Design, Evaluation and Study of Effect of Hydrophilic Polymers on Release Rate of Antiulcer Floating Tablets
Akbari BV1★, Dholakiya RB1, Shiyani BG1, Lodhiya DJ1, Shastry CS2★ Corresponding author
- 1Departments of Pharmaceutics, INDIA.
- 2Department of Pharmacology, Shree Dhanvantary Pharmacy College, Kim, Surat, Gujarat, INDIA.
Volume 1, Issue 4 · pp. 305–311 · PUBLISHED · DOI: 10.4103/0975-1483.59318
ABSTRACT
Gastro retentive drug delivery systems are the systems which are retained in the stomach for a longer period of time and thereby improve the bioavailability of drugs. Different approaches for gastro retentive dosage forms include ß oating, raft, expanding/swelling, bioadhesive/ mucoadhesive and high/low density systems.Famotidine, an anti-ulcer drug, suffers from poor bioavailability (50% as famotidine is less soluble in alkaline pH. Famotidine used in combination with antacids promotes local delivery of these drugs to the receptor of the parietal cell wall. Local delivery also increases bioavailability at the stomach wall receptor site and increases the efÞ cacy of drugs to reduce acid secretion. This study aim to formulate ß oating tablets of famotidine using an effervescent approach for gastroretentive drug delivery system. Floating tablets were prepared using direct compression techniques using polymers like HPMC K4M and HPMCK100M for their gel-forming properties. The HPMC polymer alone is unable to control release rate. It releases drug >90% in four to six hours. In combination with Xanthan gum it release >90% in eight hours. The results indicate that gas generated gastroretentive ß oating tablets of famotidine containing HPMCK100M and Xanthan gum provide better options for controlled release action and improved bioavailability.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
As publishedShowing references and in-text citations exactly as published.
Cite this article
SELECT FORMAT
BV, A., RB, D., BG, S., DJ, L., & CS, S. (). Design, Evaluation and Study of Effect of Hydrophilic Polymers on Release Rate of Antiulcer Floating Tablets. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 1(4), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.59318
