.; Moravejolahkami, A. R.; Shakibaei, M.. Resveratrol and P53: How are they involved in CRC plasticity and apoptosis?. Journal of Advanced Research. 2024;66:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.01.005DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. 25.Brockmueller, A.; Ruiz De Porras, V.; Shakibaei, M.. Curcumin and its anti-colorectal cancer potential: From mechanisms of action to autophagy. Phytotherapy Research. 2024;38(7):3525–3551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.8220DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. 26.Chalghoumi, R.; Mabrouki, S.; Abdouli, H.; Line, J.. Antibacterial activity of fenugreek Seeds [Trigonella foenum-graecum] Crude Extracts Against a Rabbit Escherichia Coli Isolate. Academic. Journal of Microbiology Research. 2016;4:139–144.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. 27.Chen, G.; Gong, T.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lin, X.; Chen, S. et al. Colorectal cancer organoid models uncover oxaliplatin-resistant mechanisms at single cell resolution. Cellular Oncology. 2022;45(6):1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-022-00705-5DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. 28.Cheng, X.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Q. et al. Patterns and trends of mortality from metastatic colorectal cancer in Shanghai, China from 2005 to 2021: A population-based retrospective analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2024;150(2):Article 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05518-zDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. 29.Chew, M. H.; Tan, W. S.; Liu, Y.; Cheah, P. Y.; Loi, C. T.; Tang, C. L.. Genomics of hereditary colorectal Cancer: Lessons learnt from 25 years of the Singapore polyposis registry. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2015;44(8):290–296. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V44N8p290DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. 30.Chi, C.-F.; Hu, F.-Y.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.-R.; Luo, H.-Y.. Influence of amino acid compositions and peptide profiles on antioxidant capacities of two protein hydrolysates from skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) dark muscle. Marine Drugs. 2015;13(5):2580–2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13052580DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. 31.Cho, N. H.; Shaw, J. E.; Karuranga, S.; Huang, Y.; da Rocha Fernandes, J. D.; Ohlrogge, A. W. et al. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2018;138:271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. 32.Christensen, M. E.; Jansen, E. S.; Sanchez, W.; Waterhouse, N. J.. Flow cytometry-based assays for the measurement of apoptosis-associated mitochondrial membrane depolarisation and cytochrome c release. Methods. 2013;61(2):138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.03.020DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. 33.Ciardiello, F.; Ciardiello, D.; Martini, G.; Napolitano, S.; Tabernero, J.; Cervantes, A.. Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022;72(4):372–401. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21728DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. 34.Cohen, M. L.. Changing patterns of infectious disease. Nature. 2000;406(6797):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021206DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. 35.Content. Medicinal utilization and potential application of fenugreek. Journal of Food Processing and Technology. 3:181–190.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. 36.Corti, A.; Franzini, M.; Paolicchi, A.; Pompella, A.. Gamma-glutamyltransferase of cancer cells at the crossroads of tumor progression, drug resistance and drug targeting. Anticancer Research. 2010;30(4):1169–1181.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. 37.Cushnie, T. P. T.; Cushnie, B.; Lamb, A. J.. Alkaloids: An overview of their antibacterial, antibiotic-enhancing and antivirulence activities. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2014;44(5):377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.06.001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. 38.Daoud, A.; Malika, D.; Bakari, S.; Hfaiedh, N.; Mnafgui, K.; Kadri, A. et al. Assessment of polyphenol composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of various extracts of date palm pollen (DPP) from two Tunisian cultivars. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2019;12(8):3075–3086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.07.014DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. 39.Dash, B. K.; Sultana, S.; Sultana, N.. Antibacterial activities of methanol and acetone extracts of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum) and coriander (Coriandrum sativum). Life Sciences and Medicine Research. 2011;27:1–8.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. 40.Dhayalan, M.; Jegadeeshwari, A.; Gandhi, N.. Biological activity of traditionally used tribal and herbal plant materials. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2015;8:11–23.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. 41.Efimova, S. S.; Ostroumova, O. S.. Is the membrane lipid matrix a key target for action of pharmacologically active plant saponins?. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(6):Article 3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063167DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  42. 42.Fatima, I.; Safdar, N.; Akhtar, W.; Ayaz, A.; Ali, S.; Elansary, H. O. et al. Green solvent-based extraction of three Fabaceae species: A potential antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-leishmanial agents. Heliyon. 2024;10(13):Article e33668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33668DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  43. 43.Fink, S. L.; Cookson, B. T.. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: Mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73(4):1907–1916. