Article

Drug Utilization and Prescription Monitoring of Asthma Patients

Vijaya Kumar S1★, Sasi Kala M1, Mohamed Saleem TS1, Gauthaman K1★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmacology, Himalayan Pharmacy Institute, Sikkim -737136, INDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Vijaya Kumar S

Department of Pharmacology, Himalayan Pharmacy Institute, Sikkim -737136, INDIA.

vijayvijay66@yahoo.co.in

Volume 1, Issue 2 · pp. 180–183 · PUBLISHED · DOI: 10.4103/0975-1483.55753

View on JYP original site ↗

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to establish prescription trends of anti-asthmatic drugs at the Central Referral Hospital, Tadong and Gangtok, Sikkim. The study was conducted using WHO-based prescriptionauditing performa. Data were recorded from the patients attending the hospital outpatient department (OPD) through a chance, random sampling method. Methylxanthine (40%) was the most frequently prescribed drug among anti-asthmatics, followed by β2-agonists (27%), corticosteroids (23%), and mucolytics (09%). which were the least prescribed. Our study further found that combination therapy (80%) was given to a signiÞ cant number of patients as compared to monotherapy (20%). In combination therapy, the two-drug combination was the most often prescribed (57.69%). Further, anti-asthmatic drugs were mostly given (68.18%) by the oral route, followed by the inhalation route (27.27%) and injection route (4.55%). The asthmatic problem was more prevalent in grade III employees that includes drivers and laborers. It has been concluded that a study may be more meaningful to further improve the prescribing as well as dispensing practices of the pharmacist through successful implementation of interventional programs in health centers.

KEYWORDS

Open in new tab

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

    Cite this article

    SELECT FORMAT

    S, V. K., M, S. K., TS, M. S., & K, G. (). Drug Utilization and Prescription Monitoring of Asthma Patients. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 1(2), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.55753