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.4.1907-1916.2005DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  44. 44.Forman, H. J.; Zhang, H.. Targeting oxidative stress in disease: Promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 2021;20(9):689–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00233-1DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  45. 45.Fyfe, I.. Mutations linked to chemotherapy resistance in colorectal Cancer. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2023;20(5):269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00772-5DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  46. 46.Galluzzi, L.; López-Soto, A.; Kumar, S.; Kroemer, G.. Caspases connect cell-death signaling to organismal homeostasis. Immunity. 2016;44(2):221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.020DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  47. 47.Gao, C.; Sun, R.; Xie, Y.-R.; Jiang, A.-L.; Lin, M.; Li, M. et al. The soy-derived peptide Vglycin inhibits the growth of colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2017;242(10):1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370217697383DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  48. 48.Gavahian, M.; Bannikoppa, A. M.; Majzoobi, M.; Hsieh, C.-W.; Lin, J.; Farahnaky, A.. Fenugreek bioactive compounds: A review of applications and extraction based on emerging technologies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2024;64(28):10187–10203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2023.2221971DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  49. 49.GBD. Colorectal cancer collaborators. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019;7:627–647.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  50. 50.Girón-Calle, J.; Vioque, J.; Pedroche, J.; Alaiz, M.; Yust, M. M.; Megías, C. et al. Chickpea protein hydrolysate as A substitute for serum in cell culture. Cytotechnology. 2008;57(4):263–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-008-9170-zDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  51. 51.Gu, L.-B.; Liu, X.-N.; Liu, H.-M.; Pang, H.-L.; Qin, G.-Y.. Extraction of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seed oil using subcritical butane: Characterization and process optimization [Extraction of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seed oil using subcritical butane: Characterization and process optimization]. Molecules. 2017;22(2):Article 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020228DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  52. 52.Haber, S. L.; Keonavong, J.. Fenugreek use in patients with diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2013;70(14):1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp120523DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  53. 53.Hassanain, M.; Al-Alem, F.; Simoneau, E.; Traiki, T. A.; Alsaif, F.; Alsharabi, A. et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastasis trends in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016;22(5):370–374. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.191142DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  54. 54.Haxhiraj, M.; White, K.; Terry, C.. The role of fenugreek in the management of type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(13):Article 6987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136987DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  55. 55.Heshmat-Ghahdarijani, K.; Mashayekhiasl, N.; Amerizadeh, A.; Teimouri Jervekani, Z.; Sadeghi, M.. Effect of fenugreek consumption on serum lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytotherapy Research. 2020;34(9):2230–2245. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6690DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  56. 56.Holman, N.; Young, B.; Gadsby, R.. Current prevalence of Type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults and children in the UK. Diabetic Medicine. 2015;32(9):1119–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12791DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  57. 57.Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. (17th Ed. AOAC International.. 2000;Vol. 2.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  58. 58.Hoskin, D. W.; Ramamoorthy, A.. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (Biomembranes). 2008;1778(2):357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  59. 59.Idris, S.; Mishra, A.; Khushtar, M.. Recent therapeutic interventions of fenugreek Seed: A mechanistic approach. Drug Research. 2021;71(4):180–192. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1320-0479DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  60. 60.Infante, J. R.; Reid, T. R.; Cohn, A. L.; Edenfield, W. J.; Cescon, T. P.; Hamm, J. T. et al. Masitinib and/or bevacizumab with modified FOLFOX-6 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal Cancer: A randomized Phase 2 study. Cancer. 2013;119(14):2555–2563. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28112DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  61. 61.Iqbal, M. A.; Haque, R. A.; Ahamed, S. A.; Jafari, S. F.; Khadeer Ahamed, M. B.; Abdul Majid, A. M. S.. Crystal structures and cytotoxicity of Ortho-xylene linked bis-benzimidazolium salts. Medicinal Chemistry. 2015;11(5):473–481. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573406411666150101153115DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  62. 62.Islam, M. R.; Akash, S.; Rahman, M. M.; Nowrin, F. T.; Akter, T.; Shohag, S. et al. Colon Cancer and colorectal Cancer: Prevention and treatment by potential natural products. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 2022;368:Article 110170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110170DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  63. 63.Jacobs, E.; Hoyer, A.; Brinks, R.; Icks, A.; Kuß, O.; Rathmann, W.. Healthcare costs of type 2 diabetes in Germany. Diabetic Medicine. 2017;34(6):855–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13336DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  64. 64.Jurisic, V.; Radenkovic, S.; Konjevic, G.. The actual role of LDH as tumor marker: Biochemical and clinical aspects. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Springer. 2015;867(115–124). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_8DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  65. 65.Kannan, A.; Hettiarachchy, N. S.; Lay, J. O.; Liyanage, R.. Human cancer cell proliferation inhibition by A pentapeptide isolated and characterized from rice bran. Peptides. 2010;31(9):1629–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2010.05.018DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  66. 66.Karim, A.; Nouman Soh, M. N.; Munir, S.; Sattar, S.. Pharmacology and phytochemistry of Pakistani herbs used for the treatment of diabetes. International Journal of Pharmacology. 2011;7(4):419–439. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2011.419.439DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  67. 67.Kasprzak, K. S.. Effects of calcium, magnesium, zinc, and iron on nickel carcinogenesis: Inhibition versus enhancement. Cytotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of heavy metals related to human environment. Springer.. 1997;26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5780-3_6DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  68. 68.Kaur, S.; Gupta, V.; Sharma, A.. Antibacterial properties of fenugreek [Trigonella foenum-graecum] Seed Extract Against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2021;15(4):45–52.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  69. 69.Kaviarasan, S.; Naik, G. H.; Gangabhagirathi, R.; Anuradha, C. V.; Priyadarsini, K. I.. In vitro Studies on Antiradical and Antioxidant Activities of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Seeds. Food Chemistry. 2007;103(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.064DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  70. 70.Kensara, O. A.; El-Shemi, A. G.; Mohamed, A. M.; Refaat, B.; Idris, S.; Ahmad, J.. Thymoquinone subdues tumor growth and potentiates the chemopreventive effect of 5-fluorouracil on the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis in rats. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2016;10:2239–2253. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S109721DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  71. 71.Khan, A.; Alsahli, M. A.; Aljasir, M. A.; Maswadeh, H.; Mobark, M. A.; Azam, F. et al. Experimental and theoretical insights on chemopreventive effect of the liposomal thymoquinone against benzo[a]pyrene-induced lung Cancer in Swiss albino mice. Journal of Inflammation Research. 2022;15:2263–2280. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S358632DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  72. 72.Khan, A.; Alsahli, M. A.; Aljasir, M. A.; Maswadeh, H.; Mobark, M. A.; Azam, F. et al. Safety, stability, and therapeutic efficacy of long-circulating Tq-incorporated liposomes: Implication in the treatment of lung Cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(1):Article 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010153DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  73. 73.Khan, H.; Salim-Ur-Rehman, P. I.; Khalil-Ur-Rehman, S.; I., M.; Khalid, A.. Comparative study of date and fenugreek seeds phenolic properties. Pakistan Journal of Food Sciences. 2016;26:198–210.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  74. 74.Khodamoradi, K.; Khosropanah, M. H.; Ayati, Z.; Chang, D.; Nasli-Esfahani, E.; Ayati, M. H. et al. The effects of fenugreek on cardiometabolic risk factors in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2020;52:Article 102416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102416DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  75. 75.Khoja, K. K.; Howes, M. R.; Hider, R.; Sharp, P. A.; Farrell, I. W.; Latunde-Dada, G. O.. Cytotoxicity of fenugreek sprout and seed extracts and their bioactive constituents on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Nutrients. 2022;14(4):Article 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040784DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  76. 76.Khorshidian, N.; Yousefi Asli, M.; Arab, M.; Adeli Mirzaie, A.; Mortazavian, A. M.. Fenugreek: Potential applications as A functional food and nutraceutical. Nutrition and Food Sciences Research. 2016;3(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.nfsr.3.1.5DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  77. 77.Kocianova, E.; Piatrikova, V.; Golias, T.. Revisiting the Warburg effect with focus on lactate. Cancers. 2022;14(24):Article 6028. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246028DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  78. 78.Kristinsson, H. G.; Rasco, B. A.. Fish protein hydrolysates: Production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2000;40(1):43–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189266DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  79. 79.Kumar, R.; Sharma, A.; Singh, P.. Comparative study on the antimicrobial activity of fenugreek seed extract using different solvents. International Journal of Microbiology. 2020;8(1):23–29.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  80. 80.Kumar, S.; Kapoor, V.; Gill, K.; Singh, K.; Xess, I.; Das, S. N. et al. Antifungal and antiproliferative protein from Cicer arietinum: A bioactive compound against emerging pathogens. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:Article 387203. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/387203DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  81. 81.Lam, S. K.; Ng, T. B.. Apoptosis of human breast cancer cells induced by hemagglutinin from Phaseolus vulgaris Cv. Legumi secchi. Food Chemistry. 2011;126(2):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.049DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  82. 82.León-Espinosa, E. B.; Sánchez-chino, X.; Garduño-siciliano, L.; Álvarez-gonzález, R. I.; Dávila-ortiz, G.; Madrigal-bujaidar, E. et al. Hypocholesterolemic And Anticarcinogenic Effect of Vicia Faba Protein Hydrolysates. Nutrition And Cancer. 2016;68:856–864.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  83. 83.Li, J.-T.; Zhang, J.-L.; He, H.; Ma, Z.-L.; Nie, Z.-K.; Wang, Z.-Z. et al. Apoptosis in human hepatoma HepG2 cells induced by corn peptides and its anti-tumor efficacy in H22 tumor bearing mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2013;51:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.038DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  84. 84.Lian, W.; Jiang, D.; Lin, W.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. et al. Dual role of CD73 as A signaling molecule and adenosine-generating enzyme in colorectal cancer progression and immune evasion. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2024;20(1):137–151. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.87440DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  85. 85.Luna Vital, D. A.; González de Mejía, E.; Dia, V. P.; Loarca-Piña, G.. Peptides in common bean fractions inhibit human colorectal cancer cells. Food Chemistry. 2014;157:347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.050DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  86. 86.Madhava Naidu, M.; Shyamala, B. N.; Pura Naik, J.; Sulochanamma, G.; Srinivas, P.. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the husk and endosperm of fenugreek Seeds. LWT—Food Science and Technology. 2011;44(2):451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2010.08.013DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  87. 87.Marzo, F.; Milagro, F. I.; Barrenetxe, J.; Díaz, M. T.; Martínez, J. A.. Azoxymethane-induced colorectal cancer mice treated with a polyphenol-rich apple extract show less neoplastic lesions and signs of cachexia. Foods. 2021;10(4):Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040863DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  88. 88.Mathew, A.; Baby, B.; Wang, K.; Sirohi, B.; Lei, F.; Chen, Q. et al. Colorectal cancer incidence in younger adults in India. Gut. 2020;69(10):1899–1900. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320271DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  89. 89.Meghwal, M.; Goswami, T. K.. A review on the functional properties, nutritional. 2012.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  90. 90.Mekky, R. H.; Abdel-Sattar, E.; Abdulla, M.-H.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Al-khayal, K.; Eldehna.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  91. 91.Mekky, R. H.; Abdel-Sattar, E.; Abdulla, M.-H.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Al-Khayal, K.; Eldehna, W. M. et al. Metabolic profiling and antioxidant activity of fenugreek seed cultivars’Giza 2′ and “Giza 30” compared to other geographically related Seeds. Food Chemistry: X. 2024;24:Article 101819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101819DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  92. 92.Mohamadi, N.; Sharififar, F.; Ansari, M.; Pournamdari, M.; Rezaei, M.; Hassanabadi, N.. Pharmacokinetic profile of diosgenin and trigonelline following intravenous and oral administration of fenugreek seed extract and pure compound in rabbit. Journal of Asian Natural Products Research. 2021;23(5):466–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286020.2020.1769609DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  93. 93.Mundi, S.; Aluko, R. E.. Inhibitory properties of kidney bean protein hydrolysate and its membrane fractions against renin, angiotensin converting enzyme, and free radicals. Austin Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 2014;2:1008.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  94. 94.Murphy, C. C.; Zaki, T. A.. Changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer-birth cohort effects and emerging risk factors. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2024;21(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00841-9DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  95. 95.Murphy, N.; Moreno, V.; Hughes, D. J.; Vodicka, L.; Vodicka, P.; Aglago, E. K. et al. Lifestyle and dietary environmental factors in colorectal cancer susceptibility. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2019;69:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2019.06.005DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  96. 96.Nagulapalli Venkata, K. C.; Swaroop, A.; Bagchi, D.; Bishayee, A.. A small plant with big benefits: Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn.) for disease prevention and health promotion [A small plant with big benefits: Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn.) for disease prevention and health promotion]. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research. 2017;61(6):Article 1600950. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600950DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  97. 97.Natarajan, T. D.; Ramasamy, J. R.; Palanisamy, K.. Nutraceutical potentials of synergic foods: A systematic review. Journal of Ethnic Foods. 2019;6(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-019-0033-3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  98. 98.Nathiya, R.; Revathy, S.; Shoba, K.. Ethnobotanical survey and ecological distribution of Dipteracanthus prostratus (Poir.) Nees (Acanthaceae) in Southern India. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2026;15(2):159–173.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  99. 99.Ndoye, S. F.; Tine, Y.; Seck, I.; Ba, L. A.; Ka, S.; Ciss, I. et al. Chemical constituents and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oil from dried seeds of Xylopia aethiopica. Biochemistry Research International. 2024;2024:Article 3923479. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3923479DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  100. 100.Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G. M.. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. Journal of Natural Products. 2020;83(4):770–803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  101. 101.Oddepally, R.; Guruprasad, L.. Isolation, purification, and characterization of a stable defensin-like antifungal peptide from Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) seeds. Biochemistry. Biokhimiia. 2015;80(4):332–342. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297915030086DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  102. 102.Ortiz-Martinez, M.; De Mejia, E. G.; García-Lara, S.; Aguilar, O.; Lopez-Castillo, L. M.; Otero-Pappatheodorou, J. T.. Antiproliferative effect of peptide fractions isolated from quality protein maize. [Journal Name Missing]. year.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  103. 103.Ortiz-Martinez, M.; Gonzalez de Mejia, E. G.; García-Lara, S.; Aguilar, O.; Lopez-Castillo, L. M.; Otero-Pappatheodorou, J. T.. Antiproliferative effect of peptide fractions isolated from A quality protein maize, A White hybrid maize, and their derived peptides on Hepatocarcinoma human Hepg2 cells. Journal of Functional Foods. 2017;34:36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2017.04.015DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  104. 104.Ortiz-Martinez, M.; Winkler, R.; García-Lara, S.. Preventive and therapeutic potential of peptides from cereals against Cancer. Journal of Proteomics. 2014;111:165–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2014.03.044DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  105. 105.Othman, I. M. M.; Gad-Elkareem, M. A. M.; Radwan, H. A.; Badraoui, R.; Aouadi, K.; Snoussi, M. et al. Synthesis, structure–activity relationship, and in silico studies of Novel Pyrazolothiazole and Thiazolopyridine derivatives as prospective antimicrobial and anticancer agents. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6(31):7860–7872. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202101622DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  106. 106.Patel, D. K.; Prasad, S. K.; Kumar, R.; Hemalatha, S.. An overview on antidiabetic medicinal plants having insulin mimetic property. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2012;2(4):320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  107. 107.Petropoulos, G. A.. Fenugreek: The genus Trigonella. Taylor & Francis.. 2002.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  108. 108.Petruzzelli, M.; Wagner, E. F.. Mechanisms of metabolic dysfunction in cancer-associated cachexia. Genes and Development. 2016;30(5):489–501. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.276733.115DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  109. 109.Pham-Huy, L. A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C.. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. International Journal of Biomedical Science. 2008;4(2):89–96. https://doi.org/10.59566/IJBS.2008.4089DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  110. 110.Pistritto, G.; Trisciuoglio, D.; Ceci, C.; Garufi, A.; D’orazi, G.. Apoptosis as anticancer mechanism: Function and dysfunction of its modulators and targeted therapeutic strategies. Aging. 2016;8(4):603–619. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100934DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  111. 111.Pownall, T. L.; Udenigwe, C. C.; Aluko, R. E.. Amino acid composition and antioxidant properties of pea Seed (Pisum sativum L.) enzymatic protein hydrolysate fractions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58(8):4712–4718. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf904456rDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  112. 112.Pricci, M.; Girardi, B.; Giorgio, F.; Losurdo, G.; Ierardi, E.; Di Leo, A.. Curcumin and colorectal Cancer: From basic to clinical evidences. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(7):Article 2364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072364DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  113. 113.Raaman, N.. Phytochemical techniques. New India Publishing.. 2006. https://doi.org/10.59317/9789390083404DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  114. 114.Raghunath, D.. Emerging antibiotic resistance in bacteria with special reference to India. Journal of Biosciences. 2008;33(4):593–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-008-0077-9DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  115. 115.Rahman, H. S.. Preclinical drug discovery in colorectal Cancer: A focus on natural compounds. Current Drug Targets. 2021;22(9):977–997. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450122666210405105206DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  116. 116.Rahmouni, F.; Hamdaoui, L.; Saoudi, M.; Badraoui, R.; Rebai, T.. Antioxidant and antiproliferative effects of Teucrium polium extract: Computational and in vivo study in rats. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. 2024;34(5):495–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2023.2301670DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  117. 117.Rai, M.; Acharya, D.; Wadegaonkar, P.. Plant-derived antimycotics: Potential of asteraceous plants. In Plant-derived antimycotics: Current trends and prospects. Haworth Press.. 2003;165–195.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  118. 118.Randhir, R.; Lin, Y.-T.; Shetty, K.. Phenolics, their antioxidant and antimicrobial activity in dark-germinated fenugreek sprouts in response to peptide and phytochemical elicitors. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2004;13(4):295–307.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  119. 119.Rehman, A. U.; Khan, K.; Pasha, G. N.; Sultana, U.; Sultana, T.; Nangreja, R.. Calculation of the zone of inhibition and sensitivity pattern of fenugreek seeds extract and Nigella sativa seeds extract on ESBL E. coli growth plates. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021;33:1298–1303.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  120. 120.Riedl, S. J.; Shi, Y.. Molecular mechanisms of caspase regulation during apoptosis. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2004;5(11):897–907. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1496DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  121. 121.Roy, F.; Boye, J. I.; Simpson, B. K.. Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. Food Research International. 2010;43(2):432–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.002DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  122. 122.Ruiz-Leal, M.; George, S.. An in vitro procedure for evaluation of Early stage oxidative stress in an established fish cell line applied to investigation of PHAH and pesticide toxicity. Marine Environmental Research. 2004;58(2–5):631–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2004.03.054DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  123. 123.S Revathy, R.; R Nathiya, N.; K Shoba, S.. A variety of bioactive compounds can be found in the spice and medicinal herb Trigonella foenum-graecum plant. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2025;15(4):748–752. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20250185DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  124. 124.Salah, T.; Mhadhbi, N.; Ben Ahmed, A.; Hamdi, B.; Krayem, N.; Loukil, M. et al. Physico-chemical characterisation, DFT modelling and biological activities of A new Zn(ii) complex containing melamine as A template. Crystals. 2023;13(5):746. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050746DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  125. 125.Salarbashi, D.; Bazeli, J.; Fahmideh-Rad, E.. Fenugreek seed gum: Biological properties, chemical modifications, and structural analysis- A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019;138:386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.006DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  126. 126.Sánchez-de-Diego, C.; Mármol, I.; Pérez, R.; Gascón, S.; Rodriguez-Yoldi, M. J.; Cerrada, E.. The anticancer effect related to disturbances in redox balance on Caco-2 cells caused by an alkynyl gold(I) complex. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2017;166:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.11.009DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  127. 127.Sangeetha, K.; Albeshr, M. F.; Shoba, K.; Lavanya, G.; Supriya Prasad, P.; Sudha, P..GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  128. 128.Sangeetha, K.; Albeshr, M. F.; Shoba, K.; Lavanya, G.; Prasad, P. S.; Sudha, P. N.. Evaluation of cytocompatibility and cell proliferation of electrospun chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/montmorillonite clay scaffold with L929 cell lines in skin regeneration activity and in silico molecular docking studies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024;268(2):Article 131762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131762DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  129. 129.Sbroggio, M. F.; Montilha, M. S.; De Figueiredo, V. R. G.; Georgetti, S. R.; Kurozawa, L. E.. Influence of the degree of hydrolysis and type of enzyme on antioxidant activity of Okara protein hydrolysates. Food Science and Technology. 2016;36(2):375–381. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.000216DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  130. 130.Seuring, T.; Archangelidi, O.; Suhrcke, M.. The economic costs of type 2 diabetes: A global systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(8):811–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0268-9DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  131. 131.Shabbeer, S.; Sobolewski, M.; Anchoori, R. K.; Kachhap, S.; Hidalgo, M.; Jimeno, A. et al. Fenugreek: A naturally occurring edible spice as an anticancer Agent. Cancer Biology and Therapy. 2009;8(4):272–278. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.8.3.7443DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  132. 132.Shang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, W.; Liang, H.; Bi, X.. The effects of LPS on the activity of Trp-containing antimicrobial peptides against Gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin neutralization. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016;33:153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.019DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  133. 133.Shi, J.; Sun, Z.; Gao, Z.; Huang, D.; Hong, H.; Gu, J.. Radioimmunotherapy in colorectal cancer treatment: Present and future. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023;14:Article 1105180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1105180DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  134. 134.Shrikanth, V. M.; Janardhan, B.; Dhananjaya, B. L.; Muddapura, U. M.; Suresh, S.. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of methanolic root extract of Tabernaemontana alternifolia L. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;7:66–69.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  135. 135.Slee, E. A.; Adrain, C.; Martin, S. J.. Executioner caspase-3, −6, and −7 perform distinct, non-redundant roles during the demolition phase of apoptosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(10):7320–7326. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008363200DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  136. 136.Snehlata, H. S.; Payal, D. R.. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.): An overview. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research. 2012;2:169–187.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  137. 137.Subhashini, N.; Nagarajan, G.; Kavimani, S.. Anti-inflammatory and in vitro antioxidant property of Trigonella foenum-graecum Seeds. Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2011;6(4):371–380. https://doi.org/10.3923/jpt.2011.371.380DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  138. 138.Subhashini, N.; Thangathirupathi, A.; Lavanya, N.. Antioxidant activity of Trigonella foenum-graecum using various in vitro and ex vivo models. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011;3:96–102.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  139. 139.Sun, H.; Saeedi, P.; Karuranga, S.; Pinkepank, M.; Ogurtsova, K.; Duncan, B. B. et al. IDF diabetes atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2022;183:Article 109119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  140. 140.Sur, P.; Das, M.; Gomes, A.; Vedasiromoni, J. R.; Sahu, N. P.; Banerjee, S. et al. Trigonella foenum graecum (fenugreek) seed extract as an antineoplastic agent. Phytotherapy Research. 2001;15(4):257–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.718DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  141. 141.Syeda, B. B.; Muhammad, I. B.; Shahabuddin, M.. Antioxidant activity from the extract of fenugreek Seeds. Pakistan Journal of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry. 2008;9:78–83.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  142. 142.Teshager, T.; Herrero, I. A.; Porrero, M. C.; Garde, J.; Moreno, M. A.; Domínguez, L.. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from pigs at Spanish slaughterhouses. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2000;15(2):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(00DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  143. 143.Thanikachalam, K.; Khan, G.. Colorectal Cancer and nutrition. Nutrients. 2019;11(1):Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11010164DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  144. 144.Torres-Fuentes, C.; Contreras, M. D. M.; Recio, I.; Alaiz, M.; Vioque, J.. Identification and characterization of antioxidant peptides from chickpea protein hydrolysates. Food Chemistry. 2015;180:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.046DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  145. 145.Ullah, S.; Ullah, M.; Rahim, G.; Khan, S.; Ullah, I.. Proximate analysis and mineral composition of some selected medicinal plants of Malakand division, Pakistan. Natural Products Chemistry and Research. 2023;11:8–12.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  146. 146.Upadyshev, M.; Ivanova, B.; Motyleva, S.. Mass spectrometric identification of metabolites after magnetic-pulse treatment of infected Pyrus communis L. microplants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(23):Article 16776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316776DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  147. 147.Vijayakumar, S.; Gomathi, T.; Santhanalakshmi, K.; Monika, K.; Joseph, J. J.; Khalid, M. et al. Chitosan-lysine nanoparticles for sustained delivery of capecitabine: Formulation, characterization, and evaluation of anticancer and antifungal properties with molecular docking insights on anti-inflammatory potential. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2025;167:1–12.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  148. 148.Vijayakumar, S.; Gomathi, T.; Suganya, R.; Joseph, J. J.; Pandiaraj, S.; Alibrahim, K. et al. Development and evaluation of biodegradable alginate beads loaded with sorafenib for cancer treatment. Colloids and Surfaces. Part A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2025;Article 135083:1–12.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  149. 149.Whitfield, J. F.. Calcium, calcium-sensing receptor and colon Cancer. Cancer Letters. 2009;275(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.07.001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  150. 150.Wong, C. C.; Yu, J.. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer development and therapy. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology. 2023;20(7):429–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-023-00766-xDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  151. 151.World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance. WHO press. 2019.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  152. 152.Xi, Y.; Xu, P.. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Translational Oncology. 2021;14(10):Article 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101174DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  153. 153.Xu, L.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, R. et al. National and subnational incidence, mortality and associated factors of colorectal cancer in China: A systematic analysis and modelling study. Journal of Global Health. 2023;13:Article 04096. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04096DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  154. 154.Xue, W.-L.; Li, X.-S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Wang, Z.-L.; Zhang, R.-J.. Effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) extracts on blood glucose, blood lipid and Hemorheological properties in streptozotocin-induced diabetic Rats. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007;16(Suppl. 1):422–426.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  155. 155.Xue, Z.; Wen, H.; Zhai, L.; Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yu, W. et al. Antioxidant activity and anti-proliferative effect of A bioactive peptide from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Research International. 2015;77:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.027DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  156. 156.Yadav, U. C. S.; Baquer, N. Z.. Pharmacological effects of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. in health and disease. In Pharmaceutical Biology. 2014;52(2):243–254. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.826247DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  157. 157.Yasmin, H.; Kaisar, M. A.; Sarker, M. M. R.; Rahman, M. S.; Rashid, M. A.. Preliminary antibacterial activity of some indigenous plants of Bangladesh. Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009;8:61–65.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  158. 158.Yu, L.; Zhang, M.-M.; Hou, J.-G.. Molecular and cellular pathways in colorectal Cancer: Apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation as key players. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022;57(11):1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2022.2088247DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  159. 159.Yust, M. M.; Millán-Linares, M. C.; Alcaide-Hidalgo, J. M.; Millán, F.; Pedroche, J.. Hypocholesterolaemic and antioxidant activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) protein hydrolysates. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2012;92(9):1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5573DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  160. 160.Yust, M. M.; Pedroche, J.; Girón-Calle, J.; Vioque, J.; Millán, F.; Alaiz, M.. Determination of tryptophan by high-performance liquid chromatography of alkaline hydrolysates with spectrophotometric detection. Food Chemistry. 2004;85(2):317–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.026DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  161. 161.Zahra, M.; Abrahamse, H.; George, B. P.. Flavonoids: Antioxidant powerhouses and their role in nanomedicine. Antioxidants. 2024;13(8):Article 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13080922DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  162. 162.Zambrowicz, A.; Timmer, M.; Polanowski, A.; Lubec, G.; Trziszka, T.. Manufacturing of peptides exhibiting biological activity. Amino Acids. 2013;44(2):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-012-1379-7DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  163. 163.Zhang, F.-L.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.-H.; Liu, L.-B.; Liu, X.-B.; Li, Z. et al. Topoisomerase I inhibitors, shikonin and topotecan, inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of glioma cells and glioma stem cells. PLOS One. 2013;8(11):Article e81815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081815DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  164. 164.Zhang, Q.; Tong, X.; Sui, X.; Wang, Z.; Qi, B.; Li, Y. et al. Antioxidant activity and protective effects of Alcalase-hydrolyzed soybean hydrolysate in human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. Food Research International. 2018;111:256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.046DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  165. 165.Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, C.. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and suppresses the migration and invasion of colon cancer cells by regulating STAT3/CXCL8 pathway. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2023;478(4):887–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-022-04550-wDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  166. 166.Zheng, Y.; Ley, S. H.; Hu, F. B.. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nature Reviews. Endocrinology. 2018;14(2):88–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  167. 167.Zhong, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Niu, J.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y. et al. Physicochemical properties, Content, composition and partial least squares models of A. Trifoliata seeds oil. Food Chemistry: X. 2021;12:Article 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2021.100131DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  168. 168.Zhou, J.; Chan, L.; Zhou, S.. Trigonelline: A plant alkaloid with therapeutic potential for diabetes and central nervous system disease. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;19(21):3523–3531. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712801323171DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  169. 169.Zygulska, A. L.; Pierzchalski, P.. Novel diagnostic biomarkers in colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(2):Article 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020852DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  170. 170.Sangeetha, K.; Albeshr, Mohammed F.; Shoba, K.; Lavanya, G.; Supriya Prasad, P.; Sudha, P. N.. Evaluation of cytocompatibility and cell proliferation of electrospun chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/montmorillonite clay scaffold with l929 cell lines in skin regeneration activity and in silico molecular docking studies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024;268:131762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131762DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  171. 171.Gomathi, Thandapani; Suganya, R.; Joseph, J. John; Pandiaraj, Saravanan; Alibrahim, Khuloud A.; Alodhayb, Abdullah N. et al. Development and evaluation of biodegradable alginate beads loaded with sorafenib for cancer treatment. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2024;702:135083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135083DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  172. 172.Gomathi, Thandapani; Santhanalakshmi, K.; Monika, A.K.; Joseph, J. John; Khalid, Mohammad; Albakri, Ghadah Shukri et al. Chitosan-lysine nanoparticles for sustained delivery of capecitabine: Formulation, characterization, and evaluation of anticancer and antifungal properties with molecular docking insights on anti-inflammatory potential. Inorganic ChemistryCommunications. 2024;167:112797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.112797DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  173. 173.Revathy, S; Nathiya, R; Shoba, K. A Variety of Bioactive Compounds can be Found in the Spice and Medicinal Herb Trigonella foenum-graecum Plant. Int. J. Pharm. Investigation. 2025;15(4):748–752.GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Revathy, S., Shoba, K., & Vidhya, A. (2026). GC-MS and UV-visible Spectroscopic Analysis of Bioactive Phytochemical in Trigonella foenum-graecum Visible Spectroscopic. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 16(4), 1680–1695. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20260024